Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 30 Issue 4
Dec.  2011
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2011  >  30(4): 461-465
Wu Yan-you. Strategies to increase carbon fixation and sequestration by karst-adaptable plants[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(4): 461-465. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.018
Citation: Wu Yan-you. Strategies to increase carbon fixation and sequestration by karst-adaptable plants[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(4): 461-465. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.018
shu

Strategies to increase carbon fixation and sequestration by karst-adaptable plants

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.018

  • State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • Received Date: 2011-10-21
  • Publish Date: 2011-12-25
    Abstract
  • Based on the analysis on the soil chemical properties in karst area, it is proved the factors that restrict the increasing of carbon fixation and sequestration by the karst-adaptable plants involve karst drought, low nutrient, high pH value and high concentration of bicarbonate.The differences in the use of inorganic carbon and nitrogen as well as in responds to low nutrient by karst-adaptable and karst-inadaptable plants are also analyzed in the paper. The strategies to increase carbon fixation and sequestration by karst-adaptable plants are put forth, which includes the following strategies –efficiently using of bicarbonate source; gaining photosynthetic carbon fixation with low nutrition cost; absorbing restrictive ammonium nitrogen rapaciously and absorbing nitrate nitrogen as compensation. The ways to increase carbon fixation and sequestration by karst-adaptable plants is also proposed, that will maximally excavate the potential of increasing carbon fixation and sequestration by the plants in karst area.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(44)
  • [1]
    孔兰,梁虹,贺向辉,李陶琳,等.喀斯特流域水资源问题及可持续利用对策［J］.中国农村水利水电.2008,(3):17-19.
    [2]
    苏维词,杨汉奎.贵州岩溶区生态环境脆弱性类型的初步划分［J］.环境科学研究.1994,7(6):35-41.
    [3]
    王德炉,喻理飞.喀斯特环境生态脆弱性数量评价［J］.南京林业大学学报(自然科学版).2005,296:23-26.
    [4]
    周游游,蒋忠诚.韦珍莲.广西中部喀斯特干旱农业区的干旱程度及干旱成因分析［J］.中国岩溶,2003,22(2):144-149.
    [5]
    Betts R A. Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo［J］. Nature, 2000, 408: 187-190.
    [6]
    Myneni R, Dong J, Tucker C, et al. A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of northern forests［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2001, 98: 14784-14789.
    [7]
    Goodale C L, Apps M J, Birdsey R A, et al. Forest carbon sinks in the Northern Hemisphere［J］. Ecological Applications, 2002, 12: 891-899.
    [8]
    张治军,张小全,朱建华,等.2010,广西主要人工林类型固碳成本核算［J］.林业科学,2010,46:16-22.
    [9]
    张鹏超,张一平,杨国平,等.哀牢山亚热带常绿阔叶林乔木碳储量及固碳增量［J］.生态学杂志,2010,29:1047-1053.
    [10]
    于贵瑞,王秋凤,刘迎春,等.区域尺度陆地生态系统固碳速率和增汇潜力概念框架及其定量认证科学基础［J］.地理科学进展,2011,30:771-787
    [11]
    张志华,彭道黎.森林管理对森林碳汇的作用和影响分析［J］.安徽农业科学,2008,36:3654-3656.
    [12]
    张志华, 彭道黎. 森林管理对森林碳汇的作用和影响分析［J］.安徽农业科学, 2008, 36: 3654-3656.
    [13]
    McKenney D W, Yemshanov D, Fox G, et al. Cost estimates for carbon sequestration from fast growing poplar plantations in Canada［J］. Forest Policy and Economics, 2004,6:345-358.
    [14]
    Xu D. The potential for reducing atmospheric carbon by large-scale afforestation in China and related cost/benefit analysis［J］. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1995, 8:337-344.
    [15]
    Yoshimoto A. Evaluation of carbon sequestration and thinning regimes within the optimization framework for forest stand management［J］. European Journal of Forest Research, 2007, 126(2): 315-329.
    [16]
    Bravo F, Bravo-Oviedo A, Diaz-Balteiro L. Carbon sequestration in Spanish Mediterranean forests under two management alternatives: a modeling approach［J］. European Journal of Forest Research, 2008, 127: 225-234.
    [17]
    陈伟杰,熊康宁,任晓冬,等.岩溶地区石漠化综合治理的固碳增汇效应研究——基于实地监测数据的分析［J］.中国岩溶,2010,29:229-238.
    [18]
    田大伦,王新凯,方晰,等.喀斯特地区不同植被恢复模式幼林生态系统碳储量及其空间分布［J］.林业科学2011,47(9):7-14.
    [19]
    刘合满,曹丽花.退化草地碳动态及固碳潜力［J］.中国农学通报,27:11-15.
    [20]
    Yuan D. Rock desertification in the subtropical karst of south China. Zeitschrift Fur Geomorphologie Supplementband［J］. 1997, 108:81-90.
    [21]
    覃小群.桂中岩溶干旱特征及综合治理对策［J］.桂林工学院学报,2005,25(3):278-283.
    [22]
    Legrand H E, Stringfield V T. Karst hydrology:A review［J］ Journal of Hydrology, 1973, 20(2) :97-120.
    [23]
    曹建华,袁道先,潘根兴.岩溶生态系统中的土壤［J］.地球科学进展,2003,18:37-44.
    [24]
    Guo F, Jiang G, Yuan D. Major ions in typical subterranean rivers and their anthropogenic impacts in southwest karst areas, China［J］. Environmental Geology, 2007, 53: 533-541.
    [25]
    刘璐,曾馥平,宋同清,等.喀斯特木论自然保护区土壤养分的空间变异特征［J］.应用生态学,2010,21:1667-1673.
    [26]
    董玲玲,何腾兵,刘元生,等.喀斯特山区不同母质(岩)发育的土壤主要理化性质差异性分析［J］.土壤通报,2008,39:471-474.
    [27]
    姬飞腾,李楠,邓馨.喀斯特地区植物钙含量特征与高钙适应方式分析［J］.植物生态学报,2009,33:926-935.
    [28]
    熊德中,蔡海洋,张仁椒,等.福建烟区土壤中量和微量营养元素含量状况的研究［J］.中国生态农业学报,2007,15:36-38.
    [29]
    李志安,邹碧,曹裕松,等.南方典型丘陵退化荒坡地土壤养分特征分析［J］.生态学报,2003,23:1648-1656.
    [30]
    Paramasivam S, Alva A K. Nitrogen recovery from controlled-release fertilizers under intermittent leaching and dry cycles［J］. Soil Science 1997, 162:447-453.
    [31]
    刘丛强.生物地球化学过程与地表物质循环——西南喀斯特土壤-植被系统生源要素循环［M］.北京:科学出版社,2009:308-353,401-443.
    [32]
    魏孝荣,邵明安.黄土高原沟壑区小流域坡地土壤养分分布特征［J］.生态学报,2007,27(2):603-613.
    [33]
    全国土壤普查办公室.中国土壤［M］.北京:中国农业出版社.1998:843-984.
    [34]
    蒋定安,成杰民.近十几年来宜兴市水稻土表层土壤pH及B、Cu、Zn、Mn有效态含量的变化［J］.南京农业大学学报,1997,20(4):111-113.
    [35]
    Hu H, Boisson-Dernier A, Israelsson-Nordstr?m M, et al. Carbonic anhydrases are upstream regulators of CO2-controlled stomatal movements in guard cells［J］. Nature Cell Biology, 2010, 12:87-93.
    [36]
    Wu Y Y, Zhao X Z, Li P P, et al. A study on the activities of carbonic anhydrase of two species of bryophytes, Tortula sinensis (Mull. Hal.) Broth. and Barbula convoluta Hedw.［J］. Cryptogamie Bryologie, 2006, 27 (3):349-355.
    [37]
    吴沿友,邢德科,朱咏莉,等.营养液pH对3种藤本植物生长和叶绿素荧光的影响［J］.西北植物学报,2009,29(2):338-343.
    [38]
    Wu Y Y, Wu X M, Li P P, et al. Comparison of photosynthetic activity of Orychophragmus violaceus and oil-seed rape［J］. Photosynthetica, 2005, 43(2):299-302.
    [39]
    吴沿友,邢德科,刘莹.植物利用碳酸氢根离子的特征分析［J］.地球与环境,2011,39(2):273-277.
    [40]
    吴沿友,刘丛强,王世杰,诸葛菜的喀斯特适生性［M］.贵阳,贵州科技出版社,2004,1-153.
    [41]
    梁铮.构树和桑树对聚乙二醇诱导的干旱以及低磷的生理响应［D］.镇江:江苏大学硕士学位论文,2010.
    [42]
    邢德科.三种藤本植物对高pH和低营养浓度适应性的对比研究［D］.镇江:江苏大学硕士学位论文,2009.
    [43]
    Wu Y Y, Zhao K. Determination on nitrate use capacity in plants via isotope tracer［J］. Mineralogical Magazine, 2011, 75(3):2183-2183.
    [44]
    吴沿友.喀斯特适生植物诸葛菜综合研究［M］.贵阳,贵州科技出版社,1997,1-168.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(1013.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2014) PDF downloads(2407) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return