• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WU Yi, CHEN Xi, ZHANG Zhicai, LIU Weihan, GAO Fengjun, LIU Xiuqiang, PENG Tao. Numerical Simulation Study of Preferential Flow at the Rock-Soil Interface in the Epikarst Zone[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA. doi: 10.11932/karst2026y021
Citation: WU Yi, CHEN Xi, ZHANG Zhicai, LIU Weihan, GAO Fengjun, LIU Xiuqiang, PENG Tao. Numerical Simulation Study of Preferential Flow at the Rock-Soil Interface in the Epikarst Zone[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA. doi: 10.11932/karst2026y021

Numerical Simulation Study of Preferential Flow at the Rock-Soil Interface in the Epikarst Zone

doi: 10.11932/karst2026y021
  • Received Date: 2025-09-29
  • Accepted Date: 2026-05-22
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-05-07
  • Available Online: 2026-06-30
  • In the karst region of southwest China, the epikarst zone is characterized by soil-filled solution grooves and an intricate network of fractures. Rainfall infiltration is jointly controlled by the groove soil, preferential flow pathways at the rock-soil interface, and the surrounding fractures. However, the dynamic interactions among the groove soil, rock-soil interface, and fracture network, especially their response mechanisms under different rainfall intensities, remain poorly quantified. Based on in-situ dye tracer tests on a solution groove profile, combined with long-term monitoring of soil moisture and fracture water content, this study developed a numerical model of water flow to quantitatively reveal the contributions of preferential flow at the rock-soil interface and adjacent inclined fractures to water movement and the outlet flux at the lower boundary. The study was conducted on a typical epikarst profile in Puding, Guizhou Province. The profile is 10 m long and 2.24-2.5 m high, containing three solution grooves with widths of 0.22-0.82 m, four sub-horizontal fractures (dip angle~5.4°) and three sub-vertical fractures (dip angle~83.2°). A dye tracer test using Brilliant Blue FCF was carried out on the middle solution groove at a rainfall intensity of 60 mm·h−1 for one hour, followed by excavation to reveal the spatial distribution of preferential flow. Five soil moisture sensors were installed at depths of 5, 20, 50, 100 and 180 cm in the groove soil, and five fracture moisture sensors (F 1-F 5) were placed in adjacent fractures. Meteorological data, including rainfall, were recorded every 30 minutes from September 2022 to September 2024. Based on the soil and fracture moisture responses, four representative rainfall events were selected for detailed analysis: light rain (4.3 mm), moderate rain (12.3 mm), heavy rain (34.2 mm), and storm (62.1 mm).A numerical model of water flow was constructed using COMSOL Multiphysics. Unsaturated flow in the groove soil and fractures was described by the Richards equation, and the soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity were described by the van Genuchten model. Solute transport in the dye tracer experiment was simulated using the convection-diffusion equation with Langmuir isothermal adsorption. The effective aperture of the open rock-soil interface was inversely calibrated against the dye distribution and soil moisture dynamics, yielding an aperture of 4.22 mm in the upper zone (A) and 1.66 mm in the lower zone (B). Hydraulic parameters for the soil and fractures were optimized using the BOBYQA iterative algorithm. Model validation against two years of soil and fracture moisture data gave root-mean-square errors (RMSE) mostly below 0.05 m3·m−3 and mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) below 5%, indicating that the calibrated parameters represent the average hydraulic conditions over the entire monitoring period.Three simulation scenarios were compared under a storm event: (A) actual conditions with an open rock-soil interface (preferential flow) and surrounding fractures; (B) closed rock-soil interface (no preferential flow); and (C) no surrounding fractures. The results show that preferential flow at the rock-soil interface provides an efficient pathway for vertical water movement. Under actual conditions (scenario A), the maximum flow velocity reaches 0.027 m·s−1. When preferential flow is ignored (scenario B), the flow exhibits typical piston-flow characteristics with a uniform flow field and a maximum velocity of only 7.32$ \times $10−5 m·s−1. When surrounding fractures are absent (scenario C), the flow velocity in the groove is about 1.3 times that of scenario A, indicating that inclined fractures retard vertical flow under heavy rainfall. For the four representative rainfall events, the outlet water flux at the lower boundary of the solution groove was analyzed. In the preferential flow zone of the rock-soil interface, the flux increased significantly with rainfall intensity. In the non-preferential flow zone (soil matrix), the flux was very small or even negative during light and moderate rain events, indicating that infiltrated water did not reach the lower boundary; only after heavy rain and storm events did a slow increase occur, reflecting slow matrix flow. The cumulative outflow volumes over 24 hours were 0.19 L (light rain), 18.25 L (moderate rain), 29.62 L (heavy rain), and 132.33 L (storm rain) in the preferential flow zone, whereas the non-preferential zone contributed only 0.12-0.23 L for all events. This demonstrates that the preferential flow zone is one to two orders of magnitude more effective in recharging the deep epikarst than the non-preferential zone. Furthermore, the presence of inclined fractures significantly influences the outflow process. In the preferential flow zone, after heavy rain and storm events, ignoring the surrounding fractures led to a faster rise and a larger flux, indicating that the inclined fractures weaken the preferential outflow. In the non-preferential flow zone, after heavy rain and storm events, the increase in outlet flux when neglecting the surrounding fractures was generally greater than when fractures were present, suggesting that fractures also modulate matrix flow, but with a more persistent effect. In conclusion, this study confirms that preferential flow at the rock-soil interface is the dominant pathway for rapid groundwater recharge from precipitation. The combination of dye tracer tests, long-term in-situ monitoring, and physically-based numerical modeling provides a reliable approach for quantifying the roles of rock-soil interface aperture and fractures under different rainfall intensities. The findings offer a scientific basis for the coordinated management of water resources and ecological protection in karst regions.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    凡非得, 王克林, 熊鹰, 宣勇, 张伟, 岳跃民. 西南喀斯特区域水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异特征 [J]. 生态学报, 31(21): 6353-6362.

    Fan F D, Wang K L, Xiong Y, Xuan Y, Zhang W, Yue Y M. Assessment and spatial distribution of water and soil loss in karst regions, southwest China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(21): 6353-6362.
    [2]
    邹小阳, 周旺, 孙文俊, 肖克飚, 胡封兵. 桂西北岩溶区土壤理化性质及相关性分析 [J]. 东北农业科学, 2021, 46(3): 41-7+129.

    Zou Xiaoyang, Zhou Wang, Sun Wenjun, Xiao Kebiao, Hu Fengbing. Soil physical and chemical properties and correlation analysis in karst area of Northwest Guangxi [J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 46(3): 41-47+129.
    [3]
    覃小群, 蒋忠诚. 表层岩溶带及其水循环的研究进展与发展方向[J]. 中国岩溶, 2005, 24(3): 250-254.

    Qin Xiaoqun, Jiang Zhongcheng. A review on recent advances and perspective in epikarst water study[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2005, 24(3): 250-254.
    [4]
    杨继翔, 张志才, 陈喜, 刘秀强, 谢永玉, 彭韬, 陈波. 喀斯特关键带裂隙土壤水分时空变化特征及其水流路径[J]. 中国岩溶, 2025, 44(5): 1063-1073. doi: 10.11932/karst20250510

    Yang Jixiang, Zhang Zhicai, Chen Xi, Liu Xiuqiang, Xie Yongyu, Peng Tao, Chen Bo. Spatiotemporal variation characteristics and water flow path of soil moisture of the critical zones fissures in karst area[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2025, 44(5): 1063-1073. doi: 10.11932/karst20250510
    [5]
    Zhou J, Tang Y Q, Yang P, Zhang X H, Zhou N Q, Wang J X. Inference of creep mechanism in underground soil loss of karst conduits I. Conceptual model[J]. Natural Hazards, 2012, 62(3): 1191-1215. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0143-3
    [6]
    Zhang Z C, Chen X, Ghadouani A, Shi P, Xue X W. Modeling hydrological processes influenced by soil, rock and vegetation in a small karst basin of southwest China[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2010, 7: 561-592.
    [7]
    冷德明, 史文兵, 李华, 梁风. 表层喀斯特带溶蚀岩体单轴压缩力学特性模拟研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2023, 42(6): 1258-1269.

    Leng Deming, Shi Wenbing, Li Hua, Liang Feng. Numerical simulation on uniaxial compressive mechanical properties of karstified rock mass in epikarst zone[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2023, 42(6): 1258-1269.
    [8]
    Liu X Q, Liu W H, Chen X, Wang L C, Zhang Z C, Peng T. Estimating fracture characteristics and hydraulic conductivity from slug tests in epikarst of southwest China[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2024, 53: 101777. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101777
    [9]
    Sohrt J, Ries F, Sauter M, Lange J. Significance of preferential flow at the rock soil interface in a semi-arid karst environment[J]. Catena, 2014, 123: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.07.003
    [10]
    Zhao Z M, Wang Q H. Effect of Rock Film Mulching on Preferential Flow at Rock−Soil Interfaces in Rocky Karst Areas [J/OL]. Water, 2023, 15(9): 1775
    [11]
    Liu J X, Deng Z M, Chen L D, Huang Y, Peng X Y. Quantifying the influence of soil-rock interfaces on water infiltration rate in karst landscapes[J]. Geoderma, 2025, 460: 117432. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117432
    [12]
    王甲荣, 陈喜, 张志才, 张润润, 朱彪, 龚轶芳, 刘皓, 袁瞬飞. 喀斯特溶槽岩-土界面优势流及其对土壤水分动态的影响[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(1): 109-116.

    Wang Jiarong, Chen Xi, Zhang Zhicai, Zhang Runrun, Zhu Biao, Gong Yifang, Liu Hao, Yuan Shunfei. Preference flow at rock-soil interface and its influence on soil water dynamics in the karst troughs[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(1): 109-116.
    [13]
    许胜兵, 彭旭东, 戴全厚, 刘婷婷, 岑龙沛. 喀斯特高原石漠化区露石岩-土界面与非岩-土界面土壤入渗特性差异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(5): 136-143.

    Xu Shengbing, Peng Xudong, Dai Quanhou, Liu Tingting, Cen Longpei. Differences of soil infiltration characteristics between exposed rock-soil interface and non-rock-soil interface in rocky desertification area of karst plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(5): 136-143.
    [14]
    豆红强, 谢森华, 简文彬, 王浩, 郭朝旭. 球状风化花岗岩类土质边坡土-岩界面优势流潜蚀特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 950-960. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0644

    Dou Hongqiang, Xie Senhua, Jian Wenbin, Wang Hao, Guo Chaoxu. Characteristics of preferential flow suffosion of soil-rock interface in spherical weathered granite slopes[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 950-960. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0644
    [15]
    徐子凡, 陈喜, 刘维翰, 刘皓, 张志才. 表层岩溶带土岩结构对降雨−径流响应特征的影响[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(4): 863-875. doi: 10.11932/karst20240406

    Xu Zifan, Chen Xi, Liu Weihan, Liu Hao, Zhang Zhicai. Effect of soil-rock structures on the characteristics of rainfall-runoff responses in epikarst zones[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(4): 863-875. doi: 10.11932/karst20240406
    [16]
    Zhang J, Chen H S, Fu Z Y, Luo Z D, Wang F, Wang K L. Effect of soil thickness on rainfall infiltration and runoff generation from karst hillslopes during rainstorms[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 73(4): e13288. doi: 10.1111/ejss.13288
    [17]
    曾庥, 彭旭东, 戴全厚, 刘婷婷, 许胜兵, 岑龙沛. 石漠化区露石岩-土界面流形成过程模拟试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(17): 110-117. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.17.012

    Zeng Xiu, Peng Xudong, Dai Quanhou, Liu Tingting, Xu Shengbing, Cen Longpei. Simulation test on the formation of rock-soil interface flow from outcrops in the rocky desertification areas[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(17): 110-117. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.17.012
    [18]
    沈蔚, 王建力, 王家录, 蒋先淑, 毛庆亚, 陈挚秋, 刘肖. 贵州纳朵洞洞穴水水文地球化学变化特征及其环境意义[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(12): 4455-4463. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.12.017

    Shen Wei, Wang Jianli, Wang Jialu, Jiang Xianshu, Mao Qingya, Chen Zhiqiu, Liu Xiao. Variation characteristics of cave water hydrogeochemistry in Naduo Cave of Guizhou and its implications for environment research[J]. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(12): 4455-4463. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.12.017
    [19]
    Liu X Q, Chen X, Zhang Z C, Liu W H, Gao F J, Cheng Q B, Chen J, Peng T. The role of rock fractures as a water source for trees growing in karst[J]. Water Resources Research, 2025, 61(11): e2024WR039588. doi: 10.1029/2024WR039588
    [20]
    Indraratna B, Premadasa W, Brown E, Gens A, Heitor A. Shear strength of rock joints influenced by compacted infill[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 70: 296-307. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.019
    [21]
    Khosravi A, Mousavi S, Serej Ali D. Hydraulic behavior of infilled fractured rocks under unsaturated conditions [C]// Proceedings of the Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress 2016. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2016: 1708-1718.
    [22]
    Richards L A. Capillary Conduction of Liquids through Porous Mediums[J]. Physics, 1931, 1(5): 318-333. doi: 10.1063/1.1745010
    [23]
    Celia M A, Bouloutas E T, Zarba R L. A general mass-conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation[J]. Water Resources Research, 1990, 26(7): 1483-1496. doi: 10.1029/WR026i007p01483
    [24]
    Liu W H, Chen X, Wang L C, Zhang Z C, Liu X Q, Peng T, Chen J, Dong J Z. The role of karstic soil-rock structures on subsurface stormflow dynamics in southwest China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2025, 657: 133126. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133126
    [25]
    Van Genuchten M T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(5): 892-898.
    [26]
    Camillo P, Gurney R. A resistance parameter for bare-soil evaporation models[J]. Soil Science, 1986, 141(2): 95-105. doi: 10.1097/00010694-198602000-00001
    [27]
    Wei Y Q, Cao X D. A COMSOL-PHREEQC Coupled Python Framework for Reactive Transport Modeling in Soil and Groundwater[J]. Groundwater, 2022, 60(2): 284-294. doi: 10.1111/gwat.13144
    [28]
    Li J, Werth C J. Modeling sorption isotherms of volatile organic chemical mixtures in model and natural solids[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2002, 21(7): 1377-1383. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620210707
    [29]
    Clancy A, Chen D, Bruns J, Nadella J, Stealey S, Zhang Y, Timperman A, Zustiak S P. Hydrogel-based microfluidic device with multiplexed 3D in vitro cell culture[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 17781. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22439-y
    [30]
    Ketelsen H, Meyer-Windel S. Adsorption of brilliant blue FCF by soils[J]. Geoderma, 1999, 90(1): 131-145.
    [31]
    Zhang X X, Qi X B, Zhou X G, Pang H B. An in situ method to measure the longitudinal and transverse dispersion coefficients of solute transport in soil[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 328(3): 614-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.01.004
    [32]
    Powell M J D. The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives [R]. Cambridge, UK: Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, 2009.
    [33]
    Yang W, Peng X D, Dai Q H, Li C L, Xu S B, Liu T T. Storage infiltration of rock-soil interface soil on rock surface flow in the rocky desertification area[J]. Geoderma, 2023, 435: 116512. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116512
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (6) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return