• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 35 Issue 5
Oct.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Yu, ZHANG Hua, ZHANG Gui, PENG Shuhui, YANG Wenli, CAI Baoxin, FENG Min, WANG Ziwei. Review of the investigation and integrated renovation on rocky desertification in Yunnan Province, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(5): 486-496. doi: 10.11932/karst20160501
Citation: WANG Yu, ZHANG Hua, ZHANG Gui, PENG Shuhui, YANG Wenli, CAI Baoxin, FENG Min, WANG Ziwei. Review of the investigation and integrated renovation on rocky desertification in Yunnan Province, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(5): 486-496. doi: 10.11932/karst20160501

Review of the investigation and integrated renovation on rocky desertification in Yunnan Province, China

doi: 10.11932/karst20160501
  • Publish Date: 2016-10-25
  • As one of the provinces with largest karst area, the size of karst area is 110,875.7 km2in Yunnan province, with a rocky desertification size of 34,772.76 km2of in the karst area. The rocky desertification has seriously restricted the sustainable development the local economy. The ecologic and geologic environment is very fragile, and the land is very droughty and lacks of soil in rocky desertification areas. The main factors that directly impact on the rocky desertification include excess population relative to the environment bearing capacity, unreasonable exploitation of land, impacts of mining activities on local ecology and environments, and industrial pollution, etc. In addition, low-level utilization of green resources have an indirect influence on the development of rock desertification. These include natural resources as biology, tourism, geothermal water and mineral water, which are much abundant in the karst area. After full investigations and comprehensive studies, an integrated renovation program has been completed. Based on this program, biological, engineering, economic and social measures have been implemented for the integrated renovation of the rocky desertification. It should be stressed that the Department of Land and Resources (DLR) has implemented many effective measures, such as demonstration projects for the development of karst groundwater and the integrated renovation of rocky desertification, land consolidation, mining geo-environmental protection and associated mine rehabilitation, and geopark ecological construction and environmental protection, etc. These measures have directly reduced land area of rocky desertification land and effectively restricted those artificial or natural factors leading to rocky desertification in the karst area. In the meantime, the department has increased job opportunities and promoted rural urbanization in small towns through effective development of valuable geological resources, which in turn the efforts of the DLR have been paid off. The main problems in the integrated renovation include the following parts. Firstly, the renovation areas of the rocky desertification are sporadically distributed and the change of the regional landscape is small. Secondly, the correlation and overall response of karst basin have been less well recognized and the selected renovation methods are improper. Thirdly, the investigation and monitor are not updated in time so that the effects and progress of the renovation are inaccurate. Fourthly, the development and utilization of groundwater resource as well as the protection of the resource and environment have not been implemented well. Finally, the coordination and cooperation among different governmental departments for the integrated renovation projects are not enough. These problems have negative influence on the efficiency of the integrated renovation of the rocky desertification. In this paper, the distribution diagram of rocky desertification, the investigation intensity map and the distribution diagram of the demonstration engineering are valuable material to have a better understanding of the rocky desertification, environmental conditions and resources, and the investigation progress in Yunnan Province.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    王宇,黄兴章,谭继中,等.云南省岩溶水有效开发利用规划建议报告[R].昆明:云南省地质矿产厅、云南省计划委员会.1997.
    [2]
    王宇,张贵,柴金龙,等.云南岩溶石山地区重大环境地质问题及对策[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2013:17-27.
    [3]
    王宇,彭淑惠,王梓溦,等.云南省抗旱井定井论证方法[J].中国岩溶,2013,32(3):305-312.
    [4]
    王宇.云南泸西小江流域岩溶水有效开发模式研究[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2006.
    [5]
    袁道先. 我国岩溶资源环境领域的创新问题[J].中国岩溶,2015,34(2):98-100.
    [6]
    王宇,张贵.滇东岩溶石山地区石漠化特征及成因[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(6):933-938.
    [7]
    王宇,李燕,谭继中,等.断陷盆地岩溶水赋存规律研究[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2003.1-4.
    [8]
    王宇.西南岩溶石山区断陷盆地岩溶水系统分类及供水意义[J].中国地质,2003,30(2): 220-224.
    [9]
    王宇.西南地区岩溶水源地类型及开发技术条件[J].中国岩溶,2009,28(4):370-374.
    [10]
    杨立铮.中国南方地下河分布特征[J].中国岩溶,1985,4(1-2):92-100.
    [11]
    姚六三.试论地貌一地质环境与岩溶发育的关系[J].云南地质,1989,8(2):164 -170.
    [12]
    王宇.昆明市区地表水与地下水联合调度系统研究[J].水资源研究,1990, 11(4):9-12.
    [13]
    王宇.滇东地区断陷盆地裸露—覆盖型岩溶水系统特征剖析[J].云南地质,1993,12(3):301-316.
    [14]
    王宇.红河断裂南段活动性分析[J].地质灾害与环境保护,1994,5(2):28-35.
    [15]
    王宇.元阳县南沙新城址地质环境评价[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护,1994,5(4):18-24.
    [16]
    康彦仁,梁彬.云南南洞地下河系统的水文地质特征[J].水文地质工程地质,1996,23(4):28-30.
    [17]
    杨子生.滇东北山区坡耕地水土流失状况及其危害[J].山地学报,1999,17(S1):25-31.
    [18]
    王宇,罗毅.凌子口隧道围岩稳定性分析评价[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2002,13(3):40-42.
    [19]
    姜朝松,周瑞琦,王绍晋.昆明盆地形成模式及其演化[J].地震研究,2003,26(2):172-175.
    [20]
    蒋忠诚,裴建国,夏日元,等.我国“十一五”期间的岩溶研究进展与重要活动[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(4):349-354.
    [21]
    彭淑惠,王宇,张贵.昆明盆地土地利用对岩溶水质的影响[J].昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版),2011,36(6):1-7.
    [22]
    王宇,彭淑惠,杨双兰.云南岩溶区As、Cd元素异常特征[J]. 中国岩溶,2012,31(4):377-381.
    [23]
    莫美仙,王宇,李峰.滇东断陷盆地地下水污染的水文地质模式[J].昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版),2014,39(5):88-95.
    [24]
    彭淑惠,王宇,黄成,等.昆明大板桥岩溶地下水系统污染边界及其防污性能研究[J].中国岩溶,2015,34(4):362-368.
    [25]
    王宇,王梓溦.岩溶地下水富集的地貌组合形态[J].中国岩溶,2015,34(4):314-324.
    [26]
    王宇,袁道先,杨世瑜.泸西小江流域岩溶水有效开发模式[J].中国岩溶,2005,24(4):305-311.
    [27]
    王宇,张贵,张华,等.云南省岩溶水文地质环境地质调查与研究(国土资源大调查项目成果集成)[R].昆明:云南省地质环境监测院,2014:176-275.
    [28]
    张贵,王宇,李燕等.云南“十五”水工环地质大调查成果丰硕[J].云南地质,2006,25(3):269-275.
    [29]
    张华,王宇,柴金龙.滇池流域石漠化特征分析[J].中国岩溶,2011,30(2):181-186.
    [30]
    彭淑惠,袁忠玉,张华.滇东南南丘河流域石漠化特征及其防治研究[J].昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版),2014,39(1):26-31.
    [31]
    张华,王宇,张贵.云南重点岩溶流域水文地质及环境地质调查成果评析[J].云南地质,2014,33(2):259-263.
    [32]
    王宇,杨世瑜,远道先.云南岩溶石漠化状况及治理规划要点[J].中国岩溶,2005,24(3):206- 211.
    [33]
    张伏全. 治理石漠化建设彩云南[J].云南林业,2015,36(4):21-25.
    [34]
    覃星铭,蒋忠诚,何丙辉,等.南洞流域东部重点区石漠化现状及治理对策[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(4):456- 463.
    [35]
    覃星铭,蒋忠诚,蓝芙宁,等.南洞地下河最枯径流的周期变化及趋势分析[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,33(2):120-126.
    [36]
    康小波,王宇,张华,等.丽江黑龙潭泉群水文地质特征及断流的影响因素分析[J].中国岩溶,2013,32(4):398-403.
    [37]
    王宇,何绕生,刘海峰,等.昆明翠湖九龙池泉群断流原因及恢复措施[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(3):263-271.
    [38]
    袁道先,蔡桂鸿.岩溶环境学[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1988:23-58.
    [39]
    王宇,彭淑惠.云南省岩溶水赋存特征[J].中国岩溶,2011,30(3):253-259.
    [40]
    袁道先.论岩溶水的不均匀性[A].岩溶地区水文地质及工程地质工作经验汇编(第二辑)[C].北京:地质出版社,1978:1-19.
    [41]
    王宇,张贵,吕爱华,等.云南暗河水资源开发利用条件及典型工程研究[A].殷跃平.中国西南地区岩溶地下水资源开发与利用[C].北京:地质出版社,2006:11-34.
    [42]
    王宇主编.岩溶找水与开发技术研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2007:10-22.
    [43]
    王宇.云南泸西皮家寨岩溶大泉束流调压壅水开发示范[J].中国岩溶,2008,27(1):1-5.
    [44]
    王宇,彭淑惠,袁忠玉,等.云南省抗旱救灾地下找水技术总结报告[R].云南省国土资源厅,2011:1-8.
    [45]
    TD/T1011-2000,土地开发整理规划编制规程[S].
    [46]
    张发旺,王贵玲,候新伟.矿业开发环境地质链及其控制[J].地学前缘,2001,8(1):107-111.
    [47]
    陶于祥,赵宇,徐乃政.浅析金属矿山开采对岩土生态环境的影响[J].火山地质与矿产,1999,20(3):225-232.
    [48]
    魏伦武.西南地区矿山环境地质问题与防治对策[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2002,13(1):6-8.
    [49]
    DZ/T0223-2011,矿山地质环境保护与恢复治理方案编制规范[S].
    [50]
    李玉辉.地质公园研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006:1-21.
    [51]
    国土资源部.国家地质公园规划编制技术要求[S].2010.
    [52]
    王宇,李丽辉.德国岩溶水勘查技术与开发利用概况[J].水文地质工程地质,2005,(6):91-95.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2504) PDF downloads(2057) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return