• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 30 Issue 2
Jun.  2011
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Cai-ku, CHEN Yu-ping, XU Gui-sheng, JU Da-wei, LI Yan-mei. The dissolved horizontal groove on stone pillar in Yunnan Stone Forest and its environmental sense[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(2): 138-144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.02.004
Citation: LI Cai-ku, CHEN Yu-ping, XU Gui-sheng, JU Da-wei, LI Yan-mei. The dissolved horizontal groove on stone pillar in Yunnan Stone Forest and its environmental sense[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(2): 138-144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.02.004

The dissolved horizontal groove on stone pillar in Yunnan Stone Forest and its environmental sense

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.02.004
  • Received Date: 2011-02-24
  • Publish Date: 2011-06-25
  • The study focuses on the dissolved horizontal groove around the stone pillars higher than 5m in Yunnan Stone Forest. The height, width, elevation, latitude and longitude of the stone pillars at different topography sites and different elevation are measured. Further on, the number of layers of the soil moisture dissolved groove and the height of each layer to ground surface are metered. The statistics shows that the grooves are divided into two kinds, water eroded and soil moisture dissolved grooves, according their formation. The length of water eroded grooves are longer, about 1.77m in average, but the soil moisture dissolved ones are shorter, about 1.33m in average. The depth of water eroded grooves are deeper, about 0.45m in average, than the soil moisture dissolved ones (about 0.40m in average). The average width of water eroded grooves is about 0.25m, and that of soil moisture dissolved is wider, about 1.13m. The average height of the stone pillar is 12.53m with the height of the stone pillars being 14.0m at the bottom of the depression, 12.3m on the slope and 11.3m on the hill-top dividedly. There are 4.95 layers of groove in average totally, but 5.0 layers at the bottom of the depression, 4.9 layers on the slope and 4.7 layers on the hill top dividedly. The height of the one to three levels’ grooves to the ground is 2.00m, 4.09m and 6.20m dividedly. Upon inspection, there is significant difference in width between the two different genetic types of grooves. The length, width and depth of soil moisture dissolved groove decrease with elevation, but that of water eroded groove have nothing to do with elevation. There are no obvious differences in the height, number of layers and altitude in the grooves at different topography sites, proving that there was neither strong folding movement nor tilting uplift-falling movement but consistent geologic structure conditions during the formation of the stone forest that leading to uniform karstification.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    袁道先,章程.岩溶动力学的理论探索与实践[J].地球学报,2008,29(3):355-365.
    [2]
    石林研究组.中国路南石林喀斯特研究[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,1997,20-23.
    [3]
    袁道先.中国岩溶学[M].北京:地质出版社,1994,65-67.
    [4]
    林钧枢.路南石林形成过程与环境变化[J].中国岩溶,1997,16(4):346-350.
    [5]
    张寿越.路南石林发育及其演进[J].中国岩溶,1984,3(2):78-87.
    [6]
    杰显义.云南东部地区喀斯特层组类型、古喀斯特及石林形成条件的初步探讨[C]//.第一界全国水文地质工程地质学术会议论文选编(喀斯特问题专辑).北京:中国工业出版社,1966.
    [7]
    俞锦标等.路南石林形成时代及古地理环境的初步分析[J].南京大学学报,1983,(2):362-371.
    [8]
    赵景波.细粒松散沉积地层中垂直循环带岩溶划分[J].中国岩溶,1999,18(2):116-121.
    [9]
    何师意,宋林华,唐涛.岩溶土壤中CO2浓度、水化学观测及其与岩溶作用关系[J].中国岩溶,1997,16(4):319-323.
    [10]
    章程,谢运球,姜光辉.云南路南石林裂隙渗透张量特征[J].中国岩溶,2001,20(2):97-100.
    [11]
    张捷.福建永安石林地貌的现代生物喀斯特侵蚀营力[J].山地研究,1994,12(3):136-140.
    [12]
    李玉辉.地质公园研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004,167.
    [13]
    李玉辉.中国云南石林岩溶形态类型与特征[J].中国岩溶,2002,21(3):165-172.
    [14]
    彭建.喀斯特流域演变路南石林发育研究[L].中国岩溶,2002,20-21.
    [15]
    王在高,杨明德,梁虹,等.路南石林形态计量特征[J].山地学报,2002,20(5):519-526.
    [16]
    梁福源,宋林华,王富昌,等.路南石林地区土壤空气中二氧化碳浓度分布规律与土下溶蚀形态研[J].中国岩溶,2000,19(2):181-187.
    [17]
    刘宏,吴文青.路南石林现代喀斯特溶蚀速率研究[L].云南地理环境研究,1998,24(3):213-219.
    [18]
    谢运球,何师意.路南石林非可溶性盖层下的岩溶动力系统特征[J].吉林大学学报,2003,25(1):59-62.
    [19]
    李玉辉,梁永宁,任坚等.滇中路南石林的发育年代[J].中国区域地质,1998,17(1):45-51.
    [20]
    蔡炳贵,刘东生.云南石林地区土壤侵蚀的石笋记录与现代观测[L].第四纪研究,2005,25(2):171-175.
    [21]
    彭建,杨明德,梁虹.基于GIS的路南巴江喀斯特流域地貌演化定量研究[J].中国岩溶2002,21(2):90-94.
    [22]
    李玉辉,冯正清,俞筱押,等.云南石林公园植被重大变化与意义[J].中国岩溶,2005.
    [23]
    王在高,杨明德,梁虹,等.路南石林形态计量特征[J].山地学报,2002,20(5):519-526.
    [24]
    云南省地质局水文地质工程地质队.中华人民共和国区域水文地质普查报告(1:20万),宜良幅G-48XXVI,1977.
    [25]
    彭建.中国石林发育研究进展[J].中国岩溶,2002,21(1):0067-06.
    [26]
    Derek Ford & Paul Williams. Karst geomorphology and hydrology [M].the Academic Division of Unwin Hyman Ltd, Britain, 1989,375-396.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2448) PDF downloads(1919) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return