Study on the ecological benefit of Lippia nodiflora (L.)Greene in karst mountain
-
摘要: 本文首次在岩溶山地生态重建中引进优质草种——日本岩垂草(Lippianodiflora (L.) Greene),通过对其盖度、根系特征、径流量和抗侵蚀能力的研究,探讨其在岩溶山地的生态效益,寻求修复岩溶地区脆弱生态系统的途径,并为日本岩垂草在岩溶山地种植推广提供依据。试验表明,日本岩垂草对降低地表径流量收效明显,在种植了3个月后,地表径流量已经由110mm下降到42mm,下降了62%;抗侵蚀能力强,在同样的雨强和降雨量情况下,其侵蚀量只是传统耕地的5.60%~5.83%;根系生长速度快,密度大,数量多,种植90d时盖度已达100%。实验证明,日本岩垂草具有优秀的生态修复和生态美化能力,能够有效地改善岩溶地区脆弱的生态状况。Abstract: A high quality Japanese species - Lippia nodiflora(L.)Greene is introduced for the first time to be planted for eco-rehabilitation in karst mountain in the paper. The ecological benefitis discussed in the pa per through studying the coverage, root system characteristics, runoff and erosion resistance, whereby seeking eco-rehabilitation ways for fragile ecosystem and providing scientific basis for planting and popularizing Lippia nodiflora(L.)Greene in karst mountain. The experiments show that the amount of runoff will drop after planting Lippia nodiflora(L.)Greene, and the amount of surface runoff reduces by 62% from110 mm to 42 mm 3 months later. Under same rainfall intensity and capacity, the erosion amount in Lippia nodiflora(L.)Greene land counts to only5.60%~5.83% of that in traditional farming lands, and that the root system grows faster, gets denser and more. After planting90 days, the Lippia nodiflora(L.)Greene has covered100% of the ground surface. The experiments prove that Lippia nodiflora(L.)Greene is good for eco-rehabilitation and can improve efficiently the ecosystem and landscape in karst mountain.
-
Key words:
- Lippia nodiflora(L.)Greene /
- ecological benefit /
- coverage /
- the amount of soil erosion /
- karst mountain
-
[1] 张远瞩,李勇,谢世友.岩垂草在重庆石漠化地区的引种适应性研究［J］.安徽农业科学,2010,38(10):5238-5240. [2] 刘良宏,张萍,王玲,等.姬岩垂草的园林应用与生长繁殖［J］.中国园艺文摘,2009,6:66-67. [3] 蔡汉,王珺,赵梁军.优良的园林地被花卉——姬岩垂草［J］.北京园林,2004,69(3):22-24. [4] 张学霞,朱清科,吴根梅,等.数码照相法估算植被盖度［J］.北京林业大学学报,2008,30(1):164-169. [5] 韦红波,李锐,杨勤科.我国植被水土保持功能研究进展［J］.植物生态学报,2002,26(4):489-496. [6] 张彦平.草被植物水土保持作用的研究进展［J］.黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报,2007,20(3):5-7. [7] Hussein M H, Laflen J M. Effects of copy and residue on rill and interrill soil erosion［J］. Transactions of ASAE,1982,25(5):1310-1315. [8] Gross C M, Angle J S, Hill R L. Runoff and sediment losses from tall fescue under simulate drain fall［J］. J. Environ. Qual,1991,20:604-607. [9] Molina A. Govers G, Vanacker V, et al. Runoff generation in a degraded Andean ecosystem: lnteraction of vegetation cover and land use［J］.Catena,2007(71):357-370. [10] Gyssels G, Poesen J, Bochet E, et al. Impact of plant rooys on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review［J］. Progress in Physical Geography,2005(29):189-217. [11] Bochet E, Poesen J, Rubio J L. Runoff and soil loss under individual plants of asemi-arid Mediterranean shrubland: influence of plant morphology and rain fall intensity［J］. Earth Surface Processes and Land forms, 2006(31):536-549. [12] 张彦平.草被植物水土保持作用的研究进展［J］.黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报,2007,20(3):5-14. [13] 龙忠富,唐成斌,钱晓刚,等.几种草被植物保持水土效益的研究［J］.水土保持研究,2002,9(4):136-138. [14] 韦红波,李锐,杨勤科.我国植被水土保持功能研究进展［J］.植物生态学报,2001,26(4):489-496. [15] 李勉,姚文艺,李占斌.黄土高原草本植被水土保持作用研究进展［J］.地球科学进展,2005,20(1):74-80. [16] Sanchez L A, Ataroff M, Lopez R. Soil erosion under different vegetation covers in the Venezuelan Andes［J］. The Environmentalist, 2002,22(2):161-172. [17] 李阳兵,王世杰,容丽.关于中国西南石漠化的若干问题［J］.长江流域资源与环境［J］.2003,12(6):593-598. [18] 吴文荣,袁福锦,奎嘉祥.滇东南岩溶坡地种植牧草和农作物水土流失对比研究［J］.四川草原,2005(11):6-8. [19] 熊先勤,赵明坤,刘正书.皇草保持水土的效益研究［J］.贵州农业科学,2005,33(4):63-64. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2085
- HTML浏览量: 346
- PDF下载量: 1702
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
