Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 43 Issue 3
Aug.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2024  >  43(3): 684-693
GAO Zhaolong, DAN Yong, ZHANG Xihua, CAO Hua, DENG Min, CHEN Cong, HU Luojia. Differences of carbon and oxygen isotopes in coarse-grained calcite from the Permian Maokou Formation in different regions of Sichuan Basin and their significance in paleokarst environment[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(3): 684-693. doi: 10.11932/karst20240309
Citation: GAO Zhaolong, DAN Yong, ZHANG Xihua, CAO Hua, DENG Min, CHEN Cong, HU Luojia. Differences of carbon and oxygen isotopes in coarse-grained calcite from the Permian Maokou Formation in different regions of Sichuan Basin and their significance in paleokarst environment[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(3): 684-693. doi: 10.11932/karst20240309
shu

Differences of carbon and oxygen isotopes in coarse-grained calcite from the Permian Maokou Formation in different regions of Sichuan Basin and their significance in paleokarst environment

doi: 10.11932/karst20240309
  • 1.

    Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, PetroChina, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

  • 2.

    Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu, Sichuan 610081, China

  • 3.

    Key Laboratory of Sedimentary Basin and Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chengdu, Sichuan 610081, China

  • Received Date: 2023-11-22
    Available Online: 2024-08-15
    Abstract
  • Oil and gas fields in karst carbonate reservoirs are widely distributed in China. A number of karst fracture-vuggy reservoirs have been found in the Tarim Basin, the Ordos Basin and the Sichuan Basin. Therefore, research of reservoirs in karst fractured caves has become one of the focuses in recent years, which indicates a promising future and huge potential for exploring karst carbonate reservoirs in China. Reservoirs in fractured caves of the Maokou Formation have always been one of the key areas for oil and gas exploration in the Sichuan Basin. Since the last century when reservoirs in fractured caves in the southern Sichuan region were discovered, breakthroughs have been made in this field in the Yuanba area of northern Sichuan, Yunjin area of southern Sichuan, and the Penglaiba area of central Sichuan, demonstrating good exploration prospects. However, there has always been controversy over the origin of fractured caves. One view suggests that the exposure of the Maokou Formation caused by the Dongwu Movement and the occurrence of freshwater karst are the main reasons for the development of fractured caves in the Maokou Formation, while another view suggests that fractured caves in the Maokou Formation are related to the tectonic fluid activity during the burial period. these two views are mostly based on research in the southern Sichuan region, and further consideration of the entire Sichuan Basin is needed to search for relevant evidence from geological phenomena to geochemistry.To understand the causes and differences of these fractured caves, we systematically sampled calcite for data of carbon and oxygen isotopes from outcrop profiles or from drilling fractured caves in different areas of the Sichuan Basin, in order to determine the paleokarst environment in which fractured caves were developed. Study results show that fractured caves of the Maokou Formation in this basin are mainly composed of small-and-medium-sized dissolution pores, fractures, and dissolution fractures. The carbon and oxygen isotopes of calcite in the Maokou Formation can be divided into four types, indicating four types of paleokarst environment with different fluid properties. Type I is the quasi syngenetic karst environment in which the oxygen isotope values of calcite in fractured caves are basically consistent with the values of limestone or of Middle Permian seawater in the Maokou Formation, with δ13C ranging from 1.80‰ to 3.83‰ and δ18O ranging from −8.95‰ to −4.11‰. Type II is the freshwater karst environment in which high negative δ13C and δ18O values are present in calcite of fractured caves, with δ13C<0‰ and δ18O ranging from −12.00‰ to −9.00‰. Type III is the buried karst environment in which lower δ18O values are significantly negative compared to the values of bedrock. However, δ13C values are basically consistent with those of bedrock, with δ13C ranging from 0‰ to 3.83‰ and δ18O ranging from −12.00‰ to −8.50‰. Type IV is the high-temperature hydrothermal environment in which δ18O values are significantly negative (<−12.00‰).Regional comparison shows that the oxygen isotopes in central and southern Sichuan are more negative than those in northern Sichuan, while the carbon isotopes in northern and central Sichuan are more negative than those in southern Sichuan. Research suggests that buried karst is the main type in southern Sichuan, followed by freshwater karst and quasi syngenetic karst, all together forming reservoirs dominated by fractures. In addition to quasi syngenetic karst and freshwater karst, high-temperature hydrothermal karst is also developed in central Sichuan. The high-temperature hydrothermal karst has formed dissolution pore reservoirs related to dolomite. The northern Sichuan is mainly characterized by quasi syngenetic karst and freshwater karst, forming reservoirs mainly composed of dissolution pores.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(37)
  • [1]
    陈学时, 易万霞, 卢文忠. 中国油气田古岩溶与油气储层[J]. 沉积学报, 2004, 22(2):244-254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2004.02.008

    CHEN Xueshi, YI Wanxia, LU Wenzhong. The palaeokarst reservoirs of oil/gas fields in China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2004, 22(2): 244-254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2004.02.008
    [2]
    贾疏源. 中国岩溶缝洞系统油气储层特征及其勘探前景[J]. 特种油气藏, 1997, 4(4):1-5, 9

    JIA Shuyuan. Characteristics and exploration potential of hydrocarbon reservoirs of karst slot and cave system in China[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 1997, 4(4): 1-5, 9
    [3]
    贾振远, 蔡忠贤. 碳酸盐岩古风化壳储集层(体)研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2004, 23(4):94-104.

    JIA Zhenyuan, CAI Zhongxian. Carbonate paleo-weathered crust reservoirs (body)[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2004, 23(4): 94-104.
    [4]
    王招明, 张丽娟, 孙崇浩. 塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶分类、期次及勘探思路[J]. 古地理学报, 2015, 17(5): 635-644.

    WANG Zhaoming, ZHANG Lijuan, SUN Chonghao. Classification, period and exploration for carbonate karst in the Ordovician, Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 2015, 17(5) : 635-644.
    [5]
    夏日元, 唐建生, 邹胜章, 梁彬, 金新峰, 姚昕. 碳酸盐岩油气田古岩溶研究及其在油气勘探开发中的应用[J]. 地球学报, 2006, 27(5):503-509. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2006.05.013

    XIA Riyuan, TANG Jiansheng, ZOU Shengzhang, LIANG Bin, JIN Xinfeng, YAO Xin. Palaeo-karst research of the carbonate oil-gas field and its application to oil-gas exploration and development[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2006, 27(5): 503-509. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2006.05.013
    [6]
    朱东亚, 张殿伟, 李双建. 四川盆地下组合碳酸盐岩多成因岩溶储层发育特征及机制[J]. 海相油气地质, 2015, 20(1):33-44 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2015.01.005

    ZHU Dongya, ZHANG Dianwei, LI Shuangjian. Development genesis and characteristics of karst reservoirs in lower assemblage in Sichuan basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2015, 20(1): 33-44 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2015.01.005
    [7]
    淡永, 梁彬, 曹建文. 塔里木盆地轮南奥陶系岩溶缝洞充填物地球化学特征及环境意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2012, 34(6):623-628.

    DAN Yong, LIANG Bin, CAO Jianwen. Geochemical features and environmental significances of deposits in Ordovician karstic fractures and caves, Lunnan area, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2012, 34(6): 623-628.
    [8]
    郭旭升, 李宇平, 魏全超. 川东南地区茅口组古岩溶发育特征及勘探领域[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(6):1-8.

    GUO Xusheng, LI Yuping, WEI Quanchao. Palaeokarst reservoirs and exploration areas of Maokou Formation in the southeast of Sichuan basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2012, 34(6): 1-8.
    [9]
    杨海军, 韩剑发, 孙崇浩, 王福焕, 正岩, 吉云刚. 塔中北斜坡奥陶系鹰山组岩溶型储层发育模式与油气勘探[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(2):199-205. doi: 10.7623/syxb201102002

    YANG Haijun, HAN Jianfa, SUN Chonghao, WANG Fuhuan, ZHENG Yan, JI Yungang. A development model and petroleum exploration of karst reservoirs of Ordovician Yingshan Formation in the northernslope of Tazhong palaeouplift[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(2): 199-205. doi: 10.7623/syxb201102002
    [10]
    杨雨, 谢继容, 赵路子, 黄平辉, 张玺华, 陈聪, 张本健, 文龙, 汪华, 高兆龙, 山述娇. 四川盆地茅口组滩相孔隙型白云岩储层天然气勘探的突破及启示:以川中北部地区JT1井天然气立体勘探为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(2):1-9.

    YANG Yu, XIE Jirong, ZHAO Luzi, HUANG Pinghui, ZHANG Xihua, CHEN Cong, ZHANG Benjian, WEN Long, WANG Hua, GAO Zhaolong, SHAN Shujiao. Breakthrough of natural gas exploration in the beach facies porous dolomite reservoir of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the Sichuan basin and its enlightenment: A case study of the tridimensional exploration of Well JT1 in the central-northern Sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(2): 1-9.
    [11]
    张宇, 曹清古, 罗开平, 李龙龙, 刘金连. 四川盆地二叠系茅口组油气藏勘探发现与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(3):610-620. doi: 10.11743/ogg20220310

    ZHANG Yu, CAO Qinggu, LUO Kaiping, LI Longlong, LIU Jinlian. Reservoir exploration of the Permian Maokou Formation in the Sichuan basin and enlightenment obtained[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 610-620. doi: 10.11743/ogg20220310
    [12]
    何钊, 高兆龙, 李国蓉, 何赛, 莫国宸, 田家奇, 李肖肖. 川南云锦地区茅口组储集层溶蚀期次及模式[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5):537-545.

    HE Zhao, GAO Zhaolong, LI Guorong, HE Sai, MO Guochen, TIAN Jiaqi, LI Xiaoxiao. Dissolution stage and pattern of reservoirs in Maokou Formation in Yunjin area, southern Sichuan basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(5): 537-545.
    [13]
    诸丹诚, 喻雅敏, 黎霆, 张雷, 李让彬, 杨明磊, 邹华耀. 四川盆地北部元坝地区茅口组岩溶: 发育特征与分布模式[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(3):701-714.

    ZHU Dancheng, YU Yamin, LI Ting, ZHANG Lei, LI Rangbin, YANG Minglei, ZOU Huayao. Karst development and distribution pattern of the Maokou Formation in Yuanba area, northern Sichuan basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2023, 25(3): 701-714.
    [14]
    聂国权, 淡永, 徐亮, 梁彬, 李景瑞. 蜀南Z工区茅口组顶岩溶古地貌、古水系特征与刻画[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(6):911-917. doi: 10.11932/karst20200610

    NIE Guoquan, DAN Yong, XU Liang, LIANG Bin, LI Jingrui. Characteristics and characterization of karst palaeo-geomorphology and palaeowater system on the top of Maokou Formation in the Z area in southern Sichuan basin[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2020, 39(6): 911-917. doi: 10.11932/karst20200610
    [15]
    王国锋, 张大伟, 邓守伟, 杨光, 宋文礼. 四川盆地自贡区块茅口组岩溶储层发育特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(9):63-75. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.09.006

    WANG Guofeng, ZHANG Dawei, DENG Shouwei, YANG Guang, SONG Wenli. Development characteristics and main controlling factors of Maokou Formation karst reservoirs in Zigong block of the Sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(9): 63-75. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.09.006
    [16]
    曹华, 陈延贵, 陈聪, 高兆龙, 山述娇, 李天军, 胡罗嘉, 谢静平. 四川盆地东北部茅口组岩溶储层控制因素[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2022, 45(3):1-10. doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2022.03.001

    CAO Hua, CHEN Yangui, CHEN Cong, GAO Zhaolong, SHAN Shujiao, LI Tianjun, HU Luojia, XIE Jingping. Controlling factors of karst reservoir in Maokou Formation, northeastern Sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2022, 45(3): 1-10. doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2022.03.001
    [17]
    江青春, 胡素云, 汪泽成, 池英柳, 杨雨, 鲁卫华, 王海真, 李秋芬. 四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及勘探选区[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(6):949-960. doi: 10.7623/syxb201206005

    JIANG Qingchun, HU Suyun, WANG Zecheng, CHI Yingliu, YANG Yu, LU Weihua, WANG Haizhen, LI Qiufen. Paleokarst landform of the weathering crust of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan basin and selection of exploration regions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(6): 949-960. doi: 10.7623/syxb201206005
    [18]
    明盈, 徐亮, 周刚, 周红飞, 李毅, 戴鑫. 四川盆地南部地区茅口组古岩溶缝洞充填演化特征[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2021, 44(1):46-54.

    MING Ying, XU Liang, ZHOU Gang, ZHOU Hongfei, LI Yi, DAI Xin. Evolution characteristics of paleo-karst fracture and vug flling in Maokou Formation, southern Sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2021, 44(1): 46-54.
    [19]
    胡修权, 施泽进, 田亚铭. 川东南地区茅口组断裂多重分形特征及意义[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 41(4):476-482.

    HU Xiuquan, SHI Zejin, TIAN Yaming. Multifractal feature and significance of Maokou Formation faults in the southeast of Sichuan[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 41(4): 476-482.
    [20]
    施泽进, 夏文谦, 王勇, 田雪松, 王长城. 四川盆地东南部茅口组古岩溶特征及识别[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(3):622-630.

    SHI Zejin, XIA Wenqian, WANG Yong, TIAN Xuesong, WANG Changcheng. Characteristics and identification of paleokarst in the Maokou Formation in the southeastern Sichuan basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(3): 622-630.
    [21]
    Arthur M A, Dean W E, Pratt L M. Geochemical and climatic effects of increased marine organic carbon burial at the Cenomanian/Turonian boundary[J]. Nature, 1988, 335: 714-717. doi: 10.1038/335714a0
    [22]
    Scholle P A, Arthur M A. Carbon isotope fluctuations in Cretaceous pelagic limestones: Potential stratigraphic and petroleum exploration tool[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1980, 64: 67-87.
    [23]
    刘存革, 李国蓉, 朱传玲, 刘国勇, 卢宇峰. 塔河油田中下奥陶统岩溶缝洞方解石碳、氧、锶同位素地球化学特征[J]. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 2008, 33(3):377-384.

    LIU Cunge, LI Guorong, ZHU Chuanling, LIU Guoyong, LU Yufeng. Geochemistry characteristics of carbon‚ oxygen and strontium isotopes of calcites filled in karstic fissure-cave in Lower-Middle Ordovician of Tahe oilfield‚ Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science: Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2008, 33(3): 377-384
    [24]
    孔兴功. 石笋氧碳同位素古气候代用指标研究进展[J]. 高校地质学报, 2009, 15(2):165-170. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2009.02.004

    KONG Xinggong. Advance in study of oxygen and carbon isotope variations in cave stalagmites as palaeo-climate proxies[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2009, 15(2): 165-170. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2009.02.004
    [25]
    魏魁生, 徐怀大, 叶淑芬. 四川盆地层序地层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1997, 18(2):151-157. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.1997.02.012

    WEI Kuisheng, XU Huaida, YE Shufen. Sequence stratigraphic characteristics of Sichuan basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1997, 18(2): 151-157. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.1997.02.012
    [26]
    廖芸, 张建勇, 鲁鹏达, 李泽奇, 李文正, 田腾振, 吴娟, 孙玮, 刘树根, 邓宾. 川中北斜坡中二叠统茅口组多期流体活动与成藏过程研究[J/OL]. 天然气地球科学: 1-16[2023-11-22]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1177.te.20230713.1404.004.html.

    LIAO Yun, ZHANG Jianyong, LU Pengda, LI Zeqi, LI Wenzheng, TIAN Tengzhen, WU Juan, SUN Wei, LIU Shugen, DENG Bin. Multi-stage fluid activity and accumulation process of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the northern slope of central Sichuan[J/OL]. Natural Gas Geoscience: 1-16[2023-11-22] . Http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1177.te. 20230713.1404.004.html.
    [27]
    曾韬, 柳昊, 夏文谦, 田亚铭, 邓剑, 施泽进. 四川盆地元坝地区茅口组方解石充填物特征及指示意义[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 49(4):474-481.

    ZENG Tao, LIU Hao, XIA Wenqian, TIAN Yaming, DENG Jian, SHI Zejin. Characteristics and indicative significance of calcite fillings in Maokou Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2022, 49(4): 474-481.
    [28]
    周进高, 郝毅, 邓红婴, 谷明峰, 潘立银, 姚倩颖, 杨雨然, 娄雪. 四川盆地中西部栖霞组—茅口组孔洞型白云岩储层成因与分布[J]. 海相油气地质, 2019, 24(4):67-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2019.04.006

    ZHOU Jingao, HAO Yi, DENG Hongying, GU Mingfeng, PAN Liyin, YAO Qianying, YANG Yuran, LOU Xue. Genesis and distribution of vuggy dolomite reservoirs of the Lower Permian Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation, central-western Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2019, 24(4): 67-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2019.04.006
    [29]
    田雪松. 川东南地区茅口组碳酸盐岩储层地球化学特征研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2014.

    TIAN Xuesong. The geochemical study on the carbonate resevior of the Maokou Formation in southeastern Sichuan Province[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
    [30]
    Veizer J, Fritz P, Jones B. Geochemistry of brachiopods: Oxygen and carbon isotopic records of Paleozoic oceans[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1986, 50(8): 1679-1696.
    [31]
    Dan Y, Lin L, Liang B, Zhang Q, Cao J, Li J. Geochemistry of the fracture-cave calcite of the ordovician Yingshan Formation and its paleokarst environment in the Tazhong area, Tarim Basin, China[J]. Carbonates & Evaporites, 2019, 34(4): 1511-1524.
    [32]
    淡永, 梁彬, 张庆玉, 李景瑞, 聂国权. 碳酸盐岩早成岩岩溶作用与油气储层预测[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2022.
    [33]
    董红琪, 张庆玉, 梁嘉鹏, 梁彬, 李景瑞, 淡永, 聂国权, 季少聪. 岩溶缝洞充填物碳氧同位素特征及环境意义:以塔河油田奥陶系鹰山组为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2023, 42(4):863-874. doi: 10.11932/karst20230417

    DONG Hongqi, ZHANG Qingyu, LIANG Jiapeng, LIANG Bin, LI Jingrui, DAN Yong, NIE Guoquan, JI Shaocong. Carbon and oxygen isotopic characteristics of karst fracture-cavity fillings and environmental significance: A case study of Ordovician Yingshan Formation in Tahe oilfield[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2023, 42(4): 863-874. doi: 10.11932/karst20230417
    [34]
    董红琪, 张庆玉, 梁嘉鹏, 淡永, 梁彬, 聂国权, 季少聪. 广西环江凹陷深部岩溶缝洞充填物碳氧同位素特征及古环境意义[J]. 中国岩溶, 2022, 41(5):838-846, 837. doi: 10.11932/karst20220512

    DONG Hongqi, ZHANG Qingyu, LIANG Jiapeng, DAN Yong, LIANG Bin, NIE Guoquan, JI Shaocong. Carbon and oxygen isotope characteristics and paleoenvironmental significance of deep karst fracture-cave fillings in Huanjiang sag, Guangxi[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2022, 41(5): 838-846, 837 doi: 10.11932/karst20220512
    [35]
    蔡春芳, 李开开, 李斌, 蔡鏐璐, 姜磊. 塔河地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩缝洞充填物的地球化学特征及其形成流体分析[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(10): 2399-2404.

    CAI Chunfang, LI Kaikai, LI Bin, CAI Liulu, JIANG Lei. Geochemical characteristics and origins of fracture-and vug-fillings of the Ordovician in Tahe oilfield, Tairm Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 25 (10): 2399-2404.
    [36]
    Schopf T J M. Paleoceanography[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980: 106-107.
    [37]
    张正红, 淡永, 梁彬, 张庆玉, 李景瑞, 郝彦珍. 塔中Ⅱ区鹰山组岩溶缝洞充填物碳氧同位素特征及环境意义[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(2):159-164. doi: 10.11932/karst20150209

    ZHANG Zhenghong, DAN Yong, LIANG Bin, ZHANG Qingyu, LI Jingrui, HAO Yanzhen. Characteristics of oxygen and carbon isotopes of karst fissure-cave fillings in the Yingshan Formation, Tazhong Ⅱ area, Tarim Basin and their implications for environment[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2015, 34(2): 159-164. doi: 10.11932/karst20150209
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(3709.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (37) PDF downloads(138) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return