• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 39 Issue 5
Oct.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
DENG Ou, LI Yiqiu, YANG Guangbin, LI Ruoshuang. Evaluation on the ecosystem health of national key ecological function areas for karst rocky desertification prevention and control in Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(5): 689-696. doi: 10.11932/karst20200506
Citation: DENG Ou, LI Yiqiu, YANG Guangbin, LI Ruoshuang. Evaluation on the ecosystem health of national key ecological function areas for karst rocky desertification prevention and control in Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(5): 689-696. doi: 10.11932/karst20200506

Evaluation on the ecosystem health of national key ecological function areas for karst rocky desertification prevention and control in Guizhou Province

doi: 10.11932/karst20200506
  • Publish Date: 2020-10-25
  • The national key ecological function areas for karst rocky desertification prevention and control in Yunnan, Guangxi and Guizhou are the important ecological regions where development is restricted at the national level. These areas host special ecological systems dominated by karst environments. Of them, the key area of Guizhou Province is located in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and the Pearl River, a vital ecological barrier for the Yangtze River basin and the Pearl River basin. It is responsible for water conservation, soil and water conservation and other important ecological services. This functional area includes 9 counties subordinated to 4 cities with a total area of 26,454 km2. According to the different landforms and ecological functions, it is divided into four sub-areas, the Weining-Hezhang plateau watershed, Guanling-Zhenning plateau canyon, lower reach of the Ceheng-Wangmo Nan-Beipan River, and the Luodian-Pingtang plateau valley. This paper focuses on this functional area of Guizhou. Based on remote sensing images, geographic information data, precipitation data and soil data of year 2010 and 2015, by integrating 3S ecological and ecological assessing model, a quantitative and positioning analysis is performed to water conservation, soil erosion and rocky desertification degrees. The results show that, (1) Four sub-areas are at a medium or ‘high’ level of water conservation function, and water conservation index of 2015 was enhanced with respect to 2010;(2)The soil erosion modulus of Weining-Hezhang, Guanling-Zhenning and Ceheng-Wangmo areas are high, while their soil and water conservation functions are of low ranks. The soil erosion modulus of the Luodian-Pingtang area is the lowest, and its soil and water conservation function is of medium rank; (3) In the Weining-Hezhang area, the proportion of moderate and high rocky desertification reached 16.36% in 2010, and dropped to 8.74% in 2015. The ecosystem health degree changed from low to medium. The proportion of moderate and high rocky desertification in the Guanlin-Zhenning area was 8.64% in 2010 and 4.49% in 2015, respectively. The ecosystem health degree changed from medium to high. The health degrees of both Ceheng-Wangmo and Luodian-Pingtang are high, which were improved in 2015 compared to 2010. In the four sub-areas, the proportions of rocky desertification deteriorated areas are less than 1.00%, and the proportions of rocky desertification improved areas are 27.00%, 14.10%, 10.24% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that rocky desertification has been effectively curbed. In the future, we should continue to adapt to local conditions to restore the vegetation and ecological system, and expand the achievements in the prevention and control of rocky desertification.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国国务院. 全国主体功能区规划[R]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国务院, 2011.
    [2]
    樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(4): 339-350.
    [3]
    樊杰, 王亚飞, 汤青, 等. 全国资源环境承载能力监测预警(2014版)学术思路与总体技术流程[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(1): 1-10.
    [4]
    吴旗韬, 陈伟莲, 张虹鸥, 等. 南岭生态功能区产业选择及发展路径探索[J]. 生态经济, 2014, 30(2): 88-92.
    [5]
    Fanbin Kong. Eco-compensation mechanism for ecological function conservation zones in the headwaters: A case study of Dongjiang riverhead region in Jiangxi province[J]. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(2): 299-305.
    [6]
    Guoping Li, Xiao Li, Haizhou Wang.Ecological compensation effect of national key ecological function area’s transfer payment policy[J].Modern Economic Science,2013,35(5):58-64.
    [7]
    Lin Huang, Wei Cao, Dan Wu, et al. Assessment on the changing conditions of ecosystems in key ecological function zones in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(9): 2758-2766.
    [8]
    李盈盈, 刘康, 胡胜, 等. 陕西省子午岭生态功能区水源涵养能力研究[J].干旱区地理, 2015, 38(3): 636-642.
    [9]
    刘璐璐, 曹巍, 吴丹,等.国家重点生态功能区生态系统服务时空格局及其变化特征[J].地理科学,2018,35(9):1508-1515.
    [10]
    侯鹏, 翟俊, 曹巍, 等. 国家重点生态功能区生态状况变化与保护成效评估:以海南岛中部山区国家重点生态功能区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3): 429-441.
    [11]
    Yiqiu Li, Chunxia Lu, Ou Deng, et al. Ecological characteristics of China’s key ecological function areas[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015, 6 (6): 427-433.
    [12]
    徐宁. 桂黔滇喀斯特石漠化防治生态功能区中贵州9县的生态分析[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2012, 7(27): 166-169.
    [13]
    李玉杰. 贵州独山国家重点生态功能区生态敏感性评价[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2017, 37 (3): 66-73.
    [14]
    徐宁. 水土保持型限制开发区转变经济发展方式问题研究:以桂黔滇喀斯特石漠化防治生态功能区贵州 9 县为例[J]. 生产力研究, 2013(7): 77-81.
    [15]
    贵州省人民政府. 贵州省主体功能区规划[R]. 贵阳:[贵州省人民政府(黔府发[2013]12号), 2013.
    [16]
    徐卫华,杨瑛,张路,等. 区域生态承载力预警评估方法及案例研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 306-312.
    [17]
    龚诗涵,肖洋,郑华, 等. 中国生态系统水源涵养空间特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(7): 2455-2462.
    [18]
    国家发展和改革委员会. 关于印发《资源环境承载能力监测预警技术方法(试行)》的通知, 发改规划〔2016〕2043号[R]. 北京: 国家发展和改革委员会, 2016.
    [19]
    Zhiyuan Ouyang, Hua Zheng, Yi Xiao, et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital[J]. Science, 2016, 352(6292): 1455-1459.
    [20]
    Enming Rao, Zhiyuan Ouyang, Xinxiao Yu, et al. Spatial patterns and impacts of soil conservation service in China[J]. Geomorphology, 2014, 207:64-70.
    [21]
    喻锋, 李晓兵, 王宏. 生态安全条件下土地利用格局优化:以皇甫川流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(12): 3198-3210.
    [22]
    中华人民共和国水利部. SL190-2007土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2008: 3-12.
    [23]
    李瑞玲,王世杰,熊康宁,等.贵州省岩溶地区坡度与土地石漠化空间相关分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2006, 26(4) : 82-86.
    [24]
    李瑞玲, 王世杰, 周德全,等 贵州岩溶地区岩性与土地石漠化的相关分析[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(2) : 314-320.
    [25]
    李阳兵, 白晓永, 周国富, 等. 中国典型石漠化地区土地利用与石漠化的关系[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6) : 624-632.
    [26]
    王培彬, 安裕伦. 2000-2010年贵州喀斯特地区石漠化时空特征分析[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 32(3): 10-16, 46.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1527) PDF downloads(195) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return