• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 28 Issue 3
Sep.  2009
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Ming, WANG Qian, MA Jian-rong, ZHAN Jin-xing, YIN Wei-rong, ZHI Chong-yuan. Preliminary study on diatom biodiversity and environment in Tianhetan dry cave, Guiyang[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(3): 324-328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.016
Citation: LIU Ming, WANG Qian, MA Jian-rong, ZHAN Jin-xing, YIN Wei-rong, ZHI Chong-yuan. Preliminary study on diatom biodiversity and environment in Tianhetan dry cave, Guiyang[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(3): 324-328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.016

Preliminary study on diatom biodiversity and environment in Tianhetan dry cave, Guiyang

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.016
  • Received Date: 2009-01-16
  • Publish Date: 2009-09-25
  • In order to study the distribution and biodiversity of karst cave diatom, enrich and accumulate the basic theory date of diatom research, the authors conducted a field investigation in Tianhetan dry cave, Guiyang in December 2008. After identifying and analyzing in laboratory, 7 Genus and 27 species, including variation, were found in Tianhetan dry cave, among which 7 dominance species were included. The diatom quotient is zero, average dominance of biodiversity indexes of genus and species are 0.113 and 0.023, and Shannon—Wiener indexes are 2.60 and 4.43, respectively, evenness degrees of both genus and species are approximately 0.93, average cell density of diatom is 1 609.36 cell/cm2. The results also show that diatom biodiversity in Tianhetan dry cave is higher than in the river, lake (or reservoir) and ocean, but the diatom body in Tianhetan dry cave is smaller. There is a good correlation between diatom and kast cave environment, so make use of diatom as an indicator for the evaluation and monitoring of karst cave environment will be of important scientific research value, theoretical and actual significance.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    曾宪东. 植物碳酸酐酶对石灰岩岩溶的驱动作用研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学. 2004.
    [2]
    Hah G L, Liu C Q. Water geochemistry controlled by carbonate dissolution: a study of the river waters draining karst dominated terrain, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Chemical Geology, 2004, 204: 1-2 1.
    [3]
    杨晓霞,向旭,袁道先,等. 喀斯特洞穴旅游研究综述[J]. 中国岩溶,2007,26(4):369-377.
    [4]
    张朝晖,赵传海,李晓娜,等. 中国桂林岩溶洞穴苔藓植物研究[J]. 广西植物,2005, 25(2): 107-111.
    [5]
    张朝晖,艾伦?培特客斯. 英格兰洞穴苔藓植物区系特征及其岩溶沉积研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2002, 22(2): 35-367.
    [6]
    张朝晖,艾伦?培特客斯. 法国阿尔卑斯—罗讷(Rhone—Alps)岩溶洞穴弱光带苔藓植物群落研究[J]. 中国岩溶,2001, 20(3): 236-240.
    [7]
    戎昆方,安裕国. 喀斯特洞穴堆积物生物成因研究:以贵州织金洞为例[J]. 贵州地质,1996, 13(2): 177-180.
    [8]
    许为斌,高海山,刘演. 靖西细简苣苔──中国广西苦苣苔科──新种[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报,2008, 16(3): 274-276.
    [9]
    郝诒纯,茅绍智. 微体古生物学教程[M]. 北京: 中国地质大学出版社. 1998.
    [10]
    支崇远. 硅藻与环境---东海南部陆缘硅藻与古环境[M]. 北京:海洋出版社. 2006.
    [11]
    胡鸿均,魏印心. 中国淡水藻类——系统、分类及生态[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2006: 946-947
    [12]
    沈国英,施并章. 海洋生态学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2002:158-163.
    [13]
    邓洪平,陈锋,王明书. 嘉陵江南充段硅藻群落结构及水环境分析[J]. 水生生物学报,2008, 32(4): 586-591.
    [14]
    辛晓云. 河南南湾水库浮游硅藻的种群结构与水质污染评价初步研究[J]. 生态学杂志,2003, 22(5): 125-126.
    [15]
    吴瑞,蓝东兆,高亚辉,等. 象山港潮间带底栖硅藻的分布及其与环境关系探讨[J]. 2008, 27(4): 445-451.
    [16]
    隋战鹰. 浮游藻类与水质污染监测[J]. 生物学通报,2002, 37(8): 49.
    [17]
    刘子琦,熊康宁,陈洪云,等. 贵州世界自然遗产提名地喀斯特洞穴利用研究[J]. 人民长江, 2008, 39(8): 25-28.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1191) PDF downloads(608) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return