喀斯特山区溪流上覆水—孔隙水—沉积物中不同形态氮的赋存特征及其迁移——以麦西河为例

谢伟芳; 夏品华; 林 陶; 张邦喜; 詹金星; 胡继伟

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.01.002

喀斯特山区溪流上覆水—孔隙水—沉积物中不同形态氮的赋存特征及其迁移——以麦西河为例

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.01.002

贵州师范大学省山地环境信息系统与生态环境保护重点实验室

基金项目: 贵阳市社会发展攻关项目(2009304)、贵州省科技厅社发攻关项目

计量
- 文章访问数: 2368
- HTML浏览量: 378
- PDF下载量: 2509
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2011-12-06
- 发布日期: 2011-03-25

Distribution and migration of different forms of nitrogen among overlying water, pore water and sediments in karst mountain stream—A casein the Maixi River

Guizhou Key Laboratory for Mountainous Environ mental Information and Ecological Protection, Guizhou Normal University

摘要

摘要: 选取贵州百花湖入湖支流麦西河为对象,研究了上覆水—孔隙水—沉积物体系氮的形态差异,结果表明:麦西河上覆水中,以硝态氮(NO-3-N)为主,氨态氮(NH+4-N)次之,亚硝态氮(NO-2-N)最低;孔隙水中,溶解无机氮中以NH+4-N为主, NO-3-N次之, NO-2-N最低;沉积物中,总氮(TN)的含量为1110.67～4413.16mg/kg;固定态铵含量为34.56～170.05mg/kg,占TN的1.47%～6.25%;可交换态氮以NH+4-N为主, NO-3-N次之, NO-2-N最低。孔隙水NH+4-N是上覆水NH+4-N的2.65～19.51倍,上覆水NO-3-N是孔隙水NO-3-N的7.14～20.43倍。沉积物TN与孔隙溶解水无机氮(DIN)、孔隙水NH+4-N、沉积物可交换态氮和沉积物可交换性NH+4-N呈显著正相关;在沉积物中,可交换性NO-3-N与可交换性NH+4-N及可交换态氮呈显著正相关,可交换性NH+4-N与可交换态氮呈极显著正相关;孔隙水溶解无机氮与孔隙水NH+4-N呈极显著正相关。麦西河不同介质中氮的迁移关系则表现为:由于浓度梯度,上覆水中的NO-3-N扩散到孔隙水中,进而累积到沉积物中;沉积物的可交换性NH+4-N,进入孔隙水,最终扩散到上覆水中。
- 喀斯特 /
- 氮形态 /
- 赋存特征 /
- 迁移 /
- 上覆水 /
- 孔隙水 /
- 沉积物 /
- 麦西河
Abstract: Distribution and migration of nitrogen among overlying water, pore water and sediments are investigated in the Maixi River, the results indicate that in overlying water, the content of different forms of nitrogen assumes an order NO-3-N (tric nitrogen)> NH+4-N (ammonicacal nitrogen)> NO-2-N (trite nitrogen); while the content of dissolved inorganic nitrogen(DIN)in pore water assumes an order NH+4-N> NO-3-N > NO-2-N.Content of total nitrogen and fixed am monium(F-N H4)is1110.67～4413.16mg/kg and34.56～170.05mg/kgin sediments, accounting for1.47%～6.25% of total nitrogen; the content of different forms of exchangeable nitrogen in sediments assumes an order NH+4-N> NO-3-N > NO-2-N. Content of NH+4-N in pore wateris2.65～19.51 times higher than that in overlying water, and content of NO-3-N in overlying water is 7.14～20.43 times higher than that in pore water’s N in sediments has significant positive correlations with the content of DIN, NH+4-N in pore water, exchangeable nitrogen and exchangeable NH+4-N in sediments; in sediments, exchangeable NO-3-N has significant positive correlations with the content of exchangeable NH+4-N and exchangeable nitrogen, and exchangeable NH+4-N has significant positive correlations with the content of exchangeable nitrogen. DIN in pore water has significant positive correlations with the content of NH+4-N in pore water. Migration of nitrogen in the Maxi River is shown as follows: with a concentration gradient, NO-3-N in overlying water is diffuse into pore water, finally accumulated in sediments, while the exchangeable NH+4-N in sediments is released into the pore water and further into the overlying water.
- karst /
- nitrogen forms /
- distribution characteristic /
- migration /
- overlying water /
- pore water /
- sediment /
- Maixi River

HTML

参考文献(23)

[1]	Smith V H, Tilman G D, Nekola J C. Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine and terrestrial eco-systems ［J］.Environmental Pollution,1999,100:179-196.
[2]	陈绍勇,韩舞鹰.南海东北部沉积物间隙水氮和硅的研究［J］.热带海洋,1994,13(2):56-60.
[3]	朱广伟,陈英旭.沉积物中有机质的环境行为研究进展［J］.湖泊科学,2001,13(3):272-279.
[4]	陈武,任明强,芦正艳,等.贵州典型喀斯特区土壤地球化学特征研究［J］.中国岩溶,2010,29(3):246-252.
[5]	刘方,罗海波,刘鸿雁,等.土地利用方式对喀斯特浅层地下水质量的影响［J］.矿物学报,2007,27(3):540-544.
[6]	苏跃,刘方,李航,等.喀斯特山区不同土地利用方式下土壤质量变化及其对水环境的影响［J］.水土保持学报,2008(01):65-68.
[7]	王雨村,万国江,尹澄清,等.红枫湖、百花湖沉积物全氮、可交换态氮和亚硝态氮的赋存特征［J］.湖泊科学,2002,14(4):301-309.
[8]	朱爱美,叶思源,卢文喜,等.胶州湾海水-沉积物界面氮、磷、铁的地球化学特征［J］.海洋地质与第四纪地质,2006,26(6):55-64.
[9]	国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析分析方法国家水质监测标准第4版［M］.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002,211-281.
[10]	Silva J A,Bremner J M.Determination and isotope-ratio analysis of different forms of nitrogen in soils.5 Fixed ammonium［J］.Soil Sci Soc Am Proc,1966,30:587-594.
[11]	毛战坡,尹澄清,王雨春,等.污染物在农田溪流生态系统中的动态变化［J］.生态学报,2003,23(12):2614-2623.
[12]	毛战坡,单保庆,尹澄清,等.磷在农田溪流中的动态变化［J］.环境科学,2003,24(6):1-8.
[13]	李睿华,管运涛,何苗,等.河岸混合植物带处理受污染河水中试研究［J］.环境科学,2006,2(4):651-654.
[14]	卢少勇,金相灿,余刚.人工湿地的氮去除机理［J］.生态学报,2006,26(8):2670-2677.
[15]	冉景丞,何师意,曹建华,等.亚热带喀斯特森林的水土保持效益研究——以贵州茂兰国家级自然保护区为例［J］.水土保持学报,2002,16(5):92-95.
[16]	马红波,宋金明.海洋沉积物中的氮循环［J］.海洋科学集刊,2001,43:96-107.
[17]	马红波,宋金明,吕晓霞,等.渤海沉积物中氮的形态及其在循环中的作用［J］.地球化学,2003,32(1):48-54.
[18]	吕晓霞,宋金明.海洋沉积物中氮的形态及其生态学意义［J］.海洋科学集刊,2003,45:101-111.
[19]	Lü Xiao-xia,SONG Jin-ming,YUAN Hua-mao,et a1.Biogeochemical processes of nitrogen in marine sediment［J］.Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,2002,19(2):l48-l56.
[20]	高效江,张念礼,陈振楼,等.上海滨岸潮滩水沉积物中无机氮的季节性变化［J］.地理学报,2002,5(4):407-412.
[21]	王圣瑞,焦立新,金相灿,等.长江中下游浅水湖泊沉积物总氮、可交换态氮与固定态铵的赋存特征［J］.环境科学学报,2008,28(1):37-43.
[22]	张水元,刘瑞秋,黎道丰.保安湖沉积物和间隙水中氮和磷的含量及其分布［J］.水生生物学报,2000,24(5):434-438.
[23]	徐红灯,席北斗,翟丽华.沟渠沉积物对农田排水中氨氮的截留效应研究［J］.农业环境科学学报,2007,26(5):1924-1928.