• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 45 Issue 2
Apr.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YAO Kezhui, KANG Xiaobing, XU Mo, LU Danmei, LAN Haimin, WANG Shengjie, DAI Wenhao. Study on the mechanism and treatment of water inrush in the inclined shaft of the Siding tunnel on the new Guilin-Liucheng expressway in Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2026, 45(2): 399-410. doi: 10.11932/karst20260207
Citation: YAO Kezhui, KANG Xiaobing, XU Mo, LU Danmei, LAN Haimin, WANG Shengjie, DAI Wenhao. Study on the mechanism and treatment of water inrush in the inclined shaft of the Siding tunnel on the new Guilin-Liucheng expressway in Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2026, 45(2): 399-410. doi: 10.11932/karst20260207

Study on the mechanism and treatment of water inrush in the inclined shaft of the Siding tunnel on the new Guilin-Liucheng expressway in Guangxi

doi: 10.11932/karst20260207
  • Received Date: 2024-09-25
  • Accepted Date: 2025-07-21
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-06-05
  • The problem of water inrush and mud gushing is a major hazard encountered during the construction of karst tunnels. During the excavation of the inclined shaft of the Siding tunnel on the Guilin–Liucheng expressway in Guangxi, karst caves were discovered at XK0+410 m and XK0+365 m, respectively. The karst pipelines exposed by the inclined shaft excavation caused groundwater to gush from the karst cave at XK0+365 m after rainfall, flowing back into the tunnel along the inclined shaft and disrupting construction. In May to June of 2020, the tunnel site experienced a rainstorm that significantly increased water inrush at XK0+365 m due to the karst cave, with a maximum flow rate of approximately 300 m³·h−1. Meanwhile, large-scale water accumulation occurred in the Xiaguling Depression, located south of the inclined shaft entrance, with water depths ranging from 1.50 to 4.67 m and a flood level of 444.874 m. The massive inflow of accumulated water into the tunnel made construction impossible, severely impeding project progress.This study takes the water inrush from the inclined shaft of the Siding tunnel on the Guilin–Liucheng expressway as the research object. Through karst hydrogeological surveys, high-density electrical resistivity prospecting, and connectivity experiments conducted in the tunnel site area, the study identified the water inrush channels and sources associated with the inclined shaft. It elucidated the genetic mechanism of water inrush, predicted the volume of water inflow, validated the accuracy of prediction in conjunction with the water inrush mechanism, and comprehensively compared three treatment measures. The results indicate the following: (1) During the construction of the Siding tunnel inclined shaft, a karst conduit was exposed,through which rainfall surged into the working area,resulting in a water inrush disaster.The primary sources of the water inrush are identified as:water from gullies on the hillslope,groundwater discharged via underground river conduits from the Duzhangtun depression from the north,and groundwater discharged from underground river tributary near Malong village from the northeast. All of these sources originate from atmospheric precipitation collected in karst negative terrains. (2) The formation process of the water inrush disaster at the Siding tunnel was as follows:during the construction of the inclined shaft,the upper conduit of the Duzhang underground river was exposed,resulting in immediate water inflow upon the occurrence of rainfall.Under heavy rain conditions,in addition to the drainage of rainwater from high-elevation depressions,the water level in the Xiaguling depression rose to 443.7 m, causing backflow into the tunnel's inclined shaft.The synergistic effect of these two factors led to a major water inrush.The water inrush mechanism at the inclined shaft of the Siding tunnel is classified as karst conduit-type water inrush, which can be divided into two processes: ① Rainwater drainage from high-elevation karst depressions. When the elevation of a karst depression is higher than that of the tunnel, after rainfall,water accumulates within the depression and flows along the karst conduit,discharging into the inclined shaft through the karst cave opening exposed during excavation. ② Backflow from low-elevation karst depressions. When the elevation of a karst depression is lower than that of the tunnel, during heavy rainfall,a large volume of rainwater accumulates instantaneously in the depression.Due to poor drainage, the water level rises continuously.When the water level exceeds the elevation of the karst conduit exposed by excavation,a hydraulic head difference drives the accumulated water to backflow into the inclined shaft via the karst conduit,resulting in a major inrush. (3) Based on the principle that groundwater in karst areas should be drained rather than blocked, and considering the sources of water inrush, channels, topography, and karst development characteristics of the inclined shaft of the Siding tunnel, a measure of intercepting and externally diverting water was adopted. This involved intercepting part of the floodwater in the Duzhangtun depression and using the natural drainage channel developed at the northwestern foot of the mountain in Duzhangtun to divert some of floodwater to Matang’ao village by raising the water level. Simultaneously, the accumulated water in the depression was directly diverted into the Tianchuang karst cave through tunnels or open ditches to achieve rapid drainage, reduce the flood level in the depression, and thereby decrease recharge sources and the water pressure in karst conduits. This approach effectively solves the water inrush problem in the inclined shaft and provides a basis for the treatment of water inrush in shallow-buried tunnels in similar karst areas. This study not only ensures the construction safety of the Siding tunnel, but also holds significant importance for ecological protection in the tunnel site area.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    康小兵, 张强, 许模. 重庆走马岭岩溶隧道涌水量初步研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2006(1): 68-71.

    Kang Xiaobing, Zhang Qiang, Xu Mo. A preliminary study of water intrusion in zoumaling karst tunnel, chongqing[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2006(1): 68-71.
    [2]
    李术才, 薛翊国, 张庆松, 李树忱, 李利平, 孙克国, 葛颜慧, 苏茂鑫, 钟世航, 李貅. 高风险岩溶地区隧道施工地质灾害综合预报预警关键技术研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008(7): 1297-1307.

    Li Shucai, Xue Yiguo, Zhang Qingsong, Li Shuchen, Li Liping, Su Keguo, Ge Yanhui, Su Maoxin, Zhong Shihang, Li Xiu. Research on key technology of comprehensive forecasting and early warning of geologic hazards in tunnel construction in high-risk karst areas[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008(7): 1297-1307.
    [3]
    王遇国. 岩溶隧道突水灾害与防治研究[D]. 北京: 中国铁道科学研究院, 2010.

    Wang Yuguo. Study on scourge and prevention of karst tunnel water inrush[D]. Beijing: China Academy of Railway Sciences, 2010.
    [4]
    Lyu Yuxiang, Jiang Yongjun, Hu Wei, Cao Min, Mao Yang. A review of the effects of tunnel excavation on the hydrology, ecology, and environment in karst areas: Current status, challenges, and perspectives[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 586: 124891.
    [5]
    吕玉香, 蒋勇军, 王正雄, 胡伟. 西南岩溶槽谷区隧道建设的水文生态环境效应研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6): 1851-1864.

    Lyu Yuxiang, Jiang Yongjun, Wang Zhengxiong, Hu Wei. Review on the hydrology and the ecological and environmental effects of tunnel construction in the karst valley of Southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(6): 1851-1864.
    [6]
    江杰, 蒲鸥, 欧孝夺, 赵建刚, 谢规球. 岩溶区公路隧道围岩分级专家系统设计与应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2018, 35(7): 94-99.

    Jiang Jie, Pu Ou, Ou Xiaoduo, Zhao Jiangang, Xie Guiqiu. Expert system of surrounding rock classification for highway tunnel in karst region: Design and application[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2018, 35(7): 94-99.
    [7]
    甘子锋. 都巴高速公路隧道涌水突泥病害处治措施[J]. 西部交通科技, 2022(12): 150-151, 155.

    Gan Zifeng. Duba highway tunnel water surge mud disease treatment measures[J]. Western Transportation Technology, 2022(12): 150-151, 155.
    [8]
    张丕界, 林振球, 熊安详. 斜井在长大隧道施工中的作用探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003, 40(4): 8-14.

    Zhang Pijie, Lin Zhenqiu, Xiong Anxiang. Discussion on the function of inclined shaft for long tunnel construction[J].Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2003,40(4): 8-14.
    [9]
    蒋建平, 高广运, 李晓昭, 罗国煜. 隧道工程突水机制及对策[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2006, 27(5): 76-82.

    Jiang Jianping, Gao Guangyun, Li Xiaozhao, Luo Guoyi. Mechanism and countermeasures of water-bursting in railroad tunnel engineering[J]. China Railway Science, 2006, 27(5): 76-82.
    [10]
    黄鸿健, 张民庆. 宜万铁路隧道工程岩溶及岩溶水分析与应对[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2009, 46(2): 22-34.

    Huang Hongjian, Zhang Minqing. Analysis and countermeasures against karst and karst-water in tunnels on Yichang-Wanzhou railway[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2009, 46(2): 22-34.
    [11]
    王青松. 岩溶隧道突水机理研究[J]. 中国铁路, 2023(4): 1-8.

    Wang Qingsong. Research on the mechanism of sudden water flow in karst tunnels[J]. China Railway, 2023(4): 1-8.
    [12]
    王运生, 黄润秋, 蒋良文, 许模, 李超. 园梁山隧道背斜段涌水机制探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004(S1): 355-357.

    Wang Yunshen, Huang Runqiu, Jiang Liangwen, Xu Mo, Li Chao. Discussion on the mechanism of water gushing in the anticline section of Yuanliangshan Tunnel[J]. Advances In Earth Science, 2004(S1): 355-357.
    [13]
    洪庆仁, 吴勇, 卓勇, 张凡, 邱钦钦. 综合超前地质预报在大秦岭隧道中的应用[J]. 人民长江, 2017, 48(7): 56-59.

    Hong Qingren, Wu Yong, Zhuo Yong, Zhang Fan, Qiu Qinqin. Application of integrated advance geological forecast in Daqinling Tunnel[J]. Yangtze River, 2017, 48(7): 56-59.
    [14]
    陈国庆, 李天斌, 范占锋, 杨成祥. 基于不同渗流方程的岩溶隧道涌突水过程模拟[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2011, 38(4): 8-13.

    Chen Guoqing, Li Tianbin, Fan Zhanfeng, Yang Chengxiang. A study of the process simulation of water burst in a karst tunnel based on different seepage equations[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2011, 38(4): 8-13.
    [15]
    Li Ji, Hong Aihua, Yuan Daoxian, Jiang Yongjun, Deng Shujin, Cao Cong, Liu Jiao. A new distributed karst-tunnel hydrological model and tunnel hydrological effect simulations[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 593:125639.
    [16]
    Huang Xin, Li Shucai, Xu Zhenhao, Guo Ming, Chen Yucheng . Assessment of a concealed karst cave's influence on karst tunnel stability: A case study of the huaguoshan tunnel, China[J]. Sustainability, 2018,10(7): 2132.
    [17]
    陈旭, 许模, 杜宇本, 赵帅军. 保山隧道暗河管道系统及其对隧道影响研究[J]. 人民长江, 2011, 42(5): 22-25.

    Chen Xu, Xu Mo, Du Yuben, Zhao Shuaijun. Research on underground river system in Baoshan tunnel and its influence on tunnel engineering[J]. Yangtze River, 2011, 42(5): 22-25.
    [18]
    李利平, 李术才, 张庆松. 岩溶地区隧道裂隙水突出力学机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(2): 523-528.

    Li Liping, Li Shucai, Zhang Qingsong. Study of mechanism of water inrush induced by hydraulic fracturing in karst tunnels[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(2): 523-528.
    [19]
    Xu Zhenhao, Lin Peng, Xing Huilin, Pan Dongdong, Huang Xin. Hydro-mechanical coupling response behaviors in tunnel subjected to a water-filled karst cave[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2021,54(8):3737-3756.
    [20]
    史箫笛, 黄勋, 康小兵, 谢怀前. 高密度电法在覆盖型岩溶地区探测中的应用[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(S2): 117-120, 127.

    Shi Xiaodi, Huang Xun, Kang Xiaobing, Xie Huaiqian. Application of high density electrical method in exploration of covered karst areas[J]. Yangtze River, 2018, 49(S2): 117-120, 127.
    [21]
    易连兴, 夏日元, 王喆, 卢海平, 赵良杰. 岩溶峰丛洼地区降水入渗系数: 以寨底岩溶地下河流域为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(4): 512-517.

    Yi Lianxing, Xia Riyuan, Wang Zhe, Lu Haiping, Zhao Liangjie. Infiltration coefficient of precipitation in karst peak-cluster depression area: A case study of Zhaidi karst underground river basin[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(4): 512-517.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (6) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return