Flow recession analysis of karst underground river basins in different karst geomorphic units in the upper reaches of the south source of the Wujiang river, Guizhou Province

GONG Xiaoyu; ZENG Cheng; HE Chun; CHEN Wangguang

doi:10.11932/karst2020y22

Volume 39 Issue 2

Apr. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > CARSOLOGICA SINICA > 2020 > 39(2): 154-163

GONG Xiaoyu, ZENG Cheng, HE Chun, CHEN Wangguang. Flow recession analysis of karst underground river basins in different karst geomorphic units in the upper reaches of the south source of the Wujiang river, Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(2): 154-163. doi: 10.11932/karst2020y22

Citation:

GONG Xiaoyu, ZENG Cheng, HE Chun, CHEN Wangguang. Flow recession analysis of karst underground river basins in different karst geomorphic units in the upper reaches of the south source of the Wujiang river, Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(2): 154-163. doi: 10.11932/karst2020y22

Citation:

GONG Xiaoyu, ZENG Cheng, HE Chun, CHEN Wangguang. Flow recession analysis of karst underground river basins in different karst geomorphic units in the upper reaches of the south source of the Wujiang river, Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(2): 154-163. doi: 10.11932/karst2020y22

PDF( 3315 KB)

Flow recession analysis of karst underground river basins in different karst geomorphic units in the upper reaches of the south source of the Wujiang river, Guizhou Province

doi: 10.11932/karst2020y22

1.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China/University of Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100049, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China/University of Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100049, China/College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China

Publish Date: 2020-04-25

Abstract

Abstract

The Sanchahe river basin is located in the transition zone from the Yunnan plateau to the Guizhou Plateau, which is the south tributary of the Wujiang river. The total area of the basin is 7，264 km2, where elevation drops from 2，000 m to 1，100 m. This basin hosts many multi-phase karst and diverse landforms. Within this basin, the Huayudong sub-underground river basin and the Santang sub-underground river basin are located in the karst peak-cluster region of Panxian-Weining and the karst peak forest region of central-southwest Guizhou, respectively, possessing different karst development characteristics. To investigate the relationship between karst surface morphology and structure of karst water-bearing medium, this work uses the topographic indexes (elevation and relief) of the two basins to compare and analyze their geomorphologic development features, and determine structural characteristics of the water bearing medium in the two basins by the flow recession analysis based on interval exponential function. Results show that， (1) The Huayudong underground river basin has an average elevation of 2，306 m and an average relief of 73.2 m. It can be divided into two areas: high relief area I (mean 122 m) and low relief area II (mean 64 m), which account for 14.9% and 85.1% of the whole basin area, respectively. The Santang underground river basin has an average elevation of 1，880 m and an average relief of 87.6 m. It can be divided into three areas: high relief area I (mean 106 m), medium relief area II (mean 81 m)and low relief area III(mean 48 m),which account for 40.2%, 49.7% and 10.1% of the whole basin area, respectively. (2)The recession coefficients of each stage of the Huayudong underground river basin are 0.000，3, 0.000，1, 0.000，06 (1/0.5 hour), the total water storage capacity is 2，199.356×104 m3, and the water storage of different hydrological sub-regime accounts for 0.1%, 9.9% and 90.0% of the total water storage, respectively. The recession coefficients of every stage of the Santang underground river basin are 0.001, 0.000，3 and 0.000，1 (1/0.5 hour),the total water storage capacity is 2，310.902×104 m3, and the water storage of different hydrological sub-regime accounts for 9.4%, 30.8% and 59.8%, respectively. These results suggest that there may be some correlation between surface relief and flow recession, that is, high relief corresponds to strong karst pipeline flow (the first flow recession state), and low relief corresponds to aquifers (the second and third flow recession state) with small fissures and karst cracks.
- karst,
- topographic index,
- relief,
- flow recession,
- Sanchahe tributary

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	姜光辉,郭芳.我国西南岩溶区表层岩溶带的水文动态分析［J］.水文地质工程地质,2009,26(5):89-93.
[2]	田娟,董贵明,束龙仓.孔隙-管道型西南岩溶地下河系统参数与流量衰减系数关系的数值试验研究［J］.水文地质工程地质,2013,40(2):13-18.
[3]	Kovács A, Perrochet P, Király L,et al. Aquantitative method for the characterisation of karst aquifers based on spring hydrograph analysis［J］.Journal of Hydrology,2005,303(1-4):152-164.
[4]	Worthington S R H. Characteristics of channel networks in unconfined carbonate aquifers［J］.Bulletin,2015,127(5-6): 759-769.
[5]	K?ss W, Behrens H, Himmelsbach T, et al. Tracing technique in geohydrology［J］. Chemical Geology,1998,175(3):779-780.
[6]	Goldscheider N，Drew D（Eds.）.Methods in Karst Hydrogeology.IAH:International Contributions to Hydrogeology,26［M］. Crc Press, 2007:264-265.
[7]	Shuster E T, White W B. Seasonal fluctuations in the chemistry of lime-stone springs:A possible means for characterizing carbonate aquifers［J］.Journal of hydrology,1971,14(2):93-128.
[8]	梁日胜,曾成,闫志为,等.贵州印江朗溪岩溶槽谷龙洞湾泉流量衰减分析［J］.中国岩溶,2019,38(1):1-8.
[9]	赵良杰,夏日元,易连兴,等.基于流量衰减曲线的岩溶含水层水文地质参数推求方法［J］.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015,45(6):1817-1821.
[10]	韩行瑞.岩溶水文地质学［M］.北京:科学出版社,2015:6-9.
[11]	Goldscheider N, Drew D.Methods in Karst Hydrogeology［M］.AK Leiden,The Netherlands:Taylor & Francis,2007:9-25.
[12]	陈宏峰,何愿译.岩溶水文地质学方法［M］.北京:科学出版社,2017:10-21.
[13]	宋林华.喀斯特地貌演化与喀斯特含水层特性［J］.地理研究,1986,5(4):68-77.
[14]	周训,胡伏生,何江涛，等.地下水科学概论［M］.北京:地质出版社,2009.
[15]	贵州省地方志编纂委员会. 贵州省志-地理志［M］. 贵阳：贵州人民出版社,1988: 710-727.
[16]	焦树林,罗福家,梁虹,等.乌江源区阳长流域化学侵蚀作用的碳汇效应［J］.水土保持学报, 2012, 26(5): 44-47.
[17]	李兴中. 晚新生代贵州高原喀斯特地貌演进及其影响因素［J］. 贵州地质, 2001, 18(1): 29-36.
[18]	李宗发. 贵州喀斯特地貌分区［J］.贵州地质,2011,28(3):177-181.
[19]	韩中丰,王朝明,田数耕，等. 1∶20万区域水文地质普查报告(威宁幅)［R］.1978:7-20.
[20]	金占省,任建国,袁德修，等.1∶20万区域水文地质普查报告(安顺幅)［R］.1979:5-27.
[21]	黄敬熙. 流量衰减方程及其应用：以洛塔岩溶盆地为例［J］. 中国岩溶, 1982, 1(2): 118-126.
[22]	钟玲敏.川东高陡背斜区岩溶空间分异特征及评价系统构建研究［D］.成都：成都理工大学,2018:61-70.
[23]	沈丹.贵州省三岔河流域地貌研究［D］.贵阳：贵州师范大学,2019:17-24.
[24]	李钜章.中国地貌基本形态划分的探讨［J］.地理研究,1987,6(2):32-39.
[25]	孙兰,周德全.基于GIS的喀斯特小区域地貌分区：以贵州省贵阳市为例［J］.贵阳学院学报（自然科学版），2018,13(3): 54-61.
[26]	铁道部第二勘测设计院.岩溶工程地质［M］.北京:中国铁道出版社,1984:82-93.
[27]	李玉辉,丁智强,吴晓月.基于Strahler面积—高程分析的云南石林县域喀斯特地貌演化的量化研究［J］.地理学报,2018,73(5):973-985.
[28]	郎玲玲,程维明,朱启疆, 等. 多尺度DEM提取地势起伏度的对比分析：以福建低山丘陵区为例［J］. 地球信息科学学报, 2007, 9(6):1-6.
[29]	杨艳林,邰长生.长江中游地形起伏度分析研究［J］.人民长江, 2018,49(2):51-55.

Relative Articles

[1]	LUO Zhenyu, YANG Yan, LI Ji, XIAO Wenjie, SUN Tingting, YE Zhimao. Flow attenuation analysis and inorganic carbon flux estimation of surface karst spring in rocky desertification control area: A case study at Laoquan spring in the Longtan trough valley, Youyang county, Chongqing City, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(2): 337-350, 381. doi: 10.11932/karst2023y011
[2]	MENG Yan, ZHEN Xiaozhan, LEI Mingtang, LI Zhuojun, JIA Long, PAN Zongyuan. Karst distribution and development in the Pearl River Delta[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(5): 746-751. doi: 10.11932/karst20190510
[3]	LIANG Risheng, ZENG Cheng, YAN Zhiwei, SHI Biao, HE Shiyi, FAN Yuhong, GUAN Jin. Recession flow analysis for Longdongwan spring at Langxi karst valley in Yinjiang county, Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(1): 10-18. doi: 10.11932/karst20190102
[4]	WU Yanan. Application of the highdensity electrical resistivity method to karst geological exploration in Quanhe, Laiwu City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(4): 617-623. doi: 10.11932/karst20180416
[5]	ZHANG Xin, ZHAO Ming-jie, WANG Kui, RONG Yao, LIU Qiang. Application of 3D electrical resistivity tomography to a tunnel in a karst area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(3): 291-298. doi: 10.11932/karst20160307
[6]	ZHANG Ying, LI Qiang. Is it karst carbon sink or karst carbon flux?[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(6): 539-542. doi: 10.11932/karst20150601
[7]	CHANG Hong, ZHANG Yu, LI Jing-fu, TAN Jian-min, HAN Hui-qing. The relationship between karst formation and geological disasters in Qingjiang river basin, western Hubei Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(3): 288-293.
[8]	DAI Jian ling, LEI Ming tang. First and second level karst environment zoning for highway engineering[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2013, 32(2): 153-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2013.02.005
[9]	YU Jian-guo, DU Wen-yue, WANG Hua, ZHOU Xiao-hong. Uncertainty evaluations on the measurement of “carbon” in the research on karst carbon sink effect: A case for dissolved inorganic carbon[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(3): 333-338. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.03.016
[10]	WANG Mao-mei, SHU Long-cang, JI Ye-fei, TAO Yu-fei, DONG Gui-ming, LIU Li-hong. Causes of spring＇s of flux attenuation and simulation of spring＇s regime --A case in Jinan karst spring area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2008, 27(1): 19-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2008.01.004
[11]	SUO Li-tao, WAN Jun-wei, LU Xue-wei. Improvement and application of TOPMODEL in karst region[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2007, 26(1): 67-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2007.01.011
[12]	SHI Jian, WANG Jing, LIU De-shen, HAN Xing-rui. RESEARCH ON ATTENUATION CAUSES AND CHANGE TENDENCY OF LARGE KARST SPRINGS IN ENERGY RESOURCE BASE ON THE MIDDLE AND UPPER REACHES OF YELLOWRIVER[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(4): 330-334. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.04.013
[13]	ZHANG Jia-gui. ANALYSIS ON CATASTROPH BY KARST WEATHERING OF MARLY LIMESTONE IN POPULATION RESETTLEMENT REGION OF THE THREE GORGES[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2005, 24(3): 239-244. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2005.03.013
[14]	ZHANG Zhi-gan, HUANG Bao-jian, HUANG Hai-peng. CARBON CYCLE AND SOIL AMELIORATION IN SOUTH CHINA KARST TERRAIN :PRINCIPLES AND REVIEW[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2002, 21(1): 7-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2002.01.003
[15]	YAO Chang-hong, YANG Gui-fang, JIANG Zhong-cheng, YUAN Dao-xian. THE NUTRIENT BALANCE OF THE ECOSYSTEM IN KARST AREA[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2001, 20(1): 41-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2001.01.008
[16]	MA Teng, WANG Yan-xin, HAO Zhen-chun. THE CAUSE ANALYSIS FOR THE DECLINING DISCHARGE OF SHENTOU SPRING AND THE FORECAST OF ITS EVOLUTION TREND[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2001, 20(4): 261-267. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2001.04.003
[17]	WANG Zai-gao, LIANG Hong. PRELIMINARY STUDY ON THE INDEX SYSTEM AND THEORETICAL MODEL OF THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF WATER RESOURCES IN KARST REGIONS[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2001, 20(2): 144-148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2001.02.013
[18]	Li Guomin, Yang Fu. TIME SERIES ANALYSIS FOR THE DECLINING DISCHARGE OF SHENTOU SPRING[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1993, 12(2): 123-130.
[19]	Zheng Wenxing, Zhang Qizhang. A PRELIMINARY STUDY ON THE REGULARITY OF KARST DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORTH ANHUI AND EAST HENAN AREA[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1989, 8(1): 33-40.
[20]	Huang Jingxi. RECESSION EQUATION AND ITS APPLICATION——CASE HISTORY OF LUOTA KARST BASIN[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1982, 1(2): 118-126.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	杨海明，王家乐，顾再柯，刘伟，王志刚，刘纪根. 基于洪水退水过程的喀斯特小流域径流组分与含水层储水结构. 地球科学与环境学报. 2025(01): 82-94 .
2.	卢献健，黎振宝，晏红波，张焕铃，郭子扬. 基于TVDI的不同类型岩溶区干旱时空演变及其影响因素分析. 遥感技术与应用. 2024(03): 669-678 .
3.	陈旺光，曾成，龚效宇，邰治钦，邓俊祖，杨明星. 贵州深切峡谷区典型岩溶地下河水文水化学特征-以贵州三塘地下河为例. 水文地质工程地质. 2022(04): 19-29 .

Other cited types(2)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF(3315.0KB)

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (1681) PDF downloads(231)