• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 28 Issue 3
Sep.  2009
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Rong-biao, HONG Han-lie, YIN Ke, LI Yang-bing, YANG Guangbin, AN Yu-lun. Evaluation on karst eco-environment sensitivity— A case study in Duyun city[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(3): 300-307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.012
Citation: LI Rong-biao, HONG Han-lie, YIN Ke, LI Yang-bing, YANG Guangbin, AN Yu-lun. Evaluation on karst eco-environment sensitivity— A case study in Duyun city[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(3): 300-307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.012

Evaluation on karst eco-environment sensitivity— A case study in Duyun city

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.012
  • Received Date: 2008-07-19
  • Publish Date: 2009-09-25
  • Evaluation index system of eco-environment sensitivity was established in this paper, which is founded with six kinds of indexes, including stratum lithology, topographical slope, vegetation cover, land use and population density as well as average annual net income of farmers. Based on the 3S technology, the paper extracted evaluation indexes, built spatial analysis model for spatial overlay analysis of the evaluation indexes, and graded eco-environment sensitivity and its spatial distribution in karst area. Grade evaluation analysis was finally established according to the characteristics of spatial distribution. The results show that strong, moderate, light, minor and non-eco-environment sensitivity area cover an area of 75.23 km2, 228.32km2,902.11km2, 841.00km2and 231.35 km2 respectively, which account for 3.30%, 10.02%, 39.60%, 36.92%, and 10.16% of the total area of the whole city accordingly. At the same time,the research indicate that the problem of fragile eco-environment sensitivity in karst area is a result that the fragile eco-environment is disturbed perennial by human activities.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    李阳兵,谢德体,魏朝富,等.西南岩溶山地生态脆弱性研究[J].中国岩溶,2002,21(1):25-29.
    [2]
    刘康,欧阳志云,王效科,等.甘肃省生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布[J].生态学报,2003.23(12):2711-2718.
    [3]
    肖荣波,欧阳志云,王效科,等.中国西南地区石漠化敏感性评价及其空间分析[J].生态学杂志.,2005, 24(5):551-554.
    [4]
    欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):9-12.
    [5]
    靖娟利,陈植华,胡成,等.中国西南部岩溶山区生态环境脆弱性评价[J].地质科技情报,2003,22(3):95-99.
    [6]
    苏维词.岩溶地区生态环境敏感度评价研究——以乌江流域为例[J].中国岩溶,1997,16(1):57-65.
    [7]
    王艳强,朱波,王玉宽,等.重庆市石漠化敏感性评价[J].西南农业学报, 2005,18(1):70-73.
    [8]
    周兴,童新华,华璀,等.广西生态环境敏感性综合评价及其空间分布[J].广西师范学院学报(自然科学版),2006, 23:1-8.
    [9]
    杜毓超,李兆林,陈宏峰,等.广西灌江流域岩溶生态环境敏感性分析[J].中国岩溶,2006,25(3):220-221.
    [10]
    贺秋华,张丹,陈朝猛,等.GIS支持下的黔中地区生态环境敏感性评估[J].生态学杂志,2007, 26 (3): 413-417.
    [11]
    贵州省都匀市史志编纂委员会.都匀市志[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1999.
    [12]
    王德炉,喻理飞.喀斯特环境生态脆弱性数量评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2005, 29(6):23-26.
    [13]
    李瑞玲,王世杰,周德全,等.贵州岩溶地区岩性与土地石漠化的相关分析[J].地理学报,2003,58(2):314-320.
    [14]
    张 喜.贵州喀斯特山地坡耕地立地影响因素及分区[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2003, 27(6):98-102.
    [15]
    安裕伦,蔡广鹏,熊书益.贵州高原水土流失及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持通报,1999,19(3):47-52.
    [16]
    杨明德.论喀斯特环境的脆弱性[J].云南地理环境研究,1990,2(1):21-29.
    [17]
    李阳兵,邵景安,王世杰,等.岩溶生态系统脆弱性研究[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(5):1-9.
    [18]
    李秀彬.全球环境变化研究的核心领域——土地利用/覆盖变化的国际研究动向[J].地理学报,1996, 51(6):553-557.
    [19]
    李荣彪,洪汉烈,强泰,等.喀斯特生态环境敏感性评价指标分级方法研究——以都匀市土地利用类型为例[J].中国岩溶,2009,28(1):87-93.
    [20]
    张利华,薛重生.“3S”技术在土壤侵蚀研究中的应用——以湖北省东北地区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(5):503-07.
    [21]
    都匀年鉴编纂委员会.都匀年鉴(2006)[M].香港:中国文化出版社,2007.
    [22]
    徐建华.现代地理学中的数学方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2002.
    [23]
    贵州地层古生物工作队.西南地区区域地层表贵州分册[M].北京:地质出版社,1977.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1215) PDF downloads(518) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return