Exploration and 3D visualization of leakage channels of tailings ponds in karst regions：A case study of Zhatang Tailings Pond in Guiyang City
-
摘要: 岩溶区尾矿库渗漏造成地下水污染严重。为查明岩溶区尾矿库渗漏通道，以贵州岩溶发育区扎塘赤泥尾矿库为研究对象，开展系统的岩溶渗漏通道探查与可视化精细模型构建工作。基于密集的瞬变电磁法测线与高密度电法测线建立了地层电阻率模型，并利用物探技术与三维地质建模技术相结合的方法，融合库区勘探钻孔、地质剖面图和物探成果等多源数据建立了研究区精细三维地质模型和渗漏通道模型。结果表明：扎塘赤泥库5号、6号库区内低阻异常主要呈南北向分布，是库区内的主要渗漏通道，2号库内的低阻异常主要呈带状分布，是S704泉点的渗漏通道；库区地下水的运动方向主要受构造和地层界线控制，岩溶渗漏带主要沿断层与地层界线发育分布；精细岩溶渗漏通道模型准确识别了岩溶渗漏通道与地下水侧向补给通道，实现了库区渗漏污染过程可视化。研究成果可为岩溶区尾矿库渗漏污染科学防治提供支撑。Abstract:
Karst regions are rich in mineral resources, and tailings ponds-essential facilities for maintaining normal production in mining enterprises-are often inevitably constructed on carbonate formations in these areas. However, the complex hydrogeological conditions in karst regions, including well-developed karst features such as sinkholes, swallow holes, and underground karst channels, make tailings ponds highly susceptible to leakage. This leakage can lead to surface and groundwater contamination, posing significant challenges to regional groundwater pollution control. Therefore, identifying underground karst channels beneath tailings ponds and characterizing their leakage patterns are critical for mitigating pollution in karst regions. To investigate leakage channels in karst tailings ponds, this study focuses on the Zhatang red mud tailings pond in Guizhou Province, which is located in a well-developed karst region and has experienced leachate leakage. A systematic approach integrating geophysical exploration techniques-including the high-density resistivity method and transient electromagnetic method-hydrogeological drilling, tracer tests, and 3D geological modeling was employed to identify karst leakage channels and construct a detailed visual model. Dense survey lines for the transient electromagnetic and high-density resistivity methods were arranged in a grid pattern within Ponds 2, 5, and 6. Using the inverse distance weighting (IDW) algorithm, 3D resistivity models of the strata were developed, effectively identifying low-resistivity anomalies in the pond area. The models revealed that the low-resistivity anomalies in Pond 5 and Pond 6 predominantly exhibited a north-south distribution, corresponding to the main leakage channels toward the Damawo, Lujiawan, and S703 seepage points. In Pond 2, a banded low-resistivity anomaly extending southeast was identified as the leakage channel for the S704 spring. Based on the 3D resistivity models, additional high-density resistivity and transient electromagnetic survey lines were deployed outside the pond area to further delineate the developmental patterns of karst leakage channels. The integrated interpretation of exploration results from both inside and outside the pond area clarified the spatial distribution characteristics of these leakage channels. Hydrogeological drilling, borehole television imaging, and tracer tests were conducted to validate the karst leakage channels identified by geophysical methods. Drilling results confirmed that the low-resistivity anomalies corresponded to fractured zones and areas filled with high-concentration leachate. For instance, boreholes Z11 and Z16 intercepted leachate-saturated zones, while Z17 and Z19 revealed intense shallow karst development. Boreholes Z15 and Z14 demonstrated the hydraulic connectivity of dissolution cavities along lithological boundaries. Tracer tests further verified the karst leakage channel toward the S704 spring. By combining geophysical exploration with 3D geological modeling and integrating multi-source data-including 119 actual boreholes, 104 virtual boreholes, geophysical interpretation results, and UAV topographic surveys-a refined 3D geological model and a leakage channel model of the study area were developed. The 3D geological model visually represents stratigraphic interfaces, lithology, terrain, fault distributions, and tailings pond boundaries, enabling cross-sectional visualization at any location. The leakage channel model accurately identifies karst leakage channels and lateral groundwater recharge channels, clearly delineating the spatial distribution pattern of pollution sources (low-resistivity zones within the pond), migration channels (karst channels controlled by structures or stratigraphic boundaries), and discharge endpoints (springs). This model elucidates the groundwater "recharge-flow-discharge" system in the study area. The leakage channel model demonstrates that groundwater movement is primarily controlled by structural and stratigraphic boundaries, with karst leakage zones predominantly developing along faults and lithological interfaces. For example, the Lujiawan and S703 spring channels are associated with faults F3 and F5, while the S704 spring channel follows the boundary between the Longtan and Maokou Formations. The karst channel model visualizes the spatial distribution of underground features and the leachate migration process, providing critical insights for assessing groundwater contamination risks and designing remediation strategies for the Zhatang red mud tailings pond. This study innovatively integrates geophysical exploration with 3D geological modeling, enabling comprehensive analysis of geological data and overcoming the limitations of traditional 2D interpretations. In scenarios with limited borehole data, this method significantly enhances the accuracy of detecting karst groundwater channels and improves model representation. It offers a novel approach for precisely locating leakage channels and visualizing pollution processes in karst tailings ponds. The research findings provide a scientific foundation for designing remediation measures such as grouting leakage channels and altering flow directions, thereby substantially reducing wastewater treatment costs and yielding significant environmental and economic benefits. -
Key words:
- tailings pond /
- karst channel /
- groundwater pollution /
- geophysical exploration /
- 3D geological model /
- visualization.
-
图 3 5号、6号库区内瞬变电磁法数据处理
Figure 3. Data processing of transient electromagnetic method in Pond 5 and Pond 6
图 6 库区北部渗漏通道探查结果
Figure 6. Exploration results of leakage channel in the north of the tailings pond
图 7 库区南部渗漏通道探查结果
Figure 7. Exploration results of leakage channel in the south of the tailings pond
图 8 库区北部渗漏通道验证
Figure 8. Verification of leakage channel in the north of the tailings pond
图 9 库区南部渗漏通道验证
Figure 9. Verification of leakage channel in the south of the tailings pond
表 1 场地内主要介质物性参数
Table 1. Physical parameters of the main medium in the study area
介质名称 赤泥层 充水溶洞或
充水断层灰岩 视电阻率/Ω·m 1~100 50~600 > 1000 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 褚学伟. 黔中岩溶山谷型赤泥尾矿库污染物迁移机理及预测研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2019.CHU Xuewei. Research on the Mechanism and Prediction of Contaminant Migration in Red Mud Tailings in Karst Valley in Central Guizhou[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2019. [2] 覃政教, 林玉石, 袁道先, 潘勇邦, 王明章. 西南岩溶区矿山与水污染问题探讨及建议[J]. 地球学报, 2012, 33(3): 341-348.QIN Zhengjiao, LIN Yushi, YUAN Daoxian, PAN Yongbang, WANG Minzhang. A Discussion on Mine and Water Pollution Problems in Karst Areas in Southwest China[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 341-348. [3] 郑文成, 贾洪彪, 郭明, 陈科. 平坝磷石膏堆场渗漏分析与污染防治对策[J]. 中国岩溶, 2010, 29(1): 75-80.ZHENG Wencheng, JIA Hongbiao, GUO Ming, CHEN Ke. Analysis on leakage and pollution prevention methods of phosphogypsum sit in Pingba[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2010, 29(1): 75-80. [4] 查学芳, 覃应机, 吴攀, 韩志伟, 李学先, 叶慧君, 李 玲. 磷石膏堆场渗漏影响下岩溶地下水地球化学过程[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(6): 1708-1715.ZHA Xuefang, QIN Yingji, WU Pan, HAN Zhiwei, LI Xuexian, YE Huijun, LI Ling. Geochemical process of karst groundwater as affected by the leakage of phosphogypsum stock dump[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(6): 1708-1715. [5] 汪泉, 付文堂, 邢爱国, 刘宁, 吴泉澳. 赤泥尾矿库气驱排渗降水试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2021(10): 186-191.WANG Quan, FU Wentang, XING Aiguo, LIU Ning, WU Quanao. Experimental Study on Dewatering of Red Mud Tailings Pond by Gas-driven Drainage[J]. Metal Mine, 2021(10): 186-191. [6] 田帅, 胡振琪, 李社锋. 我国西南尾矿库区岩溶特征及防渗研究进展[J]. 金属矿山, 2022(2): 185-193.TIAN Shuai, HU Zhenqi, LI Shefeng. Research Progress on Karst Characteristics and Seepage Prevention of Tailings Reservoir Area in Southwest China[J]. Metal Mine, 2022(2): 185-193. [7] 程峰, 苏夏征, 周洁军, 郭尚其. 岩溶区尾矿库渗漏机理与综合防治技术: 以环江北山铅锌矿尾矿库为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(2): 242-247.CHENG Feng, SU Xiazheng, ZHOU Jiejun, GUO Sangqi. Leakage mechanism and comprehensive prevention control technology of tailing pond in karst area[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(2): 242-247. [8] 彭道平, 廖才能, 李芹, 廖明旭, 黄涛, 王志达, 孟春晓. 赤泥渗滤液对压实黏土衬垫的侵蚀机理研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(5): 2262-2271.PENG Daoping, LIAO Caineng, LI Qin, LIAO Mingxu, HUANG Tao, WANG Zhida, MENG Chunxiao. Study on the erosion mechanism of red mud leachate on compacted clay liners[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21(5): 2262-2271. [9] 褚学伟, 许模, 段先前, 王中美. 扎塘赤泥库赤泥颗粒分布特征及迁移规律[J]. 工程地质学报, 2019, 27(2): 360-366.CHU Xuewei, XU Mo, DUAN Xianqian, WANG Zhongmei. Distribution characteristics and transport law of red mud particles in Zhatang red mud pond[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 27(2): 360-366. [10] 王梓博, 卢文喜, 王涵, 李久辉, 范越. 某钼矿尾矿库地下水污染的随机模拟[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(5): 2124-2131.WANG Zibo, LU Wenxi, WANG Han, LI Jiuhui, FAN Yue. Stochastic Simulation of the Groundwater Pollution in the Molybdenum Mine Tailings Pond[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020, 40(5): 2124-2131. [11] LI B, ZHANG H L, LONG J, FAN J, WU P, CHEN M, LIU P, LI T. Migration mechanism of pollutants in karst groundwater system of tailings impoundment and management control effect analysis: Gold mine tailing impoundment case[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 350: 131434. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131434 [12] 江成鑫, 赵江, 张洪文. 复杂岩溶条件下锰矿尾矿库地下水溶质运移特征数值模拟研究[J]. 中国环境监测, 2021, 37(1): 95-102.JIANG Chengxin, ZHAO Jiang, ZHANG Hongwen. Numerical Simulation of Solute Transport Characteristics in Groundwater of Manganese Tailings Reservoir Under Complex Karst Conditions[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2021, 37(1): 95-102. [13] 李乐乐, 张卫民. 渗透反应墙技术处理铀尾矿库渗漏水的研究现状[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(1): 168-172,125.LI Lele, ZHANG Weimin. Research status of uranium tailings seepage water remediation using permeable reactive barrier[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2016, 34(1): 168-172,125. [14] SHI C Y, GUI L H. Assessing the Effectiveness of Tailings Pond Seepage Remediation Using the Four Dimensions of "Point-Line-Surface-Body ":A Case Study[J]. Mine Water and the Environment, 2023, 42: 687-696. doi: 10.1007/s10230-023-00955-1 [15] 陈舟, 赵贵清, 王志光, 陈豪, 张科正. 岩溶区某磷石膏堆放场渗漏特征分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2017, 44(2): 144-150.CHEN Zhou, ZHAO Guiqing, WANG Zhiguang, CHAN Hao, ZHANG Kezheng. Leakage characteristics of a phosphorus gypsum storage site in karst area[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2017, 44(2): 144-150. [16] 程亚平, 蒋灵芝, 黎柳月, 李善民, 冯志秦. 综合物探技术探测平果铝厂赤泥堆场岩溶发育特征[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(6): 688-698.CHENG Yaping, JIANG Lingzhi, LI Liuyue, LI Shanmin, FENG Zhiqi. The application of integrated geophysical method to karst pipeline distribution[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2016, 35(6): 688-698. [17] 谢世平, 徐磊, 易伟功. 岩溶地区某尾矿库尾砂渗漏探查与治理[J]. 中国矿业, 2024, 33(5): 101-108.XIE Shiping, XU Lei, YI Weigong. Exploration and control of tailings leakage in a tailings reservoir in karst area[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2024, 33(5): 101-108. [18] 曾洁, 潘晓东, 任坤, 刘伟, 彭聪, 郑智杰. 贵州省碧云湖岩溶渗漏水文地质条件与渗漏管道位置识别[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(1): 201-208.ZENG Jie, PAN Xiaodong, REN Kun, LIU Wei, PENG Chong, ZHENG Zhijie. Hydrogeological conditions of karst leakage and locating of leakage channels in Biyun lake, Guizhou[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(1): 201-208. [19] Ren Hujun, Sui Wanghua, Meng Xiangdong, Guo Rur. Hydrogeological investigation for the assessment of spring pollution due to abandoned mines in a karst area[J]. Water, 2021, 13(17): 2399. doi: 10.3390/w13172399 [20] Targa D A, Moreira C A, Casagrande M F S. Hydrogeological analysis of sulfide tailings at a uranium mine using geophysical and hydrochemical methods[J]. Mine Water and the Environment, 2021, 40: 671-689. doi: 10.1007/s10230-021-00791-1 [21] G BUSELLI, LU K L. Groundwater contamination monitoring with multichannel electrical and electromagnetic methods[J]: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2001: 11-23. [22] Song Renbo, Qin Xiaoqian, Yeqing Tao, Xiyuan Wang, Biao Yin, Yuexiang Wang, Wenhui Li. A semi-automatic method for 3D modeling and visualizing complex geological bodies[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2018, 78(3): 1371-1383. [23] 向中林, 王妍, 王润怀, 刘玉芳, 刘顺喜. 基于钻孔数据的矿山三维地质建模及可视化过程研究[J]. 地质与勘探, 2009, 45(1): 75-81.XIANG Zhonglin, WANG Yan, WANG Runhuai, LIU Yufang, LIU Shunxi. 3D Geological Modeling and Visualization Process of Mines Based on Borehole Data[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2009, 45(1): 75-81. [24] 田雪峰, 王金林, 张征峰, 石洞, 周可法, 周曙光. 基于多源数据的三维地质建模与应用[J]. 新疆地质, 2022, 40(3): 456-459.TIAN Xuefeng, WANG Jinlin, ZHANG Zhengfeng, SHI Dong, ZHOU Kefa, ZHOU Shuguang. 3D geological modeling and application based on multi-source data[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2022, 40(3): 456-459. [25] 熊玖琦, 刘星. 基于支持向量机的顾北煤矿北一矿区三维地质模型构建[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(19): 8194-8199.XIONG Jiuqi, LIU Xing. A 3D geological model of the north one mining area of Gubei coal mine based on the support vector machine[J]. Science, Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(19): 8194-8199. [26] Marques F, Dias P, Carvalho J, Represas P, Spicer B, Araújo V, Matos J X. 3D constrained gravity inversion and TEM, seismic reflection and drill-hole analysis for new target generation in the Neves−Corvo VMS Mine Region, Iberian Pyrite Belt[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2022, 31(5): 2321-2346. doi: 10.1007/s11053-022-10081-4 [27] 杨通花. 基于三维地质建模的地下河空间展布特征分析: 以大小井地下河为例[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2022.YANG Tonghua. Spatial distribution characteristics of underground rivers based on 3D geological modeling: a care study of Daxiaojing underground river[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2022. [28] 孟美杉, 顾海波, 孙杰夫, 孙小华, 王立发, 刘清俊. EVS耦合三维地质模型在地下水污染修复中的应用[J]. 地质论评, 2023, 69(S1): 378-380.MENG Meishan, GU Haibo, SUN Jiefu, SUN Xiaohua, WANG Lifa, LIU Qingjun. Application of EVS coupled 3D geological modeling in groundwater pollution remediation[J]. Geological Review, 2023, 69(S1): 378-380. [29] 田浪, 陈世万, 吴佼基, 李加华, 余琪, 李仁启. 岩溶区闭坑煤矿采空区综合物探及三维地质模型构建[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2022, 49(6): 112-117.TIAN Lang, CHEN Shiwan, WU Jiaoji, LI Jiahua, YU Qi, LI Renqi. Comprehensive geophysical exploration and three-dimensional geological model construction of goaf in closed pit coal mine in karst area[J]. Mining Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 49(6): 112-117. [30] 程庭, 卢小慧. 岩溶地层的三维地质构模研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2008(2): 30-32.CHENG Ting, LU Xiaohui. Study on the Three-dimension Geological Model of Karst Stratum[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2008(2): 30-32. [31] 陈根深, 郭绪磊, 刘刚, 陶坤燏, 陈麒玉, 周宏. 宜昌长江南岸岩溶流域典型区三维地质建模[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2019, 26(2): 1-8.CHEN Genshen, GUO Xulei, LIU Gang, TAO Kunyu, CHEN Qiyu,ZHOU Hong. 3D geological modeling in typical area of karst basin on the south bank of the Yangtze River in Yichang City[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2019, 26(2): 1-8. [32] F M D Affonseca, M Finkel , O A Cirpka. Combining implicit geological modeling, field surveys, and hydrogeological modeling to describe groundwater flow in a karst aquifer[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2020, 28: 2779-2802. doi: 10.1007/s10040-020-02220-z [33] 马蓝建, 陈世万, 田浪, 余会云, 吴攀. 岩溶区矿山地下水通道精细探查与地质模型构建[J]. 水利水电技术, 2025,56(1): 203-216.MA Lanjian, CHEN Shiwan, TIAN Lang, YU Huiwun,WU Pan. Study on the groundwater pathway exploration and the geological model construction of the mine in karst area [J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2025, 56(1):203-216. -
点击查看大图
图(15) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 5
- HTML浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
