• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
JIANG Fuwei, ZHANG Fawang, LIU Lin, LIU Wei, LI Liang, CHEN Hang. Dewatering induced karst collapse conditions and safety prevention and control measures in Nanning subway construction[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(3): 415-420. doi: 10.11932/karst20180312
Citation: WU Ya’nan. Analysis of karst collapse development in Tai’anJiuxian water source area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(1): 94-100. doi: 10.11932/karst20170112

Analysis of karst collapse development in Tai’anJiuxian water source area

doi: 10.11932/karst20170112
  • Publish Date: 2017-02-25
  • Research area is located on the western edge of Tailai basin, Shandong Province, which is part of Taishan Mountain piedmont alluvial plain. Karst collapse as one of geological disasters in the area has occured since the 1960s. In recent years, with the development of the national economy, the karst collapse disasters has increasingly taken place at a high occurence frequency. In the research area, the succession of strata from old to young is the bottom Tarzan Group metamorphic rocks of the Archean era and then the Cambrian and Ordovician carbonate and shale rocks, overlaid by the Paleogene conglomerate and mudstone, the Neogene clay rock and unconsolidated sediments of the Quaternary. Daidaoan fault is the main geologic structure, which is of significance in controlling the karst collapse. In this area, the aquifers mainly consist of the Cambrian and Ordovician limestone and dolomite, where karst is well developed and is favorable for the rainwater and upper porous water to infiltrate. Groundwater extraction is the main route of excretion, and as a result mass exploitation has led to a large depression cone of the karst water in the research area. The change in hydrodynamic field is the most important factor that induces karst collapses.Based on previous studies and combining with the latest survey and the results of investigation and monitoring, this paper researches and analyzes the development conditions, distribution characteristics and genetic evolution of karst collapses, with the intention of putting forward countermeasures for the prevention and control of the karst collapses in this area. Results showed that the karst collapses mainly occurred in the following regions,(1) sections with shallowly well developed karst, mostly in the Ordovician and Cambrian limestone and dolomite; (2) the Quaternary sediments with a thickness of less than 20 m and a multi-layer deposit structure, namely, cohesive soil on the top, sandy soil in the middle and clay soil at the bottom; (3) fault zone; (4) areas within the depression cone of the karst groundwater and its influence range. Karst collapses in the research area occur due to all kinds of adverse factors, of which the most important one is change of hydrodynamic condition. With all available data including hydrology, geology, disaster data, it analysed the relationships between the occurence of karst collapses and strata, precipitation, exploitation and karst water level, respectively. The analytical results clearly showed that the karst groundwater level depressed along with increasing resource exploitation in karst area. As a result, when the cavern water level is lower than bedrock surface, the karst collapse begin to occur. Moreover, with the decrease of the water level and the increase of the fluctuation range, the number of the collapse is obviously increased.

     

  • [1]
    王淑彦.泰安路基塌陷机理的探讨[J].铁道工程学报,1985(1):93-95.
    [2]
    高宗军,张富中,鲁峰.山东泰安岩溶地面塌陷前兆及其预测预报[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15(3):149-150.
    [3]
    焦玉国,陈伟清,程凤.山东泰安市岩溶塌陷易发性评估与防治对策[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2014,25(1):38-43.
    [4]
    高宗军.岩溶地面塌陷形成机理与成因模式研究:以山东泰安-莱芜为例[J].中国工程科学,2008,10(4):38-43.
    [5]
    王滨,李治广,董昕,等.岩溶塌陷的致塌力学模型研究:以泰安市东羊娄岩溶塌陷为例[J].自然灾害学报,2011,20(4):119-125.
    [6]
    焦玉国,陈伟清,程凤.山东泰安市岩溶塌陷易发性评估与防治对策[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2014,25(1):38-43.
    [7]
    贺可强,王滨,杜汝霖,等.中国北方岩溶塌陷[M].北京:地质出版社,2005:129-133.
    [8]
    王延岭.山东省泰莱盆地岩溶地面塌陷影响因素分析[J].中国岩溶,2016,35(1):60-66.
    [9]
    王延岭,陈伟清,蒋小珍,等.山东省泰莱盆地岩溶塌陷发育特征及形成机理[J].中国岩溶,2015,34(5):495-506.
    [10]
    成世才,郭加朋,马海会,等.泰安市岩溶地面塌陷动力诱导因素分析[J]. 山东国土资源,2009,25(12):42-45.
    [11]
    山东省第五地质矿产勘查院.泰安市泰山区上高办事处訾家灌庄村岩溶塌陷区地质调查与评价报告[R].2002.
    [12]
    山东省第五地质矿产勘查院.山东省泰莱盆地岩溶塌陷地质灾害机理研究与风险区预测报告[R].2013.
    [13]
    张广安,鲁峰,渠涛,等.泰安市泰山区岩溶塌陷成因分析及防治措施[J].山东国土资源,2007,23(10):31-33.
    [14]
    朱大力.泰安地面塌陷若干数理统计[J].铁道工程学报,1996(4):61-65.
    [15]
    左平怡.论岩溶地面塌陷的形成过程与机理[J].中国岩溶,1987, 6(1):71-79.
    [16]
    泰安地质环境监测站.山东省泰安市地下水动态监测报告[R].1981-2014.
    [17]
    高宗军,孙文广,唐蒙生,等.泰安—旧县水源区岩溶水开采与地质环境的关系[J].山东地质,2001,17(3-4):86-91.
    [18]
    王淑彦.津浦铁路泰安路基塌陷研究与防治[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1992,3(4):77-86.
    [19]
    谢晓彤,李少荣,廖云平,等.重庆市铜锣山地区岩溶塌陷分布规律及成因分析[J].南水北调与水利科技,2015,13(4):751-755.
    [20]
    张丽芬,曾夏生,姚运生,等.我国岩溶塌陷研究综述[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2007,18(3):126-130.
    [21]
    康彦仁.岩溶地面塌陷的形成条件[J].中国岩溶,1988,7(1):9-18.
    [22]
    程星,黄润秋.岩溶塌陷的地质概化模型[J].水文地质工程地质,2002(6):30-34.
    [23]
    严若钧,盛智勇.郴州市岩溶塌陷分布规律及防治措施探讨[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2005,16(2):143-146.
    [24]
    罗小杰,罗程.覆盖型岩溶地面塌陷综合地质预测与危险性评估[J].中国岩溶,2016,35(1):51-59.
    [25]
    罗小杰.武汉地区浅层岩溶发育特征与岩溶塌陷灾害防治[J].中国岩溶,2013,32(4):419-432.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]FENG Yawei, MAO Ningli, LI Weili. Zoning of early warning for karst collapses in the Jingquan area of Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(2): 421-431. doi: 10.11932/karst20240207
    [2]YI Shouyong, JIA Long, HAN Qingding, LUO Xiyi, ZOU Jie. Mechanism analysis of karst ground collapse caused by the construction of punching piles in Fuwan, Foshan City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(5): 1144-1155. doi: 10.11932/karst20240511
    [3]WANG Youzhi, YANG Ning, YU Linhong, LV Lingfeng. Development characteristics and prevention countermeasures of karst collapse in Zhongqiao of Yantai[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(6): 1007-1015. doi: 10.11932/karst20220612
    [4]ZHANG Zongsheng. Origin and trend analysis of karst collapse in Huangqi and Haibei communities, Foshan City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(6): 880-894. doi: 10.11932/karst20220603
    [5]FENG Yawei. Distribution and genesis of karst collapse in Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 205-214. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y01
    [6]MENG Yan, LEI Mingtang. Analysis of situation and trend of sinkhole collapse[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(3): 411-417. doi: 10.11932/karst20190311
    [7]LIU Lin, JIANG Fuwei, ZHANG Fawang, LIU Wei, LUAN Song. Discussion on the mechanism and critical condition of ground collapse of clay layer induced by karst groundwater pumping in underground engineering construction[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(5): 752-758. doi: 10.11932/karst20190511
    [8]JIANG Fuwei, LI Liang, CHEN Hang. Critical conditions for karst collapses in the Yongwen Middle School, Guiyang, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(2): 294-299. doi: 10.11932/karst20180217
    [9]WANG Qingjiu, YE Xiaohua, MENG Meng, LUO Jiao, LYU Chuanzhong. Characteristics of caprock-karst combination in typical karst collapsearea along the Yangtze River in Anhui Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(6): 859-866. doi: 10.11932/karst20170609
    [10]GAO Peide, WANG Linfeng. Analysis of collapse mechanism for mantled karst collapse[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(6): 770-776. doi: 10.11932/karst20170602
    [11]JIA Long, MENG Yan, DAI Jianling. Analysis of karst collapse susceptibility in Guang-Fo-Zhao regions[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(6): 819-829. doi: 10.11932/karst20170604
    [12]JIANG Fuwei. Study on the developing model of karst collapse[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(6): 759-763. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y37
    [13]YANG Jing, CHEN Hongsong, WANG Sheng, WANG Fa, FU Wei. Calibration of soil water content of calcareous soil using Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) method in karst regions[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(1): 75-80. doi: 10.11932/karst20170109
    [14]LIU Pengrui, LIU Changxian, JIANG Chao, WANG Fang, CHEN Yu, JIA Long. Mechanism of karst collapse caused by engineering construction in Wuhan City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(6): 830-835. doi: 10.11932/karst20170605
    [15]JIA Long, WU Yuan-bin, PAN Zong-yuan, YIN Ren-chao, MENG Yan, GUAN Zhen-de. A review of the research on karst and sinkhole of red beds in China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(1): 67-73. doi: 10.11932/karst20160110
    [16]LI Yan-gui, LIU Zi-long, YU Xiao-min, LUO Shui-yu, YONG Fan, JIANG Zheng-zhong. Formation conditions and mechanisms of karst subsidence: A case study of Huangzhuang village in Tangshan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(3): 299-307.
    [17]WAN Zhi-bo, WU Xiong, XU Sheng, LI Yuan-zhong, YANG Rui-ying, CHEN Hong-han, GAO Ming-xian, ZHANG Shun-feng. ANALYSIS ON THE CHARACTERISTICS AND CAUSES OF THE KARST COLLAPSE IN ZAOZHUANG[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(2): 146-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.02.010
    [18]MENG Yan, YIN Kun-long, LEI Ming-tang. PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS ON KARST COLLAPSE INDUCED BY WATER TABLE FLUCTUATION[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(3): 239-241. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.03.009
    [19]LI Yu, LEI Ming-tang, JIANG Xiao-zhen. KARST COLLAPSE MONITORING IN LITANG, GUANGXI[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(4): 341-346. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.04.015
    [20]LI Yu, ZHU Ping, LEI Ming-tang, JIANG Xiao-zhen, DAI Jian-ling, MENG Yan. MONITORING TECHNIQUE AND METHODS OF THE KARST COLLAPSES[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2005, 24(2): 103-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2005.02.003
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 姜伏伟,唐书君,邓晓飞,李振超,张发旺,尹鸿远. 基坑施工抽水诱发土体渗透破坏的临界抽水量预测. 水文地质工程地质. 2025(01): 53-61 .
    2. 潘宗源,戴建玲,文日海,蒙彦,蒋小珍,马骁,白冰,吴远斌,张心. 基于声发射技术的岩溶塌陷监测预警试验研究. 中国岩溶. 2024(05): 1166-1178 . 本站查看
    3. 杨朋. 地铁车站基坑上跨既有大型岩溶塌陷区处理措施研究. 城市轨道交通研究. 2023(03): 170-175 .
    4. 刘昭京,蒋小珍,冯涛,黄胜平,周富彪,伊小娟. 湘桂铁路二塘车站路基岩溶塌陷成因与防治对策. 中国岩溶. 2023(01): 109-118 . 本站查看
    5. 鲁玉龙,叶高峰,杨仙,卢治林,刘洋,张联志,李干龙. 基于正态云模型的浏阳市永和镇岩溶塌陷易发性研究. 中国岩溶. 2023(06): 1294-1302 . 本站查看
    6. 赵庚亮,张志龙,赵金鹏,谭忠盛. 南宁地铁4号线岩溶发育特征及处治技术. 科学技术与工程. 2021(31): 13552-13560 .
    7. 覃纹,黄秋燕,庾露,胡宝清. 南宁在建地铁沿线地表沉降监测. 地球信息科学学报. 2019(09): 1467-1478 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 26.7 %FULLTEXT: 26.7 %META: 70.7 %META: 70.7 %PDF: 2.6 %PDF: 2.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.5 %其他: 11.5 %其他: 0.0 %其他: 0.0 %China: 6.8 %China: 6.8 %三明: 0.0 %三明: 0.0 %三门峡: 0.0 %三门峡: 0.0 %上海: 18.0 %上海: 18.0 %中卫: 0.5 %中卫: 0.5 %内华达: 0.0 %内华达: 0.0 %北京: 2.6 %北京: 2.6 %北海: 0.0 %北海: 0.0 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %合肥: 0.0 %合肥: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %宜春: 0.0 %宜春: 0.0 %崇左: 0.8 %崇左: 0.8 %巴黎: 0.0 %巴黎: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %杭州: 0.0 %杭州: 0.0 %武汉: 0.0 %武汉: 0.0 %永州: 0.0 %永州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %漳州: 0.0 %漳州: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.0 %珠海: 0.8 %珠海: 0.8 %百色: 0.0 %百色: 0.0 %盐城: 0.0 %盐城: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %红河: 0.1 %红河: 0.1 %纽约: 1.3 %纽约: 1.3 %芒廷维尤: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 0.4 %萍乡: 0.0 %萍乡: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %西宁: 2.0 %西宁: 2.0 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.0 %鄂州: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.0 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.0 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.0 %长沙: 0.0 %长沙: 0.0 %防城港: 0.0 %防城港: 0.0 %驻马店: 53.7 %驻马店: 53.7 %其他其他China三明三门峡上海中卫内华达北京北海南宁南昌台州合肥哥伦布嘉兴天津宜春崇左巴黎广州廊坊成都晋城杭州武汉永州漯河漳州潍坊珠海百色盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛红河纽约芒廷维尤萍乡衢州西宁贵阳鄂州铁岭锡林郭勒盟长沙防城港驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2352) PDF downloads(726) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return