Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 42 Issue 5
Oct.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2023  >  42(5): 898-906, 916
SUN Bin, LI Changsuo, XU Qingyu, GAO Shuai, LIU Chunwei, XING Liting, YU Lingqin. Analysis of dynamic characteristics and driving factors of Jinan spring water on a long-time scale[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 898-906, 916. doi: 10.11932/karst20230503
Citation: SUN Bin, LI Changsuo, XU Qingyu, GAO Shuai, LIU Chunwei, XING Liting, YU Lingqin. Analysis of dynamic characteristics and driving factors of Jinan spring water on a long-time scale[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 898-906, 916. doi: 10.11932/karst20230503
shu

Analysis of dynamic characteristics and driving factors of Jinan spring water on a long-time scale

doi: 10.11932/karst20230503
  • 1.

    801 Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources (Shandong Provincial Geo-mineral Engineering Exploration Institute), Jinan, Shandong 250014, China

  • 2.

    Shandong Engineering Research Center for Environmental Protection and Remediation on Groundwater, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China

  • 3.

    College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266100, China

  • 4.

    School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong 250002, China

  • Received Date: 2023-04-20
  • Accepted Date: 2023-07-25
    • Available Online: 2023-10-20
    Abstract
  • Springs of Jinan City in Shandong Province are typically large karst ones in Northern China. With 136 mouths of springs, there are four major spring groups, namely, Baotu Spring, Heihu spring, Wulongtan spring and Pearl spring, distributed around the moat in the urban area. Springs are the lifeblood of Jinan City and play an important role in the development of this city. However, since the dry season in 1972, the springs had witnessed seasonal cutoffs. Baotu Spring even experienced complete cutoffs throughout the respective year of 1982, 1988 and 1989. From 1999 to 2002, the cutoff of this spring spanned 926 days, the longest cutoff time in history. Until September 2003, thanks to a series of measures taken by the government, the four major springs began to gush all year-round, but the spring flow is much less than before. Currently, studies usually focus on short-time-span spring dynamics in Jinan instead of long-term comparative studies on spring dynamics in different periods. Especially, the strong human influence on spring dynamics after springs gushed again needs further research. Few analyses of the influence factors of complex human activities, such as the impact of urban construction are relatively few. In these studies, the whole built-up area has been taken as the object, which ignores the fact that the runoff discharge area itself does not have the condition of infiltration, resulting in the overestimation of hardening area in statistics. In order to comprehensively explore the dynamic evolution of the four major spring groups and the main control factors affecting spring gushing, we have conducted a study on the dynamic characteristics and causes of springs over the past 60 years for the development and utilization of karst groundwater resources and environmental protection in the Jinan region. To identify the dynamic change pattern of the four spring groups in Jinan, we have studied the dynamic change characteristics of the springs and their influencing factors such as natural-human activities, etc. through correlation analysis, partial correlation analysis, regression analysis, and water balance analysis, based on a series of monitoring data for a long term. The results indicate that the dynamics of the four springs in Jinan City have experienced four stages: stage 1 from 1959 to 1967, at which the springs gushed spectacularly with a large amount of flow at a high water level; stage 2 from 1968 to 1980, at which the landscape of springs attenuated with a small amount of flow at a low water level; stage 3 from 1981 to 2002, at which the springs experienced long-term intermittent cutoff with a very small amount of flow at a rather low water level; stage 4 from 2003 up till now, at which the springs gushed again because of the regulated restoration. At stage 4, the average flow rate of springs decreased from 366.6 thousand m3·d−1 to 142.0 thousand m3·d−1, then to 46.9 thousand m3·d−1, but subsequently recovered to 170.6 thousand m3·d−1; the average water level of springs decreased from 30.48 m to 27.91 m, then to 26.25 m, but afterward, recovered to 28.24 m. In addition, this study quantitatively identifies the influencing factors and the degree of impact in each stage. The main control factors at stage 1 are precipitation and extraction, with an average impact degree of 581.7 thousand m3·d−1 and −95.8 thousand m3·d−1; the main control factors at stage two are precipitation, extraction and water engineering, with an average impact degree of 520.1 thousand m3·d−1, −426.1 thousand m3·d−1 and −59.8 thousand m3·d−1; the main control factors at stage 3 are extraction, precipitation, water engineering, and urban construction, with an average impact degree of −518.2 thousand m3·d−1, 514.2 thousand m3·d−1, −69.2 thousand m3·d−1 and −24.0 thousand m3·d−1; the main control factors at stage 4 are precipitation, extraction, ecological replenishment sources, urban construction, and water engineering, with an average impact degree of 553.8 thousand m3·d−1, −254.4 thousand m3·d−1, 103.6 thousand m3·d−1, −89.9 thousand m3·d−1 and −65.6 thousand m3·d−1. In general, precipitation and extraction control the spring flow, but other driving factors gradually increased with the development at the four stages. Before the springs gushed again, the impact of precipitation gradually weakened, but the influence of extraction, urban construction and water conservancy projects gradually increased by degrees. After the springs gushed again, the impact of the government's regulation and control played a dominant role. To keep a continuous gush of spring, first of all, we should ensure that Baotu Spring area 3-type water conversion can be effectively carried out. Besides, we should strengthen dynamic monitoring and regulation, rationally coordinate major factors such as groundwater mining, ecological replenishment and water conservancy projects, etc., and formulate an optimal groundwater development program in a scientific and elaborate way, relying on the sharing mechanism among different departments. Finally, in order to reduce the impact of urbanization on springs, we should strengthen the protection and restoration of ecological environmental in the recharge area of southern springs so as to improve the capacity of water resources conservation. The research results can provide basis for spring runoff protection.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(20)
  • [1]
    钱学溥. 山西省岩溶泉水[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 1979(5):47-52.

    QIAN Xuebo. Karst spring in Shanxi Province[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 1979(5):47-52.
    [2]
    柏红. 济南泉水漫谈[J]. 山东国土资源, 2009, 25(10):66-68.

    BAI Hong. Primary introduction to springs in Jinan City[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2009, 25(10):66-68.
    [3]
    张效平, 宋儒. 洪山泉流量动态及影响因素分析[J]. 中国煤田地质, 2002, 14(3):31-32, 41.

    ZHANG Xiaoping, SONG Ru. Discharge dynamics of Hongshan spring and its analyses on influence factors[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2002, 14(3):31-32, 41.
    [4]
    梁永平, 高洪波, 张江华, 霍建光, 王桃良. 娘子关泉流量衰减原因的初步定量化分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2005, 24(3):227-231.

    LIANG Yongping, GAO Hongbo, ZHANG Jianghua, HUO Jianguang, WANG Taoliang. Preliminary quantitative analysis on the causes of discharge attenuation in Niangziguan spring[J]. Carsologica sinica, 2005, 24(3):227-231.
    [5]
    王茂枚, 束龙仓, 季叶飞, 陶玉飞, 董贵明, 刘丽红. 济南岩溶泉水流量衰减原因分析及动态模拟[J]. 中国岩溶, 2008, 27(1):19-23.

    WANG Maomei, SHU Longcang, JI Yefei, TAO Yufei, DONG Guiming, LIU Lihong. Causes of spring's of flux attenuation and simulation of spring's regime: A case in Jinan karst spring area[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2008, 27(1):19-23.
    [6]
    于苗, 邢立亭, 吴吉春, 侯玉松, 朱恒华, 彭玉明, 李罡. 基于时间序列分形的济南岩溶大泉动态研究[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(8): 2509-2519.

    YU Miao, XING Liting, WU Jichun, HOU Yusong, ZHU Henghua, PENG Yuming, LI Gang. Study of large karst springs using the time series fractal method in Jinan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2020, 94(8): 2509-2519.
    [7]
    唐春雷, 晋华, 梁永平, 赵春红, 申豪勇, 潘尧云, 景泽. 娘子关泉域岩溶地下水位变化特征及成因[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(6):810-816.

    TANG Chunlei, JIN Hua, LIANG Yongping, ZHAO Chunhong, SHEN Haoyong, PAN Yaoyun, JING Ze. Characteristics and causes of variation of karst groundwater level in the Niangziguan spring area[J]. Carsologica sinica, 2020, 39(6):810-816.
    [8]
    陈荦, 张幼宽, 王长申. 基于时间序列分析的辛安泉流量变化研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2012, 39(1):19-23, 41.

    CHEN Luo, ZHANG Youkuan, WANG Changshen. A study of evolution of the discharge of the Xin'an spring with time series analysis[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2012, 39(1):19-23, 41.
    [9]
    郝永红, 王玮, 王国卿, 杜欣, 朱宇恩, 王学萌. 气候变化及人类活动对中国北方岩溶泉的影响:以山西柳林泉为例[J]. 地质学报, 2009(1):138-144.

    HAO Yonghong, WANG Wei, WANG Guoqing, DU Xin, ZHU Yuen, WANG Xuemeng. Effects of climate change and human activities on the karstic springs in Northern China: A case study of the Liulin springs[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2009(1):138-144.
    [10]
    王亚捷, 王国卿, 郝永红, 李华敏, 赵娇娟. 人类活动对柳林泉域水文过程影响研究[J]. 水文, 2011, 31(3):82-87.

    WANG Yajie, WANG Guoqing, HAO Yonghong, LI Huamin, ZHAO Jiaojuan. Effect of human activities on hydrological process of Liulin springs[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2011, 31(3):82-87.
    [11]
    李华敏, 吴敬, 赵娇娟, 郝永红, 王亚捷, 曹碧波. GM(1, 1)分解模型与ARIMA模型在岩溶地下水模拟中的对比研究:以柳林泉流量模拟为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(3):260-269.

    LI Huamin, WU Jing, ZHAO Jiaojuan, HAO Yonghong, WANG Yajie, CAO Bibo. Comparative study on karst groundwater simulation between GM (1, 1) decomposition model and ARIMA model: A case study on discharge simulation of the Liulin spring[J]. Carsologica sinica, 2011, 30(3):260-269.
    [12]
    王喆. 岩溶地下水系统演化的数值模拟[J]. 地质科技情报, 2013, 32(4):201-206.

    WANG Zhe. Numerical simulation of the karst groundwater system evolution[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(4):201-206.
    [13]
    相华, 封得华, 蒋国民. 济南四大泉群泉水出流量分析[J]. 山东水利, 2017(12):49-50.
    [14]
    迟光耀, 邢立亭, 主恒祥, 侯新宇, 相华, 邢学睿. 大气降水与济南泉水动态变化的定量关系研究[J]. 地下水, 2017, 39(1):8-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2017.01.002

    CHI Guangyao, XING Liting, ZHU Hengxiang, HOU Xinyu, XIANG Hua, XING Xuerui. The study of quantitative relationship between the spring water and the dynamic change of the atmospheric precipitation in Jinan[J]. Ground Water, 2017, 39(1):8-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2017.01.002
    [15]
    倪寒茜, 束龙仓, 韩刚, 张曼琦, 王鑫, 王小博, 余亚飞, OPOKU Portia Annabelle. 城市化对趵突泉泉域降水入渗补给的影响[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2020, 18(6):64-70, 147.

    NI Hanxi, SHU Longcang, HAN Gang, ZHANG Manqi, WANG Xin, WANG Xiaobo, YU Yafei, OPOKU Portia Annabelle. Impact of urbanization on precipitation infiltration recharge in Baotu Spring basin[J]. South–to–North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2020, 18(6):64-70, 147.
    [16]
    尹德超, 吴玺, 崔虎群, 王文祥, 王晓燕, 王茜, 安永会. 西北内陆盆地浅层地下水温度场及动态类型: 以酒泉东盆地为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(1):193-202.

    YIN Dechao, WU Xi, CUI Huqun, WANG Wenxiang, WANG Xiaoyan, WANG Qian, AN Yonghui. Temperature field and dynamic types of shallow groundwater in the northwest inland basin: A case study of the Jiuquan east basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(1):193-202.
    [17]
    吴兴波, 牛景涛, 牛景霞, 宋星原. 人工回灌对济南泉水系统修复的影响[J]. 人民黄河, 2004(8):20-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2004.08.009

    WU Xingbo, NIU Jingtao, NIU Jingxia, SONG Xingyuan. Influence of artificial recharge of groundwater on rehabilitation of spring system in Jinan[J]. Yellow River, 2004(8):20-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2004.08.009
    [18]
    刘江, 李波, 杨增元, 杜雪梅. 卧虎山水库对济南泉水影响的定量分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2012, 28(1):67-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6933.2012.01.016

    LIU Jiang, LI Bo, YANG Zengyuan, DU Xuemei. Quantitative analysis of influences of Wohushan reservoir on Jinan karst spring basin[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2012, 28(1):67-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6933.2012.01.016
    [19]
    李波. 卧虎山水库对济南泉域岩溶水补给的影响[D]. 济南: 济南大学, 2011.

    LI Bo. The influence of Wohushan reservoir to Jinan karst spring basin[D]. Jinan: University of Jinan, 2011.
    [20]
    李传谟. 济南岩溶水资源的分析与泉水名胜的保护[J]. 中国岩溶, 1985, 4(Suppl.1):31-39.

    LI Chuanmo. Analysis on karst resources and preservation of famous spring in Jinan[J]. Carsologica sinica, 1985, 4(Suppl.1):31-39.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(1725.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (176) PDF downloads(70) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return