Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 42 Issue 6
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2023  >  42(6): 1173-1182
HE Xiang, DONG Xuelan, YANG Chao, LIU Peng, XUE Boqiang. Characteristics of karst development and water abundance of the Beiya Gold Deposit in Heqing county of Yunnan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(6): 1173-1182. doi: 10.11932/karst2023y025
Citation: HE Xiang, DONG Xuelan, YANG Chao, LIU Peng, XUE Boqiang. Characteristics of karst development and water abundance of the Beiya Gold Deposit in Heqing county of Yunnan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(6): 1173-1182. doi: 10.11932/karst2023y025
shu

Characteristics of karst development and water abundance of the Beiya Gold Deposit in Heqing county of Yunnan

doi: 10.11932/karst2023y025

  • Yunnan Gold and Mining Group Company(Ltd), Kunming, Yunnan 650299, China

  • Received Date: 2022-12-28
    Available Online: 2023-12-28
    Abstract
  • The Beiya Gold Deposit is a typical karst water-filled deposit. As the hydrogeological conditions and water environment are expected to be changed by future deep mining, the water inrush risk will increase if the roadway is exposed or connected with the karst zone, the underground river and Guochang river. In this study, comparing the field investigation of regional hydrogeology and the geological exploration data with the actual production, we analyze the karst development and water abundance characteristics from the aspects of lithology, structure, landform, etc. The study results show as follows. (1) The karst forms mainly include stone forest, drainage cave, karst depression, solubilization trough, solubilization gap, karst cave and underground river. (2) Lithologically, karst in the second segment of the Middle Triassic Beiya Formation is the most developed, with the purest fine crystalline limestone containing 41.52%–54.77% of CaO. Karst development in the first segment of the Beiya Formation is restricted by limestone and siltstone. Karst is developed in the contact zone on the side of the second segment, while not developed on the side of the first segment. (3) Karst development is mainly controlled by structure, and the direction of karst development is consistent with the NS, EW and NW tectonic lines. Karst is more developed in the fold axis and the warped end, and is relatively developed in the zone affected by fault and the contact zone of rock mass. (4) Karst development shows the characteristics of vertical zonation. Funnels and sink holes are developed at the level of 2,500 m to 3,500 m, grikes and solution grooves at 1,800 m to 2,500 m. Slope valleys, karst caves and underground rivers are developed at the level of 1,694 m, while karst is still relatively developed below the base level of erosion. The lowest control elevation of the cave is 1,479.54 m, and the depth of karst development below the base level of erosion is more than 150 m. (5) The karst water abundance shows its synclinal confluence pattern. The Beiya synclinal water storage structure plays a key role in karst water enrichment. The zone affected by fault and the contact zone between rock mass and its surrounding rock are also conducive to groundwater migration and enrichment. (6) The spatial variation of water abundance in karst aquifer is large. From rock mass as the center to its outward direction, radial water abundance and permeability can be listed in the order of weak-medium-strong or extremely strong. The rock mass and its proximal annular ore-bearing alteration zone shows weak-medium water abundance, while the distal end shows medium-strong water abundance. Some parts of the area are extremely strong in water abundance. (7) The underground river is developed along the axis of the Beiya syncline at the level of 1,740 m to 1,694 m. The Beiya Formation is composed of sandy limestone. The possibility of karst cave or water inrush of the underground river will increase if the mining passes through the fault zone and the syncline core.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(23)
  • [1]
    齐跃民. 矿区岩溶地下水动态的随机模拟及应用研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2009.

    QI Yuemin. Stochastic simulation of karst groundwater dynamics in coal mine and its application[D]. Bejing: China University of Mining and Technology, 2009.
    [2]
    李涛, 李文平, 高颖, 乔伟. 杨庄矿6煤底板深部岩溶裂隙水体特征研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2010, 27(1):94-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3363.2010.01.018

    LI Tao, LI Wenping, GAO Ying, QIAO Wei. Characteristics of karst-fissure water bodies deeply seated in the floor of No. 6 coal seam in Yangzhuang coal mine[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2010, 27(1):94-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3363.2010.01.018
    [3]
    姜文, 柏道远, 尹欧, 杨帆, 彭祖武, 钟响, 李彬, 李银敏. 湘中灰山港—煤炭坝地区岩溶发育特征及其构造控制[J]. 中国岩溶, 2022, 41(1):1-12.

    JIANG Wen, BAI Daoyuan, YIN Ou, YANG Fan, PENG Zuwu, ZHONG Xiang, LI Bin, LI Yinmin. Characteristics of karst development and its structural control in the Huishangang-Meitanba area of central Hunan[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2022, 41(1):1-12.
    [4]
    吴继文, 吴亮君, 吕勇, 王璞珺, 周嘉铭, 林宇, 潘明, 廖家飞, 孟庆鑫. 云南泸水市压扭性构造对银厂坪白云岩岩溶系统发育控制作用[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(5):793-804.

    WU Jiwen, WU Liangjun, LV Yong, WANG Pujun, ZHOU Jiaming, LIN Yu, PAN Ming, LIAO Jiafei, MENG Qingxin. Transpressional structure and its control on development of Yinchangping dolomite karst system in Lushui City, Yunnan[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(5):793-804.
    [5]
    李小明, 朱丽, 李永军, 杨希培. 淮南矿区岩溶发育特征及其富水规律[J]. 华北科技学院学报, 2010, 7(1):8-11, 22.

    LI Xiaoming, ZHU Li, LI Yongjun, YANG Xipei. The karst development characteristic and the water abundance regular in Huainan mine area[J]. Journal of North China Institute of Science and Technology, 2010, 7(1):8-11, 22.
    [6]
    吕玉香, 胡伟, 周军. 渝东南渝东北岩溶区地下水富集特征研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报, 2016, 35(4):83-87, 92.

    LV Yuxiang, HU Wei, ZHOU Jun. Study on the enrichment characteristics of groundwater in Chongqing southeast and northeast karst areas[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2016, 35(4):83-87, 92.
    [7]
    李铎, 魏爱华, 贾磊, 陈康. 山东福山铜矿岩溶裂隙水充水矿井涌水量预测[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(3):319-325.

    LI Duo, WEI Aihua, JIA Lei, CHEN Kang. Prediction of water inflow in karst fracture of Fushan copper mine, Shandong Province, China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(3):319-325.
    [8]
    王宇, 王梓微. 岩溶地下水富集的地貌组合形态[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(4):314-324.

    WANG Yu, WANG Ziwei. Patterns of karst geomorphologic combinations in areas with rich groundwater[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2015, 34(4):314-324.
    [9]
    王宇. 岩溶高原地下水径流系统垂向分带[J]. 中国岩溶, 2018, 37(1):1-7.

    WANG Yu. Vertical zoning of groundwater runoff system in karst plateau[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2018, 37(1):1-7.
    [10]
    王宇. 西南岩溶地区岩溶水系统分类、特征及勘查评价要点[J]. 中国岩溶, 2002, 21(2):114-119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2002.02.008

    WANG Yu. Classification, features of karst water system and key point for the evaluation to karst water exploration in Southwest China karst area[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2002, 21(2):114-119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2002.02.008
    [11]
    WANG Yu, YUAN Daoxian, YANG Shiyu. Geophysical prospecting of karst water in Yunnan Province, China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2007, 26(2): 155-161.
    [12]
    王宇, 彭淑惠. 云南省岩溶水赋存特征[J]. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(3):253-259.

    WANG Yu, PENG Shuhui. Distribution features of karst water in Yunnan[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2011, 30(3):253-259.
    [13]
    Randall C Orndofff, David J Weary, Stanka Sebela. Geologic framework of the ozarka of south-central Missouri—contributions to a conceptual model of karst[C]//Geological survey karst interest group proceedings, water-resources investigations report 01-4011, 2001: 18-24.
    [14]
    Philipp Hauselmann, Pierre Yves Jeannin, Thomas Bitterli. Relationships between karst and tectonics: Case study of the cave system north of Lake Thun (Bern, Switzerland)[J]. Geodinamica Acta, 1999, 12(6): 377-387.
    [15]
    云南黄金矿业集团股份有限公司. 云南省鹤庆县北衙铁金矿水文地质工程地质环境地质专项勘查报告[R]. 2021.
    [16]
    王大纯, 张人权, 史毅虹, 许绍倬, 于青春, 梁杏. 水文地质学基础[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1995.

    WANG Dachun, ZHANG Renquan, SHI Yihong, XU Shaozhuo, YU Qingchun, LIANG Xing. Fundamentals of Hydrogeology[M]. Beijing: Geology Press, 1995.
    [17]
    袁道先, 蒋勇军, 沈立成, 浦俊兵, 肖琼. 现代岩溶学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
    [18]
    中国人民解放军〇〇九三九部队. 鹤庆幅区域水文地质普查报告[R]. 1979.
    [19]
    王锦国, 赵洪达, 周云, 黄华, 陈长生. 云南鹤庆西山地质构造对岩溶发育的控制作用分析[J]. 河海大学学报, 2021, 49(3):241-248.

    WANG Jinguo, ZHAO Hongda, ZHOU Yun, HUANG Hua, CHEN Changsheng. Control effect analysis of geological structure on karst development in Westshan mountains, Heqing county, Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Hohai University, 2021, 49(3):241-248.
    [20]
    叶浩, 周云, 房艳国, 罗文行, 吴海斌, 翁文林, 付兴伟. 鹤庆—剑川地区岩溶发育特征及其控制因素[J]. 华南地震, 2021, 41(2):19-26. doi: 10.13512/j.hndz.2021.02.03

    YE Hao, ZHOU Yun, FANG Yanguo, LUO Wenxing, WU Haibin, WENG Wenlin, FU Xingwei. The development characteristics and controlling factors of Heqing–Jianchuan karst[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 2021, 41(2):19-26. doi: 10.13512/j.hndz.2021.02.03
    [21]
    吴慧群. 大沙地尾矿库岩溶发育特征及地下水环境影响分析[D]. 云南: 昆明理工大学, 2015.
    [22]
    梁彬, 李兆林. 西南岩溶石山地区岩溶水资源合理开发利用模式:以湖南龙山洛塔为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1):62-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2008.01.012

    LIANG Bin, LI Zhaolin. Reasonable mode in exploitation of karst water resources in karst stone mountainous areas in Southwest China: A case study of Luota, Longshan county, Hunan province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2008, 17(1):62-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2008.01.012
    [23]
    周训, 胡伏生, 何江涛, 王旭升, 方斌. 地下水科学概论(第二版)[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2014.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Yu. Study on complexity of groundwater systems in the karst mining areas with abundant water on the Yunnan plateau[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(6): 1223-1234. doi: 10.11932/karst20240601
    [2]JIANG Feng, JIQIN Kebuzi, CAO Jianwen, WANG Ruofan, ZHAO Liangjie. Source characteristics and influencing factors of groundwater hydrochemistry in the karst areas of central Guizhou[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(4): 889-899. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y028
    [3]PAN Tianwang, SHI Wenqiang, LI Chengzhan, CHEN Weihai, TANG Liangliang, WU Hongmei. Features and genesis analysis of geological relics of karst landforms in the Laoshan area of Malipo, Yunnan Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(6): 1430-1444. doi: 10.11932/karst20240619
    [4]ZHANG Wenqiang, TENG Yue, TANG Fei, WANG Jinxiao, XU Qingyu, ZHANG Hailin. Groundwater hydrochemical characteristics and evolution of the karst water system in the Feicheng fault block in Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 1047-1060, 1084. doi: 10.11932/karst20230515
    [5]LIU Zhizheng, LI Shuang, LIU Baihan, ZHANG Xuesong, LIU Huafeng, PENG Junfeng, LIU Yunde. Source-tracing of sulfate in groundwater of Xizhang Well Group in the Liuzheng water source area of Zibo City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 1074-1084. doi: 10.11932/karst20230517
    [6]DING Guantao, LI Changsuo, WEI Shanming, WANG Shaojuan, LI Yan, LU Qianqian, SUN Bin, Liu Haoran. Study on the influence of external recharge of Yufu river on karst groundwater[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 907-916. doi: 10.11932/karst20230504
    [7]LIN Yongsheng, DU Yuchao, ZOU Shengzhang, FAN Lianjie, QUAN Xiqiang. Structural characteristics of karst groundwater system beneath Jinfoshan, Nanchuan district, Chongqing City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(5): 658-664. doi: 10.11932/karst20200502
    [8]WANG Yu. Evaluation status and problems of groundwater resource potential in Yunnan Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(2): 137-146. doi: 10.11932/karst20200201
    [9]WANG Yu. Study on watershed boundary division for unified evaluation of surface water and groundwater resources and environment in karst areas[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(6): 823-830. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y08
    [10]LUO Fei, SU Chuntian, PAN Xiaodong, YANG Yang, ZHAO Guangshuai. Hydrochemical characteristics and geochemical sensitivity of groundwater in typical karst hilly regions:A case study of Eastern Wugang[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(2): 211-217. doi: 10.11932/karst20180207
    [11]XU Zhongping, ZHOU Xun, CUI Xiangfei, TA Mingming, WANG Xinyun, ZHANG Ying. Research advances of numerical simulation of groundwater in karst areas[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(4): 475-483. doi: 10.11932/karst20180401
    [12]WANG Yu. Vertical zoning of groundwater runoff system in karst plateau[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(1): 1-8. doi: 10.11932/karst20180101
    [13]ZHOU Changsong, ZOU Shengzhang, ZHU Danni, XIE Hao, CHEN Hongfeng, YU Jianguo. Contrast study of Ca2+ and HCO3- concentration in karst-water samples between field test and laboratory test values[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 684-690. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y33
    [14]YU Cuicui. Numerical simulation of karst groundwater and dynamic prediction of spring water level in the Mingshui spring area , Ji’nan City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(4): 533-540. doi: 10.11932/karst20170415
    [15]QIN Xiaoqun, SONG Kaiben, HUANG Qibo, LAN Funing, HUANG Chunyang, HUANG Hui. Groundwater occurrence characteristics and drilling well models in karst peak forest areas, Guangxi, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 618-625. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y28
    [16]ZHENG Xiaozhan, GUO Yu, DAI Jianling, CHEN Xiaoyue, HUANG Jianmin. Groundwater monitoring and numerical simulation under the influence of linear engineering in karst areas: A case study of the Jinshazhou area, Guangzhou City [J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(6): 657-666. doi: 10.11932/karst20160607
    [17]WANG Yu, WANG Zi-wei. Patterns of karst geomorphologic combinations in areas with rich groundwater[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(4): 314-324. doi: 10.11932/karst20150402
    [18]YU Le, WANG Li-heng, WANG Ju-ping. Study of karst groundwater flow characteristics of a mine in Pingnan county, Guangxi through connection test[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(1): 31-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2014.01.005
    [19]GUO Fang, JIANG Guang-hui, X IA Qing, LI Ke. Hydro-chemical variation of karst groundwater under the impact of land use in Donghe catchment, Hunan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2007, 26(3): 212-218. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2007.03.005
    [20]Ha Chengyou, Tang Bangyi, Lu Rongan. CHARACTERISTICS OF FISSURE KARST IN THE MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN LIME AND GROUNDWATER NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE WEST MOUNTAIN OF TAIYUAN, SHANXI PROVINCE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1989, 8(1): 41-46.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 王宇. 论云南高原岩溶大水矿区地下水系统的复杂性. 中国岩溶. 2024(06): 1223-1234 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 21.2 %FULLTEXT: 21.2 %META: 65.8 %META: 65.8 %PDF: 13.0 %PDF: 13.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.2 %其他: 7.2 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Seattle: 0.3 %Seattle: 0.3 %三亚: 0.2 %三亚: 0.2 %三明: 0.2 %三明: 0.2 %上海: 1.8 %上海: 1.8 %上饶: 0.2 %上饶: 0.2 %东莞: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %中卫: 5.2 %中卫: 5.2 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %临沧: 0.2 %临沧: 0.2 %丹东: 0.5 %丹东: 0.5 %乌海: 0.2 %乌海: 0.2 %五家渠: 0.2 %五家渠: 0.2 %伊犁: 0.3 %伊犁: 0.3 %克拉玛依: 0.2 %克拉玛依: 0.2 %六盘水: 0.2 %六盘水: 0.2 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %内江: 0.2 %内江: 0.2 %北京: 18.1 %北京: 18.1 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 1.1 %南京: 1.1 %南宁: 0.6 %南宁: 0.6 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %南阳: 0.2 %南阳: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.6 %哈尔滨: 0.6 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大庆: 0.2 %大庆: 0.2 %大理: 1.2 %大理: 1.2 %天津: 2.5 %天津: 2.5 %太原: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %威海: 0.2 %威海: 0.2 %娄底: 0.6 %娄底: 0.6 %宁德: 0.2 %宁德: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %安康: 0.6 %安康: 0.6 %宜昌: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.2 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %崇左: 3.2 %崇左: 3.2 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %庆阳: 0.3 %庆阳: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %徐州: 1.2 %徐州: 1.2 %忻州: 0.3 %忻州: 0.3 %惠州: 0.3 %惠州: 0.3 %成都: 1.5 %成都: 1.5 %扬州: 0.9 %扬州: 0.9 %抚顺: 0.2 %抚顺: 0.2 %文昌: 0.2 %文昌: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 7.5 %昆明: 7.5 %曲靖: 0.5 %曲靖: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %株洲: 0.2 %株洲: 0.2 %梅州: 0.2 %梅州: 0.2 %楚雄: 0.2 %楚雄: 0.2 %武威: 0.2 %武威: 0.2 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %永州: 0.2 %永州: 0.2 %池州: 0.2 %池州: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %波士顿: 0.2 %波士顿: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %济南: 0.5 %济南: 0.5 %海东: 0.3 %海东: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淮南: 0.3 %淮南: 0.3 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.3 %湘西: 0.2 %湘西: 0.2 %滁州: 0.6 %滁州: 0.6 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %玉林: 0.5 %玉林: 0.5 %玉溪: 0.2 %玉溪: 0.2 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %白山: 0.2 %白山: 0.2 %百色: 0.2 %百色: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 1.1 %福州: 1.1 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %红河: 0.5 %红河: 0.5 %纽约: 3.1 %纽约: 3.1 %绍兴: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %聊城: 0.2 %聊城: 0.2 %肇庆: 0.3 %肇庆: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 0.6 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %茂名: 0.2 %茂名: 0.2 %莆田: 0.3 %莆田: 0.3 %莱芜: 0.5 %莱芜: 0.5 %萍乡: 0.2 %萍乡: 0.2 %葫芦岛: 0.2 %葫芦岛: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %西宁: 10.6 %西宁: 10.6 %西安: 1.1 %西安: 1.1 %许昌: 0.8 %许昌: 0.8 %诺沃克: 0.5 %诺沃克: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %贺州: 0.2 %贺州: 0.2 %赤峰: 0.2 %赤峰: 0.2 %运城: 1.1 %运城: 1.1 %遂宁: 0.3 %遂宁: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邢台: 0.5 %邢台: 0.5 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %都伯林: 0.8 %都伯林: 0.8 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %镇江: 0.2 %镇江: 0.2 %长春: 0.6 %长春: 0.6 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %阜阳: 0.2 %阜阳: 0.2 %韶关: 0.2 %韶关: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.5 %马鞍山: 0.5 %黔东南: 0.2 %黔东南: 0.2 %黔南: 0.3 %黔南: 0.3 %其他其他Seattle三亚三明上海上饶东莞中卫临沂临沧丹东乌海五家渠伊犁克拉玛依六盘水兰州内江北京十堰南京南宁南昌南阳合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨唐山嘉兴大庆大理天津太原威海娄底宁德宁波安康宜昌宣城崇左广州庆阳廊坊徐州忻州惠州成都扬州抚顺文昌新乡无锡昆明曲靖朝阳杭州株洲梅州楚雄武威武汉永州池州沈阳波士顿洛阳济南海东海口淄博淮南深圳湘潭湘西滁州漯河玉林玉溪珠海白山百色石家庄福州秦皇岛红河纽约绍兴绵阳聊城肇庆芒廷维尤苏州茂名莆田莱芜萍乡葫芦岛蚌埠西宁西安许昌诺沃克贵阳贺州赤峰运城遂宁遵义邢台郑州都伯林重庆银川镇江长春长沙阜阳韶关马鞍山黔东南黔南

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(3633.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (428) PDF downloads(85) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return