• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 38 Issue 2
Apr.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LUO Huailiang. Spatial differences and evolution of economic development of county-level mature resource cities in karst mountainous region:A case study of Xingwen county, Sichuan Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(2): 217-226. doi: 10.11932/karst20190206
Citation: LUO Huailiang. Spatial differences and evolution of economic development of county-level mature resource cities in karst mountainous region:A case study of Xingwen county, Sichuan Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(2): 217-226. doi: 10.11932/karst20190206

Spatial differences and evolution of economic development of county-level mature resource cities in karst mountainous region:A case study of Xingwen county, Sichuan Province

doi: 10.11932/karst20190206
  • Publish Date: 2019-04-25
  • Xingwen county is located in the transition zone between Sichuan basin and Yunnan-Guizhou plateau. It covers an area of 1,373 km2 and has jurisdiction over 15 townships with a population of 484,000 and an urbanization rate of 33.19%. The terrain in the county gradually rises from north to south, and large areas of karst landforms occur in the middle and south. There are typical Xingwen-type karsts in Xingwen Stone Field World Geopark. Xingwen county belongs to matured resource-based city at county-level in karst mountainous area, which is dominated by coal, pyrite and limestone mines. Taking the villages and towns of the county as the basic unit, and the last 10 years (2006-2015) as the research period, 15 townships of Xingwen county which is a mountainous and matured resource-based city in karst region at a county level are divided into 4 township groups, namely mining group, tourism and mining group, agriculture group and industry group. The spatial differences and evolution of economic development during the last 10 years (2006-2015) in the county were discussed through analyzing per capita GDP, Theil Index, and separation coefficient. Results show that difference of per capita GDP, Theil Index (increased from 0.1088 to 0.1697, up to 55.97%), and the separation coefficient among villages and towns (the separation factor increased from 2.4041 to 2.8414) have been rising, with an economic spatial difference increasing in the county over the last 10 years. Economic differences in 4 township groups are larger than that among township groups (mean contribution rates for total difference are respectively 70.43% and 29.51%), but rising extent of economic difference among 4 township groups (76.21%) is higher than that in township groups (47.94%). Average Theil index sequence of township groups is as follows, mining group (0.2370)>industrial group (0.0624)> tourism and mining group (0.0581) > agricultural group (0.0108). The Theil Indices of industrial group, mining group and agricultural group increased by 193.13%, 27.69% and 20.18%, respectively, while that of tourism and mining group decreased by 30.95%. The main reasons for spatial difference and evolution of economic development in the county include, economic development being over reliance on resources, development of industrial townships being accelerated by establishment of industrial park, macro-economic effect on mining townships being obvious, double restrictions for tourism and mining townships concluding single exploitation of tourism resources and macro-economic effect on mining, economic development of agricultural township being overall lag and imbalance and so on. In order to promote industrial restructuring and regional coordinated development, these measures should be taken, such as implementing comprehensive development of diversified industries, carrying out differentiated development according to local conditions for the 4 township groups, and paying attention to coordination between economic development and environmental protection, and so on.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    国务院. 《国务院关于印发全国资源型城市可持续发展规划(2013-2020年)的通知》[OL]. [2015-06-26]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-12/03 /content_2540070.htm.
    [2]
    陆大道.统筹兼顾,全面部署,资源型城市可持续发展迈入新阶段[J].国土资源,2014(1):10-11.
    [3]
    郑伯红, 张方, 廖荣华. 资源型城市核心竞争力的演变与调控:以冷水江市为例[J]. 人文地理,2002,17(6): 15-19.
    [4]
    张文忠, 王岱, 余建辉. 资源型城市接续替代产业发展路径与模式研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2011,26(2):134-141.
    [5]
    马克, 李军国. 我国资源型城市可持续发展的实践与探索:国内资源枯竭型城市十年经济转型经验与展望[J]. 经济纵横,2012(8):1-7.
    [6]
    关兴良, 方创琳, 罗奎. 基于空间场能的中国区域经济发展差异评价[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(9): 1055-1065.
    [7]
    罗怀良. 改革开放以来中国资源(枯竭)型城市转型实践[J]. 四川师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 38(5): 774-781.
    [8]
    陈国阶,方一平,高延军.中国山区发展报告:中国山区发展新动态与新探索[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010: 36-57.
    [9]
    张继飞,邓伟,刘邵权. 西南山地资源型城市地域空间发展模式:基于东川区的实证[J]. 地理科学,2013,33(10):1206-1215.
    [10]
    《兴文县志》编纂委员会. 《兴文县志》(1996-2005) [M]. 北京: 方志出版社, 2010: 1987, 81-84,192-196, 598-607, 710-768.
    [11]
    朱学稳, 张任, 张元海, 等. 四川兴文石林区的喀斯特与洞穴[J]. 中国岩溶,1995, 14(增):28-48.
    [12]
    徐建华, 鲁凤, 苏方林, 等. 中国区域经济差异的时空尺度分析[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(1): 57-68.
    [13]
    刘慧. 区域差异测度方法与评价[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(4): 710-718.
    [14]
    陈洪全, 张云峰. 江苏沿海经济发展的区域差异及空间格局演变[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(2): 283-288.
    [15]
    李缙荣, 张小洪. 基于能值和产业视角的兴文县可持续发展评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014,33(7): 1989-1996.
    [16]
    沈镭,高丽.中国西部能源及矿业开发与环境保护协调发展研究[J].中国人口?资源与环境, 2013, 23(10): 17-23.
    [17]
    李倩, 张文忠, 王岱. 地理学视角下的独立工矿区研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(7): 1092-1101.
    [18]
    张文忠,王岱.中国资源型城市的城镇化特征和发展途径选择[J].中国国土资源经济,2014(6):12-17.
    [19]
    申勇.我县页岩气开发项目正式投入产气[OL]. [2016-12-12]. www.scxwx.gov.cn/index/details/tid/5605.hmtl.
    [20]
    袁俊宏. 我国硫与硫铁矿产业现状及市场分析[J]. 硫酸工业, 2016(5):10-17.
    [21]
    许吉黎, 焦华富. 成熟期煤炭资源型城市社会空间结构研究: 以安徽省淮南市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(1): 61-68.
    [22]
    罗怀良.亚热带西部山地平原交错带全域旅游发展研究:以四川省洪雅县为例[J]. 国土资源科技管理,2017,34(3): 23-34.
    [23]
    王兴贵, 税伟, 陈毅萍, 等. 兴文喀斯特与中国南方喀斯特旅游资源对比研究[J]. 中国岩溶,2017,36(2):255-263.
    [24]
    戴代新. 我国文化旅游资源保护与利用的误区及对策:以宜宾市僰文化旅游开发研究为例[J]. 同济大学学报:社会科学版, 2010, 21(1): 4651, 78.
    [25]
    罗怀良,袁道先,陈浩.近50年来重庆南川市三泉镇喀斯特区农田生态系统的演替分析[J].中国岩溶,2007,26(3):230-236.
    [26]
    陈晓清,李发斌,崔鹏,等.兴文县新华硫铁矿地质环境恢复治理[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2006,15(6):761-766.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1988) PDF downloads(472) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return