• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 40 Issue 5
Oct.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
NIE Guoquan,LI Xiaopan,DAN Yong,et al.Burial and thermal history of mud shale in Niutitang formation of lower Cambrian in southern Guizhou depression:A case study of Guidudi well 1[J].Carsologica Sinica,2021,40(05):760-767. doi: 10.11932/karst20210503
Citation: NIE Guoquan,LI Xiaopan,DAN Yong,et al.Burial and thermal history of mud shale in Niutitang formation of lower Cambrian in southern Guizhou depression:A case study of Guidudi well 1[J].Carsologica Sinica,2021,40(05):760-767. doi: 10.11932/karst20210503

Burial and thermal history of mud shale in Niutitang formation of lower Cambrian in southern Guizhou depression:A case study of Guidudi well 1

doi: 10.11932/karst20210503
Funds:

 2018YFC0604301

 DD20190723, DD20190562, DD20190022

  • Received Date: 2021-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2021-10-25
  • The Niutitang formation of lower Cambrian is one of the most important target strata for shale gas in southern Guizhou depression. In order to explore the hydrocarbon generation and evolution of mud shale, the burial and thermal history of Niutitang formation in Guidudi Well 1 in southern Guizhou depression has been reconstructed based on petroleum geological as well as geochemical analyses by basin simulation. Results demonstrate the abundant type-I organic matter in mud shale of Niutitang formation. The organic matter has reached over-mature stage and generally has a certain potential of hydrocarbon generation.The mud shale of Niutitang formation experienced the oil-generating period from early Middle Cambrian to Middle Ordovician (about 508~466 Ma) and the gas-generating period from Middle Ordovician to early Middle Triassic (about 466~236 Ma),reaching the maximum burial depth of 5,740 m and the maximum temperature of about 215 °C in the late Middle Triassic (about 230 Ma). It has the characteristics of transient oil generation and continuous gas generation. The process of the hydrocarbon generation during the high thermal evolution can provide good basic conditions for shale gas enrichment. However, tectonic uplift and erosion since Indosinian period has had a strong destructive effect on shale gas preservation, and preservation conditions are the most important controlling factors for shale gas enrichment.

     

  • NIE Guoquan,LI Xiaopan,DAN Yong,et al.Burial and thermal history of mud shale in Niutitang formation of lower Cambrian in southern Guizhou depression:A case study of Guidudi well 1[J].Carsologica Sinica,2021,40(05):760-767.
  • loading
  • 王成善,李祥辉. 沉积盆地分析原理与方法[M].北京: 高等教育出版社,2003.
    贾承造,李本亮,张兴阳,等. 中国海相盆地的形成与演化[J]. 科学通报,2007,52(1):1-8.
    宋颖睿,侯宇光,刘宇坤,等. 黔南坳陷下石炭统摆佐组暗色页岩热演化与生烃史研究[J]. 石油实验地质,2018, 40(2):226-232.
    张金川,徐波,聂海宽,等. 中国页岩气资源勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业,2008,28(6):136-140.
    赵文智,李建忠,杨涛,等. 中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2016,43(4):499-510.
    刘洪林,王红岩,刘人和,等. 中国页岩气资源及其勘探潜力分析[J]. 地质学报, 2010,84(9):1374-1378.
    郑民,李建中,吴晓智,等. 海相页岩烃源岩系中有机质的高温裂解生气潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探,2014,19(3):1-11.
    杨剑,易发成,钱壮志. 黔北下寒武统黑色岩系古地温及其指示意义[J]. 矿物学报,2009,29(1):87-94.
    岳来群,康永尚,陈清礼,等. 贵州地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气潜力分析[J]. 新疆石油地质,2013,34(2):123-128.
    卢树藩,陈厚国. 黔南地区麻页1井寒武系牛蹄塘组页岩特征及页岩气勘探前景[J]. 中国石油勘探,2017,22(3):81-87.
    封永泰,赵泽恒,赵培荣,等. 黔中隆起及周缘基底结构、断裂特征[J]. 石油天然气学报,2007,29(3):35-38.
    宁飞,汤良杰,王鹏昊,等. 黔南坳陷节理发育特征及其对构造应力场转换的指示[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,33(6):22-26.
    王鹏万,陈子炓,贺训云,等. 黔南坳陷下寒武统页岩气成藏条件与有利区带评价[J].天然气地球科学,2011(3):150-156.
    陈方文,卢双舫,丁雪. 泥页岩吸附气能力评价模型:以黔南坳陷牛蹄塘组吸附气含量为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2015,40(3):508-513.
    徐政语,姚根顺,郭庆新,等. 黔南坳陷构造变形特征及其成因解析[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2010,34(1):20-31.
    张江江. 黔南坳陷构造演化研究[D]. 北京:中国石油大学,2010.
    金宠,陈安清,楼章华,等.黔南坳陷构造运动与流体响应及油气保存[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2012,46(10):1910-1922.
    曾辉. 黔南坳陷九门冲组富有机质页岩无机孔隙定量评价[J]. 石油天然气学报,2013,35(9):34-39.
    徐思煌,马永生,梅廉夫,等. 中国南方典型气(油)藏控藏模式探讨[J]. 石油实验地质,2007,29(1):19-24.
    白森舒,彭金宁,刘光祥,等. 黔南安顺凹陷油气成藏特征及勘探潜力分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2013,35(1):24-28.
    贺训云,姚根顺,蔡春芳,等. 黔南坳陷下寒武统烃源岩地球化学特征及成因[J]. 沉积学报,2012,30(4):761-769.
    HOUY G, LIANGY Q, HES, et al. Distribution and thermal maturity of Devonian carbonate reservoir solid bitumen in Desheng area of Guizhong Depression, South China[J]. Geofluids, 2017, 2017:4580416.
    张渠,腾格尔,张志荣,等. 凯里—麻江地区油苗与固体沥青的油源分析[J]. 地质学报,2007,81(8):1118-1124.
    腾格尔,秦建中,郑伦举. 黔南坳陷海相优质烃源岩的生烃潜力及时空分布[J]. 地质学报,2008,82(3):366-371.
    梁狄刚,郭彤楼,陈建平,等. 中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(一)南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的分布[J]. 海相油气地质, 2008,13(2):1-16.
    王利,李宗星,刘成林,等. 柴达木盆地德令哈坳陷石炭系烃源岩成熟度演化史[J]. 地质力学学报,2019,25(3):370-381.
    罗超. 上扬子地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩特征研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2015.
    丰国秀,陈盛吉. 岩石中沥青反射率与镜质体反射率之间的关系[J]. 天然气工业,1988,8(3):20-25.
    李湘涛,石文睿,郭美瑜,等. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区海相页岩气层特征研究 [J]. 石油天然气学报,2014,36(11):11-15.
    郭彤楼,张汉荣. 四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式 [J]. 石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):28-36.
    袁玉松,马永生,胡圣标,等. 中国南方现今地热特征[J]. 地球物理学报,2006,49(4):1118-1126.
    汪洋,邓晋福,汪集旸,等. 中国大陆热流分布特征及热-构造分区[J]. 中国科学院研究生院学报,2001,18(1):51-58.
    谢舟,卢双舫,于玲,等. 泥质气源岩层内天然气扩散损失量评价:以黔南坳陷黄页1井九门冲组页岩为例[J]. 矿物学报,2014,34(1):137-143.
    康建威,余谦,田晶春,等. 黔南坳陷下奥陶统油苗与沥青特征及其成藏史[J]. 新疆石油地质,2016,37(5):507-511.
    侯方浩,方少仙,王兴志,等. 四川震旦系灯影组天然气藏储渗体的再认识[J]. 石油学报,1999,20(6):16-21.
    汪泽成,姜华,王铜山,等. 四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):305-312.
    李伟,刘静江,邓胜徽,等. 四川盆地及邻区震旦纪末—寒武纪早期构造运动性质与作用[J]. 石油学报,2015,36(5):546-556.
    邢凤存,侯明才,林良彪,等. 四川盆地晚震旦世—早寒武世构造运动记录及动力学成因讨论[J]. 地学前缘,2015,22(1):115-125.
    武赛军,魏国齐,杨威,等. 四川盆地桐湾运动及其油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学,2016,27(1):60-70.
    余开富,王守德. 贵州南部的都匀运动及其古构造特征和石油地质意义[J]. 贵州地质,1995,12(3):225-232.
    李双建,肖开华,汪新伟,等. 南方志留系碎屑矿物热年代学分析及其地质意义[J]. 地质学报,2008, 82(8):1068-1076.
    李梅. 黔南桂中坳陷水文地质地球化学与油气保存条件研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2011.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1378) PDF downloads(62) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return