中国南方喀斯特世界自然遗产拓展地环江喀斯特地貌价值及贡献（英文）

刘子琦; 熊康宁; 李高聪; 肖时珍; 王玲玉; 王恒松; 罗 鼎

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2014.01.011

中国南方喀斯特世界自然遗产拓展地环江喀斯特地貌价值及贡献（英文）

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2014.01.011

1.
西南大学地理科学学院；贵州师范大学中国南方喀斯特研究院/贵州省山地生态环境国家重点实验室培育基地
2.
贵州师范大学中国南方喀斯特研究院/贵州省山地生态环境国家重点实验室培育基地

基金项目: China National Project for Nomination of World Heritage "The Nomination and Protection of South China Karst World Natural Heritage" (Jian Cheng Jing [(2005] No. 115 / [2012] No. 175), Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province (Qian Ke He J [ 2009] No. 2036)

计量
- 文章访问数: 2683
- HTML浏览量: 154
- PDF下载量: 1237
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-01-23
- 发布日期: 2014-03-25

Geomorphologic value and contributions of the Huanjiang Karst Extension to South China Karst World Heritage

1.
School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University；Institute of South China Karst, Guizhou Normal University / The State Key Laboratory IncubationBase for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province
2.
Institute of South China Karst, Guizhou Normal University / The State Key Laboratory IncubationBase for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province

摘要

摘要: “中国南方喀斯特”是中国向联合国教科文组织世界遗产委员会分期申报的系列世界自然遗产。“中国南方喀斯特”第一期遗产地包括云南石林喀斯特、贵州荔波喀斯特和重庆武隆喀斯特；第二期提名地则包括了广西桂林喀斯特、贵州施秉喀斯特、重庆金佛山喀斯特，以及作为荔波喀斯特拓展地的广西环江喀斯特。环江喀斯特作为中国南方喀斯特荔波世界自然遗产地的拓展，对其申报论证倍受关注。新西兰Williams教授2013年考察环江时指出：“环江喀斯特作为荔波喀斯特的拓展地，无须论证其突出的普遍价值，而应关注其拓展的价值，即能为中国南方喀斯特及荔波喀斯特世界自然遗产构成作出哪些突出贡献”。然而近年来人们多注重于荔波喀斯特地貌世界遗产价值研究，环江喀斯特的世界遗产价值至今尚无人进行过相关研究。本文基于野外实测资料、研究区遥感影像图、1∶10 000地形图及1∶200 000水文地质图等工作底图，并运用ArcGIS、Erdas、AutoCAD、Photoshop等技术软件，尝试从环江喀斯特的地理地质背景、地貌特征等方面与荔波喀斯特和“中国南方喀斯特”其他片区进行对比的角度来研究环江喀斯特的地貌特征，旨在申明环江喀斯特的拓展，能为“中国南方喀斯特”世界自然遗产做出哪些实际的补充和完善，进而为“中国南方喀斯特”第二期世界自然遗产的成功申报提供科学材料。研究结果表明，环江喀斯特作为荔波喀斯特的拓展，在“中国南方喀斯特”系列遗产中其具有以下重要价值和突出贡献：(1)环江喀斯特主体为锥状峰丛谷地喀斯特地貌，从分水岭至河谷表现出由峰丛洼地―峰丛谷地―峰林洼地―峰林谷地的有序正向演替规律。(2)环江喀斯特与荔波喀斯特相似性体现在喀斯特演化环境、形态特征、演化过程、生物生态等方面，而这些也正是荔波喀斯特给“中国南方喀斯特”的贡献所在。(3)环江喀斯特和荔波喀斯特联合展示了从高原到低山区逐渐过渡的一套完整的锥状喀斯特体系，例证了湿润热带－亚热带地区正在进行的锥状喀斯特地貌基本发育过程及演化规律，与此同时，由于环江喀斯特靠近古宾河而促发回春效应，形成了一套峰丛洼地更深、坡度更陡、内部地势高差更大的回春地貌，增加了锥状喀斯特回春发育方面的价值。(4) 拓展环江喀斯特将保证荔波喀斯特在地质地貌、生物生态、自然景观等方面的完整性，不仅扩展了荔波喀斯特的面积范围，增加了荔波喀斯特森林生态系统的价值及其安全性，提升了荔波喀斯特世界遗产价值，还解决了因贵州和广西行政边界而遗留下来的荔波喀斯特南部缓冲区边界不完整的问题。(5)在中国南方喀斯特谱系中，荔波－环江喀斯特记录了中国南方碳酸盐岩第二旋回的沉积历史，经历了东吴运动、印支运动及新构造运动对喀斯特地貌的改造过程，代表了中国南方云贵高原向桂林盆地过渡地区锥状喀斯特地貌及正在进行的锥状喀斯特地貌演化过程，其地貌特点、形成条件与高原面上的石林剑状喀斯特、云贵高原边缘的台原喀斯特、高原向低山盆地过渡的武隆天坑地缝喀斯特、施秉白云岩峡谷喀斯特和低山盆地的桂林塔状喀斯特有显著的区别，是热带亚热带地区锥状喀斯特的世界模式地。
- 世界遗产 /
- 地貌学 /
- 贡献 /
- 环江喀斯特 /
- “中国南方喀斯特”
Abstract: “South China Karst” is a serial World Natural Heritage site, nominated in phases by the government of China to the UNESCO World Heritage Committee. In this paper, based on the geomorphologic characteristic research of Huanjiang Karst, is compared with Libo Karst and other sites of “South China Karst”. It is concluded that: (1) Huanjiang Karst and Libo Karst have the same geomorphic landscape type－cone karst. (2) The extension adds the geomorphologic rejuvenation value to Libo Karst. (3) Huanjiang Karst in the nomination will make an important addition to the integrity problem about the boundary of the southern buffer zone of Libo Karst World Heritage Site, resulting from the administrative boundary between Guizhou and Guangxi Provinces, including geology and geomorphology, biology and ecology, natural landscape, etc., further more meeting the integrity requirements of world heritage; (4) In the history of South China karst, Libo-Huanjiang Karst recorded the sedimentary history of the second cycle of carbonate rocks. After experiencing the transformation processes of karst landforms from Dongwu, Indosinian and Neotectonic movements, they represent the cone karst landform in the transition zone from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau to the Guilin Basin in southern China and the ongoing evolution process of cone karst geomorphology. It is the model site for tropical-subtropical cone karst in the world.
- World Heritage /
- geomorphology /
- contribution /
- Huanjiang Karst, South China Karst /

HTML

参考文献(29)

[1]	Xiong Kangning, Xiao Shizhen, Liu Ziqi, et al. Comparative Analysis on World Natural Heritage Value of "South China Karst" ［J］. Engineering Sciences, 2008, 10(4): 17-28.
[2]	World Heritage Committee．Decision of the Nomination of Natural Properties to the World Heritage List-South China Karst［EB/OL］．2007-07-02, http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1248/documents/．
[3]	Meng Meng, Meng Dapeng, Qin Wengeng. Monitor and Study on Wildlife Harming Crops in Mulun National Nature Reserve of Guangxi Province［J］. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2012, 41(2):196-198.
[4]	Zheng Yingwu. Introduction to Mulun Karst Forest Region ［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 1999:41-50.
[5]	Xiong Kangning. Morphometry and Evolution of Fenglin Karst in the Shuicheng Area, Western Guizhou, China［J］, Z.Geomorph.N.F.,1992,36(2):227-248.
[6]	Mayer L. Geomorphology - a Systematic Analysis of Late Cenozoic Landforms［J］.Eos,Transactions American Geophysical Union,1988,79(18):220.
[7]	Ford D C，Williams P W．Karst Hydrology and Geomorphology［M］．London：Unwin Hyman，2007:209-214.
[8]	Zhang Zhigan. Karst Genetic Theory［M］. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press: 2006:142.
[9]	Xiong Kangning, Xiao Shizhen, et al. World Heritage and Chishui Dnaxia Landscape ［M］. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012:1-2.
[10]	Zhang Shouyue. The Development and Evolution of Lunan Stone Forest ［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 1984, 2(8), 78-88.
[11]	Peng Jian. The Statue and the Research of the Development of Stone Forest in China ［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 2002, 21(1), 67-72.
[12]	Chen Weihai, Zhu Dehao, Zhu Xuewen, et al. Study on Tiankeng Landscape in Fengjie and World Natural Value［M］. Beijing: Geology Press House, 2003:5-23.
[13]	Chen Weihai, Zhu Dehao, Zhu Xuewen, et al. Assessment on Karst Landscape in Wulong and World Natural Value［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 2006, 25(S):106-112.
[14]	Li Gaocong, Xiong Kangning, Xiao Shizhen, et al. Study on World Heritage Value of Shibing Karst ［J］. Tropical Geology, 2013, 33(5):562-569.
[15]	Zhang Ren, Zhu Xuewen, Han Daoshan, et al. Preliminary Study on Karst Caves of Mt, Jinfo, Nanchuan, Chongking ［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 1998, 3(17), 67-72, 196-211.
[16]	Sweeting M M．The karst of Guilin，southern China ［J］．Geography．1978，144：199-204．
[17]	Yuan Daoxian. Study on Fenglin Landform［J］. Guangxi Geology, 1984, 1(1), 79-86.
[18]	Zhu Xuewen. New Considerations on Characteristics and Evolution of Fenglin Karst［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 1991,11,79-86.
[19]	Liu Jinrong, Yuan Daoxian, Liang Yaocheng, et al. Characteristics and Tropical Karst Geomorphology in Guilin and Its Scientific Importance ［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 2001, 20(2):138-139.
[20]	Waltham A C．Fengcong, Fenglin, Cone Karst and Tower Karst［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 2009, 28(4): 355-368.
[21]	Zeng Zhaoxuan. The Karst Morphological Character in South China［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 1982, 1(5):27-32.
[22]	Liu Baojun, Xu Xiaosong, Xu Qiang, et al.The sedimentary tectonic evolution and minerlization of ancient mainland in south China［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 1993:48-110.
[23]	Xiong Kangning. Development of Cone Karst in Response to Neotectonics in Guizhou［J］. Guizhou Geology: 1996, 13(2): 181-186.
[24]	Ren Meie, Liu Zhenzhong. Introduction to Karst ［M］. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1983:24.
[25]	Zhu Dehao, Qin Houren. Study on Cave Types and the Formation Reasons of Karst Caves ［J］. Tourism Tribune, 1988, 1(2), 41-46.
[26]	Yuan Daoxian, Zhu Dehao, Wong Jintao, et al. China Karst［M］. Beijing : Geological Press, 1994:9-10.
[27]	Sweeting M M, Bao Haosheng. Study on Karst in China from a World Perspective ［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 1990, 92: 342-351.
[28]	Yang Mingde, He Caihua. The Development Features of China Cone Karst［M］//Study on Karst:Yang Mingde symposium. Guiyang: Guizhou Nationality Press, 2003:21-25.
[29]	Xiong Kangning. Hydrodynamic Genetics of Cone Karst and Tower Karst:With Special Reference to the Middle Guizhou［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 1994, 13(3): 237-246.