Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 41 Issue 1
Feb.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2022  >  41(1): 1-12
JIANG Wen,BAI Daoyuan,YIN Ou,et al.Characteristics of karst development and its structural control in the Huishangang-Meitanba area of central Hunan[J].Carsologica Sinica,2022,41(01):1-12. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y39
Citation: JIANG Wen,BAI Daoyuan,YIN Ou,et al.Characteristics of karst development and its structural control in the Huishangang-Meitanba area of central Hunan[J].Carsologica Sinica,2022,41(01):1-12. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y39
shu

Characteristics of karst development and its structural control in the Huishangang-Meitanba area of central Hunan

doi: 10.11932/karst2021y39

  • Hunan Institute of Geological Survey，Changsha， Hunan 410116，China

Funds:

 DD20160031┫之子项目“湖南1∶5万浯口镇、金井、沙市街、灰山港、煤炭坝幅区域地质调查”

  • Received Date: 2019-05-16
  • Publish Date: 2022-02-25
    Abstract
  • Carbonate rocks of the upper Paleozoicare are widely distributed in central Hunan， and karst and karst subsidence are well developed in the Huishangang-Meitanba area of central Hunan， which leads to the karst collapse in mining areas such as Loudi and Ningxiang. Among them， the karst collapse in Ningxiang Meitanba area is particularly serious， and predecessors have carried out much exploring and monitoring work. However， there is still a lack of comprehensive and in-depth study on the overall characteristics and geological conditions of karst development in this area， which affects， to a certain extent， the scientific understanding and prevention of geological disasters caused by karst collapse. Based on the 1：50，000 regional geological survey project and the previous environmental geological survey data， this paper studies the characteristics of karst development and its tectonic control in this area. The soluble rocks in the study area mainly occur in the upper Palaeozoic， with a small amount of development at the bottom of Cretaceous-Paleogene. The average content of CaO in the main soluble rock bearing strata in the study area is 47.71% in Dapu formation， 54.09% in Maping formation， 50.00% in Qixia formation， 50.62% in Maokou formation， 53.09% in Dalong formation and 47.17% in Baihuating formation. Combined with the actual CaO content， the potential karst development intensity of the strata is in the following order， Maping formation＞Dapu formation＞Qixia formation and Maokou formation＞Baihuating formation （only referring to the limestone conglomerate） ＞ Dalong formation. The karst area can be horizontally divided into three types， namely， bare， overburden and burial， among which overburden karst areas can be further divided into three types （strong， medium and weak）. The overlying and buried karst areas can be vertically divided into shallow karst development zone， middle karst cave fissure development zone and deep karst weak development zone. The characteristics of karst development are controlled by the folds formed by tectonic events such as Dongwu uplift of Permian， multiple compressions since middle Triassic and regional extension from Cretaceous to Paleogene， together with fracture systems in different directions， basement structures of basin， and differential vertical movements since Paleogenethe. According to the regional tectonic evolution， the karst development characteristics of different horizons and ages， the analysis of Cretaceous Paleogene underlying basement surface and quaternary system， the karst process and karst landform in the study area have experienced a multi-stage evolution. On the whole， there are three stages of karstification. The first stage is that after the rise of Dongwu at the end of the middle Permian， the sea water retreated， resulting in the exposure of the surface of Maokou formation and the formation of ancient karst forms such as karst pores and caves under Longtan formation. The second stage is from the late middle Triassic to the early Cretaceous. The regional folds were uplifted and subjected to weathering and dissolution， and then the fault subsidence was deposited， forming the karst low hill landform from the middle south to the middle east of the study area. The third stage is the development of modern karst. In the middle and late Paleogene， the rift basins contracted and uplifted， mostly forming covered karst landform， and if partially covered by red beds， forming buried karst. All kinds of structures in the study area have obvious control over the development characteristics of karst. Among them， folds determine the spatial distribution of strata， so as to control the distribution of soluble rocks and karst zones. The water content and water permeability of the fault zone are usually significantly higher than those of the normal stratum； the joint fissures of the surrounding rock near the fault are generally more developed； the fault fracture zone can effectively connect the groundwater in different soluble rock layers separated by non-soluble rock or water resisting layer. Therefore， the karstification intensity of the fault zone and the surrounding rock near the fault zone is higher， and the karst depth is greater. Generally， the larger the scale of the fault zone is， the stronger the karstification is. The karst development in the fault zone and its affected area is strong， and the karst development form is mainly karst collapse pit， karst cave and karst fissure. The long axis direction of collapse pit and karst fissure and the distribution direction of karst development are basically consistent with the fault trend. The joint fissure is a water holding and permeable structure， which is conducive to the dissolution of carbonate rock， so as to form karst forms such as karst ditch， karst tooth， karst fissure and karst pore with developed permeability. Under certain conditions， the joint fissure can control the direction of groundwater runoff.

     

    • JIANG Wen,BAI Daoyuan,YIN Ou,et al.Characteristics of karst development and its structural control in the Huishangang-Meitanba area of central Hunan[J].Carsologica Sinica,2022,41(01):1-12.
    FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(15)
  • 湖南省地质调查院. 中国区域地质志·湖南志［M］. 北京：地质出版社， 2017.

    Hunan Institute of Geological Survey.Regional geology of China·Annals of Hunan［M］.Beijing： Geological Publishing House，2017.
    周治国. 湖南娄底地区岩溶塌陷特征及防治探讨［J］. 水文地质工程地质，1993（3）：18-20.

    ZHOUZhiguo. Characteristics and prevention of karst collapse in Loudi area， Hunan Province［J］. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology，1993（3）：18-20.
    谭克龙，周春光. 湘中恩口—斗笠山矿区岩溶塌陷研究［J］. 西安矿业学院学报，1996，16（2）：130-134.

    TANKelong， ZHOUChunguang.Research on Karst Collapse in Enkou-Doulishan mine district of middle Hunan Province［J］ Journal of Xi'an Mining Institute，1996，16（2）：130-134.
    陆红，刘剑峰，胡家新. 湖南省斗笠山煤矿区岩溶塌陷分布规律及成因分析［J］. 西部探矿工程，2012（12）：121-125.

    LUHong， LIUJianfeng， HUJiaxin. Distribution law and cause analysis of karst collapse in Doulishan coal mine area， Hunan Province［J］.West-China Exploration Engineering，2012（12）：121-125.
    谭松林，尹金香，王晓燕. 湖南煤炭坝矿区岩溶塌陷的形成与易发性分区［J］. 煤田地质与勘探，2009，37（6）：39-42，46.

    TANSonglin， YINJinxiang， WANGXiaoyan.Forming conditions and zonation of succeptibility of karst collapse in Meitanba mining area in Hunan province［J］.Coal Geology & Exploration，2009，37（6）：39-42，46.
    陈亮晶，孙锡良，皮景，王璨，欧健. 湖南宁乡大成桥地区岩溶地面塌陷分布特征及影响因素分析［J］. 中国岩溶，2014，33（4）：490-497.

    CHENLiangjing，SUNXiliang，PIJing， WANGCan，JianOU. Distribution characteristics and factors influencing karst collapse in Dachengqiao， Ningxiang， Hunan［J］.Carsologica Sinica，2014，33（4）：490-497.
    蒋小珍，雷明堂，管振德. 湖南宁乡大成桥充水矿山疏干区岩溶系统水气压力监测及突变特征［J］. 中国岩溶，2016，35（2）：179-189.

    JIANGXiaozhen， LEIMingtang， GUANZhende.Character of water or barometric pressure jump within karst conduit in large strong drainage area of karst water filling mine in Dachengqiao， Ningxiang， Hunan［J］.Carsologica Sinica，2016，35（2）：179-189.
    曹创华，徐定芳，康方平，文武飞，尹欧，邓专. 湖南省岳家桥典型岩溶发育区电性特征及构造格架研究［J］. 中国地质调查，2018， 5（6）：68-74.

    CAOChuanghua， XUDingfang， KANGFangping， WENWufei，YINOu，DENGZhuan. Electrical characteristics and tectonic framework of typical karst zone in Yuejiaqiao area of Hunan Province［J］. Geological Survey of China，2018， 5（6）：68-74.
    邓沛宇，黎永索，李留玺，范子坚，黄文武. 岳家桥镇岩溶塌陷区地下水动态监测与分析［J］. 湖南城市学院学报（自然科学版），2017，26（6）：26-29.

    DENGPeiyu，LIYongsuo，LILiuxi， FANZijian， HUANGWenwu. The Survey and Analysis the Influence of Groundwater Changes on Karst Collapse in Yuejiaqiao Area［J］. Journal of Hunan City University （Natural Science），2017，26（6）：26-29.
    何禹，邓专，周磊. 综合物探法在益阳市岳家桥镇地面塌陷勘查中的应用［J］. 工程地球物理学报，2013，10（6）：814-821.

    HEYu，DENGZhuan，ZHOULei.The Application of Integrated Geophysical Methods to Surface Collapse Exploration in Yuejiaqiao［J］.Chinese Journal of Engineering geophysics，2013，10（6）：814-821.
    柏道远，姜文，钟响，熊雄. 湘西沅麻盆地中新生代构造变形特征及区域地质背景［J］. 中国地质， 2015，42（6）：1851-1875.

    BAIDaoyuan， JIANGWen， ZHONGXiang， XIONGXiong. Mesozoic-Cenozoic structural deformation characteristics of Yuanling-Mayang basin and regional tectonic setting［J］. Geology in China， 2015， 42（6）：1851-1875.
    柏道远，李银敏，钟响，李彬，黄乐清，伍贵华，李超，姜文. 湖南NW向常德—安仁断裂的地质特征、活动历史及构造性质［J］. 地球科学，2018，43（7）：2496-2517.

    BAIDaoyuan， LIYinmin， ZHONGXiang， LIBin， HUANGLeqing，WUGuihua，LIChao，JIANGWen. Geological Features， Activity History and Tectonic Attribute of NW-Trending Changde-Anren Fault in Hunan［J］. Earth Science，2018，43（7）：2496-2517.
    柏道远，刘波，倪艳军，马铁球，王先辉，彭云益，李纲. 湘东北湘阴凹陷控盆断裂特征、盆地性质及动力机制研究［J］. 资源调查与环境，2010，31（3）：157-168.

    BAIDaoyuan， LIUBo， NIYanjun， MATieqiu， WANGXianhui， PENGYunyi， LIGang. Characteristics of basin-controlling faults， basin type and dynamic mechanisms of the Xiangyin Sag in northeastern Hunan［J］.Resources Survey & Environment，2010，31（3）：157-168.
    柏道远，李长安，王先辉， 马铁球，周柯军，彭云益，李纲，陈渡平. 第四纪洞庭盆地构造性质及动力机制探讨［J］. 大地构造与成矿学，2010，34（3）：317-330.

    BAIDaoyuan，LIChang’an， WANGXianhui， MATieqiu， ZHOUKejun， PENGYunyi ，LIGang， CHENDuping. Quaternary Tectonic Characteristics and Dynamic Mechanisms of the Dongting Basin［J］.Geotectonica et Metallogenia， 2010：317-330.
    柏道远，王先辉，李长安， 马铁球，陈渡平，周柯军，彭云益，李纲. 洞庭盆地第四纪构造演化特征［J］. 地质论评，2011，57（2）：261-276.

    BAIDaoyuan，WANGXianhui，LIChang’an， MATieqiu， CHENDuping， ZHOUKejun， PENGYunyi，LIGang .Characteristics of Quaternary Tectonic Evolution in Dongting Basin［J］.Geological Review，2011，57（2）：261-276.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(2598.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1676) PDF downloads(118) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return