Karst features and optimization of karst foundation treatment in Luodi-Xinhua Expressway
-
摘要: 娄底—新化高速公路岩溶发育。由于邻近煤矿采矿抽排水，地下水位急降，形成土洞和塌陷。为保证公路建设经济、安全，须对岩溶路基进行处理。通过对地基处理方案影响因素进行研究与分析，运用多目标决策模糊集理论并结合层次分析方法，优选出具有多指标因素属性和模糊特性的岩溶地基处理方案。在此基础上，从地质条件出发，并考虑加固效果、工程造价等，比较了3种岩溶地基处理方案：注浆、沉管挤密桩、强夯+双层钢筋混凝土连续板。分析结果表明：强夯+双层钢筋混凝土连续板方案最佳，模糊优化计算中，该方案对优的隶属度最高，达0.86，具有施工便捷、加固效果好、成本低等优点，总造价为仅1 350万元，分别比沉管挤密桩、注浆处理少170万和360万元。Abstract: Karst is developed in Luodi-Xinhua Expressway. Earth-caves and karst collapses are formed with groundwater table rapidly falling led by mining and pumping in the surrounding coal mine. In order to make the construction of expressway economically and securely, the karst subgrade is necessary to be treated. Firstly, through study and analysis on the factors affecting the foundation treatment, a foundation treatment scheme with multiple attribute and fuzzy property is optimized by means of multi-objective decision making fuzzy set theory and analytical hierarchy process. Secondly, based on the engineering geological conditions and the reinforcement effect as well as engineering cost, three schemes of karst foundation treatment are compared, including static pressure grouting, tube sinking compacted gravel piles and dynamic compaction with reinforced concrete continuous plate. The results show that the dynamic compaction with reinforced concrete continuous plate is the most optimal scheme which is of the highest degree of membership to excellence (up to 0.86), the lowest cost (only 13.5 million yuan) and good reinforcement effect. The cost, 13.5 million yuan, is respectively 1.7 and 3.6 million yuan less than the tube sinking compacted gravel piles and the static pressure grouting schemes.
-
Key words:
- karst collapses /
- foundation treatment /
- optimized scheme /
- Luodi-Xinhua Expressway
-
[1] 康厚荣,罗强,梅世龙,等.岩溶地区公路修筑技术研究［J］.公路交通科技,2009,26(11):36-43. [2] 郑志超.复合地基在大连地铁岩溶地段地基加固中的应用［D］.北京:北京交通大学,2012. [3] 龚小陶,张智浩,马凛, 等.振冲碎石桩与素混凝土桩复合地基在填海岩溶地基处理中的应用［J］.工业建筑,2012,42(10):166-170. [4] 刘国.用模糊数学方法选择软土地基加固方案［J］.水文地质工程地质,2000,27(4):17-19. [5] 徐杨青.深基坑工程优化设计理念与动态变形控制研究［D］.武汉:武汉理工大学博士学位论文,2001. [6] Azam G, Wang M C. Performance of strip footing above voids in clay［J］.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1991, 117(5):753-765. [7] 彭小云,宫治国,折学森, 等.地基处理方案优选的可拓层次分析法［J］.长安大学学报(自然科学版),2006,26(6):6-11. [8] 中华人民共和国交通运输部,公路工程地质勘察规范（JTGC 20-2011）\［S］.人民交通出版社,2011. [9] 肖拥军,刘新华.斗笠山煤矿区地质构造与岩溶塌陷分布的关系研究［J］.地球与环境，2005,33(增1),247-250. [10] 谢忠球,万志清,钱海涛.抽水引起岩溶区路基塌陷的机理分析及其控制［J］.公路,2006,(7):25-29. [11] 康彦仁. 岩溶地面塌陷的形成条件［J］.中国岩溶,1988,7(1):9-18. [12] 万志博,武雄,徐晟,等.枣庄市中区岩溶塌陷特征与成因分析［J］.中国岩溶,2006,25(2):146-151. [13] 樊治平.多属性决策中权重确定的主客观赋权法［J］.决策与支护系统,1997,7(4):87-91. [14] 赵焕臣,许树柏,和金生. 层次分析法［M］. 北京: 科学出版社,1986,46-85. [15] 肖武权,冷伍明.深基坑支护结构设计的优化方法［J］.岩土力学,2007,28(6):1201-1211. [16] 李洪涛,田微微,梁东.基于模糊综合评判的地基处理方案优化［J］.土工基础,2010,24(3):61-64. [17] 曾晓锋.模糊综合评判法在地基处理方案优选中的应用［J］.中国水运,2009,9(7):253-254. [18] 王广月.基于改进的AHP方法进行地基处理方案的优选［J］.水文地质工程地质,2003,(5): 98-101. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2599
- HTML浏览量: 406
- PDF下载量: 2533
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
