• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LU Ruting, HUANG Fen, HU Xiaonong, ZHANG Tao, Hou Yuxia, HUANG Weiyi. Hydrogeochemistry and Carbon Cycling in the Lijiang River Basin during the Dry Season: Coupling Control of Geological Background and Biological Processes[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA. doi: 10.11932/karst2026y012
Citation: LU Ruting, HUANG Fen, HU Xiaonong, ZHANG Tao, Hou Yuxia, HUANG Weiyi. Hydrogeochemistry and Carbon Cycling in the Lijiang River Basin during the Dry Season: Coupling Control of Geological Background and Biological Processes[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA. doi: 10.11932/karst2026y012

Hydrogeochemistry and Carbon Cycling in the Lijiang River Basin during the Dry Season: Coupling Control of Geological Background and Biological Processes

doi: 10.11932/karst2026y012
  • Available Online: 2026-06-18
  • To systematically elucidate the intricate carbon cycling processes and identify their primary controlling factors within karst river systems during the hydrologically stable dry season, this empirical study selected the Lijiang River Basin as a representative research domain. We established a monitoring network comprising four distinct cross-sections characterized by a progressively increasing spatial proportion of karst geomorphology: a non-karst area (HJn), a karst contact area (CTmin), a half karst area (JCmid), and a typical karst area (XLmax). Routine monthly hydrochemical sampling was initially conducted during the dry season. Furthermore, to explicitly prevent rainfall-induced surface runoff from masking the metabolic activity signals of aquatic organisms, a specific environmental window was deliberately targeted. A continuous, completely rainless period from November 12 to 24, 2024, was selected, ensuring the absolute absence of precipitation for both the two weeks preceding the monitoring and during the sampling phase itself. Utilizing this optimal temporal window, high-frequency continuous diel monitoring was executed across the four cross-sections at strictly two-hour intervals over a consecutive 48-hour span. We systematically analyzed a comprehensive suite of variables, including general hydrochemical parameters (specifically water temperature, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, and total dissolved solids), major cations and anions, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and its stable carbon isotopic composition (δ13CDIC). Additionally, the calcite saturation index (SIc), the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) and Net Ecosystem Productivity (NEP) were calculated to thoroughly explore the coupled controlling effects of the underlying geological background and aquatic biological processes.The comprehensive results demonstrate three major findings: (1) Based on the projection of hydrochemical data onto a Piper trilinear diagram, the dominant dissolved cation across all evaluated river cross-sections is exclusively calcium (Ca2+), while the dominant dissolved anion is universally bicarbonate (${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$). Other constituent ions account for comparatively marginal proportions; consequently, the fundamental hydrochemical facies characterizing all four monitoring sites are uniformly classified as a typical HCO3-Ca water type. Concurrently, the ionic composition of the water bodies is overwhelmingly governed by natural rock weathering mechanisms. Specifically, the overarching hydrochemistry of the studied watershed is jointly controlled by the concurrent weathering and dissolution processes of both silicate and carbonate rocks. Moreover, the aqueous concentrations of Ca2+, ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$, magnesium ions (Mg2+), and the aggregate metric of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) systematically increased in direct conjunction with the expanding areal proportion of karst landscapes. The specific solute concentrations documented in the non-karst cross-section were significantly and consistently lower than those recorded in the karst cross-sections, definitively constituting a well-defined spatial pattern of aquatic hydrochemistry. (2) The vast majority of evaluated parameters exhibited exceptionally strong diel variation patterns. In the karst areas, intense photosynthetic activities executed by aquatic biological communities during the daytime generated profound geochemical shifts, resulting in significant increases in dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and SIc. Simultaneously, this process caused a precipitous decline in the aqueous concentrations of ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$, Ca2+ and PCO2, while inducing a pronounced positive shift in the δ13CDIC signature. Conversely, during the nighttime hours, biological respiration became the dominant metabolic process, dictating completely inverse geochemical trajectories: DO, pH, and SIc decreased, whereas the concentrations of ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$, Ca2+ and PCO2 rebounded substantially, accompanied by a distinct negative shift in the δ13CDIC values. In stark contrast, the amplitude of diel variations in the non-karst area (HJn) was notably smaller than that observed in the karst regions. Although parameters such as DO, pH, and δ13CDIC in the non-karst area also exhibited corresponding diurnal fluctuations in response to aquatic biological metabolism, the underlying drivers were fundamentally inconsistent with the dry-season karst areas, where variations were primarily governed by robust aquatic photosynthesis. Instead, the dynamics in the non-karst area were simultaneously constrained by physical degassing processes typical of the dry season, the strict limitation imposed on photosynthesis due to an insufficient supply of inorganic carbon sources, and the characteristically low geochemical buffering capacity of mountainous headwater streams. Under these compounding conditions, the observed diel variations were far less pronounced. (3) The quantitative results derived from the NEP calculations revealed that the cross-sections located within the karst areas consistently functioned as autotrophic ecosystems throughout the monitoring period, definitively indicated by positive NEP values (NEP > 0). This robust autotrophy signifies that biological carbon fixation operates as an exceptionally active carbon sink process within karst regions. In direct contrast, the non-karst area persistently exhibited a heterotrophic state characterized by negative NEP values (NEP < 0), effectively acting as a net carbon source. This spatial dichotomy effectively substantiates the "fertilization effect" exerted by naturally high concentrations of ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$on the photosynthetic capabilities of aquatic organisms in karst areas. Essentially, the karst geological background directly enhances the operational efficiency of the biological carbon pump by consistently providing an abundant supply of inorganic carbon sources, although this process is also dynamically modulated by the local spatial richness of aquatic biological communities. In summary, this empirical investigation profoundly elucidates the coupled mechanistic framework governing the carbon cycle in karst rivers: the underlying geological background fundamentally dictates the capacity for carbon source supply, whereas dynamic biological metabolic processes directly drive the ultimate transformation of that carbon.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Liu Zaihua, Macpherson G. L. , Groves Chris, Martin Jonathan B. , Yuan Daoxian, Zeng Sibo. Large and active CO2 uptake by coupled carbonate weathering[J]. Earth-science Reviews, 2018, 182: 42-49.
    [2]
    刘再华, Dreybrodt Wolfgang. 陆地水-碳酸盐-CO2-水生光合生物相互作用产生碳汇的重要性(英文)[J]. Science Bulletin, 2015, 60(2): 182-191+146. doi: 10.1007/s11434-014-0682-y

    Liu Zaihua, Wolfgang Dreybrodt. Significance of the carbon sink produced by H2O−carbonate−CO2−aquatic phototroph interaction on land[J]. Chinese Science Bullletin, 2015, 60(2): 182-191+146 doi: 10.1007/s11434-014-0682-y
    [3]
    Liu Zaihua, Dreybrodt Wolfgang, Wang Haijing. A new direction in effective accounting for the atmospheric CO2 budget: Considering the combined action of carbonate dissolution, the global water cycle and photosynthetic uptake of DIC by aquatic organisms[J]. Earth-science Reviews, 2010, 99: 162-172.
    [4]
    陈波, 杨睿, 刘再华, 晏浩, 赵敏. 水生光合生物对茂兰拉桥泉及其下游水化学和δ13CDIC昼夜变化的影响[J]. 地球化学, 2014, 43(4): 375-385.

    Chen Bo, Yang Rui, Liu Zaihua, Yan Hao, Zhao Min. Effects of aquatic phototrophs on diurnal hydrochemical and δ13CDIC variations in an epikarst spring and two spring-fed ponds of Laqiao, Maolan, SW China[J]. Geochimica, 2014, 43(4): 375-385.
    [5]
    V. de Montety, J. B. Martin, M. J. Cohen, C. Foster, M. J. Kurz. Influence of diel biogeochemical cycles on carbonate equilibrium in a karst river[J]. Chemical Geology, 2011, 283: 31-43.
    [6]
    David A. Nimick, Christopher H. Gammons, Stephen R. Parker. Diel biogeochemical processes and their effect on the aqueous chemistry of streams: A review[J]. Chemical Geology, 2011, 283: 3-17.
    [7]
    Jiang Yongjun. The contribution of human activities to dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes in a karst underground river system: Evidence from major elements and δ13CDIC in Nandong, Southwest China[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2013, 152: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.05.010
    [8]
    莫雪, 蒲俊兵, 袁道先, 章程, 何师意, 于奭, 刘文, 张陶, 周建超, 杨会, 唐伟. 亚热带典型岩溶区地表溪流溶解无机碳昼夜变化特征及其影响因素[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(4): 873-880. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2014.04.20

    Mo Xue, Pu Junbing, Yuan Daoxian, Zhang Cheng, He Shiyi, Yu Shi, Liu Wen, Zhang Tao, Zhou Jianchao, Yang Hui, Tang Wei. Diel Variation and Influence Factors of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon in a Surface Creek Fed by a Karst Subterranean Stream in Subtropical Area, Southwest China[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2014, 34(4): 873-880. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2014.04.20
    [9]
    汪进良, 章程, 裴建国, 苗迎. 岩溶地下水补给的地表河流溶解无机碳昼夜变化与钙沉降[J]. 地球与环境, 2015, 43(4): 395-402. doi: 10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2015.04.003

    Wang Jingliang, Zhang Cheng, Pei Jianguo, Miao Ying. Diel changes of dissolved inorganic carbon and calcite precipitation in a typical karst spring-fed stream[J]. Earth and Environment, 2015, 43(4): 395-402. doi: 10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2015.04.003
    [10]
    章程, 肖琼. 桂林漓江水体溶解无机碳迁移与水生光合碳固定研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(4): 555-564.

    Zhang Cheng, Xiao Qiong. Study on dissolved inorganic carbon migration and aquatic photosynthesis sequestration in Lijiang River, Guilin[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(4): 555-564
    [11]
    Robert J. Wilcock, Steven C. Chapra. Diel changes of inorganic chemistry in a macrophyte-dominated, softwater stream[J]. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2005, 56: 1165-1174. doi: 10.1071/mf05049
    [12]
    王奇岗, 肖琼, 赵海娟, 郭永丽, 汪智军. 水生植物对岩溶区河水地球化学昼夜变化的影响: 以漓江为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2018, 37(4): 501-514. doi: 10.11932/karst20180404

    Wang Qigang, Xiao Qiong, Zhao Haijuan, Guo Yongli, Wang Zhijun. Influence of aquatic photosynthesis on diel variations of hydrochemistry in karst river: A case study of the Lijiang River[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2018, 37(4): 501-514. doi: 10.11932/karst20180404
    [13]
    Pu Junbing, Li Jianhong, Khadka Mitra B. , Martin Jonathan B. , Zhang Tao, Yu Shi, Yuang Daoxian. In-stream metabolism and atmospheric carbon sequestration in a groundwater-fed karst stream[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 579: 1343-1355.
    [14]
    李丽, 蒲俊兵, 李建鸿, 张陶. 岩溶地下河补给的地表溪流溶解无机碳及其稳定同位素组成的时空变化[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(2): 527-534. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201607171

    Li Li, Pu Junbing, Li Jianhong, Zhang Tao. Temporal and spatial variations of dissolved inorganic carbon and its stable isotopic composition in the surface stream of karst groundwater recharge[J]. Environmental Science, 2017, 38(2): 527-534. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201607171
    [15]
    曾振宇, 晏浩, 孙海龙, 刘再华. 云南白水台钙华池出入口水化学和δ13CDIC昼夜变化的影响因素及水生光合作用影响比例的计算[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(6): 605-613. doi: 10.11932/karst20160601

    Zeng Zhenyu, Yan Hao, Sun Hailong, Liu Zaihua. Theoretical calculation of aquatic photosynthesis contribution ratio and the controlling factors of diurnal vatiations of hydrochemistry and δ13CDIC in the outlets and inlets of travertine pools at Baishuitai, Yunnan, China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2016, 35(6): 605-613. doi: 10.11932/karst20160601
    [16]
    唐越尔, 曾思博, 杨琰, 刘旭阳, 胡晨鹏, 黄信何. 西南典型岩溶地下河出口拦水区−蓄水溶潭池−排水主渠道连续体碳排放昼夜变化对比研究[J]. 地球与环境, 2025, 53(6): 800-814. doi: 10.3724/EE.1672-9250.2025.53.017

    Tang Yueer, Zeng Sibo, Yang Yan, Liu Xuyang, Hu Chenpeng, Huang Xinhe. A comparative study on the diurnal variation of carbon emissions in the water retention zone−reservoir−drainage channel continuum of a typical karst underground river outlet in Southwest China[J]. Earth and Environment, 2025, 53(6): 800-814. doi: 10.3724/EE.1672-9250.2025.53.017
    [17]
    Taylor Maavara, Qiuwen Chen, Kimberly Van Meter, Lee E. Brown, Jianyun Zhang, Jinren Ni, Christiane Zarfl. River dam impacts on biogeochemical cycling[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2020, 1: 103-116.
    [18]
    Zhang Wenfeng, Wang Wanfa, Zhong Jun, Chen Sainan, Yi Yuanbi, Xu Xiaohang, Chen Shuai, Li SiLiang. Carbon sequestration and decreased CO2 emission caused by biological carbon pump effect: Insights from diel hydrochemical variations in subtropical karst reservoirs[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 632: 130909. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130909
    [19]
    Phyoe Wai Wai, Qin Yong, Yu Ningxiao, Wang Fushun. Sediment distribution and organic carbon burial in a subtropical hydroelectric reservoir[J]. Aquatic Sciences, 2020, 82: 65. doi: 10.1007/s00027-020-00738-8
    [20]
    Chen Bo, Yang Rui, Liu Zaihua, Sun Hailong, Yan Hao, Zeng Qingrui, Zeng Sibo, Zeng Cheng, Zhao Min. Coupled control of land uses and aquatic biological processes on the diurnal hydrochemical variations in the five ponds at the Shawan Karst Test Site, China: Implications for the carbonate weathering-related carbon sink[J]. Chemical Geology, 2017, 456: 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.03.006
    [21]
    李栋, 赵敏, 刘再华, 陈波. 普定岩溶水-碳循环模拟试验场水体双碳同位素特征(δ13C-Δ14C)与碳足迹[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(3): 155-166. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.1.35

    Li Dong, Zhao Min, Liu Zaihua, Chen Bo. Dual carbon isotope(δ13C-Δ14C) characteristics and carbon footprint in the spring-pond systems at the Puding Karst Water-Carbon Cycle Test Site[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(3): 155-166. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.1.35
    [22]
    王小朵, 周忠发, 董慧, 丁圣君, 龚晓欢, 熊勇, 苏丹, 张叶. 中国西南典型白云岩地区不同土地利用的土壤CO2及δ13Cco2的变化特征[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(5): 1034-1046. doi: 10.11932/karst20240504

    Wang Xiaoduo, Zhou Zhongfa, Dong Hui, Ding Shengjun, Gong Xiaohuan, Xiong Yong, Su Dan, Zhang Ye. Temporal and spatial variations of soil CO2 and δ13CCO2 from different land uses in typical dolomite areas of Southwest China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(5): 1034-1046. doi: 10.11932/karst20240504
    [23]
    王培, 胡清菁, 曹建华, 李亮. 念珠藻对岩溶水中Ca2+、HCO3利用效率实验研究[J]. 广西植物, 2014, 34(6): 799-805.

    Wang Pei, Hu Qingjing, Cao Jianhua, Li Liang. Experimental study on utilization efficiency of Ca2+ and HCO3 in karst water by Nostoc[J]. Guihaia, 2014, 34(6): 799-805.
    [24]
    王培, 曹建华, 李亮, 杨慧, 李光超. 不同来源小球藻对岩溶水Ca2+、 ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$利用的初步研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2013, 37(4): 626-631.

    Wang Pei, Cao Jianhua, Li Liang, Yang Hui, Li Guangchao. Utilization of Ca2+ and ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$ in karst water by chlorella from different sources[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2013, 37(4): 626-631.
    [25]
    赵丽华, 吴沿友, 谢腾祥, 李海涛. 微藻无机碳利用在岩石风化及碳循环过程中的作用[J]. 中国岩溶, 2023, 42(1): 1-18. doi: 10.11932/karst20230101

    Zhao Lihua, Wu Yanyou, Xie Tengxiang, Li Haitao. Role of carbonic utilization of microalgae on rock weathering and carbon cycle[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2023, 42(1): 1-18. doi: 10.11932/karst20230101
    [26]
    张彦辉, 安彦杰, 朱迟, 杨劭. 水体无机碳条件对常见沉水植物生长和生理的影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 2009, 33(6): 1020-1030. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.0000.2009.61020

    Zhang Yanhui, an Yanjie, Zhu Chi, Yang Shao. Physiological effects of dissolved inorganic carbon on common submerged macrophytes[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2009, 33(6): 1020-1030. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.0000.2009.61020
    [27]
    章程, 肖琼, 苗迎, 郭永丽, 汤庆佳, 郝玉培. 广西桂林漓江典型河段水化学昼夜动态变化及其对岩溶碳循环的影响[J]. 地球学报, 2018, 39(5): 613-621. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2018.042001

    Zhang Cheng, Xiao Qiong, Miao Ying, Guo Yongli, Tang Qingjia, Hao Yupei. Day and night aqueous chemical changes and their impact on karst carbon cycle at typical monitoring sites of the Lijiang River, Guilin, Guangxi[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2018, 39(5): 613-621. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2018.042001
    [28]
    邓自强, 林玉石, 张美良, 刘功余, 魏志民. 桂林地质构造与岩溶地貌发育的时序关系[J]. 中国岩溶, 1986, 5(4): 57-64.

    Deng Ziqiang, Lin Yushi, Zhang Meiliang, Liu Gongyu, Wei Zhimin. Time-sequence relationship between geological structures and development of karst features in Guilin area[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1986, 5(4): 57-64.
    [29]
    韩耀全, 周解, 吴祥庆. 漓江的自然地理与水质调查[J]. 广西水产科技, 2007(2): 8-16.

    Han Yaoquan, Zhou Jie, Wu Xiangqing. Physiographic and water quality investigation of the Lijiang River[J]. Fisheries Science Technology of Guangxi, 2007(2): 8-16.
    [30]
    张清华. 漓江流域外源水对岩溶无机碳通量的影响[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2018.

    Zhang Qinghua. The effect of allogenic water on karst inorganic carbon flux in Li River Basin[D]. GuiLin: Guilin University of Technology, 2018.
    [31]
    王培, 曹建华, 邵景力. 典型水生植物对岩溶水生生态系统无机碳稳定性影响研究[J]. 地球学报, 2017, 38(S1): 51-54. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2017.s1.14

    Wang Pei, Cao Jianhua, Shao Jingli. Effects of typical aquatic plants on the stability of inorganic carbon in karst aquatic ecosystem[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2017, 38(S1): 51-54. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2017.s1.14
    [32]
    王奇岗, 肖琼, 赵海娟, 王建力, 郭永丽, 张清华. 高分辨率监测下的漓江省里断面生物地球化学特征分析[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(3): 1222-1235. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201808016

    Wang Qigang, Xiao Qiong, Zao Haijuan, Wang Jianli, Guo Yongli, Zhang Qinghua. Biogeochemical characteristics in shengli site of Lijiang River under the high resolution monitoring[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(3): 1222-1235. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201808016
    [33]
    R. B. Eaton A. D. and Rice E. W. Eds Baird. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater[M]. American Water Works, Water Environment Federation, Washington Dc: American Public Health Association, 2012.
    [34]
    E. C. Tsivoglou, L. A. Neal. Tracer Measurement of Reaeration: III. Predicting the Reaeration Capacity of Inland Streams[J]. Journal (water Pollution Control Federation), 1976, 48(12): 2669-2689.
    [35]
    Thomas L. Bott. Primary Productivity and Community Respiration[M]. California: Elsevier, 2007: 663-690.
    [36]
    Ronald J. Gibbs. Mechanisms Controlling World Water Chemistry[J]. American Association for the Advancement of Science (aaas), 1970, 170(3962): 1088-1090. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3962.1088
    [37]
    张涛, 蔡五田, 李颖智, 张智印, 耿婷婷, 边超, 赵淼, 蔡月梅. 尼洋河流域水化学特征及其控制因素[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(11): 4537-4545. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201704051

    Zhang Tao, Cai Wutian, Li Yingzhi, Zhang Zhiyin, Geng Tingting, Bian Chao, Zhao Miao, Cai Yuemei. Major Ionic Features and Their Possible Controls in the Water of the Niyang River Basin[J]. Environmental Science, 2017, 38(11): 4537-4545. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201704051
    [38]
    J. Gaillardet, B. Dupr´e, P. Louvat, C. J. All`egre. Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers[J]. Chemical Geology, 1999: 1-28.
    [39]
    肖琼, 赵丽芳, 陆来谋, 孙平安, 张陶, 郭永丽. 漓江源头大溶江流域土壤理化性质[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(5): 815-824.

    Xiao Qiong, Zhao Lifang, Lu Laimou, Sun Ping’an, Zhang Tao, Guo Yongli. Spatial differences of soil physical and chemical properties in Darongjiang river watershed[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(5): 815-824.
    [40]
    黄奇波, 覃小群, 刘朋雨, 张连凯, 苏春田. 非岩溶水和硫酸参与溶蚀对湘南地区地下河流域岩溶碳汇通量的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(3): 307-318. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2017.03.0307

    Huang Qibo, Qin Xiaoqun, Liu Pengyu, Zhang Liankai, Su Chuntian. The Influence of Allogenic Water and Sulfuric Acid to Karst Carbon Sink in Karst Subterranean River in Southern Hu'nan[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(3): 307-318. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2017.03.0307
    [41]
    Thai K. Van, William T. Haller, George Bowes. Comparison of the Photosynthetic Characteristics of Three Submersed Aquatic Plants[J]. Plant Physiol, 1976, 58(6): 761-768.
    [42]
    申泰铭, 李为, 张强, 张阳, 张红辉, 余龙江. 流域不同地质生态环境中水体碳酸酐酶活性特征: 以桂江流域为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2012, 31(4): 409-414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.04.009

    Shen Taiming, Li Wei, Zhang Qiang, Zhang Yang, Zhang Honghui, Yu Longjiang. Carbonic anhydrase activity of the water-body in different eco-environments of river basins: A case study in the Guijiang river basin[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2012, 31(4): 409-414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.04.009
    [43]
    E NIELSEN. Diffusion of Dissolved Substances through Thalli and Leaves of Aquatic Plants[J]. Nature, 1947, 160: 376-377. \
    [44]
    H. B. A. Prins, J. T. M. Elzenga. Bicarbonate utilization: Function and mechanism[J]. Aquatic Botany, 1989, 34(1-3): 59-83.
    [45]
    章程. 岩溶区河流水化学昼夜变化与生物地球化学过程[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(1): 1-8. doi: 10.11932/karst20150101

    Zhang Cheng. Diel aqueous chemistry and biogeochemical processes in streams of karst areas[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2015, 34(1): 1-8. doi: 10.11932/karst20150101
    [46]
    陈羽. 会仙岩溶湿地藻与微生物及其碳酸酐酶的碳效应研究[D]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2014.

    Chen Yu. Research on the Carbon Effects of Algae and Microorganisms and Their Carbonic Anhydrase in Huixian Karst Wetland[D]. GuiLin: Guangxi Normal University, 2014.
    [47]
    Huang Jiangxun, Li Qingguang, Wu Pan, Wang Shilu, Gu Shangyi, Guo Mingwei, Fu Yong. The buffering of a riverine carbonate system under the input of acid mine drainage: Example from a small karst watershed, southwest China[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, 10: 1020452. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1020452
    [48]
    Wetzel RG. Limnology: lake and river ecosystems[J]. Journal of Phycology, 2001, 37(6): 1146-1147.
    [49]
    赵海娟. 碳酸盐岩风化产物DIC稳定性的控制过程与机理[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2022.

    Zhao Haijuan. Control Processes and Mechanisms of DIC Stability as Carbonate Weathering Product[D]. ChongQing: Southwest University , 2022.
    [50]
    Liu Shangyu, Zhao Ruizhi, Xiao Cong, Guo Qi. Optimization Analysis to Evaluate the Relationships between Different Ion Concentrations and Prymnesium parvum Growth Rate[J]. Water, 2022, 14(6): 928. doi: 10.3390/w14060928
    [51]
    李瑞, 于奭, 孙平安, 何师意, 原雅琼, 熊志斌. 贵州茂兰板寨水域水生植物δ13C特征及光合作用固定 ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$碳量估算[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(1): 9-16.

    Li Rui, Yu Shi, Sun Ping'an, He Shiyi, Yuan Yaqiong, Xiong Zhibin. Characteristics of δ13C in typical aquatic plants and carbon sequestration by plant photosynthesis in the Banzhai catchment, Maolan of Guizhou Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2015, 34(1): 9-16.
    [52]
    贺海波, 李祥忠. 抚仙湖水生植物 ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$利用效率及与之相关的内源有机碳沉积通量研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2021, 41(4): 1140-1146.

    He Haibo, Li Xiangzhong. Study on the Utilization Efficiency of ${\rm{HCO}}_3^{-}$ by Aquatic Plants and the Buried Flux of Autochthonous Organic Carbon in Fuxian Lake[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2021, 41(4): 1140-1146.
    [53]
    曹建华, 杨慧, 黄芬, 张春来, 张连凯, 朱同彬, 周孟霞, 袁道先. 岩溶碳汇原理、过程与计量[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(5): 358-376.

    Cao Jianhua, Yang Hui, Huang Fen, Zhang Chunlai, Zhang Liankai, Zhu Tongbin, Zhou Mengxia, Yuan Daoxian. The principle, process, and measurement of karst carbon sink[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(5): 358-376.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (10) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return