• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 28 Issue 3
Sep.  2009
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
DU Yu-chao, HAN Xing-rui, LI Zhao-lin. Professional evaluating system for karst tunnel gushing based on AHP and its application[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(3): 281-287. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.009
Citation: DU Yu-chao, HAN Xing-rui, LI Zhao-lin. Professional evaluating system for karst tunnel gushing based on AHP and its application[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(3): 281-287. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.009

Professional evaluating system for karst tunnel gushing based on AHP and its application

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.009
  • Received Date: 2008-12-05
  • Publish Date: 2009-09-25
  • For the purpose of quantitative and semiquantitative description of impacting factors of the evaluating system for karst tunnel gushing, which will help us to predict the geological disasters directly and effectively, the paper has adopted Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to quantitatively integrate multi-factors of tunnel gushing, with synthetic index (Skarst) for judging karst tunnel gushing being concluded, which will be used to evaluate the risk for tunnel gushing under different karst hydrogeological conditions. A case study of tunnel gushing by applying AHP has been operated in Wuchiba, and we have concluded the results as follows: the sections of ZK259+890~ZK258+500 and ZK255+405~ZK253+182 are the places with low risk for tunnel gushing, whose Skarst is lower than 0.24 (including 0.24); the sections of ZK256+300~ZK255+405 and ZK258+500~ZK257+500 are the places with middle-class risk for tunnel gushing, whose Skarst is in the range of 0.24~0.70(excluding 0.24, but including 0.70); the sections of ZK257+500~ZK256+300 is the place with high risk for tunnel gushing, whose Skarst is higher than 0.70 (excluding 0.70).

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    韩行瑞.岩溶隧道涌水及其专家评判系统[J].中国岩溶,2004,23(3):214-217.
    [2]
    蒙 彦,雷明堂. 岩溶区隧道涌水研究现状及建议[J].中国岩溶,2003,22(4):287-292.
    [3]
    何发亮,李苍松,陈成宗.岩溶地区长大隧道涌水灾害预测预报技术[J].水文地质工程地质,2001(5) :21-23.
    [4]
    郭玉法,鲍庆煜. 岩溶隧道涌水量的预测方法研究[J]. 铁道勘察,2007(5) :73-75.
    [5]
    Saaty.T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process [M].Mc Gtaw Hill ,New York,1980.
    [6]
    赵焕臣,许树柏,和金生. 层次分析法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1986.
    [7]
    许树柏. 层次分析原理[M]. 天津: 天津出版社,1988.
    [8]
    徐则民,黄润秋,罗杏春. 特长岩溶隧道涌水预测的系统辨识方法[J] .水文地质工程地质,2002,4:50-54.
    [9]
    王鹰,陈强,魏有仪,等. 岩溶发育区深埋隧道水岩相互作用机理[J].中国铁道科学,2004,25(4):55-58.
    [10]
    沈继方,李焰云,徐瑞春,等.清江流域岩溶研究[M].地质出版社,1996.
    [11]
    杜毓超,李兆林,韩行瑞,等.沪蓉高速公路乌池坝隧道区岩溶发育特征及其涌水分析[J].中国岩溶,2008,27(1):11-17.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1125) PDF downloads(678) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return