Processing math: 100%
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
DIAO Haizhong, YU Sang, LI Hongliang, YIN Xiuzhen, ZHOU Jianwei, LIU Hong, WANG Yuanxin. Analysis on the hydrochemical and sulfur isotope characteristics of the groundwater in cross-strata pollution control area of Hongshan and Zhaili coal mines in Zibo[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(1): 171-181. doi: 10.11932/karst20230113
Citation: DIAO Haizhong, YU Sang, LI Hongliang, YIN Xiuzhen, ZHOU Jianwei, LIU Hong, WANG Yuanxin. Analysis on the hydrochemical and sulfur isotope characteristics of the groundwater in cross-strata pollution control area of Hongshan and Zhaili coal mines in Zibo[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(1): 171-181. doi: 10.11932/karst20230113

Analysis on the hydrochemical and sulfur isotope characteristics of the groundwater in cross-strata pollution control area of Hongshan and Zhaili coal mines in Zibo

doi: 10.11932/karst20230113
  • Received Date: 2022-01-20
  • Since the closure of Hongshan and Zhaili coal mines in Zibo City, Shandong Province, the pumping and drainage of groundwater has stopped, leading to the rise of water level in coal mines. Consequently, Ordovician limestone water was polluted to different degrees through the hydraulic connection channels such as broken well pipes. The main pollution factors, like SO24 , TDS, total hardness, etc., resulted in the deterioration of karst water below the drinking standard in the study area, and hence seriously affected local residents’ living and economic activities. The main water-bearing strata in the study area include loose rock pore aquifers, clastic rock fissure aquifers or interlayer karst fissure aquifers and carbonate rock karst aquifers. As the main coal measure aquifer in the study area, the fissure aquifer is the direct water source of coal mining. In the natural state, there lacks hydraulic connection between the fissure aquifer and the underlying Ordovician karst aquifer. But because the impermeable layer was damaged by coal mining, the water channel has been formed. During the mining process, the fissure water in the coal measure strata was basically drained, and the Ordovician limestone water entered the pit by the way of jacking recharge. After the coal mine was closed, the level of the coal mine water rose, and the Ordovician limestone water was replenished through the connecting place.In order to provide a scientific basis for future remediation of groundwater pollution in Hongshan and Zhaili coal mine areas and other similar mining areas, this study was carried out on the hydrochemical and isotope characteristics of the water after treatment in the study area, and a qualitative and quantitative analysis was conducted on the quality characteristics and treatment effects of the groundwater. To conduct the hydrochemical and isotope analyses based on hydrogeological conditions, characteristics of groundwater flowing field and sampling points before treatment, a series of monitoring points were set up along the groundwater flowing direction from the upstream of the pollution source area. Sampling types include coal mine water, Ordovician limestone water, rain water, surface water, etc. Coal mine water includes mine water, goaf water and mine drainage.Through the sampling test, the results of hydrochemical and isotope analyses show that there is a hydraulic relation and mutual influence between Ordovician limestone water and coal mine water in the study area. The sulfate in groundwater in this area mainly comes from the oxidation of sulfide minerals in coal-bearing strata, and the Ordovician limestone water is polluted by the coal mine water in cross-strata, which leads to the increase of sulfate concentration in Ordovician limestone water.Results show that the hydrochemical type of Ordovician limestone water is complex, and some Ordovician limestone water is characterized by high SO24 concentration, high hardness and high TDS. The concentration range of high SO24 is basically consistent with the coal mine area and its downstream. The normal Ordovician limestone water environment in the area has been disturbed, because of the mixture of extraneous water. The hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions of some Ordovician limestone water and coal mine water are similar, and δS values present positive and negative deviations. According to the characteristics of sulfates and sulfur isotopes, the sulfates in Ordovician limestone water mainly come from the cross-strata pollution of coal mine water, and the pollution is more serious than it is before treatment. It is speculated that there is still a hydraulic connection between coal mine water and Ordovician limestone water. Therefore, further treatment is suggested to identify and control the water channel, strengthen the pumping and drainage of coal mine water and encourage the comprehensive utilization. Besides, the water level of mine pit should be controlled to avoid the pollution of Ordovician limestone water.

     

  • [1]
    Khalil K, Hanich L, Bannari A, Zouhri L, Pourret O, Hakkou R. Assessment of soil contamination around an abandoned mine in a semi-arid environment using geochemistry and geostatistics: Pre-work of geochemical process modeling with numerical models[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2013, 125:117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.11.018
    [2]
    Bhattacharya P, Sracek O, Eldvall B, Asklund R, Barmen G, Jacks G, Koku J, Gustafsson J, Singh N, Balfors B. Hydrogeochemical study on the contamination of water resources in a part of Tarkwa mining area, Western Ghana[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2012, 66:72-84.
    [3]
    Equeenuddin M D, Tripathy S, Saho P K, Panigrahi M K. Hydrogeochemical characteristics of acid mine drainage and water pollution at Makum Coalfield, India[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2010, 105:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2010.04.006
    [4]
    Rachid Hakkou, Mostafa Benzaazoua, Bruno Bussière. Acid mine drainage at the abandoned kettara mine (Morocco): 1. environmental characterization[J]. Mine Water and the Environment, 2008, 27:145-159. doi: 10.1007/s10230-008-0036-6
    [5]
    Olias M, Moral F, Galván L, Cerón J C. Groundwater contamination evolution in the Guadiamar and Agrio aquifers after the Aznalcóllar spill: Assessment and environmental implications[J]. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 2012, 184(6):3629-3641. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2212-6
    [6]
    常允新, 冯在敏, 韩德刚. 淄博市洪山、寨里煤矿地下水污染形成原因及防治[J]. 山东地质, 1999, 15(1):41-45.

    CHANG Yunxin, FENG Zaimin, HAN Degang. Origin and prevention of underground water pollution in Hongshan and Zhaili coal mine areas in Zibo city[J]. Geology of Shandong, 1999, 15(1):41-45.
    [7]
    徐军祥, 徐品. 淄博煤矿闭坑对地下水的污染及控制[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2003, 31(10):28-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2336.2003.10.010

    XU Junxiang, XU Pin. Underground water pollution and control with mining district closed in Zibo mine[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2003, 31(10):28-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2336.2003.10.010
    [8]
    吕华, 刘洪量, 马振民, 徐品. 淄博洪山、寨里煤矿地下水串层污染形成原因及防治[J]. 中国煤田地质, 2005, 17(4):24-27, 31.

    LV Hua, LIU Hongliang, MA Zhenmin, XU Pin. Formation and influential factors of Zibo City Hongshan and Zhaili coalmines underground water cross strata pollution[J]. Coalfield Geology in China, 2005, 17(4):24-27, 31.
    [9]
    Bottrell S, Tellam J, Bartlett R, Hughes A. Isotopic composition of sulfate as a tracer of natural and anthropogenic influences on groundwater geochemistry in an urban sandstone aquifer, Birmi-ngham, UK[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2008, 23(8):2382-2394. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.03.012
    [10]
    Jezierski P, Szynkiewicz A, Jsun drysek M O. Natural and anthropogenic origin sulphate in an mountainous groundwater system: S and O isotope evidences[J]. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 2006, 173(1/2/3/4):81-101.
    [11]
    赵春红, 梁永平, 卢海平, 唐春雷, 申豪勇, 王志恒. 娘子关泉域岩溶水SO4 2− 、δ34S特征及其环境意义[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(6):867-875.

    ZHAO Chunhong, LIANG Yongping, LU Haiping, TANG Chunlei, SHEN Haoyong, WANG Zhiheng. Chemical characteristics and environmental significance of SO4 2− and sulfur isotope in the karst watershed of the Niangziguan spring, Shanxi Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(6):867-875.
    [12]
    郝春明, 何培雍, 王议, 侯双林, 董建芳. 煤炭开采后峰峰矿区奥陶系岩溶水硫酸盐演化过程研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2014, 33(4):425-431. doi: 10.11932/karst20140406

    HAO Chunming, HE Peiyong, WANG Yi, HOU Shuanglin, DONG Jianfang. Study on the evolutionary process of sulfate concentration in Ordovician karst water after coal mining in Fengfeng mine[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2014, 33(4):425-431. doi: 10.11932/karst20140406
    [13]
    张秋霞, 周建伟, 林尚华, 魏东, 张黎明, 袁磊. 淄博洪山、寨里煤矿区闭坑后地下水污染特征及成因分析[J]. 安全环境与工程, 2015, 22(6):23-28.

    ZHANG Qiuxia, ZHOU Jianwei, LIN Shanghua, WEI Dong, ZHANG Liming, YUAN Lei. Characteristics and causes of groundwater pollution after Hongshan-Zhaili mine closure in Zibo[J]. Safety Environment and Engineering, 2015, 22(6):23-28.
    [14]
    张秋霞, 周建伟, 康凤新, 林尚华, 魏东, 张黎明, 袁磊. 淄博煤矿区地下水污染水动力和同位素解析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2016, 39(8):116-122.

    ZHANG Qiuxia, ZHOU Jianwei, KANG Fengxin, LIN Shanghua, WEI Dong, ZHANG Liming, YUAN Lei. Hydrodynamic analysis and isotope tracing for probing into groundwater pollution of Zibo mining area[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2016, 39(8):116-122.
    [15]
    李建中, 周爱国, 周建伟, 柴波, 冯海波, 苏丹辉. 华北煤田矿山开采导致含水层破坏风险评估: 以淄博洪山煤矿为例[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(3):1027-1040.

    LI Jianzhong, ZHOU Aiguo, ZHOU Jianwei, CHAI Bo, FENG Haibo, SU Danhui. Risk assessment of aquifer destruction in underground mining coal of North China: A case study of Hongshan mine in Zibo City[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(3):1027-1040.
    [16]
    高旭波, 王万洲, 侯保俊, 高列波, 张建友, 张松涛, 李成城, 姜春芳. 中国北方岩溶地下水污染分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(3):287-298.

    GAO Xubo, WANG Wanzhou, HOU Baojun, GAO Liebo, ZHANG Jianyou, ZHANG Songtao, LI Chengcheng, JIANG Chunfang. Analysis of karst groundwater pollution in Northern China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2020, 39(3):287-298.
    [17]
    梁永平, 申豪勇, 赵春红, 王志恒, 唐春雷, 赵一, 谢浩, 石维芝. 对中国北方岩溶水研究方向的思考与实践[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(3):363-380.

    LIANG Yongping, SHEN Haoyong, ZHAO Chunhong, WANG Zhiheng, TANG Chunlei, ZHAO Yi, XIE Hao, SHI Weizhi. Thinking and practice on the research direction of karst water in Northern China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(3):363-380.
    [18]
    郭达鹏, 康凤新, 陈奂良, 成建梅, 罗伟. 山东淄博沣水泉域岩溶水系统模拟及水源地优化开采预测[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(3):327-338. doi: 10.11932/karst20170306

    GUO Dapeng, KANG Fengxin, CHEN Huanliang, CHENG Jianmei, LUO Wei. Numerical simulation and optimal exploitation scheme for the karst groundwater recourses system of Fengshui spring basin in Zibo region, Shandong Province, China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(3):327-338. doi: 10.11932/karst20170306
  • Relative Articles

    [1]JIANG Feng, JIQIN Kebuzi, CAO Jianwen, WANG Ruofan, ZHAO Liangjie. Source characteristics and influencing factors of groundwater hydrochemistry in the karst areas of central Guizhou[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(4): 889-899. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y028
    [2]ZHOU Shiyang, DONG Haogang, LI Lixiang, YUAN Dongfang, LU Li, YAO Feiyan, XIANG Fan, CHEN Lin, WANG Zhenwei, WU Xin. Hydrochemical characteristics and genetic analysis of the Xianju basin in southern Zhejiang Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(3): 527-537. doi: 10.11932/karst20240303
    [3]CUI Rui, WANG Xuepeng, FENG Bo, LIU Xiyao, FENG Shoutao, LIU Shuai. Comparative analysis of the genesis models of different geothermal reservoirs in Chengning uplift area in northwest Shandong based on hydrochemical isotope technology[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 969-981, 994. doi: 10.11932/karst20230513
    [4]ZHANG Wenqiang, TENG Yue, TANG Fei, WANG Jinxiao, XU Qingyu, ZHANG Hailin. Groundwater hydrochemical characteristics and evolution of the karst water system in the Feicheng fault block in Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 1047-1060, 1084. doi: 10.11932/karst20230515
    [5]GANG Shenting, LYU Minghui, LU Qianqian, GAO Shuai, ZHAO Zhiqiang, CHEN Huanliang, PENG Tongqiang, WANG Xi, XING Liting, LI Lixia. Characterization of seawater intrusion based on multivariate statistical analysis and water chemistry characteristics: A case study of Laoshan district, Qingdao City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 982-994. doi: 10.11932/karst20230509
    [6]CHEN Hao, WANG Jiading, WANG Linlin, YANG Chuanwei, JIANG Fuhong. Hydrochemical characteristics and formation mechanism of groundwater in east Zoucheng City, Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(1): 139-148. doi: 10.11932/karst20230110
    [7]LIAO Jia, ZHU Zhenhua, PENG Yi, WEI Shanhu, LUO Zhaohui, LIU Zhuang, XU Qiangqiang, XIE Gen. Analysis on D/18O and hydrochemical characteristics of karst groundwater in northwestern Hunan Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(3): 425-435, 481. doi: 10.11932/karst2023y003
    [8]LU Li, CHEN Yudao, ZOU Shengzhang, FAN Lianjie, LIN Yongsheng, WANG Zhe. Hydrochemical characteristics and water quality evaluation of karst groundwater in typical industrial cities[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(4): 588-598. doi: 10.11932/karst20220407
    [9]WU Xia, PAN Moucheng, YIN Jianjun, WANG Zhijun, ZHU Xiaoyan, YANG Hui, ZHANG Meiliang, CAO Jianhua. Response of cave air and hydrogeochemistry of drip water to local climate in the Liangfeng cave,Guilin City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(3): 513-520.
    [10]WANG Rui, LI Xiaohan. Hydrochemical characteristics and genesis of karst groundwater in the Baiquan spring catchment[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(3): 398-408.
    [11]SHI Qipeng, SONG Shuailiang, MENG Jia, ZHENG Huiming. Hydrochemical evolution of karst geothermal water in the Heze uplift geothermal field, Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 310-318. doi: 10.11932/karst20210209
    [12]QU Qiunan, SONG Xiaoqing, TANG Yujie, YANG Zhenhua. Groundwater occurrence condition and hydrochemical characteristics:A case study of Anlong county map sheet in Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(3): 378-387. doi: 10.11932/karst20190307
    [13]GUAN Qinghua, LI Fulin, WANG Aiqin, FENG Ping, TIAN Chanjuan, CHEN Xuequn, LIU Dan. Hydrochemistry characteristics and evolution of karst spring groundwater system in Jinan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(5): 653-662. doi: 10.11932/karst20190501
    [14]ZHANG Chao, ZHANG Baoxiang, ZHANG Jisheng, DI Yan. Analysis of hydrochemical characteristics and formation mechanism of karst water in Feicheng City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(5): 698-707. doi: 10.11932/karst20180507
    [15]DU Wenyue, HE Ruoxue, HE Shiyi, SUN Ping’an, MO Jianying, Qin Xinxing, Yu Shi. Variation of hydrochemical characteristics and the ion source in the upstream of Guijiang river:A case study in Guilin section[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(2): 207-214. doi: 10.11932/karst20170208
    [16]SHEN Wei, WANG Jian-li, WANG Jia-lu, JIANG Xian-shu, MAO Qing-ya. Hydrochemistry and δ13CDIC features of cave water in Naduo cave, Guizhou and their influencing factors[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(1): 98-105. doi: 10.11932/karst20160114
    [17]MIAO Ying, KONG Xiang-sheng, SONG Zhao-jing. Hydrochemical characteristics and formation mechanism of groundwater in Nanning City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(3): 228-233. doi: 10.11932/karst20150304
    [18]ZHANG Xiao wei, XU Shang quan, ZHOU Xiao ping. Influence of agricultural activity on hydro-chemical characteristics and dissolved inorganic carbon leakage in epi-karst springs[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2013, 32(2): 133-139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2013.02.002
    [19]XIAO Qiong, SHEN Li-cheng, YUAN Dao-xian, HE Qiu-fang, WANG-Aoyu. Response of the Beiwenquan hot spring’s hydrochemical features in Chongqing to the Wenchuan earthquake of magnitude 8.0 in Sichuan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(4): 385-390. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.04.009
    [20]Li Dongchen. RECOGNIZING HYDROCHEMICAL FEATURES OF BASAL WATER AND WATER GUSH SOURCE IN BAIMIAO COAL MINE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1995, 14(4): 295-304.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 王肖肖. 地下水水质分析及污染治理措施探析. 皮革制作与环保科技. 2024(12): 122-124 .
    2. 黄欢,董书宁. 基于水化学特征及抽(放)水试验的含水层垂向水力联系研究. 煤矿安全. 2024(08): 175-183 .
    3. 王旭东,闫祖喻,郭强,张锁,唐佳伟,胡瑜恬,刘小庆,李井峰. 地下水水化学垂向分带特征及成因机制——以新街矿区为例. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(08): 222-233 .
    4. 崔锐,王学鹏,冯波,刘曦遥,冯守涛,刘帅. 基于水化学同位素技术的地热储层成因模式对比分析-以鲁西北埕宁隆起区为例. 中国岩溶. 2023(05): 969-981+994 . 本站查看
    5. 丁冠涛,李常锁,魏善明,王少娟,李岩,卢茜茜,孙斌,柳浩然. 玉符河外源回灌对岩溶地下水影响研究. 中国岩溶. 2023(05): 907-916 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1112) PDF downloads(61) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return