• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 39 Issue 5
Oct.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Xiaoyu, ZHOU Baotong, MING Hong. Empirical study on sustainable development based on the three-dimensional ecological footprint:A case of Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(5): 705-713. doi: 10.11932/karst20200508
Citation: ZHANG Xiaoyu, ZHOU Baotong, MING Hong. Empirical study on sustainable development based on the three-dimensional ecological footprint:A case of Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(5): 705-713. doi: 10.11932/karst20200508

Empirical study on sustainable development based on the three-dimensional ecological footprint:A case of Chongqing

doi: 10.11932/karst20200508
  • Publish Date: 2020-10-25
  • Chongqing is located in southwest China, the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, with a total karst area of 32,680 km2, accounting for 39.7% of the city’s land area. Due to its poor internal environmental stability, the area has serious ecological problems such as soil erosion and rocky desertification. In recent years, relying on its superior location and national strategic advantages, Chongqing has basically formed a pattern of coexistence of large agriculture, large industry, large transportation and large circulation. With the rapid economic and social development, the ecological environment is facing tremendous pressure and the sustainable development has been threatened. In order to provide references for the sustainable development of Chongqing,in this paper, we firstly adapted the 3D ecological footprint model of Niccolucci by calculating the "national hectare", updating the equilibrium factor and yield factor, and adding the pollutant account. Then, we diachronically analyzed the ecological footprint of Chongqing from 2008 to 2017 by using the improved ecological footprint model. On this basis, we constructed a comprehensive index to assess the dynamic changes of sustainable development ability in Chongqing. The results show that, (1) The stock flow indexes were less than 1 in the period studied, except for those in the years of 2008, 2012, 2013 and 2014, indicating that the consumption of stock capital has decreased; (2) The overall ecological resource utilization efficiency index decreased year by year, while the resource utilization efficiency increased at the same time; (3) The index of ecological diversity increased stepwise, and the stability of the ecosystem was enhanced; (4) The comprehensive index of sustainable development capacity increased by 13.85%, indicating that the overall sustainable development capacity has been strengthened; (5) The ecological pressure index was between 1.51 and 2.00, the ecological environment was still in a very unsafe state, the stock capital was still occupied, and Chongqing was still in a state of unsustainable development. In addition, the comprehensive index of sustainable development capacity showed a slight decline in 2017. Therefore, under the guidance of the concept of "green water and green mountains are golden mountains and silver mountains", Chongqing should accelerate the formation of a spatial pattern of resource conservation and environmental protection, strive to build an environmental governance system led by the government, dominated by enterprises, and jointly participated by social organizations and the public, optimize the ecological spatial layout, strictly abide by the three control lines, and be alert to the continuous decline of sustainable development capacity.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2):121-130.
    [2]
    Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth[M]. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers, 1996:61-83.
    [3]
    张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态足迹的概念及计算模型[J].生态经济,2000(10):8-10.
    [4]
    Bicknell B, Ball R J, Cullen R, et al. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy[J]. Ecological Economics,1998,27(2):149-160.
    [5]
    Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Erb K H, et al. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach[J]. Land Use Policy,2003,21(3):261-269.
    [6]
    Siche J R, Agostinho F, Ortega E. Emergy Net Primary Production (ENPP) as basis for calculation of Ecological Footprint[J]. Ecological Indicators,2009,10(2):475-483.
    [7]
    Niccolucci V, Bastianoni S, Tiezzi E B P, et al. How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation[J]. Ecological Modelling,2009,220(20):2819-2823.
    [8]
    顾晓薇,王青,刘建兴,等.基于“国家公顷”计算城市生态足迹的新方法[J].东北大学学报,2005,26(4):295-298.
    [9]
    张恒义,刘卫东,王世忠,等.“省公顷”生态足迹模型中均衡因子及产量因子的计算:以浙江省为例[J].自然资源学报, 2009,24(1):82-92.
    [10]
    张帅,董泽琴,王海鹤,等.基于生态足迹改进模型的均衡因子与产量因子计算:以某市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(14):7496-7498.
    [11]
    方恺.生态足迹深度和广度:构建三维模型的新指标[J].生态学报,2013,33(1):267-274.
    [12]
    靳相木,柳乾坤.基于三维生态足迹模型扩展的土地承载力指数研究:以温州市为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(9):2982-2993.
    [13]
    杜悦悦,彭建,高阳,等.基于三维生态足迹的京津冀城市群自然资本可持续利用分析[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(10):1186-1196.
    [14]
    张倩,谢世友.基于水生态足迹模型的重庆市水资源可持续利用分析与评价[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(2):93-100.
    [15]
    郭晓娜,苏维词,杨振华,等.城乡统筹背景下重庆市水生态足迹分析及预测[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(2):69-75.
    [16]
    王文国,龚久平,青鹏,等.重庆市水资源生态足迹与生态承载力分析[J].生态经济,2011(7):159-162.
    [17]
    谭秀娟.重庆市直辖以来水足迹研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2010.
    [18]
    施开放,刁承泰,孙秀锋,等.基于耕地生态足迹的重庆市耕地生态承载力供需平衡研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(6):1872-1880.
    [19]
    杨庆媛,王兆林,鲁春阳,等.生态足迹研究方法在土地资源可持续利用评价中应用:以重庆市为例[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,29(8):134-138.
    [20]
    董国仓,罗有贤,翁才银,等.基于ArcGIS的重庆市县域生态足迹差异分析[J].经济地理,2009,29(11):1885-1889.
    [21]
    邹聪明,胡小东,张云兰,等.基于能值生态足迹模型的高温伏旱区生态安全研究:以重庆市江津区为例[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(6):201-205,216.
    [22]
    李营刚,蒋勇军,丁馨怡.基于生态足迹模型的重庆市涪陵区可持续发展研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(6):73-77.
    [23]
    黄华.基于生态足迹法的三峡库区土地承载力研究:以重庆市忠县为例[J].价值工程,2014,33(20):165-166.
    [24]
    刘晓,苏维词.基于生态足迹模型的重庆市三峡库区可持续发展对策研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):222-225,228.
    [25]
    肖莉,蒋莉,陈治谏,等.小流域可持续发展能力的生态足迹法分析:以重庆市万州区五桥河流域为例[J].农村生态环境,2005,21(4):22-27.
    [26]
    郑钦玉,何再超.重庆市可持续发展的生态足迹测度[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(6):143-147.
    [27]
    丁馨怡.基于生态足迹模型的重庆市涪陵区可持续发展研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2008.
    [28]
    白婷.基于改进生态足迹模型的重庆市可持续发展能力研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2017.
    [29]
    王小丽.基于生态足迹模型的重庆市可持续发展动态研究[D].重庆:重庆师范大学,2012.
    [30]
    张喜梅.基于生态足迹的重庆市生态安全动态变化研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2014.
    [31]
    黄海,刘长城,陈春.基于生态足迹的土地生态安全评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):193-196,201.
    [32]
    王小丽,杨华,简太敏.基于生态足迹的重庆市涪陵区生态适度人口研究[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(1):340-343.
    [33]
    陈展图,杨庆媛,肖琼,等.基于生态足迹视角的建设用地节约集约利用分析:以重庆市为例[J].生态经济(学术版),2010(1):270-273.
    [34]
    杭晓宁,张健,胡留杰,等.2006-2015年重庆市农田生态系统碳足迹分析[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,44(5):524-531.
    [35]
    谭晖川.重庆市工业水足迹变化特征分析与预测[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2017.
    [36]
    刘小雷,丁桑岚.基于能值理论改进的生态足迹法:以重庆市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(12):7391-7394.
    [37]
    袁欢.基于能值理论和生态足迹模型的区域可持续发展研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2011.
    [38]
    周园园.基于能值生态足迹的微型城镇生态安全研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2016.
    [39]
    张燕,吴玉鸣.西南岩溶区生态安全评价研究:以广西为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(4):129-133.
    [40]
    杨廷锋.贵州岩溶地区生态效率的动态变化研究[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(4):414-418.
    [41]
    张凤太,苏维词.贵州省岩溶地区水土资源生态安全研究[J].水电能源科学,2015,33(9):151-154.
    [42]
    张军以,苏维词,张凤太.基于PSR模型的三峡库区生态经济区土地生态安全评价[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(6):1039-1044.
    [43]
    方恺,高凯,李焕承.基于三维生态足迹模型优化的自然资本利用国际比较[J].地理研究,2013,32(9):1657-1667.
    [44]
    方恺,Reinout H.自然资本核算的生态足迹三维模型研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(12):1700-1707.
    [45]
    吴健生,李萍,张玉清.基于生态足迹的城市地域可持续发展能力评价:以深圳为例[J].资源科学,2008,30(6):850-856.
    [46]
    林卫.基于生态足迹的流域生态系统可持续发展能力评价研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2014:9-10.
    [47]
    Shannon C E, Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication[M]. Urbana, IL: University of Illinos Press,1949.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1321) PDF downloads(150) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return