• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 39 Issue 3
Jun.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Xuyao, DENG Yan, CAO Jianhua, JIANG Zhongcheng, XU Ye, LIANG Jintao. Evolution of ecological carrying capacity in typical karst counties: A case study of Luxi county, Yunnan Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(3): 359-367. doi: 10.11932/karst2020y18
Citation: LI Xuyao, DENG Yan, CAO Jianhua, JIANG Zhongcheng, XU Ye, LIANG Jintao. Evolution of ecological carrying capacity in typical karst counties: A case study of Luxi county, Yunnan Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(3): 359-367. doi: 10.11932/karst2020y18

Evolution of ecological carrying capacity in typical karst counties: A case study of Luxi county, Yunnan Province

doi: 10.11932/karst2020y18
  • Publish Date: 2020-06-25
  • Luxi county is located in the southeast of Yunnan Province, where karst accounts for 79% of the total area. The vulnerable ecosystem overlapping with unreasonable human activities in the county has caused serious water and soil erosion and rocky desertification, thus the contradiction between human and land is prominent. Besides, there are many poor people in the county, and the deterioration of the ecological environment and poverty seriously limit the sustainable development of Luxi county. The purpose of this work is to understand ecological carrying capacity, analyze sustainable development capacity and the bottleneck factors restricting the development of Luxi county from the structure of ecological carrying capacity, thus to provide a scientific theoretical basis for promoting the coordinated sustainable development of ecology, economy and society as well as poverty alleviation in this area. We use the multi-index comprehensive evaluation method from three dimensions of ecological resilience, ecological support and ecological pressure to stratify the ecological carrying capacity, combining with the characteristics of the study area to construct an evaluation index system suitable for the karst rocky desertification area. In terms of the entropy method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, combining subjective and objective weighting methods, we analyze the evolution of ecological carrying capacity of Luxi county from 2008 to 2017. Results show that the ecological resilience index has an upward trend, while the intermediate process fluctuates sharply, indicating that the karst ecosystem is less stable and has obvious fragile characteristics. As the rapid economic growth has given supports to the management and utilization of environmental resources, residents’income and other aspects, the ecological support index has increased year by year, from 0.133,2 to 0.896,3. With the improvement of the ecological environment and the promotion of ecological civilization in recent years, the ecological pressure index is in a stable state and has been decreasing slowly in recent years, and the pressure on the ecosystem is also decreasing gradually. Except for the severe natural disasters in 2012, the index of ecological carrying capacity has been steadily increasing year by year, from 0.269,2 to 0.759,0. The carrying capacity has changed from low to high state. The structure of the ecosystem turns gradually stable and reasonable, and the capacity for sustainable development has been improved. The overall development trend in the past ten years is fairly good. Although the ecological carrying situation exhibits a good development trend, due to the steep karst slope in the fault basin, the restriction of natural environment, such as serious soil erosion and rocky desertification, superposition of original extensive farming, the development of the secondary and tertiary industries in Luxi country remains slow, limiting its economic development. So there is still a long way to the national well-off society.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    袁道先.全球岩溶生态系统对比:科学目标和执行计划[J].地球科学进展,2001,16(4):461-466.
    [2]
    曹建华,袁道先,童立强.中国西南岩溶生态系统特征与石漠化综合治理对策[J].草业科学,2008,25(9):40-50.
    [3]
    熊康宁,池永宽.中国南方喀斯特生态系统面临的问题及对策[J].生态经济,2015,31(1):23-30.
    [4]
    王建锋,谢世友.西南喀斯特地区石漠化问题研究综述[J].环境科学与管理,2008,33(11):147-152.
    [5]
    赵东升,郭彩贇,郑度,等.生态承载力研究进展[J].生态学报,2019,32(2):1-10.
    [6]
    顾康康.生态承载力的概念及其研究方法[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(2):389-396.
    [7]
    陈端吕,董明辉,彭保发.生态承载力研究综述[J].湖南文理学院学报:社会科学版,2005,30(5):70-74.
    [8]
    纪学朋,白永平,杜海波,等.甘肃省生态承载力空间定量评价及耦合协调性[J].生态学报,2017,37(17):5861-5870.
    [9]
    刘东,封志明,杨艳昭.基于生态足迹的中国生态承载力供需平衡分析[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(4):614-624.
    [10]
    王家骥,姚小红,李京荣,等.黑河流域生态承载力估测[J].环境科学研究,2000,13(2):44-48.
    [11]
    王瑶.基于可持续发展的上海市生态承载力研究[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016,34(2):13-18.
    [12]
    王影,柴立和.生态承载力水平评价的动态模型及其应用:以洞庭湖生态经济区为例[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(5):1859-1865.
    [13]
    Li Yang,Guo Tingting,Zhou Jing.Research of Ecological Carrying Capacity:Comprehensive Evaluation Model[J].Procedia Environmental Sciences,2011,11:864-868.
    [14]
    封志明,李鹏.承载力概念的源起与发展:基于资源环境视角的讨论[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(9):1475-1489.
    [15]
    黄静.典型喀斯特峰丛峡谷区生态承载力综合评价:以贵州花江为例[D].贵阳:贵州师范大学,2016.
    [16]
    熊建新,陈瑞吕,彭保发,等.洞庭湖区生态承载力系统耦合协调度时空分异[J].地理科学,2014,34(9):1108-1115.
    [17]
    Wang Jiayang, Wei Xiaomei, Guo Qiang. A three-dimensional evaluation model for regional carrying capacity of ecological environment to social economic development: Model development and a case study in China[J].Ecological Indicators,2018,89:348-355.
    [18]
    曹智,闵庆文,刘某承,等.基于生态系统服务的生态承载力:概念、内涵与评估模型及应用[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(1):1-11.
    [19]
    金悦,陆兆华,檀菲菲,等.典型资源型城市生态承载力评价:以唐山市为例[J].生态学报,2015,35(14):4852-4859.
    [20]
    施开放,刁承泰,孙秀锋,等.基于耕地生态足迹的重庆市耕地生态承载力供需平衡研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(6):1872-1880.
    [21]
    曹宸,李叙勇.区县尺度下的河流生态系统健康评价:以北京房山区为例[J].生态学报,2018,39(12):4296-4306.
    [22]
    熊建新,彭保发,陈端吕,等.洞庭湖区生态承载力时空演化特征[J].地理研究,2013,32(11):2031-2040.
    [23]
    王雅敬,谢炳庚,李晓青,等.喀斯特地区耕地生态承载力供需平衡[J].生态学报,2017,37(21):7030-7038.
    [24]
    苏品任,官冬杰,杨莎.重庆喀斯特地区水资源承载力动态变化评价[J].绿色科技,2018,4(8):203-207.
    [25]
    向悟生,李先琨,何成新,等.桂西南岩溶生态脆弱区生态承载力分析及可持续发展状况评价:以广西平果县为例[J].中国岩溶,2008,27(1):75-79.
    [26]
    杨廷锋.西南岩溶石山地区生态承载力的演变及动力机制:以贵州省为例[J].中国岩溶,2016,35(3):332-339.
    [27]
    王密,何谋军,叶晓云.喀斯特区域生态承载力综合评价案例研究[J].环境与可持续发展,2009,34(6):10-13.
    [28]
    覃楠钧.广西环大明山区域生态承载力评价[D].南宁:广西大学,2013.
    [29]
    王宇,张贵,李丽辉,等.云南泸西小江流域岩溶地下水调查与地质环境整治示范报告[R].云南省地质调查院,2006.
    [30]
    Li Ying, Zhao Guohua, Zhou Jing. Establishment of Evaluation Index System of Ecological Carrying Capacity in Changping District Pusalu Village[J].Procedia Environmental Sciences,2011,11:899-905.
    [31]
    沈利娜,蒋忠诚,尹辉,等.果化石漠化监测区岩溶生态环境系统安全评价[J].广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2014,32(3):141-149.
    [32]
    Xu Liuyu, Kang Peng, Wei Jinjin. Evaluation of urban ecological carrying capacity: a case study of Beijing, China[J].Procedia Environmental Sciences,2010,2:1873-1880.
    [33]
    高吉喜.可持续发展理论探索:生态承载力理论、方法与应用[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2001.
    [34]
    王云霄.北京市生态承载力与可持续发展研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学,2010.
    [35]
    俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.学术期刊综合评价数据标准化方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,5(12):136-139.
    [36]
    狄乾斌,张洁,吴佳璐.基于生态系统健康的辽宁省海洋生态承载力评价[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(2):256-264.
    [37]
    解雪峰,吴涛,肖翠,等.基于PSR模型的东阳江流域生态安全评价[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1702-1711.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1931) PDF downloads(371) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return