云南石林县域喀斯特洼地空间分布特征及影响因素研究

丁智强; 俞筱押; 高 璇; 李玉辉

doi:10.11932/karst20190305

云南石林县域喀斯特洼地空间分布特征及影响因素研究

doi: 10.11932/karst20190305

1.
云南师范大学旅游与地理科学学院，昆明 650500
2.
黔南民族师范学院旅游与资源环境学院，贵州都匀 558000

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（41262013，41371514）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1975
- HTML浏览量: 556
- PDF下载量: 526
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2019-06-25

Study on spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of karst depressions in Shilin county, Yunnan Province

1.
School of Tourism and Geographical Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan 650500,China
2.
School of Tourism and Resource Environment, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun, Guizhou 558000, China

摘要

摘要: 为深化洼地空间分布及其影响因素的认识，以云南石林县为例，在ArcGIS中基于DEM提取洼地分布及相关数据，并运用K函数（Ripley’s K）、核密度函数、缓冲区、空间叠加等分析方法，探讨了该区洼地密度分布特征及地理环境对其的影响。结果表明：研究区洼地在8 km尺度上为聚集分布模式，可划分为高密度（＞6个?km-2）、中密度（5～6个?km-2）和低密度（＜5个?km-2）三个区域。受多种地理环境因素影响，研究区洼地密度在不同海拔段、坡度、起伏度、地层岩石和断层缓冲区上均有差异性表现；同时，岩层节理、断层方向在一定程度上控制了洼地长轴的发育。研究区潜在水文连通性、面积—高程积分值两个指标与洼地密度呈现良好的一致性，但两个指标所反映的喀斯特洼地的地貌学意义还需进一步研究。
- 喀斯特洼地 /
- 连通性 /
- 面积-高程积分值 /
- 地理信息系统 /
- 石林
Abstract: It is of significance to study the distribution and the factors of karst impact on the development of karst depression in the fields of geomorphology and environmental science. This paper takes Shilin county with abundant karst depressions as the study area, which is in subtropical monsoon climate zone, the south of the karst plateau in eastern Yunnan Province. The area is sandwiched between the Shizong-Mile fault and the west branch of Xiaojiang fault, and at the transition zone between the southeastern margin of Qinghai-Tibet plateau and the Beibuwan hilly plain.Based on digital elevation model (DEM), the methods of Ripley’s K function, nuclear density, buffer analysis, and spatial superposition in ArcGIS are used to analyze the distribution characteristics of the depressions and the influence of geographical environment on them. The results show that, (1) The distribution of karst depression in study area presents an aggregate pattern on a scale of 8 km, and the area can be divided into three sub-areas, namely high-density(>6?km-2), medium-density (5~6?km-2) and low-density (<5?km-2) areas. The high-density area has a total area of 308 km2, which is concentrated in two areas, namely Weihei, Muzhujing, Yusheng, Nuoyi in the east, and Hemo station and Shilin town in the northwest, with an average depression density of 7.20?km-2. The medium-density area is in the surroundings of the high-density area, including Yinai, Douhei, Southern Haiyi, and Northern Weize, with an average density of 5.74?km-2; and the low-density area is mainly at the edge of county, with an average density of 4.16?km-2. From the aspect of morphological parameters of the depression individuals, perimeter and area of them are high-density area < medium-density area < low-density area; depth and side slope are high-density area ≈ medium-density area > low-density area. (2) The spatial distribution of the depressions is controlled by the factors such as topography, geomorphology and geology. They have different quantity and density at different locations in elevation, relief, slope, rock type and fault buffer. At the altitude of 1,850~1,950 m, the maximum number of depressions is 37.1%,while the slope of 6°~12° accounts for the most as 82.0%, the relief of 100~150 m is 31.3%, and the landform classification of karst hilly zone is 34.3%. In terms of rock type, the depression density in the Quaternary deposit area is 5.8?km-2, and in dolomite area is 5.6?km-2, which are both dominant distributions due to lithostratigraphy. There are differences among the density in the buffer zone of three fault groups, with similar trend of density variation at each fault group. Tectonic joints and fractures developed in the Devonian, Carboniferous and Permian strata and the Jiuxiang, Weize and Guishan faults in study area strongly control the development of karst depressions along their long axis directions.(3) The spatial variation of the depression density is well correlated with two comprehensive indicators of regional heterogeneous structure of potential hydrological connectivity (IC) and hypsometric integral (HI). As the IC value increases, the depression density decreases, showing a significant negative correlation (R2=0.81). While with the increase of HI value, the depression density gradually increases, showing a significant positive correlation (R2=0.90).The spatial distribution of karst depressions is affected by geographical factors, and IC and HI can comprehensively reflect the distribution characteristics of depressions in study area, however, whether this law is universal still need further study.
- karst depression /
- connectivity /
- hypsometric integral /
- geographic information system /
- Shilin country

HTML

参考文献(49)

[1]	Ford D C, Williams P W. Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology ［M］. USA: Hoboken, Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2007.
[2]	Theilenwillige B , Malek H , Charif A , et al. Remote Sensing and GIS Contribution to the Investigation of Karst Landscapes in NW-Morocco［J］. Geosciences, 2014, 4(2):50-72.
[3]	Panno S V, Luman D E. Characterization of cover-collapse sinkhole morphology on a groundwater basin-wide scale using lidar elevation data: A new conceptual model for sinkhole evolution［J］. Geomorphology, 2018, 318(10):1-17.
[4]	Kemmerly P R. Modeling doline populations with logistic growth functions［J］. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2007, 32(4):587-601.
[5]	朱学稳.桂林岩溶地貌与洞穴研究［M］.北京:地质出版社,1988.
[6]	Franci Gabrov?ek, Uro?Stepi?nik. On the formation of collapse dolines: A modelling perspective［J］. Geomorphology, 2011, 134(1-2):23-31.
[7]	Péntek, K, Veress M , Lóczy, D. A morphometric classification of solution dolines［J］. Zeitschrift Fur Geomorphologie, 2007, 51(1):19-30.
[8]	Wall J, Bohnenstiehl D W R, Wegmann K W, et al. Morphometric comparisons between automated and manual karst depression inventories in Apalachicola National Forest, Florida, and Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky, USA［J］. Natural Hazards, 2017, 85(1):1-21.
[9]	Bauer C. Analysis of dolines using multiple methods applied to airborne laser scanning data［J］. Geomorphology, 2015, 250(2):78-88.
[10]	Chen Z, Auler A S, Bakalowicz M, et al. The world karst aquifer mapping project: concept, mapping procedure and map of Europe［J］. Hydrogeology Journal, 2017, 25(3):771-785.
[11]	Sauro U, Ferrarese F, Francese R, et al. Doline Fills-Case Study of the Faverghera Plateau (Venetian Pre-Alps, Italy)［J］. Acta Carsologica, 2009, 38(1):51-63.
[12]	Breg Valjavec M, Zorn M, ?arni A. Human-induced land degradation and biodiversity of Classical Karst landscape: On the example of enclosed karst depressions(dolines)［J］. Land Degradation & Development,2018,29(10):3823-3835.
[13]	Siart C, Hecht S, Holzhauer I, et al. Karst depressions as geoarchaeological archives: The palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of Zominthos (Central Crete), based on geophysical prospection, sedimentological investigations and GIS［J］. Quaternary International, 2014, 216(1):75-92.
[14]	?eru T,?egina E,Gosar A Geomorphological dating of pleistocene conglomerates in central slovenia based on spatial analyses of dolines using LiDAR and ground penetrating radar［J］. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(12):1213.
[15]	Florea L J. Using Statewide GIS data to identify the coincidence between sinkholes and geologic structure［J］. Journal of Cave & Karst Studies, 2005, 67(2):120-124.
[16]	Faivre S, Reiffsteck P. Spatial distribution of dolines as an indicator of recent deformations on the Velebit mountain range［J］. Géomorphologie Relief Processus Environnement, 1999, 5(2):129-142.
[17]	Gutiérrez F, Parise M, Waele J D, et al. A review on natural and human-induced geohazards and impacts in karst［J］. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 138(11):61-88.
[18]	Siska P P, Goovaerts P, Hung I K. Evaluating susceptibility of karst dolines (sinkholes) for collapse in Sango, Tennessee, USA［J］. Progress in Physical Geography,2016,40(4):579-597.
[19]	石林研究组.中国路南石林喀斯特研究［M］.昆明: 云南科技出版社,1997.
[20]	梁福源, 宋林华, 唐涛. 石林地区土壤性质与喀斯特洼地发育［J］. 地理研究, 2004, 23(3):321-328.
[21]	Faivre S , Pahernik M . Structural influences on the spatial distribution of dolines, Island of Bra? ，Croatia［J］. Zeitschrift Für Geomorphologie, 2007, 51(4):487-503.
[22]	李玉辉, 冯正清, 俞筱押, 等. 云南石林公园植被重大变化与意义［J］. 中国岩溶, 2005, 24(3):212-219.
[23]	Huang W, Deng C, Day M J. Differentiating tower karst (fenglin) and cockpit karst (fengcong) using DEM contour, slope, and centroid［J］. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 72(2):407-416.
[24]	Liang F, Xu B. Discrimination of tower, cockpit, and non-karst landforms in Guilin, Southern China, based on morphometric characteristics［J］.Geomorphology,2014,204(1):42-48.
[25]	Liang F Y, Shi Y R, Abrook G. Mapping cockpit karst in Southern China from ASTER stereo images: DEM validation and accuracy assessment［J］. Carsologica Sinica, 2011, 30(2): 233-242.
[26]	Telbisz T, Dragu?ica H, Nagy B. Doline morphometric analysis and karst morphology of Biokovo Mt (Croatia) based on field observations and digital terrain analysis.［J］. Hrvatski Geografski Glasnik, 2009, 71(2):5-22.
[27]	Ripley, B D . The second-order analysis of stationary point processes［J］. Journal of Applied Probability, 1976, 13(2):255-266.
[28]	Silverman B W. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis［M］. London: Chapman & Hall, 1986：34-74.
[29]	Besag J, Diggle P J. Simple monte carlo tests for spatial pattern［J］. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1977, 26(3):327-333.
[30]	Pringle C M . Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: a global perspective［J］. Ecological Applications, 2001, 11(4):981-998.
[31]	Bracken L J , Wainwright J , Ali G A , et al. Concepts of hydrological connectivity: Research approaches, pathways and future agendas［J］. Earth-Science Reviews,2013,119(4):17-34.
[32]	Borselli L , Cassi P , Torri D . Prolegomena to sediment and flow connectivity in the landscape: A GIS and field numerical assessment［J］. Catena, 2008, 75(3):268-277.
[33]	Tobias H , Marco C , Olivier C , et al. Indices of sediment connectivity: opportunities, challenges and limitations［J］. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 187(12):77-108.
[34]	Davis W M. The Geographical Cycle［J］. The geographical Journal, 1899, 14(5): 481-504.
[35]	Strahler A N. Hypsometric(area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography［J］. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 1952, 63(1): 1117-1142.
[36]	李玉辉, 丁智强, 吴晓月. 基于Strahler面积—高程分析的云南石林县域喀斯特地貌演化的量化研究［J］. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5):973-985.
[37]	?ztürk M Z,?ener M F, ?ener M, et al. Structural controls on distribution of dolines on Mount Anamas (Taurus Mountains, Turkey)［J］. Geomorphology, 2018, 317(9):107-116.
[38]	Markovic J, Boic N, Pahernik M. Spatial distribution and density of dolines in the southeastern Velebit Area［J］. Preliminary Communication, 2016, 21(1):1-28.
[39]	许基伟, 方世明, 黄荣华. 广西七百弄国家地质公园高峰丛深洼地空间形态特征及其成因研究［J］. 地球学报, 2017, 38(6):961-970.
[40]	Day M . Doline Morphology and Development in Barbados［J］. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2015, 73(2):206-219.
[41]	Aguilar Y , Bautista F, Mendoza M E , et al. Density of karst depressions in Yucatán state, Mexico［J］. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 2016, 78(2): 51-60.
[42]	Gams I. Doline morphogenetic processes from global and local viewpoints［J］. Acta Carsologica, 2000, 29(2): 123-138.
[43]	Jeanpert J , Genthon P , Maurizot P , et al. Morphology and distribution of dolines on ultramafic rocks from airborne LiDAR data: the case of southern Grande Terre in New Caledonia (SW Pacific)［J］. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 2016, 41(13):1854-1868.
[44]	Bo?i? N , Pahernik M, Mihevc A. Geomorphological significance of the palaeodrainage network on a karst plateau: The UnaKorana plateau, Dinaric karst, Croatia［J］. Geomorphology, 2015, 247(10):55-65.
[45]	Daura J , Sanz M , Josep Forn S J , et al. Karst evolution of the Garraf Massif (Barcelona, Spain): doline formation, chronology and archaeo-palaeontological archives［J］. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 2014, 76 (5):69-87.
[46]	Sauro U . Landforms of mountainous karst in the middle latitudes: reflections, trends and research problems［J］. Acta Carsologica, 2011, 42 (1): 5-16.
[47]	Day M . The morphology and hydrology of some Jamaican karst depressions［J］. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 1976, 1(2):111-129.
[48]	章程, 谢运球, 姜光辉, 等. 云南路南石林裂隙渗透张量特征［J］. 中国岩溶, 2001, 20(2):97-100.
[49]	Dreybrodt W . Processes in karst systems-physics, chemistry, and geology［M］. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 1988: 288.