• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 29 Issue 1
Mar.  2010
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN-Chuan, LONG Sheng-xing, REN Qi-fei, MA Jian-rong, WANG San, LI Li, LI Qiu-hua. Seasonal variation of copepoda and cladocera communities in subtropic karst reservoir — Case in the Hongfeng, the Baihua and the Aha lakes[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 29(1): 55-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.01.010
Citation: CHEN-Chuan, LONG Sheng-xing, REN Qi-fei, MA Jian-rong, WANG San, LI Li, LI Qiu-hua. Seasonal variation of copepoda and cladocera communities in subtropic karst reservoir — Case in the Hongfeng, the Baihua and the Aha lakes[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 29(1): 55-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.01.010

Seasonal variation of copepoda and cladocera communities in subtropic karst reservoir — Case in the Hongfeng, the Baihua and the Aha lakes

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.01.010
  • Received Date: 2008-10-24
  • Publish Date: 2010-03-25
  • Copepida and cladocera community is investigated for four times in the Hongfeng, the Baihua and the Aha lakes from 2008 to 2009. It is found that the copepod consists of 5 families, 11 genera, 19 species with one species is not identified and the cladocera consists of 5 families, 9 genera, and 14 species. Dominant species of copepoda are T.prasinus(Fischer), C.uicinus lobosus Kiefer and T.breuifurcatus Harada. Dominant species of cladocera are D.longispina(O.F.M.), C.cornuta Sars and B.longirostris(O.F.Müller) in all lakes. Total density of copepoda and cladocera is highest in spring, lower in autumn, lowest in summer in both the Hongfeng and the Aha lakes; the highest in summer, lower in autumn, lowest in winter in the Baihua lake. Seasonal biodiversity ordering ranks as AH>BH>HF in spring, BH>AH>HF in summer and winter, and AH>HF>BH in autumn. Seasonal weather change and pollution is important factor affecting copepida and cladocera community change.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    张朝晖,陈家宽,艾伦? 培特客斯. 英格兰喀斯特瀑布苔藓植物水生群落生态研究. 水生生物学报,2008,32(1):24-30.
    [2]
    张维.红枫湖、百花湖环境特征及富营养化.贵州,贵州科技出版社,1996.
    [3]
    万国江, 王王雨春,尹澄清,等.红枫湖、百花湖沉积物全氮、可交换态氮和固定铵的赋存特征.湖泊科学, 2002,14(4).
    [4]
    刘从强 汪福顺,魏中青,等.贵州阿哈湖沉积物-水界面微生物活动及其对微量元素再迁移富集的影响.科学通报, 2003,48(19).
    [5]
    高倩,徐兆礼,庄平.长江口北港和北支浮游动物群落比较.应用生态学报, 2008, (19)9:2049-2055.
    [6]
    朱晓君,陆健健.长江口九段沙潮间带底栖动物的功能群.动物学研究, 2003,24(5): 355-361
    [7]
    袁兴中,陆健健,刘红.长江口九段沙的底栖动物及其生态学特征, 动物学研究2001,24(2):133-139.
    [8]
    周晓,王天厚,葛振鸣,等.长江口九段沙湿地不同生境中大型底栖动物群落结构特征分析.生物多样性, 2006,14(2): 165-171.
    [9]
    范凯,李清雪.渤海湾浮游动物群落结构及水质生物学评价, 安微农业科学,2007,35(6):1697-1699.
    [10]
    史莉,尹璐,李越越,等.贵阳市阿哈水库饮用水源地现状及保护对策, 贵州水力发电.2008,22(3):20-23.
    [11]
    吴沿友,李萍萍,王宝利,等.红枫湖百花湖水质及浮游植物的变化,农业环境科学学报. 2004,23(4):745-747.
    [12]
    王俭,秦中,邓潇雅.贵阳市“两湖”水环境研究进展.贵州大学学报,2008,25(6):640-645.
    [13]
    陈光荣,钟萍,张修峰,等.2008.惠州西湖浮游动物及其水质的关系.湖泊科学,2008,20(3):351-356.
    [14]
    BelindaW T,Martin JR, Jonathan S S. Cost-efficientmethods for marine pollution monitoring at CaseyStation, EastAntarctica:thechoice of sieve mesh-size and taxonom ic resolution[J].Marine PollutionBulletin, 2003,46: 232-243.
    [15]
    Brooks Jl, Dodson SI. Predation, bodysize, and composition of plankton[J]. Science, 1965,150:28-35.
    [16]
    刘顺会,孙松,韩博平.浮游动物昼夜垂直迁移机理的主要假说及其研究进展[J].生态科学,2008,27(6):515-521.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2315) PDF downloads(1652) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return