• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 45 Issue 2
Apr.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHUO Chun, SUI Huasheng, SU Weiguo, HAN Kai, LIU Yongliang. Leakage analysis and remediation measures for typical karst reservoirs with structural deficiencies in Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2026, 45(2): 380-398. doi: 10.11932/karst2026y009
Citation: ZHUO Chun, SUI Huasheng, SU Weiguo, HAN Kai, LIU Yongliang. Leakage analysis and remediation measures for typical karst reservoirs with structural deficiencies in Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2026, 45(2): 380-398. doi: 10.11932/karst2026y009

Leakage analysis and remediation measures for typical karst reservoirs with structural deficiencies in Guangxi

doi: 10.11932/karst2026y009
  • Received Date: 2025-03-07
  • Accepted Date: 2026-04-03
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-03-27
  • Karst leakage poses a critical engineering challenge to the safety and functionality of reservoirs in Guangxi, potentially leading to water loss, reduced performance, or even operational failure. Based on 50 typical cases from Guangxi, this study analyzes the controlling factors, main types, formation mechanisms, and mitigation strategies for karst reservoir leakage. The study aims to establish a typology-based analytical framework to enhance the understanding of leakage mechanisms and to provide reference for engineering remediation. The study shows that karst reservoir leakage in Guangxi can be classified into three main categories: tectonic leakage, contact-surface leakage, and underground conduit leakage. The development and distribution of leakage are jointly controlled by geomorphology, lithology, geological structures, and hydrodynamic conditions. The specific characteristics and intensity of karst development play a crucial role in determining the type, scale, and severity of leakage. In-depth analysis of typical cases indicates significant differences in the formation mechanisms of each leakage types: (1) Tectonic leakage is controlled by deep-seated structural discontinuities, such as faults, resulting in deep, anisotropic seepage networks. (2) Contact-surface leakage occurs through differential dissolution and structural detachment along the interface between soluble and insoluble rocks, exhibiting a strata-bound distribution. (3) Underground conduit leakage comprises well-connected concentrated conduit systems formed by the long-term positive feedback between dissolution and seepage.Given the concealed nature, complex morphology, and often high-pressure dynamic groundwater associated with karst leakage pathways, traditional mitigation techniques-such as curtain grouting, impervious blankets, conduit plugging, and cut-off walls-are often inadequate for efficient leakage control. Remediation measures must be specifically tailored to the type of leakage. For tectonic leakage, a combination of deep curtain grouting for interception and surface blanketing for sealing is typically required. For contact-surface leakage, physical interception using deep cutoff walls combined with grouting for reinforcement is a common and effective method. For underground conduit leakage, which is characterized by large flow rates and high velocity, specialized techniques that resist to high-velocity erosion, along with integrated "grouting-plugging-intercepting" strategies-such as bag grouting and quick-set pastes-are necessary. Traditional anti-leakage technologies face limitations when addressing high-pressure, large-flow conduit leakage, including issues such as grout being easily washed away, significant impact on the dam structures, and insufficient durability. Therefore, future remediation work should adopt a more refined approach. During the investigation phase, combining high-precision geophysical surveys with numerical modeling can more accurately determine the location and geometry of leakage pathways. During the construction phase, the use of new environmentally friendly materials, such as polymer grout and bio-cement, is recommended, as these materials have lower environmental impact and greater durability. Furthermore, by employing IoT-based monitoring and intelligent analysis, a leakage prevention and control system encompassing the stages of "precise detection, dynamic regulation, and targeted sealing" can be established. This approach aims to achieve precise responses and long-term effective control of karst leakage pathways.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    韦跃龙, 李成展, 陈伟海, 罗劬侃, 朱德浩, 潘天望. 广西岩溶景观特征及其形成演化分析[J]. 广西科学, 2018, 25(5): 465-504.

    Wei Yuelong, Li Chengzhan, Chen Weihai, Luo Qukan, Zhu Dehao, Pan Tianwang. Characteristics and formation and evolution analysis of the karst landscape of Guangxi[J]. Guangxi Sciences, 2018, 25(5): 465-504.
    [2]
    广西壮族自治区地方志编纂委员会. 广西通志: 岩溶志[M]. 南宁: 广西人民出版社, 2000.
    [3]
    广西壮族自治区地质矿产局. 广西壮族自治区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1985.
    [4]
    唐智德. 地表溶蚀盆地–地下岩溶联合成库条件分析: 以弄岩水库为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(5): 682-690.

    Tang Zhide. Analysis on the conditions of forming reservoirs from surface dissolution basins and underground karst: An example of the Nongyan reservoir[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(5): 682-690.
    [5]
    邓忠, 廖培涛, 秦平亮, 唐勇臣, 康志强. 大藤峡水库对广西盘龙铅锌矿矿坑涌水量影响预测[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(2): 198-204.

    Deng Zhong, Liao Peitao, Qin Pingliang, Tang Yongchen, Kang Zhiqiang. Influence of the Datengxia reservoir on water inrusch amount of the Panlong lead-zinc mine in Guangxi[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(2): 198-204.
    [6]
    胡大儒, 郑克勋, 赵代尧, 陈占恒. 复杂岩溶水系统势汇区建坝成库可行性研究: 以北盘江流域普岔河水库为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2022, 41(5): 736-745.

    Hu Daru, Zheng Kexun, Zhao Daiyao, Chen Zhanheng. Feasibility study on dam and reservoir construction in the catchment area of complex karst water system: Taking Pucha Reservoir of Beipan River as an example[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2022, 41(5): 736-745.
    [7]
    曾洁, 潘晓东, 任坤, 刘伟, 彭聪, 郑智杰. 贵州省碧云湖岩溶渗漏水文地质条件与渗漏管道位置识别[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(1): 201-208.

    Zeng Jie, Pan Xiaodong, Ren Kun, Liu Wei, Peng Cong, Zheng Zhijie. Hydrogeological conditions of karst leakage and locating of leakage channels in Biyun lake, Guizhou[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(1): 201-208.
    [8]
    段乔文, 俞富有, 张天柏, 何伟, 段春林. 滇东高原罗平湾子水库岩溶渗漏机理及库外补漏设想[J]. 中国岩溶, 2022, 41(2): 287-297.

    Duan Qiaowen, Yu Fuyou, Zhang Tianbai, He Wei, Duan Chunlin. Karst leakage and its sealing at Wanzi reservoir in Luoping county on the plateau of eastern Yunnan[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2022, 41(2): 287-297.
    [9]
    肖伟, 邹德兵, 闫福根, 蔡汉生. 龙塘水库库坝区岩溶渗漏分析及渗控设计[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2024, 55(S2): 196-202.

    Xiao Wei, Zou Debing, Yan Fugen, Cai Hansheng. Karst leakage analysis and seepage control design of Longtang Reservoir and dam[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2024, 55(S2): 196-202.
    [10]
    卢晓鹏. 清华洞水库岩溶地质条件及防渗体系[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2013, 33(6): 83-86.

    Lu Xiaopeng. Karst geological conditions and seepage control system of Qinghuadong Reservoir[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2013, 33(6): 83-86.
    [11]
    吴长敏, 周亚驰. 毕节地区岩溶区水库渗漏类型及处理办法[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2009(10): 125-126,129.
    [12]
    Mozafari M, Raeisi E. Salman Farsi Dam reservoir, a successful project on a karstified foundation, SW Iran[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(12): 1044. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5844-6
    [13]
    袁晶晶, 陈益峰, 胡冉, 杨志兵, 王国辉, 徐建华. 岩溶地区高面板坝渗流特性与防渗安全评价[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(2): 481-494.

    Yuan Jingjing, Chen Yifeng, Hu Ran, Yang Zhibing, Wang Guohui, Xu Jianhua. Seepage behavior and its control performance assessment for a high concrete faced rockfill dam in karst areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 43(2): 481-494.
    [14]
    Turkmen S, Özgüler E, Taga H, Karaogullarindan T. Seepage problems in the karstic limestone foundation of the Kalecik Dam (south Turkey)[J]. Engineering Geology, 2002, 63(3-4): 247-257. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00085-0
    [15]
    Feng S, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Wang S, Cao R. A comprehensive approach to karst identification and groutability evaluation: A case study of the Dehou reservoir, SW China[J]. Engineering Geology, 2020, 269: 105529. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105529
    [16]
    Martel R, Castellazzi P, Gloaguen E, Trépanier L, Garfias J. ERT, GPR, InSAR, and tracer tests to characterize karst aquifer systems under urban areas: The case of Quebec City[J]. Geomorphology, 2018, 310: 45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.003
    [17]
    匡楚丰, 张贵金, 刘杰, 刘云贵, 杨菊. 适于富水岩溶大孔隙地层防渗加固的水泥砂膏浆[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2018, 35(11): 126-132,144. doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20170500

    Kuang Chufeng, Zhang Guijin, Liu Jie, Liu Yungui, Yang Ju. Cement-sand paste-slurry for the seepage-proofing and reinforcement of water-rich karst macrovoid formation[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2018, 35(11): 126-132,144. doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20170500
    [18]
    曾荣福, 郑克勋, 王钦权. 岩溶水库渗透破坏型渗漏勘察与评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 2023, 42(1): 119-127. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y29

    Zeng Rongfu, Zhang Kexun, Wang Qinquan. Investigation and evaluation of the leakage caused by seepage failure in karst reservoir[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2023, 42(1): 119-127. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y29
    [19]
    陈日荣, 龙福章. 玉林地区中小型水库岩溶渗漏及防治措施[J]. 广西水利水电科技(广西中小型水库岩溶渗漏地质条件及防治措施论文选编), 1980(S1): 136-146.
    [20]
    廖有杰. 百色地区中小型水库岩溶渗漏及防治措施[J]. 广西水利水电科技(广西中小型水库岩溶渗漏地质条件及防治措施论文选编), 1980(S1): 123-135.
    [21]
    梁明廉. 南宁地区中小型水库岩溶渗漏及防治措施[J]. 广西水利水电科技(广西中小型水库岩溶渗漏地质条件及防治措施论文选编), 1980(S1): 75-106.
    [22]
    陆瑞荣. 桂林地区中小型水库岩溶渗漏及防治措施[J]. 广西水利水电科技(广西中小型水库岩溶渗漏地质条件及防治措施论文选编), 1980(S1): 152-158.
    [23]
    吴光轮. 广西中小型水库岩溶渗漏及防治措施[J]. 广西水利水电科技(广西中小型水库岩溶渗漏地质条件及防治措施论文选编), 1980(S1): 3-59.
    [24]
    卢兆欢. 柳州地区中小型水库岩溶渗漏及防治措施[J]. 广西水利水电科技(广西中小型水库岩溶渗漏地质条件及防治措施论文选编), 1980(S1): 107-122.
    [25]
    罗振评. 梧州地区中小型水库岩溶渗漏及防治措施[J]. 广西水利水电科技(广西中小型水库岩溶渗漏地质条件及防治措施论文选编), 1980(S1): 147-151.
    [26]
    李兆林, 邹胜章, 陈宏峰. 广西龙州金龙水库岩溶渗漏分析与治理[J]. 桂林工学院学报, 2006(3): 341-346.

    Li Zhaolin, Zou Shengzhang, Chen Hongfeng. Analysis and control of karst leakage of Jinlong Reservoir in Longzhou, Guangxi[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2006(3): 341-346.
    [27]
    余波, 徐光祥, 郭维祥, 刘祥刚. 岩溶水库防渗处理关键技术[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2020.

    Yu Bo, Xu Guangxiang, Guo Weixiang, Liu Xianggang. Key technology of anti-seepage treatment for karst reservoirs[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2020.
    [28]
    宋晨, 潘晓东, 刘天云, 罗飞, 曾洁, 彭聪, 程瑞瑞, 张文平. 云南省一把伞水库主封堵区岩溶渗漏条件与管道特征分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(5): 1088-1098. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y033

    Song Chen, Pan Xiaodong, Liu Tianyun, Luo Fei, Zeng Jie, Peng Cong, Cheng Ruirui, Zhang Wenping. Analysis of karst leakage conditions and pipeline characteristics in the main blocked area of Yibasan reservoir, Yunnan[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2024, 43(5): 1088-1098. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y033
    [29]
    曹建文, 杨海洋, 王喆, 赵良杰, 林玉山, 栾崧, 李录娟. 湖北某抽水蓄能电站建设中地下河系统多元信息综合分析评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 2023, 42(4): 699-710. doi: 10.11932/karst20230406

    Cao Jianwen, Yang Haiyang, Wang Zhe, Zhao Liangjie, Lin Yushan, Luan Song, Li Lujuan. Comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the multi-information on the underground river system in construction of a pumped-storage hydropower station in Hubei[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2023, 42(4): 699-710. doi: 10.11932/karst20230406
    [30]
    韩凯, 陈玉玲, 陈贻祥, 甘伏平, 郑智杰, 张伟. 岩溶病害水库的渗漏通道探测方法: 以广西全州县洛潭水库为例[J]. 水力发电学报, 2015, 34(11): 116-125. doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20151113

    Han Kai, Chen Yuling, Chen Yixiang, Gan Fuping, Zheng Zhijie, Zhang Wei. Detection method of leakage passages in karst disease reservoirs: A case study of Luotan reservoir in Quanzhou county of Guangxi[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2015, 34(11): 116-125. doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20151113
    [31]
    郑智杰, 张伟, 曾洁, 甘伏平. 综合物探方法在碳质灰岩库区岩溶渗漏带调查中的应用研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(5): 2268-2273. doi: 10.6038/pg20170558

    Zheng Zhijie, Zhang Wei, Zeng Jie, Gan Fuping. Application research of integrated geophysical methods to karst seepage investigation in carbonaceous limestone reservoir area[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(5): 2268-2273. doi: 10.6038/pg20170558
    [32]
    夏权斌, 刘成勇, 李有华, 赵学勇, 杨秀云, 沈庆双. 模袋灌浆法在云洞水库地下暗河处理中的应用[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(S2): 163-166. doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.S2.038

    Xia Quanbin, Liu Chengyong, Li Youhua, Zhao Xueyong, Yang Xiuyun, Shen Qingshuang. Application of mode-bag grouting method in underground river treatment of Yundong Reservoir Project[J]. Yangtze River, 2019, 50(S2): 163-166. doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.S2.038
    [33]
    Zhou P, Zhang Y, Huang Z, Gao Y, Wang H, Luo L. Coal and gas outburst prevention using new high water content cement slurry for injection into the coal seam[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2017, 27(4): 669-673. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.05.003
    [34]
    郑坤隆, 王剑云, 令狐延, 杨晓华, 丁亚特, 陈锟, 王志丰. 速凝渗透结晶型浆液用于隧道渗漏的防治试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023, 60(4): 254-263.

    Zheng Kunlong, Wang Jianyun, Linghu Yan, Yang Xiaohua, Ding Yate, Chen Kun, Wang Zhifeng. Experimental study on prevention and treatment of tunnel leakage with rapid setting permeable crystallographic grouts[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2023, 60(4): 254-263.
    [35]
    王福平, 李文龙, 代常友, 张成志. 滕口水库岩溶坝基灌浆堵漏工程实践[J]. 世界地质, 2017, 36(4): 1284-1290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2017.04.028

    Wang Fuping, Li Wenlong, Dai Changyou, Zhang Chengzhi. Engineering practice of grouting and leakage stoppage for karst foundation in Tengkou reservoir dam[J]. Global Geology, 2017, 36(4): 1284-1290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2017.04.028
    [36]
    王复明, 李嘉, 石明生, 郭成超. 堤坝防渗加固新技术研究与应用[J]. 水力发电学报, 2016, 35(12): 1-11. doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20161201

    Wang Fuming, Li Jia, Shi Mingsheng, Guo Chengchao. New seepage-proof and reinforcing technologies for dikes and dams and their applications[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2016, 35(12): 1-11. doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20161201
    [37]
    秦修云. 聚氨酯高聚物注浆材料的制备及性能研究[J]. 功能材料, 2023, 54(11): 11134-11138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2023.11.016

    Qin Xiuyun. Preparation and properties of polyurethane polymergrouting materials[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2023, 54(11): 11134-11138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2023.11.016
    [38]
    Escobal-Marcos I, Álvarez-Fernández M, Prendes-Gero M, González-Nicieza C. Designing cement-based grouting in a rock mass for underground impermeabilization[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(13): 4062. doi: 10.3390/en14134062
    [39]
    潘艳辉, 王复明, 臧全胜, 陈爽, 王奕丹, 陈莹莹, 陈洪良. 非水反应类高聚物注浆治理板桥水库廊道渗漏分析[J]. 人民黄河, 2023, 45(12): 130-134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2023.12.023

    Pan Yanhui, Wang Fuming, Zang Quansheng, Chen Shuang, Wang Yidan, Chen Yingying, Chen Hongliang. Analysis on non-reactive polymer grouting technology in the remediation of leakage for the gallery of Banqiao reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2023, 45(12): 130-134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2023.12.023
    [40]
    范峥, 钟久安, 何非凡, 臧鹏. 高聚物复合堵水浆材在岩溶地区深孔帷幕灌浆中的应用[J]. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程), 2020, 47(1): 86-90.

    Fan Zheng, Zhong Jiuan, He Feifan, Zang Peng. Application of high polymer composite water blocking slurry in deep hole curtain grouting in the karst area[J]. Exploration Engineering (Rock & Soil Drilling and Tunneling), 2020, 47(1): 86-90.
    [41]
    Li Y, Zhang G, Jiang H, Liu Y, Kuang C. Performance assessment of a newly developed and highly stable sandy cementitious grout for karst aquifers in China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2020, 79(6): 153. doi: 10.1007/s12665-020-8894-8
    [42]
    屈昌华, 郭维祥, 余波, 朱代强. 喀斯特地区高压联合冲洗灌浆方法及其结构: CN104594370B[P]. 2017-10-10.
    [43]
    屈昌华, 郭维祥, 余波, 朱代强, 昝廷东. 喀斯特地区高压群孔置换灌浆方法及其结构: CN104594369B[P]. 2017-12-5.
    [44]
    向新志. 七星水库地下岩溶防渗技术与监测系统研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2019.

    Xiang Xinzhi. Study on underground karst seepage control technology and monitoring system of the Seven Star Reservoir[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2019.
    [45]
    Stabnikov V, Naeimi M, Ivanov V, Chu J. Formation of water-impermeable crust on sand surface using biocement[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(11): 1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.017
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (8) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return