Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 38 Issue 2
Apr.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2019  >  38(2): 281-291
LUO Qianzhou, ZHANG Junliang, LI Yichao, YIN Zongyi, TANG Li, WANG Peng, WANG Yan, ZHANG Shuanhou. Geologic conditions and distribution features of Tiankeng groups in Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(2): 281-291. doi: 10.11932/karst20190214
Citation: LUO Qianzhou, ZHANG Junliang, LI Yichao, YIN Zongyi, TANG Li, WANG Peng, WANG Yan, ZHANG Shuanhou. Geologic conditions and distribution features of Tiankeng groups in Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(2): 281-291. doi: 10.11932/karst20190214
shu

Geologic conditions and distribution features of Tiankeng groups in Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province

doi: 10.11932/karst20190214

  • Shaanxi Mineral Resources and Geological Survey, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710068, China/International Research Base of Hanzhong Karst Cave Groups, Hanzhong, Shaanxi 723100, China

  • Publish Date: 2019-04-25
    Abstract
  • An extensive investigation determines the Tiankeng groups in Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province which are concentrated at four places, Chanjiayan of Ningqiang, Chanjiayan Group, Nanzheng Xiaonanhai of Nanzheng, Luojiaba of Xixiang and Sanyuan of Zhenba. Their geological conditions and genesis are analyzed from stratum lithology, geomorphology and structure. It is considered that the very thick carbonate strata of Permian-Triassic was the material basis for development of these big karst caves. Faults and folds controlled their generation, especially the secondary structure determined their locations. New tectonic uplift and hot and humid climate provide karst dynamic power for the formation of Tiankeng.These Tiankeng groups are clustered in a belt-like pattern in plane with large differences in vertical direction. Most of the caves are located at altitudes of 1,000-2,000 m. These results allow us to understand that the formation of Tiankeng groups has undergone four stage evolution.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(19)
  • [1]
    齐矗华,甘枝茂.陕西省境秦巴山地白马塘、小南海地区岩溶地貌的基本特征［J］.陕西师大学报(自然科学版),1981(Z1):305-314.
    [2]
    杨秀芬,马守林.汉中盆地与新构造运动有关的地貌特征［J］.西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),1987(2):45-49.
    [3]
    周宗俊. 陕西省岩溶地区水文地质特征.［J］陕西地质,1987(2):90-99.
    [4]
    沈传波,梅廉夫,徐振平,等.大巴山中新生代隆升的裂变径迹证据［J］.岩石学报,2007(11):2901-2910.
    [5]
    陕西省地质调查院. 南江市幅区域地质调查报告（1∶25000）［M］. 2008.
    [6]
    袁道先,章程.岩溶动力学的理论探索与实践［J］.地球学报,2008(3):355-365.
    [7]
    张岳桥,施炜,李建华,等.大巴山前陆弧形构造带形成机理分析［J］.地质学报,2010,84(9):1300-1315.
    [8]
    田云涛,朱传庆,徐明,等.白垩纪以来米仓山-汉南穹窿剥蚀过程及其构造意义:磷灰石裂变径迹的证据［J］.地球物理学报,2010,53(4):920-930.
    [9]
    张茜,董云鹏,杨晨,等.米仓山隆升时代的沉积学制约［J］.西北地质,2010,43(3):12-19.
    [10]
    许长海,周祖翼,常远,等.大巴山弧形构造带形成与两侧隆起的关系:FT和(U-Th)/He低温热年代约束［J］.中国科学:地球科学,2010,40(12):1684-1696.
    [11]
    孙东,刘树根,邓宾,等.米仓山与龙门山接合部叠加褶皱特征及构造演化［J］.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2011,38(2):156-168.
    [12]
    张远海,朱德浩.中国大型岩溶洞穴空间分布及演变规律［J］.桂林理工大学学报,2012,32(1):20-28.
    [13]
    王明明,周本刚,杨晓平,等.汉中盆地周缘断裂活动性及晚第四纪构造特征［J］.地震地质,2013,35(4):778-792.
    [14]
    王蕾彬.汉江上游一级阶地风成黄土光释光测年研究及意义［D］.西安:陕西师范大学,2015.
    [15]
    税晓洁，孙佳骐等. 二十一世纪地理大发现!陕西汉中天坑群揭秘［J］.中国国家地理，2017(6):26-75.
    [16]
    张拴厚，韩芳林. 中国区域地质志?陕西志［M］.北京：地质出版社，2017.
    [17]
    张拴厚,王学平,林平选,等.陕西龙门山地震带地质灾害的地质构造约束［J］.陕西地质,2008,26(2):44-54.
    [18]
    陈清敏,张丽,王喆,等.汉中大佛洞宇宙成因核素26Al/10Be埋藏年龄［J］.地球环境学报,2018,9(1):38-44.
    [19]
    陈清敏, 王喆, 张丽,等. 汉中罗汉洞宇宙成因核素26Al/10Be埋藏年龄［J］. 第四纪研究,2018,38（3）:688-694.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Kaikai, CHEN Qingmin, CHENG Xing, YANG Zhiguo, HAN Jing, CAO Jiangtao, AI Hao, ZHANG Wenshuo. Research progress on karst rocky desertification in Southwest China and the Qinba region of Shaanxi Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(1): 147-162. doi: 10.11932/karst20240108
    [2]ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Weifeng, WEI Lei, DAI Xusheng, ZHANG Wenjun. Study on distribution law of geological disasters in karst mountainous area of east Yunnan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(6): 1350-1361. doi: 10.11932/karst20240612
    [3]WU Yuanbin, LIU Zhikui, YIN Renchao, YANG Jianxing, LUO Weiquan, LEI Mingtang, DAI Jianling, PAN Zongyuan. Karst development characteristics and distribution law in Huaihua basin, Hunan Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(5): 759-772, 807. doi: 10.11932/karst2022y22
    [4]WU Yuanbin, LUO Weiquan, YIN Renchao, LIU Zhikui, DAI Jianling, PAN Zongyuan, ZHOU Fubiao. Distribution law and genetic mechanism of karst collapse in Longquan village-Qingfengshan village, Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(6): 932-942. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y43
    [5]REN Juangang, HONG Zenglin, ZHANG Jing, TANG Li, LIU Xiaofeng, QIN Zhen, WANG Peng, WANG Yan. Features of geological relics and genesis of the Chanjiayan Tiankeng group in Ningqiang, Shaanxi Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(3): 539-547.
    [6]FENG Yawei. Distribution and genesis of karst collapse in Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 205-214. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y01
    [7]WU Jin, ZHANG Zhaohui. Research status and prospect of karst Tiankengs in Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(1): 119-126. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y35
    [8]CAO Xiaojuan, JIANG Fuwei, CHEN Youzhi, DONG Ying, YANG Hongbin. Geological conditions and evolution model of red karst landscape in the Wulingshan area, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(6): 945-951. doi: 10.11932/karst20200614
    [9]DING Yinglei, ZHOU Yunchao. Characteristics of soil gravel distribution in karst small watershed and its influencing factors[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(5): 729-738. doi: 10.11932/karst20190508
    [10]HONG Zenglin, XU Tong, XUE Xuping. Evaluation of geological relics tourism resources based on AHP：An example of the Hanzhong Tiankeng group[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(2): 276-280. doi: 10.11932/karst20190213
    [11]LIU Peiliang, GUO Yaoxin, LI Zhonghu, WANG Mali1, YUE Ming, HONG Zenglin. Two newly recorded plants from the Hanzhong Tiankeng group[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(2): 292-294. doi: 10.11932/karst20190215
    [12]LUO Lichuan, LIANG Xing, ZHOU Hong, XIE Kai, CHEN Biaodian. Development and distribution characteristics of karst caves in the Xiangxi river basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(3): 450-461. doi: 10.11932/karst20180317
    [13]WEI Yong-yao, SUN Shu-lin, HUANG Jing-jun, JIANG Su, MIAO Shi-xian. Spatial-temporal distribution and causes of karst collapse in the Xuzhou area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(1): 52-57. doi: 10.11932/karst20150107
    [14]LI Qing-song, LI Zhao-lin, PEI Jian-guo, QIN Xiao-qun, YI Lian-xing, LIANG Mao-zhen. Characteristics of waterlogging and management planning in karst depressions and valley in the east Mashan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2008, 27(4): 359-365. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2008.04.011
    [15]Chen Jiangeng. AN INQUIRY ABOUT THE CHARACTERISTICS ANDLAWOF DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOCHONG CAVEGROUP OF DUYUN, GUIZHOU PROVINCE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1997, 16(1): 82-89.
    [16]Zhao Jingbo. CHANGE IN COMPOSITON OF KARST SPRING ANDCHARACTERISTICS OF KARST DEVELOPMENT INZHENAN AND XUNYANG COUNTIES OF SHAANXI PROVINCE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1996, 15(4): 376-381.
    [17]Zhou Xuansen. STUDY ON REGIONAL DISTRIVUTION OF CAVES IN ZHEJIANG[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1992, 11(1): 43-50.
    [18]Jia Guiting, Hu Kuanrong. THE FORMATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF COLLAPSE COLUMNS IN NORTH-CHINA-TYPE COAL FIELDS[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1989, 8(4): 261-267.
    [19]Li Shujun. THE APPLICATION OF AERIAL IMAGES TO KARST HYDROGEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION IN SOUTHERN QINGLING-BASHAN MOUNTAIN AREA OF SHANCI PROVINCE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1986, 5(增刊): 85-87.
    [20]Man Tienan. EXPLOITATION OF THE LOWER COAL MEASURES BY APPLYING GEOLOGICAL LAWS[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1985, 4(Z1): 117-123.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 王业明. 汉中天坑群：地质奇观的保护与旅游发展策略. 旅游纵览. 2025(01): 28-30 .
    2. 李修成，王鹏，唐力，胡义，王研. 汉中天坑群小南海岩溶水水化学特征及其指示意义. 矿产勘查. 2022(01): 106-114 .
    3. 胡义，唐力，李益朝，秦臻，王鹏，李兴文. 汉中天坑群典型岩溶景观区植物多样性研究. 陕西林业科技. 2021(02): 15-20 .
    4. 郝俊卿，李丹丹，曹晓娟. 我国地质遗迹的概念、范畴与研究进展——基于2000-2020年间文献可视化分析. 干旱区资源与环境. 2021(07): 136-143 .
    5. 任娟刚，洪增林，郭垚鑫，崔娜，唐力，张瑜，张静. 汉中天坑群喀斯特生境生物多样性特征及规律. 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(04): 63-69 .
    6. 任娟刚，洪增林，张静，唐力，刘晓峰，秦臻，王鹏，王研. 陕西宁强禅家岩天坑群喀斯特地质遗迹特征及成因. 中国岩溶. 2021(03): 539-547 . 本站查看
    7. 蒲高忠，王柯懿，莫凌，曾丹娟，陈霞霞. 中国喀斯特天坑演化及植被生态系统研究进展. 广西植物. 2021(10): 1632-1643 .
    8. 李修成，张俊良，李益朝，王鹏，唐力. 汉中市西南部岩溶水水化学特征及其形成机制. 人民长江. 2021(12): 54-58 .
    9. 翟秀敏，张远海，李发源，史文强，韦昊星. 侵蚀型天坑演化研究. 中国岩溶. 2021(06): 952-964 . 本站查看
    10. 任娟刚，洪增林，张远海，张静. 陕西南郑小南海天坑群与广西乐业大石围天坑群对比研究. 西北地质. 2020(02): 298-307 .
    11. 陈清敏，洪增林，罗乾周，唐力，王鹏，胡义，王研，崔娜. 末次冰期汉中地洞河洞穴石笋微量元素古气候记录. 西安文理学院学报(自然科学版). 2020(03): 92-97+102 .
    12. 付垒，洪增林. 遥感技术在汉中天坑群地质遗迹调查中的应用. 矿产勘查. 2020(06): 1255-1262 .
    13. 洪增林，任娟刚，张远海. 陕西汉中天坑群岩溶地质遗迹形成探微. 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(03): 81-87 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040246810
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 31.2 %FULLTEXT: 31.2 %META: 66.2 %META: 66.2 %PDF: 2.6 %PDF: 2.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.9 %其他: 14.9 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %China: 5.8 %China: 5.8 %三明: 0.1 %三明: 0.1 %上海: 13.6 %上海: 13.6 %东营: 0.2 %东营: 0.2 %中卫: 0.2 %中卫: 0.2 %丹东: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %亳州: 0.1 %亳州: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %北京: 1.6 %北京: 1.6 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %崇左: 0.3 %崇左: 0.3 %布达佩斯: 0.1 %布达佩斯: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %新德里: 0.1 %新德里: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %汉中: 0.1 %汉中: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %百色: 0.1 %百色: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %纽约: 0.6 %纽约: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 0.2 %荆州: 0.1 %荆州: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 2.6 %西宁: 2.6 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %阳江: 0.1 %阳江: 0.1 %驻马店: 55.2 %驻马店: 55.2 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %其他其他China三明上海东营中卫丹东亳州保定北京十堰南宁台州合肥哈尔滨哥伦布天津安康宝鸡宣城崇左布达佩斯徐州成都扬州新德里昆明晋城杭州武汉汉中沈阳淄博深圳温州湛江漯河珠海百色石家庄纽约芒廷维尤荆州葫芦岛衢州西宁西安西雅图诺沃克贵阳运城郑州重庆阳江驻马店黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(7631.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2195) PDF downloads(568) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return