Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 41 Issue 3
Jun.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2022  >  41(3): 477-487
ZHANG Xiaoqin, LUO Weijun, WANG Yanwei, CAI Xianli, LYU Yina, WANG Shijie. Effects of rock tablet lithology difference on estimation of rock dissolution rate and carbon flux[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(3): 477-487. doi: 10.11932/karst20220314
Citation: ZHANG Xiaoqin, LUO Weijun, WANG Yanwei, CAI Xianli, LYU Yina, WANG Shijie. Effects of rock tablet lithology difference on estimation of rock dissolution rate and carbon flux[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(3): 477-487. doi: 10.11932/karst20220314
shu

Effects of rock tablet lithology difference on estimation of rock dissolution rate and carbon flux

doi: 10.11932/karst20220314
  • 1.

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China

  • 2.

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • 3.

    Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, CAS, Puding, Guizhou 562100, China

  • 4.

    Rural Revitalization Research Center of Guizhou Universities, Anshun, Guizhou 561000, China

  • Received Date: 2022-02-20
    Abstract
  • Under the control of subtropical humid monsoon climate, karstification is very strong in the karst area of southern China. At the same time, a lot of researches indicate that the carbon sink formed by karstification in southern China may be an important part of the global missing carbon sink. At present, there are many research methods to estimate the intensity of karst carbon sink. The carbonate rock tablet test is one of the main traditional research methods to estimate the karst carbon flux. The main principle of this method is based on the chemical reaction of water-CO2-carbonate rock. The specific operation is to bury the carbonate rock test piece with the same size under the soil, then take them out and weigh them after a certain time, use the dissolution amount of rock tablets to calculate the dissolution rate and karst carbon flux in study area. Finally, the regional karst carbon sink can be estimated according to"point by area". In the study of estimating karst carbon sink in China, previous scientists used pure limestone from Rongxian formation of Devonian System in Guilin. However, the geological background of different regions is quite different, and the composition and structure of bedrock are different, so that the estimation results of standard carbonate rock tablets (pure limestone) may be also different from the actual dissolution amount of local bedrock tablets, resulting in great uncertainty in the estimation of karst carbon sink in the region. Based on this, in this study, we chose Puding county, Guizhou Province as the study area. The main bedrock types (limestone and dolomite) of this place are made into standard size rock tablets, and buried them in the typical land use types (secondary forest, shrub, grassland, dry land and paddy field) in the study area. After monitoring for four hydrological years, the dissolution rate and karst carbon flux were calculated, then compared them with the previous research results using the standard carbonate rock tablet (pure limestone) in the same study area, and the following results are obtained; (1) Under the same climatic conditions and soil environmental conditions, lithology has a significant impact on the dissolution rate of carbonate rock tablets, and the dissolution rate has a positive correlation with CaO content in the rock tablets and a negative correlation with MgO content in the rock tablets; (2) The difference of dissolution rate between limestone and dolomite is controlled by land use types and soil depths. Without considering the influence of environmental factors, on the whole, the dissolution rate of limestone is 14% higher than that of dolomite; (3) The karst carbon sink intensity estimated by different lithology carbonate rock tablets varies greatly. The estimated result of standard limestone tablets is higher than that of local tablets in this study. Therefore, when using the carbonate rock tablet method to estimate the regional karst carbon flux, we should consider the lithology of the bedrock where the rock tablet is buried, or correct the estimation results based on the standard carbonate rock tablet, so as to accurately obtain the real karst carbon flux on the regional scale.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(36)
  • [1]
    Fortunat Joos, Renato Spahni. Rates of change in natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing over the past 20000 years[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(5):1425-1430.
    [2]
    Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Are Olsen, et al. Global Carbon Budget 2020[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2020, 12(4):3269-3340.
    [3]
    PIAO Shilong, HE Yue, WANG Xuhui, CHEN Fahu. Estimation of China's terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink: Methods, progress and prospects[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2022, 65(4):641-651.
    [4]
    王世杰, 刘再华, 倪健, 闫俊华, 刘秀明. 中国南方喀斯特地区碳循环研究进展[J]. 地球与环境, 2017, 45(01): 2-9.

    WANG Shijie, LIU Zaihua, NI Jian, YAN Junhua, LIU Xiuming. A review of research progress and future prospective of carbon cycle in karst area of south China. Erath and environment. 2017, 45(1): 2-9.
    [5]
    LIU Zaihua, Wolfgang DREYBRODT, WANG Haijing. A new direction in effective accounting for the atmospheric CO2 budget: Considering the combined action of carbonate dissolution, the global water cycle and photosynthetic uptake of DIC by aquatic organisms[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 2010, 99(3-4):162-172.
    [6]
    ZHOU Guoqing, HUANG Jingjin, TAO Xiaodong, LUO Qingli, ZHANG Rongting, LIU Zaihua. Overview of 30 years of research on solubility trapping in Chinese karst[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2015, 146:183-194.
    [7]
    YUAN Daoxian. The carbon cycle in karst[J]. Zeitschrift fuer Geomorphologie, 1997, 108:91-102.
    [8]
    LIU Zaihua, ZHAO Jinbo. Contribution of carbonate rock weathering to the atmospheric CO2 sink[J]. Environmental Geology, 2000, 39(9):1053-1058.
    [9]
    LIU Zaihua, Wolfgang Dreybrodt. Significance of the carbon sink produced by H2O-carbonate-CO2-aquatic phototroph interaction on land[J]. Science Bulletin, 2015, 60(2):182-191.
    [10]
    LIU Zaihua, G. L. Macpherson, Chris Groves, Jonathan B. Martin, YUAN Daoxian, ZENG Sibo. Large and active CO2 uptake by coupled carbonate weathering[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 182:42-49.
    [11]
    袁道先. 碳循环与全球岩溶[J]. 第四纪研究, 1993, 13(1):1-6. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.1993.01.001

    YUAN Daoxian. Carbon cyclce and global karst[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 1993, 13(1):1-6. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.1993.01.001
    [12]
    CAO Jianhua, YUAN Daoxian, Chris GROVES, HUANG Fen, YANG Hui, LU Qian. Carbon Fluxes and Sinks: the Consumption of Atmospheric and Soil CO2 by Carbonate Rock Dissolution[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(4):963-972.
    [13]
    袁道先, 蔡桂鸿. 岩溶环境学[M]. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 1988: 62-64.

    YUAN Daoxian, CAI Guihong. The science of karst environment[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing Publication House, 1988: 62-64.
    [14]
    Kristina Krklec, David Domínguez-Villar, Dražen Perica. Use of rock tablet method to measure rock weathering and landscape denudation[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2021, 212(4):103449.
    [15]
    ZHANG Cheng, PEI Jianguo, XIE Yunqiu, CAO Jianghua, WANG Lanling. Impact of land use covers upon karst processes in a typical Fengcong depression system of Nongla, Guangxi, China[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008, 55(8):1621-1626.
    [16]
    谢芳, 傅瓦利, 王晓阳, 蒲 鹏, 张蕾, 谭波, 彭景涛, 甄晓君. 重庆中梁山碳酸盐岩溶蚀速率对季节的响应研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2010, 29(4):410-413. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.04.010

    XIE Fang, FU Wali, WANG Xiaoyang, PU Peng, ZHANG Lei, TAN Bo, PENG Jingtao, ZHEN Xiaojun. Study on response of carbonate rock dissolution rate to the season in Zhongliang Mountain, Chongqing[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2010, 29(4):410-413. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.04.010
    [17]
    刘文, 张强, 贾亚男. 夏季不同土地利用方式下的溶蚀作用研究: 以重庆青木关岩溶槽谷区为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2012, 31(1):1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.01.001

    LIU Wen, ZHANG Qiang, JIA Yanan. Karstification under different lan-use patterns in sumer: A case study in the Qingmuguan karst valley, Chongqing[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2012, 31(1):1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.01.001
    [18]
    蓝家程, 傅瓦利, 彭景涛, 周小萍, 肖时珍, 袁波. 不同土地利用方式土下岩溶溶蚀速率及影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(10):3205-3212.

    LAN Jiacheng, FU Wali, PENG Jingtao, ZHOU Xiaoping, XIAO Shizhen, YUAN Bo. Dissolution rate under soil in karst areas and the influencing factors of different land use patterns[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(10):3205-3212.
    [19]
    SHAO Mingyu, ZHANG Liankai, LIU Pengyu, CAO Jianhua, QIN Xiaoqun, HUANG Qibo, LUO Mingming, ZHANG Chunlai. Influential factors and spatial suitability of the method of limestone tablets in karst carbon cycle study in China[J]. Carbonates and Evaporites, 2020, 35(3):85.
    [20]
    徐胜友, 蒋忠诚. 我国岩溶作用与大气温室气体CO2源汇关系的初步估算[J]. 科学通报, 1997, 42(9):953-956. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.1997.09.019

    XU Shengyou, JIANG Zhongcheng. Preliminary estimation of the relationship between karstification and the source sink of atmospheric greenhouse gas CO2 in China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1997, 42(9):953-956. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.1997.09.019
    [21]
    罗健, 蒋勇军, 胡毅军, 李林立, 刘文. 亚高山表层岩溶泉域土壤溶蚀速率季节变化及碳汇量估算: 以重庆金佛山水房泉流域为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(4):443-448. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.015

    LUO Jian, JIANG Yongjun, HU Yijun, LI Linli, LIU Wen. Seasonal changes of soil dissolution rate and estimations on carbon sequestration in the subalpine epikarst spring zone: A case study in the Shuifang Spring in Jinfoshan, Chongqing[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2011, 30(4):443-448. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.015
    [22]
    曾成, 赵敏, 杨睿, 刘再华. 岩溶作用碳汇强度计算的溶蚀试片法和水化学径流法比较: 以陈旗岩溶泉域为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2014, 41(1):106-111.

    ZENG Cheng, ZHAO Min, YANG Rui, LIU Zaihua. Comparison of karst processes-related carbon sink intensity calculated by carbonate rock tablet test and solute load method: A case study in the Chenqi karst spring system[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2014, 41(1):106-111.
    [23]
    闫伟, 曾成, 肖时珍, 蓝家程, 何江湖, 何春, 代林玉, 狄永宁. 湿润亚热带典型白云岩流域不同土地利用下的试片溶蚀速率及岩溶碳汇[J]. 地球与环境, 2021, 49(5): 529-538.

    YAN Wei, ZENG Cheng, XIAO Shizhen, LAN Jiacheng, HE Jianghu, HE Chun, DAI Linyu, DI Yongning. Dissolution rate and karst carbon sink of different land use in typical dolomite watershed with humid subtropical weather[J]. Earth and Environment, 2021, 49(5): 529-538.
    [24]
    王文娟, 蓝芙宁, 蒋忠诚, 覃小群, 劳文科. 湖南大龙洞流域不同岩性不同土地利用类型条件下碳酸盐岩试片的溶蚀速率[J]. 中国岩溶, 2013, 32(1):29-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2013.01.005

    WANG Wenjuan, LAN Funing, JIANG Zhongcheng, QIN Xiaoqun, LAO Wenke. Corrosion rate of carbonate tablet under diverse land use and lithology in the Dalongdong basin, Hunan[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2013, 32(1):29-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2013.01.005
    [25]
    黄奇波, 覃小群, 刘朋雨, 蓝芙宁, 张连凯. 不同岩性试片溶蚀速率差异及意义[J]. 地球与环境, 2015, 43(4):379-385. doi: 10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2015.04.001

    HUANG Qibo, QIN Xiaoqun, LIU Pengyu, LAN Funing, ZHANG Liankai. Dissolution on rate and it’s significance of different lithological tablets[J]. Earth and Environment, 2015, 43(4):379-385. doi: 10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2015.04.001
    [26]
    杨成华, 陈景艳, 丁访军. 普定县天龙山喀斯特森林群落植物多样性对比研究[J]. 贵州林业科技, 2012, 40(2):1-7.

    YANG Chenghua, CHEN Jinyan, DING Fangjun. Study on the plant diversity of karst forest community in Tianlong mountain of Puding County[J]. Guizhou Forestry Science and Technology, 2012, 40(2):1-7.
    [27]
    俞锦标, 潘瑞鸿. 贵州省普定县碳酸盐岩沉积相带成岩作用与岩溶发育的研究[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 1982(3):787-798,823.

    YU Jinbiao, PAN Ruihong. Sedimentary facies zones, diagenesis and karst development of carbonate rocks in Pudding, west Guizhou[J]. Journal of Nanjing University(Natural Science), 1982(3):787-798,823.
    [28]
    胡刚, 张忠华, 程安云, 刘立斌, 吴洋洋, 倪健. 黔中天龙山喀斯特次生林林分空间结构的量化与分析[J]. 地球与环境, 2017, 45(1):25-31. doi: 10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2017.01.004

    HU Gang, ZHANG Zhonghua, CHENG Anyun, LIU Libin, WU Yangyang, NI Jian. Characterizing and analyzing stand spatial structure of a northern subtropical karst secondary forest in Tianlong mountain of central Guizhou Province, China[J]. Earth and Environment, 2017, 45(1):25-31. doi: 10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2017.01.004
    [29]
    习新强, 赵玉杰, 刘玉国, 王欣, 高贤明. 黔中喀斯特山区植物功能性状的变异与关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10):1000-1008.

    XI Xinqiang, ZHAO Yujie, LIU Yuguo, WANG Xin, GAO Xianming. Variation and correlation of plant functional traits in karst area of central Guizhou Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(10):1000-1008.
    [30]
    Luo Mingming, ZHOU Hong, Liang Yongping, Chen Zhihua, Chen Rubing, Li Xinlong, Hamza Jakada, et al. Horizontal and vertical zoning of carbonate dissolution in China[J]. Geomorphology, 2018, 322:66-75.
    [31]
    龚自珍, 黄庆达. 碳酸盐岩岩块野外溶蚀速度试验[J]. 中国岩溶, 1984(2):17-26.

    GONG Zizhen, HUANG Qingda. Field corrosion rate tests on carbonate rocks[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1984(2):17-26.
    [32]
    李永双, 范周周, 国辉, 周金星, 彭霞薇. 菌剂添加对不同树种根际土壤微生物及碳酸钙溶蚀的影响[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(6):854-862.

    LI Yongshuang, FAN Zhouzhou, GUO Hui, ZHOU Jinxing, PENG Xiawei. Effects of microorganisms agent addition on soil microbes in different rhizosphere soils and calcium carbonate dissolution[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2020, 39(6):854-862.
    [33]
    李强, 何媛媛, 曹建华, 梁建宏, 朱敏洁. 植物碳酸酐酶对岩溶作用的影响及其生态效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(12):1867-1871. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2011.12.015

    LI Qiang, HE Yuanyuan, CAO Jianhua, LIANG Jianhong, ZHU Minjie. The plant carbonic anhydrase at karst area and its ecological effects[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2011, 20(12):1867-1871. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2011.12.015
    [34]
    SHE Min, Shou Jianfeng, SHEN Anjiang, PAN Liyin, HU Anping, HU Yuanyuan. Experimental simulation of dissolution law and porosity evolution of carbonate rock[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4):616-625.
    [35]
    何宇彬, 金玉璋, 李康. 碳酸盐岩溶蚀机理研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 1984, 3(2):12-16.

    HE Yubin, JIN Yuzhang, LIKang. An experimental study of carbonate rock corrosion mechanism[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1984, 3(2):12-16.
    [36]
    黄奇波, 覃小群, 刘朋雨, 康志强, 唐萍萍. 半干旱区岩溶碳汇原位监测方法适宜性研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1):240-246. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201501206

    HUANG Qibo, QIN Xiaoqun, LIU Pengyu, KANG Zhiqiang TANG Pingping. Applicability of karst carbon sinks calculation methods in semi-arid climate environment[J]. Joural of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(1):240-246. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201501206
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(3593.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1060) PDF downloads(56) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return