• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 31 Issue 2
Jun.  2012
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Peng, SHEN Li-cheng, WU Kun-yu, XIAO Qiong, ZHOU Xiao-ping, ANG Ping-heng. Comparing on the chemic features of the ground water in and around the Jinfoshan Natural Reserve in Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(2): 165-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.009
Citation: WANG Peng, SHEN Li-cheng, WU Kun-yu, XIAO Qiong, ZHOU Xiao-ping, ANG Ping-heng. Comparing on the chemic features of the ground water in and around the Jinfoshan Natural Reserve in Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(2): 165-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.009

Comparing on the chemic features of the ground water in and around the Jinfoshan Natural Reserve in Chongqing

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.009
  • Received Date: 2011-06-02
  • Publish Date: 2012-06-25
  • In light of the hydrochemical monitoring data of 22 groundwater discharge points, the differences of the hydrochemic features and the impact factors of the ground water in and around the Jinfoshan natural reserve, Chongqing is compared in the article. The results show that the pH values of the springs outside the reserve are lower than those inside, but the conductivity is higher. The median concentration of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cl-, NO3-, SO42- and HCO3- around the reserve are respectively 27.78 mg/L, 3.23 mg/L, 3.47 mg/L, 0.97 mg/L, 2.38 mg/L, 9.29 mg/L,15.06 mg/L and 42.03 mg/L higher than those inside the natural reserve. The Mg2+/Ca2+ (mole ratio) in dolomite aquifer is 0.76~1.33, obviously higher than that in limestone or clastic rock aquifer. But in the same limestone aquifer the Mg2+/Ca2+ around the reserve is higher than those inside. The results indicate that GSICa2+ is 0.097, GSIHCO3- is 0.125, GSINO3- is 0.008 in the reserve, and GSICa2+ is 0.415, GSIHCO3- is 0.334, GSINO3- is 0.648 around the reserve. The water quality of the reserve is mostly grade I andⅡ. But affected by agricultural fertilization, industrial pollution and sewage discharge, the springs water outside the reserve isⅢ andⅤ,and the NO3- concentration is higher in springs N0.1, NO.16 and NO.19. Over all, the water quality inside the reserve is significantly better than the outside. It can clearly be seen that the establishment of natural reserves has positive significance for karst water protection.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    刘再华,ChrisGrovesz,袁道先,等.水—岩—气相互作用引起的水化学动态变化研究——以桂林岩溶试验场为例[J].水文地质工程地质,2003,(4):13-18.
    [2]
    章程,袁道先,李强,等.典型表层岩溶动力系统的环境敏感性研究——以广西马山县弄拉峰丛洼地为例[J].水文地质工程地质,2005,32(1):78-80.
    [3]
    袁道先.岩溶作用对环境变化的敏感性及其记录[J].科学通报,1995,40(13):1210-1213.
    [4]
    Liu Z H, Li Q, Sun H L, et al. Seasonal, diurnal and stormscale hydrochemical variations of typical epikarst springs in sub-tropical karst areas of SW China: soil CO2 and dilution effects[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2007,337(1-2):207-223.
    [5]
    刘再华,袁道先,何师意.岩溶动力系统水化学动态变化规律分析[J].中国岩溶,1999,18(2):103-108.
    [6]
    章程,袁道先,曹建华,等.典型表层岩溶泉短尺度动态变化规律研究[J].地球学报,2004,25(4):467-471.
    [7]
    杨平恒,袁道先,袁文昊,等.以PCA揭示降雨期间岩溶地下水文地球化学的形成[J].科学通报,2010,55(9):788-789.
    [8]
    章程,曹建华.不同植被条件下表层岩溶泉动态变化特征对比研究——以广西马山县弄拉兰电堂泉和东旺泉为例[J].中国岩溶,2003,22(3):1-5.
    [9]
    Paul J M, Jonathan B M, Elizabeth J S. Geochemical and statistical evidence of recharge, mixing, and controls on spring discharge in an eogenetic karst aquifer[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 376(1-2):443-455.
    [10]
    Ford D C, Willimas P W. Karst geomorphology and hydrology[M]. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989: 601.
    [11]
    赵敏,曾成,叶文炳,等.不同土地利用分布格局下的岩溶泉水化学变化研究[J].地球与环境,2009,37(3):214-220.
    [12]
    汪智军,杨平恒,旷颖仑,等.基于δ15N同位素示踪技术的地下河硝态氮来源时空变化特征分析[J].环境科学,2009,30(12):3548-3554.
    [13]
    高彦芳,李红春,沈立成,等.重庆金佛山泉水地球化学特征及其空间分布意义[J].中国地质,2008,35(2):322-330.
    [14]
    伍坤宇,王鹏,沈立成.金佛山地区地下水硝态氮时空变异性[J].环境科学,2011,32(11):3547-3254.
    [15]
    劳文科,祁晓凡,刘慧敏,等.广西果化龙何地区表层带岩溶水系统及其水资源特征[J].中国岩溶,2008,27(2):122-128.
    [16]
    陈静生,文荣,夏星辉,等.长江中、上游水质变化趋势与环境酸化关系初探[J].环境科学学报,1988,18(3):265-270.
    [17]
    肖林萍,黄思静.方解石和白云石溶蚀实验热力学模型及地质意义[J].矿物岩石,2003,23(1):113-116.
    [18]
    何守阳,朱立军,董志芬,等.典型岩溶地下水系统地球化学敏感性研究[J].环境科学,2010,31(5):1176-1182.
    [19]
    袁道先.中国岩溶学[M].北京:地质出版社,1993:23-41.
    [20]
    贾鹏,蒋勇军,杨平恒.典型岩溶槽谷区地下河水质变化对农业活动的响应——以重庆市青木关地下河为例[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(1):205-209.
    [21]
    国家技术监督局.GB/T14848-9,地下水质量标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1994:1-4.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2457) PDF downloads(1590) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return