Changes of soil physicochemical and microbial features during the typical vegetation restoration in karst mountain
-
摘要: 探讨了岩溶山地耕地、1年退耕地、灌草地、15年侧柏疏林地、25年侧柏次生林地植被恢复过程中土壤理化性质和微生物特征的变化。结果表明土壤随着植被恢复的进行,容重先升高后降低,总孔隙度与之相反;各恢复阶段(退耕地、灌草地、疏林地、次生林地)表土>0.25 mm水稳定性团聚体含量较耕地的增幅为5.1%~12.5%,以疏林地最高;团聚体结构破坏率依次降低,各恢复阶段较耕地降幅为34.0%~64.7%,与有机质呈负相关;全N、碱解N等肥力因子含量总体呈逐渐增加的趋势;各恢复阶段中以灌草地pH值最高;表土微生物总数先降后升,各阶段细菌占微生物总数的66.7%~93.3%,放线菌占4.2%~28.8%,同时细菌也是土壤呼吸的主要贡献者。土壤特征的差异性是地表植物组成、凋落物成分及不同指标之间综合作用的结果。Abstract: Five types of vegetation(farmland, 1-year abandoned farmland, bush-grass land, 15-year scattered woodland(Platycladus orientalis)and 25-year woodland(Platycladus orientalis))are selected to investigate the changes of soil physicochemical and microbial features during the vegetation restoration in karst mountain. The results show that the soil improving process is complicated. Density increases first and then decreases. The trend of bulk density is just opposite to that of total porosity. Soil available water capacity in bush-grass land is the lowest. The amount of >0.25 mm soil water stable aggregate content has increased by 5.1%~12.5% in the last four stages than that in farmland, and the amount of >0.25 mm soil water stable aggregate content in the bush-grass land is the highest. Aggregate destruction ratio gradually decreases by 34.0%~64.7% from abandoned farmland to woodland with a obviously close correlation with organic matter content. The total nitrogen and available nitrogen have the same increasing trend during the vegetation restoration. The total soil microorganism decreases at first and then increases. The quantity of bacteria group is much higher compared to other two groups at every stages, which accounts for 66.7%~93.3% against the total. The bacteria group is also the most important contributor to soil respiration. The difference for soil characteristic is the result of comprehensive function of surface vegetation composition, litter composition and other different features.
-
[1] 袁道先.全球岩溶生态系统对比:科学目标和执行计划[J].地球科学进展.2001,16(4):461-466. [2] 李阳兵,谢德体.西南岩溶山地生态脆弱性研究[J].中国岩溶,2002,21(1):25-29. [3] 靖娟利,陈植华,胡成,等.中国西南部岩溶山区生态环境脆弱性评价[J].地质科技情报,2003,22(3):95-99. [4] 杨玉盛,俞新妥,邱仁辉.栽杉留阔模式生产力和土壤肥力的研究[J].林业科学, 1999,35(4):9-13. [5] 彭新华,张斌,赵其国.土壤有机碳库与土壤结构稳定性关系的研究进展[J].土壤学报,2004,41(4):618-623. [6] 安韶山,张扬,郑粉莉.黄土丘陵区土壤团聚体分形特征及其对植被恢复的响应[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(2):66-70. [7] P. Puget,D.A. Angers,C.Chenu.Nature of carbohydrates associated with water-stable aggregates of two cultivated soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31 (1999): 55-63. [8] 史奕,陈欣,沈善敏.土壤团聚体的稳定机制及人类活动的影响[J].应用生态学报,2002,13 (11):1491-1494. [9] 卢金伟,李占斌.土壤团聚体研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(1):81-85. [10] 阎建忠,张镱锂,摆万奇,等.基于植被演替的土地覆被变化研究—大渡河上游的森林采伐、更新和退化[J].中国科学D辑,2005,35(11):1060-1070. [11] 魏媛,喻理飞,张金池.退化喀斯特植被恢复过程中土壤微生物活性研究——以贵州花江地区为例[J].中国岩溶,2008,27(1):63-67. [12] 樊军,郝明德.长期轮作与施肥对土壤主要微生物类群的影响[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(1):88-90. [13] 谢龙莲,陈秋波,王真辉,等.环境变化对土壤微生物的影响[J].热带农业科学,2004,24(3):39-47. [14] 周丽霞,蚁伟民,易志刚,等.鹤山退化生态系统恢复过程中土壤微生物的特性[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2004,12(3):202-206. [15] 尹刚强,田大伦,方晰.不同土地利用方式对湘中丘陵区土壤质量的影响[J].林业科学,2008,44(8):9-15. [16] 毕江涛,贺达汉,黄泽勇.退化生态系统土壤微生物种群数量和分布对植被恢复的响应[J].地理科学,2009,29(2):238-243. [17] 许光辉,郑洪元主编.土壤微生物分析手册[M].北京:农业出版社,1986:105-225. [18] Wang G X,Sheng Y P,Qian J et al. Study on the influence of vegetation change on soil moisture cycle in Alpine meadow[J].Journal of Glaciologyand Geocryology,2003,25:653-659. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2363
- HTML浏览量: 497
- PDF下载量: 1462
- 被引次数: 0
下载: