• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 41 Issue 5
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
FENG Zhigang, WEI Guojian, ZHANG Hanmeng, XU Guo. Study on karst leakage caused by the combination of fault structure and interlayer corrosion zone of a hydropower station in southwest China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(5): 728-735. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y33
Citation: FENG Zhigang, WEI Guojian, ZHANG Hanmeng, XU Guo. Study on karst leakage caused by the combination of fault structure and interlayer corrosion zone of a hydropower station in southwest China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(5): 728-735. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y33

Study on karst leakage caused by the combination of fault structure and interlayer corrosion zone of a hydropower station in southwest China

doi: 10.11932/karst2021y33
  • Received Date: 2022-01-01
  • A hydropower station in southwest China is located in the middle part of the fold belt between the eastern Yunnan platform and the western Guizhou platform on the Yangzi platform. The largest fault in the near field area is F38, which is 61 km long and generally protrudes to the northwest in an arc shape. The dam site is located in the east-west structural belt on the south side of F38 fault, which is the core area of the northeast end of Dashuitang oblique anticline with an axial direction of NNE. At the dam site, the river flow direction is 25°-30°, and the valley is basically in symmetrical V shape. The dam area is dominated by carbonate rocks, and faults and karst are relatively developed. There are karst funnels, depressions, sinkholes and other surface karst forms in the upper level of planation surface on both sides of the dam site. Early investigation results of adits, drilling, foundation pit excavation and geophysical prospecting show that there are some karst caves, trough-like caves and interlayer corrosion in the riverbed and both sides, which are interconnected according to their extension trend. Since the reservoir starts to store water, continuous leakage has occurred in the 1,315 m drainage tunnel of the resistance body on the right bank of the dam site. With a rapid rise of the reservoir water level, a large number of muddy fillings gush out from each water inflow point. Then the water gradually becomes clear, the leakage gradually increases to about 1.9 m3·s−1, and the reservoir cannot store water normally. In order to find out the leakage path of reservoir water and take measures to reduce leakage, karst leakage research is carried out. 15 boreholes are arranged on the right bank of the dam site, with the borehole bottom elevation from 1,133.3 m to 1,249.9 m, and the borehole water pressure tests of 121 section are carried out below the bottom elevation of the dam foundation curtain. Results show that the permeability area of Lugeon value q≥3 Lu below the curtain bottom elevation is distributed in a band, mainly between 1,200 m and 1,260 m, where Lugeon value gradually decreases from q=3-75 Lu to 2-8.82 Lu toward the right bank. Inspection holes are arranged along the grouting curtain line of the grouting drainage tunnel at the elevations of 1,293 m and 1,340 m on the right bank, and the bottom elevation of the holes is about 1,200 m. The water pressure test, borehole television, the data of simple water pressure test and abnormal records during the grouting process are analyzed comprehensively. 8 inspection holes of the 1,293 m grouted drainage tunnel can be grouted normally, and no hydraulic connection with the water gushing channel of the 1,315 m downstream drainage tunnel is found. 6 inspection holes are arranged in the 1,340 m grouting drainage tunnel, and hundreds of grouting holes are arranged at intervals of 10 m to the left and 2 m to the right of borehole inspection-4. There are 2-3 rows of grouting holes in local sections, and the abnormal tunnel sections are densely grouted. The exploration results of 1,340 m grouting drainage tunnel show, (1) There is no large structural fracture zone developed in the left of inspection-4. Grouting is successfully completed in each hole, and no channel connected with water inrush at 1,315 m is found. (2) For the multiple boreholes between inspection-4 and inspection-3, porous water loss occurs when the drilling is at the elevation of 1,245-1,270 m, and the water pressure cannot be added to the predetermined pressure in the test. After the valves are closed at each water outlet of 1,315 m drainage tunnel, the water gushing phenomenon appears in many holes, especially holes near the right side of the inspection-4, which indicates that there is a leakage channel for reservoir water to bypass the curtain line at the inspection-4 position, and there is a strong hydraulic connection with the downstream 1,315 m drainage tunnel. (3) Most boreholes between inspection-3 and inspection-1 are drilled after the valves of water inlets of the 1,315 m drainage tunnel are closed. In the tunnel section of about 20 m from the left of fault F12 to inspection-2, the probability of borehole water inflow is relatively high when the drilling reaches 1,220-1,260 m, where there is a corrosion zone. Especially in the area 8 m from the left of fault F12, the water inflow phenomenon occurs in almost every borehole between the elevation about 1,240-1,260 m, which shows that the section from the left of fault F12 to inspection-2 is the main channel for the reservoir water to leak around the curtain to the 1,315 m drainage tunnel downstream. According to the water inflow conditions of each inspection hole and grouting hole of the 1,340 m grouting drainage tunnel, combined with the geological characteristics of the right bank resistance body, exploration results and rock permeability test results, the karst leakage path of 1,315 m water inflow is judged as follows: reservoir water infiltrates through the fault fracture zone F12, reaches the dissolution zone of the deep rock bedding plane, and then gradually lifts along the dissolution zone at a dip angle of 30° downstream, and bypasses the curtain line at the elevation of 1,220-1,260 m near inspection-4 and from the fault F12 to inspection-2. After encountering the geological weak zones such as vertical solution grooves, solution ditches and solution caves, reservoir water of the local area seeps upward and finally gushes out from the geological weak point of 1,315 m drainage tunnel. The treatment of karst leakage in this project is a dynamic interactive process of investigation and grouting. With the measures of grouting curtain reinforcement, the main leakage channel is blocked, and the reservoir water leakage is effectively controlled. The leakage of the right bank 1,315 m corridor gradually reduces to about 38 L·s−1. There is basically no water dripping on the tunnel wall, and the treatment meets the design requirements.the treatment meets the design requirements.e design requirements.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    李大通, 罗雁. 中国碳酸盐岩分布面积测量[J]. 中国岩溶, 1983, 2(2):147-150.

    LI Datong, LUO Yan. Measurement of carbonate rocks distribution area in China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1983, 2(2):147-150.
    [2]
    曾中磊. 滇中地区岩溶水文地质特征[J]. 人民珠江, 2016, 37(8):39-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2016.08.009

    ZENG Zhonglei. Karst hydrogeological characteristics in central Yunnan[J]. Pearl River, 2016, 37(8):39-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2016.08.009
    [3]
    刘鹏瑞, 刘长宪, 姜超, 王芳, 陈钰, 贾龙. 武汉市工程施工引发岩溶塌陷机理分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(6):830-835. doi: 10.11932/karst20170605

    LIU Pengrui, LIU Changxian, JIANG Chao, WANG Fang,CHEN Yu,JIA Long. Mechanism of karst collapse caused by engineering construction in Wuhan City[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(6):830-835. doi: 10.11932/karst20170605
    [4]
    肖明贵. 桂林市岩溶塌陷形成机制与危险性预测[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2005

    XIAO Minggui. The forming mechanism and forecast of fatalness about karst subsidence in Guilin City[D]. Changchun: Jinlin University, 2005.
    [5]
    Fares M Howari, Raed Aldouri, Abdulali Sadiq. Gravity investigations of recent sinkholes and karst pits of Dahal Al-Hamam, State of Qatar[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(5):440. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5298-x
    [6]
    Zhanfei Gu, Qi Liu, Yaoru Lu, Zhengning Shi,Gaoyu Su,Dexiang Luan. Analysis and prevention of sinkhole collapses during the reconstruction and extension of Guang-Qiing freeway, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(5):788.
    [7]
    冯志刚, 刘谢伶. 构造条件对水库岩溶渗漏的影响研究[J]. 红水河, 2018, 37(5):69-71,75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-408X.2018.05.021

    FENG Zhigang, LIU Xieling. Study on influence of tectonic conditions on karst leakage of reservoirs[J]. Hongshui River, 2018, 37(5):69-71,75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-408X.2018.05.021
    [8]
    吕耀成, 李钰强, 张富荣, 巨广宏. 莲花台水电站岩溶发育特征及工程意义[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(4):502-507.

    LYV Yaocheng, LI Yuqiang, ZHANG Furong, JU Guanghong. Karst features of the Lianhuatai hydropower station and engineering significance[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(4):502-507.
    [9]
    赵博超, 朱蓓, 王弘元, 赖柄霖. 浅谈岩溶塌陷的影响因素与模型研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(5):515-521. doi: 10.11932/karst201505y04

    ZHAO Bochao, ZHU Bei, WANG Hongyuan, LAI Binglin. Influence factors and mathematical models of karst collapses[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2015, 34(5):515-521. doi: 10.11932/karst201505y04
    [10]
    万伟锋, 王泉伟, 邹剑锋, 苗旺. 东庄水库岩溶渗漏几个关键问题的探讨[J]. 人民黄河, 2015, 37(2):99-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2015.02.026

    WAN Weifeng, WANG Quanwei, ZOU Jianfeng, MIAO Wanf. Discussion on several key problems about karst leakage of Dongzhuang reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2015, 37(2):99-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2015.02.026
    [11]
    余波, 徐光祥, 郭维祥, 等. 岩溶水库防渗处理关键技术[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2020

    YU Bo, XU Guangxiang, GUO Weixiang, et al. Key technology of anti-seepage treatment of karst reservoirs[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2020.
    [12]
    沈春勇. 水利水电工程岩溶勘察与处理[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2015

    SHEN Chunyong. Investigation and treatment of karst in water conservancy and hydropower project[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2015.
    [13]
    刘浩, 田茂中. 贵州冗赖水库岩溶成库条件分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(4):515-523.

    LIU Hao, TIAN Maozhong. Karst geological conditions of the planned Ronglai reservoir in Guizhou Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(4):515-523.
    [14]
    龚大庆, 向能武, 曾剑华. 构皮滩坝址5、6号岩溶系统的发育特征及处理[J]. 人民长江, 2007, 38(9):103-105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2007.09.038

    GONG Daqing, XIANG Nengwu, ZENG Jianhua. Development characteristics and treatment of No. 5 and No. 6 karst systems at Goupitan dam site[J]. Yangtze River, 2007, 38(9):103-105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2007.09.038
    [15]
    卢晓鹏, 谭光明. 清华洞暗河堵洞成库与防渗技术[J]. 中国岩溶, 2012, 31(2):179-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.011

    LU Xiaopeng, TAN Guangming. Reservoir building by cave-plugging and the seepage-proofing technique in the Qinghuadong underground river[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2012, 31(2):179-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.011
    [16]
    李元奇. 马洞水库岩溶渗漏处理方案[J]. 水利科技与经济, 2014, 20(2):97-98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2014.02.038

    LI Yuanqi. Treatment scheme of karst leakage in Madong reservoir[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2014, 20(2):97-98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2014.02.038
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1865) PDF downloads(81) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return