• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XIE Weian, HUANG Zhiwei, HUANG Chunyang, LI Yukun, CHEN Qingshu, KANG Zhiqiang, LIANG Shuang, CHANG Yong. Study on Hydrochemical Evolution Mechanism of Groundwater Driven by Small-scale Mining in Southwest Karst Areas: A Case Study of a Lead-Zinc Sulfide Mine in Huanjiang County, Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA. doi: 10.11932/karst2026y034
Citation: XIE Weian, HUANG Zhiwei, HUANG Chunyang, LI Yukun, CHEN Qingshu, KANG Zhiqiang, LIANG Shuang, CHANG Yong. Study on Hydrochemical Evolution Mechanism of Groundwater Driven by Small-scale Mining in Southwest Karst Areas: A Case Study of a Lead-Zinc Sulfide Mine in Huanjiang County, Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA. doi: 10.11932/karst2026y034

Study on Hydrochemical Evolution Mechanism of Groundwater Driven by Small-scale Mining in Southwest Karst Areas: A Case Study of a Lead-Zinc Sulfide Mine in Huanjiang County, Guangxi

doi: 10.11932/karst2026y034
  • Received Date: 2026-04-22
  • Accepted Date: 2026-08-06
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-07-11
  • Available Online: 2026-08-25
  • Southwest China hosts extensive karst carbonate sequences, whose groundwater constitutes an indispensable resource sustaining regional ecological security and socioeconomic water supply. However, the highly heterogeneous hydrogeological framework and intimate hydraulic connectivity between surface water and groundwater render karst aquifers extremely vulnerable to anthropogenic mining disturbances. Small-scale lead-zinc sulfide mines are widespread across Guangxi's karst terrains, typically featuring low access thresholds, rudimentary mining techniques and inadequate environmental protection infrastructure. Sustained sulfide oxidation generates acid mine drainage (AMD), which triggers dramatic shifts in groundwater hydrochemistry. Yet systematic long-term comparative investigations into small karst polymetallic mines remain scarce, largely constrained by the lack of pre-mining historical monitoring datasets. This study takes a lead-zinc sulfide mine in Huanjiang County, northern Guangxi, as a representative case, integrating archived hydrochemical records from 1982 (pre-mining period) and field sampling data collected in 2025 (long-term mining stage). A total of 32 water samples encompassing mine drainage, surface streams, borehole groundwater and karst springs were collected across wet and dry seasons. Hydrochemical trilinear plotting, characteristic ion ratio discrimination and principal component analysis (PCA) were comprehensively deployed to quantitatively elucidate the spatiotemporal evolution patterns, coupled geochemical mechanisms and dual ion sources of karst groundwater under prolonged small-scale mining perturbation. The results reveal that long-term underground exploitation and massive groundwater dewatering have fundamentally transformed the original hydrochemical facies of groundwater. Natural undisturbed karst groundwater is predominantly HCO3-Ca type, whereas post-mining groundwater evolves into SO4-Ca·Mg type, with total dissolved solids (TDS) surging by nearly an order of magnitude and sulfate concentrations rising drastically. This directional hydrochemical transition is governed by the coupled geochemical feedback between sulfide oxidation and carbonate dissolution. Oxidation of pyrite and other sulfide minerals releases substantial H+ and ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-}$; the resultant hydrogen ions further accelerate incongruent dissolution of calcite and dolomite, concurrently elevating aqueous Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations within aquifers. Pronounced spatial differentiation of hydrochemical facies exists along gradients of mining influence: SO4-Ca·Mg water occurs within the footprint of groundwater depression cones, transitional HCO3·SO4-Ca water extends along major karst runoff channels, and undisturbed HCO3-Ca water persists only in peripheral zones isolated from mining impacts. Distinct seasonal disparities in hydrochemical signatures emerge between wet and dry periods. Dilution dominates water-rock interactions during the wet season, attenuating pollution signals induced by mining; by contrast, retarded groundwater circulation during the dry season prolongs water-rock contact time, facilitating continuous accumulation of sulfate and base cations and amplifying typical AMD geochemical fingerprints. This study innovatively establishes a vertical hydrogeochemical zoning conceptual model of “shallow acidification − deep buffering” driven by mining-induced hydrodynamic field reorganization. Large-scale groundwater dewatering lowers the water table by over 136 m, exposing sulfide orebodies to the aerated zone and generating shallow acidified groundwater characterized by low pH and high ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-}$. Acidic infiltrates migrate downward into deep saturated carbonate aquifers, where carbonate minerals neutralize hydrogen ions and yield high-alkalinity, high-hardness buffered groundwater with concurrently elevated ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-}$ and ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$. Horizontal hydrochemical gradients are interpreted as planar projections of vertical acidification-buffering processes modulated by depression cone geometry and karst conduit distribution. Notably, divergent pH evolutionary trajectories between surface water and groundwater before and after mining are identified and proposed as a novel diagnostic indicator for tracing mining disturbances. Prior to exploitation, surface water exhibited weak acidity while groundwater maintained neutral to weakly alkaline conditions buffered by carbonate dissolution. Post-mining, surface water pH shifts toward neutrality and weak alkalinity owing to direct discharge of high-alkalinity deep buffered groundwater via flood drainage tunnels, whereas shallow groundwater pH declines to weak acidity within the core mining zone. PCA further quantifies the dual regulatory mechanisms of natural geological background and superimposed anthropogenic mining inputs. In the wet season, the primary principal component encapsulates combined water-rock interactions of carbonate dissolution and sulfide oxidation, while the secondary component reflects miscellaneous anthropogenic inputs including mine explosive residues and domestic wastewater. In the dry season, mining activities emerge as the dominant factor shaping hydrochemical composition, with secondary factors corresponding to evaporite dissolution and evaporative concentration effects. The conservative ion Cl exhibits negligible spatial variability, corroborating that water-rock interactions rather than simple hydraulic mixing govern overall hydrochemical evolution. This research fills the gap in long-sequence comparative research on small karst lead-zinc mines, and delivers an original vertical zoning model and pH diagnostic indicator for AMD disturbance identification. The differentiated control strategies proposed herein, targeting shallow acidified source zones and deep high-mineralization runoff zones, provide robust theoretical support for groundwater environmental impact assessment, pollution source apportionment and targeted pollution abatement in analogous small sulfide mines across karst regions of Southwest China.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    吕玉香, 胡伟, 杨琰. 岩溶关键带水循环过程研究进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2019, 30(1): 123-138. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.01.013

    Lyu Yuxiang, Hu Wei, Yang Yan. Research progress of hydrological cycle in karst critical zone[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2019, 30(1): 123-138. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.01.013
    [2]
    周长松, 邹胜章, 冯启言, 朱丹尼, 李军, 王佳, 谢浩, 邓日欣. 岩溶关键带水文地球化学研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(3): 37-50. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.1.40

    Zhou Changsong, Zhou Shengzhang, Feng Qiyan, Zhu Danni, Li Jun, Wang Jia, Xie Hao, Deng Rixin. Progress in hydrogeochemical study of Karst Critical Zone: A critical review[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(3): 37-50. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.1.40
    [3]
    覃佳肖, 郑焕君, 李金明, 冯俊海, 侯萍萍, 张勤军, 黄春阳, 贝为昶. 西南岩溶地下河水化学特征及健康风险评价——以广西平江地下河为例[J]. 环境工程学报: 1−18.

    Qin Jiaxiao, Zheng Huanjun, Li Jinming, Feng Junhai, Hou Pingping, Zhang Qinjun, Huang Chunyang, Bei Weichang. Hydrochemical characteristics and health risk assessment of karst underground rivers in southwest China: A case study of the Pingjiang underground river in Guangxi[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering: 1−18.
    [4]
    张君, 陈洪松, 聂云鹏, 付智勇, 连晋姣, 王发, 罗紫东, 王克林. 西南喀斯特关键带结构及其水文过程研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(4): 985-996. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202404.020

    Zhang Jun, Chen Hongsong, Nie Yunpeng, Fu Zhiyong, Lian Jinjiao, Wang Fa, Luo Zidong, Wang Kelin. Research progress on structure and hydrological processes in the karst critical zone of southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(4): 985-996. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202404.020
    [5]
    李岱鲜. 小型绿色矿山建设研究: 以河南省某小型金矿为例[J]. 中国矿业, 2022, 31(9): 68-74.

    Li Daixian. Research on the construction of small green mines: taking a small gold mine in Henan Province as an example[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2022, 31(9): 68-74.
    [6]
    黎华, 黄凡, 周伟金, 廖智涵, 刘名朝, 韦安伟, 戴昱, 孙兴庭, 陈文伦, 尤俊杰, 蒋剑, 辛晓卫. 广西贵金属矿产资源特征、成矿规律与找矿方向[J]. 中国矿业, 2024, 33(8): 225−237.

    Li Hua, Huang Fan, Zhou Weijin, Liao Zhihan, Liu Mingchao. Resource characteristics, metallogenic regularity and prospecting direction of precious metal minerals in Guangxi[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2024, 33(8): 225−237.
    [7]
    邓军, 战明国, 周伟金, 林建辉, 周国发, 乐兴文, 蒙永坚, 何柳羿, 郑力. 广西矿产资源分布规律与主要成矿区带潜力评价[J]. 矿床地质, 2023, 42(5): 1048-73. doi: 10.16111/j.0258-7106.2023.05.013

    Deng Jun, Zhan Mingguo, Zhou Weijin, Lin Jianhui, Zhou Guofa, Le Xingwen, Meng Yongjian, He Liuyi, Zhang Li. Distribution regularity of mineral resources and potential evaluation of main metallogenic belts in Guangxi[J]. Mineral Deposits, 2023, 42(5): 1048-1073. doi: 10.16111/j.0258-7106.2023.05.013
    [8]
    张华, 彭淑惠, 王宇, 王波, 高瑜, 李芹. 云南高原岩溶环境地质问题及修复治理难度分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(6): 1235-47. doi: 10.11932/karst20240602

    Zhang Hua, Peng Shuhui, Wang Yu, Wang Bo, Gao Yu, Li Qin. Analysis of geological problems and difficulties in restoration and treatment of karst environment on the Yunnan plateau[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(6): 1235-47. doi: 10.11932/karst20240602
    [9]
    李海豫. 广西河池北山矿水文地质分析及涌水量预测 [D]; 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2024.

    Li Haiyu. Hydrogeologic Analysis and Water Influx Prediction of Beishan Mine, Hechi, Guangxi, China [D]. Guilin: Guilin University of Technology, 2024
    [10]
    Hao HY, Hao XX, Chen MZ, Li XB, Cao XX, Zha XF, Zhang RX, Wu P, Li XX, Li Q. Towards better understanding of intermittent pollution mechanism of seasonal karst spring by combining hydrogeology, hydrogeochemistry, and REEs indication [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2025, 662.
    [11]
    Zhu MT, Chen JJ, He CL, Ren S, Liu G. Multi-method characterization of groundwater nitrate and sulfate contamination by karst mines in southwest China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 946.
    [12]
    Wu LH, Bai XY, Li CJ, Li HW, Cao Y, Ran C, Zhang SR, Xiong L, Du CC, Luo GJ, Chen F, Wei H, Chen D, Yang DN, Xiong LS, Jia JL. Assessment of carbon sinks caused by the chemical weathering of carbonate rocks under the influence of exogenous acids: Methods, progress, and prospects[J]. Science China-Earth Sciences, 2025, 68(6): 1785-804. doi: 10.1007/s11430-024-1549-y
    [13]
    Skousen JG, Ziemkiewicz PF, McDonald LM. Acid mine drainage formation, control and treatment: Approaches and strategies[J]. Extractive Industries and Society, 2019, 6(1): 241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2018.09.008
    [14]
    Wang L, Li Y, Zhang YP, Liu W, Zhang HX. Tracing Sulfate Sources of Surface Water and Groundwater in Liuyang River Basin Based on Hydrochemistry and Environmental Isotopes [J]. Water, 2025, 17(14).
    [15]
    Wang B, Ma L, Qian JZ, Fang YH, Xie W, Ding D, Zhou H, Long Y, Shen HY, Yang Q. Identifying hydrogeochemistry evolution mechanism in high-sulfur non-ferrous metal mining areas via hydrochemical characteristics and isotopic evidence [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2025, 273.
    [16]
    Kanzaki Y, Brantley SL, Kump LR. A numerical examination of the effect of sulfide dissolution on silicate weathering [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2020, 539.
    [17]
    Wang B, Ma L, Qian JZ, Fang YH, Xie W, Ding D, Long Y, Zhou H. Geochemical and Isotopic Fingerprint-Based Identification of Sulfate Source Regional Characteristics and Evolution of Groundwater Impacted by Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) from a Nonferrous Metal Mining Area[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2025, 59(50): 27598-609. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c09899
    [18]
    Zhu MT, Fan JJ, Khurram D, Chen Q, Wang XM, Tang J, Liu G. Hydrodynamic controls on sulfate cycling in karst mining area groundwater: A multi-isotope and microbiology constraint [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 396.
    [19]
    Gao M, Tang J, Tu YJ, Zhu MT, Nie ZQ, Liu X, Liu G. The response and ecological implications between various sulfur forms and environmental factors in acid mine drainage [J]. Environmental Research, 2025, 275.
    [20]
    Qiao W, Wang Y, He PY, Yin XL, Zhang DQ, Bai GY, Sun W, Luo ZG, Wei X, Lan JM, Kersten M, Gao ZP, Guo HM. Groundwater arsenic and antimony mobility from an antimony mining area: Controls of sulfide oxidation, carbonate and silicate weathering, and secondary mineral precipitation [J]. Water Research, 2025, 273.
    [21]
    Li QG, Wu P, Zha XF, Li XX, Wu LN, Gu SY. Effects of mining activities on evolution of water chemistry in coal-bearing aquifers in karst region of Midwestern Guizhou, China: evidences from δ13C of dissolved inorganic carbon and δ34S of sulfate[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(18): 18038-48. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1969-3
    [22]
    朱超, 车新亮, 宋雪娟, 肖娥, 周小平, 杨西飞, 吴蒙. 长江中下游重点铁矿区地下水化学特征、成因机制及其开发利用潜力[J/OL]. 地质通报: 1−18[2025-11-07].

    Zhu Chao, Che Xinliang, Song Xuejuan, Xiao E, Zhou Xiaoping, Yang Xifei, Wu Meng. Chemical characteristics, genesis mechanism, and development potential of groundwater in key iron mining areas in the middle and lower Yangtze River [J/OL]. Geological Bulletin of China 1−18[2025-11-07].
    [23]
    Tian B, Lu C, Zhao DQ, Li JY, Zhu HF, Dong FY. Hydrochemical Evolution of Karst Groundwater and Mining-Induced Activation Effects in a Coal Mining Area: A Case Study from the Tengxian Coalfield, China[J]. Acs Omega, 2025, 10(37): 42548-60. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c04077
    [24]
    Yang QC, Wang LC, Ma HY, Yu K, Martín JD. Hydrochemical characterization and pollution sources identification of groundwater in Salawusu aquifer system of Ordos Basin, China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 216: 340-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.076
    [25]
    徐思, 于杨, 廖赔赔, 蔡祖旭, 刘家千琳, 陈彦美. 湖北荆襄磷矿莲花山矿段主井岩溶充水水源识别[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2025, 52(4): 109-20. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202502032

    Xu Si, Yu Yang, Liao Peipei, Cai Zuxu, Liu Jiaqianlin, Chen Yanmei. Identification of karst water inflow sources in the main shaft of Lianhuashan, Jingxiang phosphate mine, Hubei Province[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2025, 52(4): 109-20. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202502032
    [26]
    白浩, 籍丽勇, 李国庆, 刘斌, 李松瑶, 闫丽. 陕北某露天煤矿矿坑涌水化学特征及灌溉适宜性[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2025, 52(4): 98-108. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202412025

    Bai Hao, Ji Liyong, Li Guoqing, Liu Bin, Li Songyao. Chemical characteristics and irrigation suitability of mine pit water at an open-cast coal mine in northern Shaanxi[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2025, 52(4): 98-108. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202412025
    [27]
    Liu P, Hoth N, Drebenstedt C, Sun YJ, Xu ZM. Hydro-geochemical paths of multi-layer groundwater system in coal mining regions - Using multivariate statistics and geochemical modeling approaches[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 601: 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.146
    [28]
    孟宪洲, 王天娇, 张丰, 安洪岩, 沈祥瑞, 肖华, 王博伦, 陈浩. 陶枣煤田闭坑矿井硫酸盐污染预测及防控研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2025, 52(05): 65-77. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202504047

    Meng Xianzhou, Wang Tianjiao, Zhang Feng, An Hongyan, Xiao Hua, Wang Bolun, Chen Hao. diction and prevention of sulfate pollution from abandoned mines in theTaozao coalfield[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2025, 52(05): 65-77. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202504047
    [29]
    江峰, 吉勤克补子, 曹建文, 王若帆, 赵良杰. 黔中岩溶区地下水水化学来源特征及其影响因素[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(4): 889-99. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y028

    JIang Feng, Jiqin Kebuzi, Cao Jianwen, Wang Ruofan, Zhao Liangjie. Source characteristics and influencing factors of groundwater hydrochemistryin the karst areas of central Guizhou[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(4): 889-99. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y028
    [30]
    周施阳, 董好刚, 李立湘, 袁东方, 卢丽, 姚飞延, 向翻, 陈林, 王震威, 吴鑫. 浙南仙居盆地水化学特征及成因分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(3): 527-37. doi: 10.11932/karst20240303

    Zhou Shiyang, Dong Haogang, Li Lixiang, Yuan Dongfang, Lu Li, Yao Feiyan, Xiang Fan, Chen Lin, Wang Zhenwei, Wu Xin. Hydrochemical characteristics and genetic analysis of the Xianjubasin in southern Zhejiang Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(3): 527-37. doi: 10.11932/karst20240303
    [31]
    于杨, 金晓文, 徐思, 张玉, 陈彦美. 延深开采影响下典型岩溶充水矿区水化学特征及涌水来源研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(5): 1020-33. doi: 10.11932/karst20240503

    Yu Yang, Jin Xiaowen, Xu Si, Zhang Yu, Chen Yanmei. Study on hydrochemical characteristics and water inflow sources of typical karstwater-filled mining areas under the influence of extended mining[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(5): 1020-33. doi: 10.11932/karst20240503
    [32]
    蓝高勇, 汪智军, 殷建军, 唐伟, 吴夏, 杨会. 岩溶泉补给地表溪流二氧化碳脱气作用研究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2021, 40(5): 720-30. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202107310088

    Lan Gaoyong, Wang Zhijun, Yin Jianjun, Tang Wei, Wu Xia, Yang Hui. Study on Carbon Dioxide Outgassing in a Karst Spring-fed Surface Stream[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2021, 40(5): 720-30. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202107310088
    [33]
    冼金梅, 宋贤威, 张乐, 林沛新, 韦岳春, 杨取宝, 甘文静, 杨露. 喀斯特地下河涌出后CO2逸散通量的时空格局——基于广西巴马盘阳河[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(4): 753-65. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y009

    Xian Jinmei, Song Xianwei, Zhang Le, Lin Peixin, Wei Yuechun, Yang Qubao, Gan Wenjing, Yang Lu. Spatiotemporal patterns of CO2 efflux fluxes from the outflow of karst undergroundriver: A case study of the Panyang river in Bama, Guangxi[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(4): 753-65. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y009
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (12) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return