• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 30 Issue 2
Jun.  2011
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHU Xing-lei, AN yu-lun, HUANG Zu-hong, WANG Jing-min. Application of a new remote sensing image interpretation method in karst area - support vector machine algorithm[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(2): 222-226. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.02.016
Citation: ZHU Xing-lei, AN yu-lun, HUANG Zu-hong, WANG Jing-min. Application of a new remote sensing image interpretation method in karst area - support vector machine algorithm[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(2): 222-226. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.02.016

Application of a new remote sensing image interpretation method in karst area - support vector machine algorithm

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.02.016
  • Received Date: 2010-12-04
  • Publish Date: 2011-06-25
  • The existing methods of remote sensing image interpretation are unsupervised classification and supervised classification. The supervised classification includes parallel algorithm, the minimum distance algorithm and maximum likelihood algorithm. Support Vector Machine is a new supervised classification algorithm. In this study, some parts in the Huaxi District, Xiaobi Township in Guiyang is selected as the research object. Remote sensing images are interpreted by means of the maximum likelihood algorithm and Support Vector Machine algorithm respectively with SPOT data. Through establishing confusion matrix, calculating classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient, it is found that the classification accuracy of support vector machine is high and classification polygon is integrity. But to the time of consumption, the support vector machine is longer than the maximum likelihood algorithm. According to the two algorithms, there are both ground objects easy to be distinguished for their spectral features being quite different from other objects and some ground objects with similar spectrum easy to lead to misclassification. However, in terms of the classification accuracy, SVM classification is higher than the maximum likelihood. SVM is sensitive to the number of samples, so too much sample size will cause too long operation. Selection of the two algorithms in practice still needs to consult the practical situation of the study area and contrast their merit and demerit.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    惠文华.基于支持向量机的遥感图像分类方法[J].地球科学与环境学,2006,28(2):93—95.
    [2]
    贵阳市花溪区人民政府网.
    [3]
    《花溪区综合农业区划》编写组.花溪区综合农业区划[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1989:53-150.
    [4]
    赵英时等,遥感应用分析原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
    [5]
    沈焕锋,钟燕飞等,ENVI遥感影像处理方法[M].武昌:武汉大学出版社,2009.
    [6]
    温兴平,胡光道,杨晓峰.基于支持向量机的CBERS-02卫星影像信息提取[J].测绘科学,2008,33(5):146—148.
    [7]
    Keerthi S S, Lin C J. Asymptotic Behaviors of Support Vector Machines with Gaussian Kernel [J]. Neural Computation,2003,15(7):1667-1689.
    [8]
    Lin H T, Lin C J. A study on sigmoid kernels for SVM and the training of non-PSD kernels by SMO-type methods,Technical report[R].2003, Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University.
    [9]
    喻琴.基于决策树模型的喀斯特石漠化光谱信息自动提取研究[D].贵州师范大学硕士学位论文,贵阳,2009.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2756) PDF downloads(2399) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return