• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 37 Issue 6
Dec.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
QUAN Xiqiang, TAO Xin, QIN Suni, DU Wenyue, YU Jianguo, GUO Yongli. Determination of 36 volatile organic compounds in landfill leachate in karst area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(6): 925-931.
Citation: QUAN Xiqiang, TAO Xin, QIN Suni, DU Wenyue, YU Jianguo, GUO Yongli. Determination of 36 volatile organic compounds in landfill leachate in karst area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(6): 925-931.

Determination of 36 volatile organic compounds in landfill leachate in karst area

  • Publish Date: 2018-12-25
  • The area of karst accounts for about 1/3 of the total area of China, and the amount of groundwater resources account for about 1/4 of the total water resources. Karst groundwater is an important source of water in China, which is also a major source of drinking water in Southwest China.In recent years, with the acceleration of urbanization, the scale of cities has been expanding, the population has been growing, and the living rubbish and waste water generated by urban residents have been constantly increasing. A large amount of waste water and landfill leachate is discharged directly without treatment and infiltrated into the underground through infiltration and burst irrigation, which seriously threatened the quality of underground water resources and the health of people downstream.In this paper, the content of 36 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in landfill leachate were analysed by method of purge and trap Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry(GC-MS). 5 mL of sample solution was obtained in the purge and trap bottle, and the samples were directly injected using TELEDYNE TEKMAR type purge and trap into the instrument for GC-MS analysis. The samples were separated by DB-VRX GC column, and then detected by the full scanning mode with positive electron ionization. The ion mass were selected and quantified by external standard method. The results showed that, the mass concentration of 36 VOCs was linear with the peak area in the range of 1-100 μg·L-1 . The method detection limit found for 36 VOCs test were in the range of 0.03-0.27 μg·L-1 . The spike recovery were performed by additional mixed standard of 36 VOCs, and the results were in the range of 88% to 110%, with RSD(n=7)ranged from 2.32% to 6.51%.The results showed that a few VOCs were found in the landfill leachate.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    袁道先.西南岩溶石山地区重大环境地质问题及对策研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:3-8.
    [2]
    马振杰.城市生活废弃物对岩溶地下河的污染研究:以南丹县里湖地下河为例[D].重庆:西南大学,2011.
    [3]
    杨立铮.中国南方地下河分布特征[J].中国岩溶,1985,4(1-2):92-99.
    [4]
    易连兴,夏日元,唐建生,等.西南岩溶地下河流量重复统计问题及对策探讨[J].中国岩溶,2015,34(1):72-78.
    [5]
    夏日元,蒋忠诚,邹胜章,等.岩溶地区水文地质环境地质综合调查工程进展[J].中国地质调查,2017,4(1):1-10.
    [6]
    夏日元,邹胜章,唐建生,等. 南方岩溶地区1∶5万水文地质环境地质调查技术要点分析[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(5):599-608.
    [7]
    荆建刚.垃圾渗滤液处理新工艺研究[J].北方环境,2012, 24(4):145-146.
    [8]
    王爱琴,孙力平,张浩,等.预处理方式对测定渗滤液中有机污染物的影响[J].中国给水排水,2010,26(6):88-91.
    [9]
    郭宝玉,赵开楼,宋庆国.吹扫捕集-气质联用法测定农田灌溉水中挥发性有机物[J].粮食流通技术,2010,42(1):39-40,42.
    [10]
    董黎静,孙佳,戴玄吏,等.典型化工园区大气中挥发性有机物污染调查[J].环境监控与预警,2016,8(2):45-51.
    [11]
    王国锋,李媛,谢诚.江西某污染地块土壤挥发性有机物污染评价及环境风险评估[J].江西化工,2017(6):64-67.
    [12]
    谭冰,王铁宇,庞博,等.农药企业场地空气中挥发性有机物污染特征及健康风险[J].环境科学,2013,34(12):4577-4584.
    [13]
    翟增秀,邹克华,李伟芳,等.天津中心城区环境空气挥发性有机物污染特征分析[J].环境科学,2013,34(12):4513-4518.
    [14]
    沈利明,黄检阅,柴剑荣.印刷企业挥发性有机物污染状况调查[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2014,24(20):2990-2992.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1813) PDF downloads(795) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return