• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 30 Issue 4
Dec.  2011
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Luo Jian, Jiang Yong-jun, Hu Yi-jun, Li Lin-li, LIU Wen. Seasonal changes of soil dissolution rate and estimations on carbon sequestration in the subalpine epikarst spring zone:A case study in the Shuifang Spring in Jinfoshan, Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(4): 443-448. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.015
Citation: Luo Jian, Jiang Yong-jun, Hu Yi-jun, Li Lin-li, LIU Wen. Seasonal changes of soil dissolution rate and estimations on carbon sequestration in the subalpine epikarst spring zone:A case study in the Shuifang Spring in Jinfoshan, Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(4): 443-448. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.015

Seasonal changes of soil dissolution rate and estimations on carbon sequestration in the subalpine epikarst spring zone:A case study in the Shuifang Spring in Jinfoshan, Chongqing

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.015
  • Received Date: 2011-11-24
  • Publish Date: 2011-12-25
  • Annual soil dissolution rates of carbonate under forestland, grassland and shrub land at different depth in the Shuifang Spring in Jinfoshan, Chongqing are tested by means of the standard limestone tablets. The results show that the karst erosion rates are quite different under different land-use types, in different seasons and at different depth of soil. Through analysis on soil organic matter, soil CO2 concentration and soil pH during different seasons and at different depth in forestland, grassland and shrub land, it is discovered firstly that the soil organic matter and pH coupled with each other to affect the dissolution rate of carbonate, and the higher the organism and the less the pH value, the higher the dissolution rate. And secondly, the soil CO2 concentration is of certain relations with the dissolution rate of carbonate, and the soil CO2 concentration in summer and autumn is higher than in winter and spring, so, the soil erosion rate in summer and autumn is higher than in winter and spring. Finally, an estimation on the carbon sequestration in the spring area is done by means of standard limestone tablets, the result is about 25.595 t/a.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    曹建华,袁道先,潘根兴.岩溶生态系统中的土壤[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(1):37-44.
    [2]
    李阳兵,王世杰,王济,等.岩溶生态系统的土壤特性及其今后研究方向[J].中国岩溶,2006,25(4):285-289.
    [3]
    袁道先,刘再华,蒋忠诚,等.碳循环与岩溶地质环境[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:36-73.
    [4]
    李恩香,蒋忠诚,曹建华,等.广西弄拉岩溶植被不同演替阶段的主要土壤因子及溶蚀速率对比研究明生态学报[J].2004,24(6):1131-1139.
    [5]
    章程,袁道先.IGCP448:岩溶生态系统全球对比研究进展[J].中国岩溶,2005,24(1):83-88.
    [6]
    陶于祥,潘根兴,孙玉华,等.土壤有机碳地球化学及其与岩溶作用的关系:以桂林丫吉村岩溶试验场为例[J].火山地质与矿产,1998,19(1):40-46.
    [7]
    潘根兴,孙玉华,滕永忠,等.湿润亚热带峰丛洼地岩溶土壤系统中碳分布及其转移[J].生态学报,2000,11(1):69-72.
    [8]
    何师意,徐胜友,张美良.岩溶土壤中CO2浓度、水化学观测及其与岩溶作用关系[J].中国岩溶,1997,16(4):319-324.
    [9]
    章程,谢运球,吕勇,等.不同土地利用方式对岩溶作用的影响——以广西弄拉峰丛洼地岩溶系统为例[J].地理学报,2006,61(11):1181-1188.
    [10]
    潘根兴.地球表层系统土壤学[M].北京:地质出版社,2000:76-81.
    [11]
    朱鹤健,何宜庚.土壤地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1992:70-82.
    [12]
    杨平恒,章程,孙玉川,等.土壤环境因子对土下岩溶溶蚀速率的影响——以重庆金佛山国家自然保护区为例[J].中国地质,2007,34(5):922-924.
    [13]
    袁道先,刘再华,林玉石,等.中国岩溶动力系统[M].北京:地质出版社,2002:121.
    [14]
    胡毅军,蒋勇军,李林立.表层岩溶泉域短时间尺度作用碳汇效应初步研究——以重庆金佛山水房泉域为例[J].中国岩溶,2011,30(2):176-180.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2456) PDF downloads(1146) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return