Experimental study on monitoring and early warning of cover collapse sinkhole based on acoustic emission technology
-
摘要: 岩溶塌陷是土体损伤孔洞发育并最终导致盖层失稳的动力地质过程，故查明土体损伤特征及演化过程是提出有效监测预警方法的重要前提。本文利用声发射与光纤光栅传感技术对岩溶塌陷形成过程展开模型试验，甄别与筛选声发射关键信号特征，并建立其与岩溶塌陷的响应机制。试验结果表明：（1）大雨条件下岩溶塌陷的形成演化过程里，覆盖层深部声发射信号振铃计数较浅部增大6.78~6.89倍，幅度增大1.02~1.12倍，能量扩大了4.45~16.6倍。在暴雨条件下，覆盖层深部声发射信号振铃计数较浅部增大14.85倍，幅度增大1.51倍，能量扩大了213.39倍；（2）大雨试验工况下是以土洞扩展并失稳破坏的蠕变破坏型岩溶塌陷，暴雨试验工况下是土层整体错断坍塌的压剪断裂型岩溶塌陷，不同塌陷类型的声发射信号特征有明显差异；（3）岩溶塌陷过程中会出现土体滑移、层面错动、孔洞发育和塌陷四类信号波形，信号波形释能幅值、上升与下降时间、波形持续时间等与岩溶塌陷演化过程土体变形密切相关；（4）岩溶塌陷过程中声发射频谱信号波形为高频窄脉冲，其中土体滑移、层面错动、孔洞发育和塌陷等四类信号频域能量分别集中在50kHz和20kHz左右的高频区段；（5）声发射累计振铃计数与覆盖层孔隙水压力、土压力和土体位移的变化过程存在紧密的关联性，在土体变形与塌陷时会导致声发射振铃计数增加或突发性跃迁现象，因此证明声发射技术用于岩溶塌陷监测预警是可行的。Abstract: The cover collapse sinkhole is the dynamic geological process in which soil damage of overburden layer developed and eventually lead to surficial collapse. Therefore, identifying the characteristics and evolution of soil damage are the important prerequisite for laying out effective monitoring and early warning methods for cover collapse. The frequently-used hydrodynamic condition and optical fiber monitoring technique easily ignore not only the process of microscopic damage in soil layer but also its effect applied on cover collapse. The possibility analysis on cover collapse sinkholes induced by groundwater or rainfall usually adopted qualitative or semi-quantitative methods. And it seems to be the one of the reasons of which cover collapse, a major and common geological disaster in karst region, has obtained few progresses in monitoring and early warning of collapses. In this paper, acoustic emission (AE) and fiber grating technology have been firstly applied to conduct model test on monitoring and early warning methods of collapse sinkhole. The research on dynamic characteristics of acoustic emission have been conducted under different rainfall condition. In addition, the important time and frequency domain features of acoustic emission have been identified and selected to establish the spatial-temporal responding mechanism between AE and collapse sinkhole through model experiment. The results show that: (1) The total ringing count, amplitude and energy of acoustic emission in upper cover layer is varied from 1 to 348 times, 30.5 to 175.9 dB and 0 to 57×10-3 PJ respectively under heavy rainfall condition, while the ringing count, amplitude and energy of acoustic emission in deeper cover layer is varied from 1 to 2361 times, 30.5 to 179 dB and 0 to 946.4×10-3 PJ respectively. Otherwise, in rainstorm condition, the ringing count, amplitude and energy of acoustic emission in upper cover layer is ranged between 1 and 2361 times, 30.5 and 179 dB, 0 and 946.4×10-3 PJ respectively. By contrast, the ringing count, amplitude and energy of acoustic emission in deeper cover layer is ranged between 1 and 1322 times, 30.5 and 213.1 dB, 0 and 4694.6×10-3 PJ respectively. During the formation process of collapse sinkhole under the heavy rain condition, the ringing count of acoustic emission in deeper layer was increased by 6.78 or 6.89 times than upper ones, respectively. Also, the amplitude of AE in deeper layer increased by 1.02 or 1.12 times than upper ones, respectively. On the other hand, the energy of AE in deeper layer increased by 4.45 or 16.6 times than upper ones, respectively. Furthermore, during the formation process of collapse sinkhole under the rainstorm condition, the ringing count, amplitude and energy of acoustic emission in deeper layer was increased by 14.85, 1.51 and 213.39 times than upper ones, respectively. (2) Under the heavy rain or rainstorm condition, the types of collapse sinkhole were defined as creep-failure sinkhole or compression-shear fracture sinkhole, respectively. The formation process of creep-failure sinkhole was characterized by soil cavity expanded and finally resulted in instability failure of cover layer. The emitted energy, which is much large in collapse stage than creep-deformation stage, implied that higher activity in AE signal condition. However, the formation process of compression-shear fracture sinkhole was characterized by the soil layer collapsed suddenly. It represented that strain energy in soil layer was completely released in a short time. Hence, the AE signals showed a sharp increase in dynamic curve, which indicated that the signal characteristics of acoustic emission had strong relationship with sinkhole types. (3) There are four types of signal waveforms in the formation process of collapse sinkhole, which were divided as soil slip, soil layer dislocation, cavity development and layer collapse. When signals showed as irregular up-down fluctuation, it represented as soil slip. While concave triangle signals indicated that rain fall dislocated stability of soil layer. On the other hand, wedge-shaped signals indicated that tiny cave developed in the overburden material. The signals which showed as combined form of equilateral triangle and concave triangle implied that cover collapse sinkhole. Therefore, the signal energy, rising and falling time and duration of signal waveforms were closely related to soil deformation in the process of collapse sinkhole. (4) In the formation process of collapse sinkhole, the spectrum signal waveform of acoustic emission was high frequency narrow pulse form, in which spectrum energy of four signal types such as soil slip, soil layer dislocation, cavity development and layer collapse were concentrated in the high frequency range of about 50 kHz or 20kHz, respectively. (5) The cumulative ringing counts of acoustic emission were closely related to pore water pressure, soil pressure and displacement of overburden material. The ringing counts of acoustic emission increased in a period of time or in a sudden during the process of soil deformation or collapse, respectively, which indicated that acoustic emission technology is feasible for motoring and early warning of collapse sinkhole.
-
图 1 试验仪器与监测系统展示图
Figure 1. General diagram of the experimental equipment and monitoring system
图 2 监测仪器布设与试验装置示意图
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the experimental equipment and monitoring apparatus
图 4 大雨条件下土体深层声发射参数特征
Figure 4. Characteristic of acoustic emission parameters in deeper overburden layer under heavy rain condition
图 5 暴雨条件下土体浅层声发射参数特征
Figure 5. Characteristic of acoustic emission parameters in upper overburden layer under rainstorm condition
图 6 暴雨条件下土体深层声发射参数特征
Figure 6. Characteristic of acoustic emission parameters in deeper overburden layer under rainstorm condition
图 3 大雨条件下土体浅层声发射参数特征
Figure 3. Characteristic of acoustic emission parameters in upper overburden layer under heavy rain condition
图 9 大雨条件下覆盖层多场耦合关联特征
Figure 9. Multi-field coupling characteristics of overburden layer under heavy rain condition
图 10 暴雨条件下覆盖层多场耦合关联特征
Figure 10. Multi-field coupling characteristics of overburden layer under rainstorm condition
表 1 试验材料基本物理力学指标
Table 1. The basic physical and mechanical indexes of the experimental material
最优含水率
$ \omega $/%最大干密度
${\rho }_{d}/g\cdot {cm}^{-1}$液限
$ {W}_{L} $/%塑限
$ {W}_{p} $/%塑性指数
$ {I}_{p} $土粒比重
$ {G}_{s} $压缩模量
$ {E}_{s} $/Mpa30.21 1.46 51.24 34.34 19.9 2.725 10.11 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 康彦仁. 岩溶塌陷的形成机制[J]. 广西地质, 1989, 2(2):83-90.KANG Yanren. On the mechanism of karst collapses[J]. Geology of Guangxi, 1989, 2(2):83-90. [2] 雷明堂, 蒋小珍. 岩溶塌陷研究现状、发展趋势及其支撑技术方法[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1998, 9(3):1-6.LEI Mingtang, JIANG Xiaozhen. Research on the present situation and developing tendency of karst collapse and techniques for its supporting[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 1998, 9(3):1-6. [3] 廖如松. 应用逐步判别法预测岩溶塌陷探讨—以桂林岩溶地区为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 1987(1):79-91.LIAO Rusong. Application of stepwise discriminant analysis to predict land collapse-a case of Guilin karst region[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1987(1):79-91. [4] 项式均, 陈健, 覃有强. 湖北大冶县大广山铁矿岩溶塌陷的预测和评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 1987, 6(4):297-314.XIANG Shijun, CHEN Jian, QIN Youqiang. Prediction and evaluation of karst collapse in Daguangshan iron mine in Daye county, Hubei[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1987, 6(4):297-314. [5] 武 鑫, 黄敬军, 缪世贤. 基于层次分析-模糊综合评价法的徐州市岩溶塌陷易发性评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(6):836-841. doi: 10.11932/karst20170606WU Xin, HUANG Jingjun, MIAO Shixian. Susceptibility zoning and mapping of karst collapse in Xuzhou using analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(6):836-841. doi: 10.11932/karst20170606 [6] 蒙彦, 殷坤龙, 雷明堂. 水位波动诱发岩溶塌陷的概率分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2006, 25(3):239-243. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.03.009MENG Yan, YIN Kunlong, LEI Mingtang. Probabilistic analysis on karst collapse induced by water table fluctuation[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2006, 25(3):239-243. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.03.009 [7] 高宗军, 鲁统民, 王敏, 冯建国, 刘书江, 王姝. 基于岩溶水动态的岩溶地面塌陷预测预报方法[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(5):739-745. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y09GAO Zongjun, LU Tongmin, WANG Min, FENG Jianguo, LIU Shujiang, WANG Shu. Prediction of karst ground collapse based on karst water regime[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(5):739-745. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y09 [8] 管振德, 蒋小珍, 高明. 岩溶塌陷光纤传感试验装置的标定试验[J]. 中国岩溶, 2012, 31(2):173-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.010GUAN Zhende, JIANG Xiaozhen, GAO Ming. A calibration test on optical fiber sensing device for karst collapse monitoring[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2012, 31(2):173-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.010 [9] Jiang XZ, Gao YL, Wu YB, Lei MT. Use of brillouin optical time domain reflectometry to monitor soil-cave and sinkhole formation[J]. Environ Earth Sci, 2016, 75(3):225. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-5084-1 [10] 蒋小珍, 雷明堂, 管振德. 湖南宁乡大成桥充水矿山疏干区岩溶系统水气压力监测及突变特征[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(2):179-189. doi: 10.11932/karst20160207JIANG Xiaozhen, LEI Mingtang, GUAN Zhende. Character of water or barometric pressure jump within karst conduit in large strong drainage area of karst water filling mine in Dachengqiao, Ningxiang, Hunan[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2016, 35(2):179-189. doi: 10.11932/karst20160207 [11] 姜伏伟, 张发旺, 柳林, 刘伟, 李亮, 陈航. 南宁地铁施工降水诱发岩溶塌陷条件及安全防控措施[J]. 中国岩溶, 2018, 37(3):415-420. doi: 10.11932/karst20180312JIANG Fuwei, ZHANG Fawang, LIU Lin, LIU Wei, LI Liang, CHEN Hang. Dewatering induced karst collapse conditions and safety prevention and control measures in Nanning subway construction[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2018, 37(3):415-420. doi: 10.11932/karst20180312 [12] 王滨, 李治广, 董昕, 陈立. 岩溶塌陷的致塌力学模型研究—以泰安市东羊娄岩溶塌陷为例[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2011, 20(4):119-125.WANG Bin, LI Zhiguang, DONG Xin, CHEN Li. Study on mechanical model of karst collapse: a case of karst collapse in Dongyanglou village, Tai’ an city[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2011, 20(4):119-125. [13] 高培德, 王林峰. 覆盖型岩溶塌陷的塌陷机制分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(6):770-776. doi: 10.11932/karst20170602GAO Peide, WANG Linfeng. Analysis of collapse mechanism for mantled karst collapse[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(6):770-776. doi: 10.11932/karst20170602 [14] Nair A, Cai CS. Acoustic emission monitoring of bridges: review and case studies[J]. Eng Struct, 2010, 32(6):1704-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.020 [15] Fricker s, Vogel T. Site installation and testing of a continuous acoustic monitoring[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2007, 21(3):501-510. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.04.008 [16] Dixon N, Spriggs MP, Smith A, Meldrum P, Haslam E. Quantification of reactivated landslide behaviour using acoustic emission monitoring[J]. Ladnslides, 2015, 12(3):549-560. [17] Cheon DS, Jung YB, Park ES, Song WK, Jang HI. Evaluation of damage level for rock slopes using acoustic emission technique with waveguides[J]. Eng Geol, 2011, 121(1):75-88. [18] Koerner RM, Lord AE. Acoustic emissions in stressed soil samples[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974, 56(6):1924-1927. doi: 10.1121/1.1903538 [19] Kurlenya MV, Petrov VE, Popov SN, Tkach KB. Applicability of acoustic waveguides for stress measurement in soils[J]. J Min Sci, 1997, 33(1):88-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02765435 [20] Huang MH, Lauchle GC, Wang MC. Seepage-induced acoustic emission in granular soils[J]. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2009, 135(4):566-572. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:4(566) [21] Leary D, Dicarlo DA, Hickey CJ. Acoustic techniques for studying soil-surface seals and crusts[J]. Ecohydrol, 2009(2):257-262. [22] Lu ZQ, Wilson GV. Acoustic measurements of soil pipeflow and internal erosion[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2011(76):853-866. [23] 陈天奇. 复合岩土声发射试验研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学. 2014.CHEN Tianqi. Experiment of acoustic emission of composites from rock and soil [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology. 2014. [24] Mao WW, Shogo A, Shigeru G. Acoustic emission characteristics of subsoil subjected to vertical pile loading in sand[J]. J Appl Geophys, 2015(119):119-127. [25] 闫梦晴, 李明宝, 于司杭, 郑宪. 土无侧限抗压试验中的声发射特性研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(33):142-146. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.33.024YAN Mengqing, LI Mingbao, YU Sihang, ZHENG Xian. Acoustic emission characteristic in soil unconfined compression test[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(33):142-146. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.33.024 [26] 李明宝, 孙振国, 陈冲, 郑宪, 闫梦晴, 于司杭. 单轴压缩下土体声发射参数与力学参数关系研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(30):278-284. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2016.30.049LI Mingbao, SUN Zhenguo, CHEN Chong, ZHENG Xian, YAN Mengqing, YU Sihang. Study the relationship between acoustic emission parameters and mechanical parameters in soil unconfined compression test[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(30):278-284. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2016.30.049 [27] 张攀. 松散堰塞坝溃决的声发射响应试验研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学. 2017.ZHANG Pan. Experimental study on acoustic emission response of loose dam failure [D]. Chengdu: Cheng du University of Technology. 2017. [28] 国防科技工业无损检测人员资格鉴定与认证培训教材编审委员会. 声发射检测[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社. 2005.Qualification and Certification Committee for NDT Personnel of Defense Industry. Acoustic emission detection [M]. Beijing: China Machine Press. 2005. -
点击查看大图
图(10) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 68
- HTML浏览量: 189
- PDF下载量: 138
- 被引次数: 0
