Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 42 Issue 1
Feb.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2023  >  42(1): 119-127
ZENG Rongfu, ZHENG Kexun, WANG Qinquan. Investigation and evaluation of the leakage caused by seepage failure in karst reservoir[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(1): 119-127. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y29
Citation: ZENG Rongfu, ZHENG Kexun, WANG Qinquan. Investigation and evaluation of the leakage caused by seepage failure in karst reservoir[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(1): 119-127. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y29
shu

Investigation and evaluation of the leakage caused by seepage failure in karst reservoir

doi: 10.11932/karst2021y29
  • 1.

    Power China Guiyang Survey and Design Corporation Limited, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China

  • 2.

    Geotechnical Engineering Corporation Limited,Sinohydro Guiyang Survey and Design Corporation Limited, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China

  • Received Date: 2021-05-30
    Abstract
  • The karst leakage that occurred after the impoundment on the right bank of Xiaojiagou Reservoir in Nanchuan district of Chongqing has been taken as an example in the investigation and evaluation of karst leakage caused by high-pressure infiltration of the anti-seepage system during the long-term operation of karst reservoir. By means of geological analysis, historical investigation of leakage, drilling, hydrogeological test, geophysical prospecting and connectivity test, the range and causes of karst leakage on the right bank of the reservoir have been identified. According to the geological analysis, groundwater level observation and water permeability characteristics, the dam area is composed of karst rock, where dissolution occurs and fracture develops, and the local water permeability rate is large, hence there exist basic conditions for leakage. Besides, the limited groundwater recharge near the dam site and the low and flat groundwater level under the influence of limestone karst contribute to the hydrodynamic conditions for leakage. Combined with the analysis of temperature field, conductivity field and chemical field of reservoir and leakage point, the areas of abnormal groundwater temperature and conductivity on the right bank are mainly concentrated near the groundwater level of ZK2 and ZK4, and the water of the seepage point does not go through the deep groundwater circulation. The leakage path is short, which may penetrate through the dissolution fracture and small karst hole at the inlet on the right bank of the dam site to the PD5 flat cave section between the dam and anti-seepage line on the right bank. The connectivity test shows that the karst cave (dissolution fracture) on the right bank upstream of the dam have good connectivity with the leakage outlet. Geophysical exploration results show that CT-2, CT-3 and CT-5, the main channels of fracture-type leakage distributed above the elevation of 630 m on the right bank, mainly control the leakage of dam foundation and around dam. Study results are shown as follows. (1) The leakage boundary of the reservoir is clear, and the leakage range is mainly above the elevation of 630 m in the soluble rock area on the right bank. The seepage failure of the anti-seepage body is the main reason for the leakage of reservoir. (2) The first leakage path is through the weak area of the original plugging plug or the surrounding of the karst plugging body, resulting in a new channel for leakage to converge into the karst cave outlet downstream. The second bypasses the dam shoulder on the right bank through anti-seepage line before leakage converges into the karst cave downstream of the right bank slope along the erosion fissures or pipelines of rock mass, and then it seeps out on the surface. In this study, the method of investigating and evaluating the leakage caused by seepage failure of anti-seepage body in karst reservoir has been proposed as illustrated by the project. To preliminarily determine the cause and range of seepage, it is advisable for us to analyze historical data and use such methods as exploration, testing and geophysical prospecting. The study results may provide a reliable basis for anti-seepage treatment.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(17)
  • [1]
    薛伟, 袁宗峰, 周密. 西南地区某岩溶水库渗漏分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(4):508-514.

    XUE Wei, YUAN Zongfeng, ZHOU Mi. Analysis on leakage of a karst reservoir in Southwestern China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(4):508-514.
    [2]
    脱云飞, 王克勤, 张振伟, 郭涛, 杨路华. 斜孔帷幕灌浆在病险水库防渗处理中的应用[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2011, 9(1):145-147.

    TUO Yunfei, WANG Keqin, ZHANG Zhenwei, GUO Tao, YANG Luhua. Application of inclined-holes curtain grouting in the seepage control of the reservoir[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2011, 9(1):145-147.
    [3]
    彭仕雄, 陈卫东, 肖强. 官地电站库首左岸河湾地块岩溶渗漏分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(S2):4030-4037.

    PENG Shixiong, CHEN Weidong, XIAO Qiang. Karst seepage analysis on left river bend in the head area of Guandi hydropower station reservoir[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(S2):4030-4037.
    [4]
    郭铁柱, 谢宝瑜, 魏红. 海子水库岩溶渗漏分析及帷幕灌浆防渗效果评价[J]. 水利水电技术, 2009, 40(4):73-75.

    GUO Tiezhu, XIE Baoyu, WEI Hong. Anaysis on karstic seepage and evaluation on anti-seepage effect from curtain grouting for Haizi reservoir[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2009, 40(4):73-75.
    [5]
    贺强. 基于渗透破坏试验的黏土临界坡降影响因素分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2017, 35(9):110-112, 21.

    HE Qiang. Influencing factor analysis of clay critical hydraulic gradient based on experiment of seepage failure[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2017, 35(9):110-112, 21.
    [6]
    张贵金, 徐卫亚. 岩溶坝区溶蚀岩体的渗透性变异研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(9):1527-1534. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.09.010

    ZHANG Guijin, XU Weiya. Study on variability of permeability of corroded rock mass in karst dam region[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(9):1527-1534. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.09.010
    [7]
    肖万春. 水库岩溶渗漏勘察技术要点与方法研究[J]. 水力发电, 2008, 34(7):52-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0559-9342.2008.07.016

    XIAO Wanchun. Keystones and methods study of karst reservoir leakage investigation[J]. Water Power, 2008, 34(7):52-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0559-9342.2008.07.016
    [8]
    李乐晨, 李子阳, 赵兆. 河口村水库坝肩裂隙岩体防渗处理分析[J]. 人民黄河, 2017, 39(10):98-101, 105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2017.10.021

    LI Lechen, LI Ziyang, ZHAO Zhao. Seepage control analysis of fractured rock mass at dam abutment of Hekoucun reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2017, 39(10):98-101, 105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2017.10.021
    [9]
    张可能, 张岳, 廖阳, 万浩然, 许培浩, 张云毅. 贵阳某地铁车站岩溶发育特征及突水模式分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2018, 37(2):300-306.

    ZHANG Keneng, ZHANG Yue, LIAO Yang, WAN Haoran, XU Peihao, ZHANG Yunyi. Analysis on karst development and water burst in a subway station[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2018, 37(2):300-306.
    [10]
    王家乐, 贾宝杰, 王志刚. 岩溶含水层地下水源热泵运行对地下水温度场的影响[J]. 水电能源科学, 2019, 37(2):55-58.

    WANG Jiale, JIA Baojie, WANG Zhigang. Influence of water source heat pump on groundwater temperature field in karst aquifer[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2019, 37(2):55-58.
    [11]
    朱彪, 陈喜, 张志才, 彭韬, 张乐辰, 陈波, 赵美刚. 西南喀斯特流域枯季地下水电导率特征及水-岩作用分析[J]. 地球与环境, 2019, 47(4):459-463.

    ZHU Biao, CHEN Xi, ZHANG Zhicai, PENG Tao, ZHANG Lechen, CHEN Bo, ZHAO Meigang. Characteristics of groundwater conductivity in dry season and water-rock interaction implications in a southwest karst basin[J]. Earth and Environment, 2019, 47(4):459-463.
    [12]
    唐春雷, 郑秀清, 梁永平. 龙子祠泉域岩溶地下水水化学特征及成因[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(5): 2087-2095.

    TANG Chunlei, ZHENG Xiuqing, LIANG Yongping. Hydrochemical characteristics and formation causes of ground karst water systems in Longzici spring catchment[J]. Environmental Science, 2020, 41(5): 2087-2095.
    [13]
    张浪, 李俊, 潘晓东, 黄晓荣, 彭聪. 西南某岩溶区地下水系统示踪试验与解析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(1): 42-47.

    ZHANG Lang, LI Jun, PAN Xiaodong, HUANG Xiaorong, PENG Cong. Tracer test and analysis of karst groundwater system in karst area of Southwest China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2020, 39(1): 42-47.
    [14]
    熊亮萍, 汪集旸. 钻孔地温分布与地下水活动[J]. 地质科学, 1992(S1):313-321.

    XIONG Liangping, WANG Jiyang. Geotemperature distribution in borehole and groundwater activity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 1992(S1):313-321.
    [15]
    程亚平, 蒋灵芝, 黎柳月, 李善民, 冯志秦. 综合物探技术探测平果铝厂赤泥堆场岩溶发育特征[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(6):688-698.

    CHENG Yaping, JIANG Lingzhi, LI Liuyue, LI Shanmin, FENG Zhiqin. The application of integrated geophysical method to karst pipeline distribution[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2016, 35(6):688-698.
    [16]
    黄朝煊, 王贺瑶. 坝基渗流与坝肩绕渗实用计算方法探讨[J]. 水电能源科学, 2015, 33(3):71-75.

    HUANG Chaoxuan, WANG Heyao. Discussion on computing method of dam foundation seepage and bypass seepage of dam a butment[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2015, 33(3):71-75.
    [17]
    康迎宾, 李琳. 涧里水库大坝右岸坝肩绕渗稳定分析[J]. 人民黄河, 2009, 31(4):109-110, 113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2009.04.051

    KANG Yingbin, LI Lin. Stability analysis of seepage around dam abutment on the right bank of Jianli reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2009, 31(4):109-110, 113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2009.04.051
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(2571.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1084) PDF downloads(60) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return