• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 40 Issue 2
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Jie, BI Pan, WEI Aihua, TAO Zhibing, ZHU Huichao. Assessment of susceptibility to karst collapse in the Qixia Zhongqiao district of Yantai based on fuzzy comprehensive method[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 215-220. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y07
Citation: ZHANG Jie, BI Pan, WEI Aihua, TAO Zhibing, ZHU Huichao. Assessment of susceptibility to karst collapse in the Qixia Zhongqiao district of Yantai based on fuzzy comprehensive method[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 215-220. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y07

Assessment of susceptibility to karst collapse in the Qixia Zhongqiao district of Yantai based on fuzzy comprehensive method

doi: 10.11932/karst2021y07
  • Publish Date: 2021-04-25
  • This work builds on investigations of geology and the conditions of karst collapse of the Qixia Zhongqiao District of Yantai. A hierarchical index system is established using 5 evaluation factors including karst development, structure, overburden bed, hydrogeology and human activities. In order to improve objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation, the memberships functions of every index are constructed to calculate the weight of the evaluation factors using fuzzy mathematical theory. In terms of ArcGIS, assessment of karst collapse susceptibility in the study area is achieved. The results show that all of existing collapses are located in the areas extremely susceptible and susceptible to karst collapse, indicating that the assessment is reasonable. To control the possibility of karst collapse in these areas, it is necessary to strictly control the exploitation of groundwater.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    潘宗源,贾龙,刘宝臣.基于AHP和ArcGIS技术的岩溶塌陷风险评价:以遵义永乐镇为例[J]. 桂林理工大学学报,2016,36(3):464-470.
    [2]
    魏永耀,孙树林,黄敬军,等.徐州岩溶塌陷时空分布规律及成因分析[J].中国岩溶,2015,34(1): 52-57.
    [3]
    王恒恒,张发旺,郭纯青,等.基于层次分析法的城市岩溶塌陷危险性评价:以武汉市南部为例[J]. 中国岩溶,2016,35(6):667-673.
    [4]
    武鑫,黄敬军,缪世贤.基于层次分析——模糊综合评价法的徐州市岩溶塌陷易发性评价[J]. 中国岩溶,2017,36(6):836-841.
    [5]
    Perrin J, Cartannaz G, Noury E, et al. A Multi-criteria Approach to Karst Subsidence Hazard Mapping Supported by Weights-of-evidence Analysis[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015, 197: 296-305.
    [6]
    李铎,魏爱华,贾磊,等.山东福山铜矿岩溶裂隙水充水矿井涌水量预测[J]. 中国岩溶,2017,36(3):319-326.
    [7]
    曾斌,杨木易,邵长杰,等.基于层次分析法的杭长高速岩溶塌陷易发性评价[J]. 安全与环境工程,2018,25(1):29-38.
    [8]
    施驰.贵州省岑巩县地质灾害危险性评价与区划[D]. 绵阳: 西南科技大学,2018.
    [9]
    雷明堂,蒋小珍,李瑜.地理信息系统(GIS)在岩溶塌陷评价中的运用[J]. 中国岩溶,1994,13(4):351-356.
    [10]
    钟宇,张明堃,潘玲,等.基于 GIS 的武汉市武昌区岩溶塌陷危险性评价[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,35(1):48-53.
    [11]
    蒋清明,邓英尔,王军朝,等.天磨沟泥石流危险性综合评判及风险性分析[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护,2017,28(4):7-12.
    [12]
    李忠,张耀文,李海君.改进型BP-网络的岩溶塌陷预测评价[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(1):1-6.
    [13]
    姜春露,姜振泉.基于Fisher判别分析法的岩溶塌陷预测[J]. 地球科学与环境,2012,34(1):91-95.
    [14]
    周国清,陈昆华,何素楠,等.基于逻辑回归模型的来宾市岩溶塌陷敏感性评价[J].安全与环境工程,2014,21(6):36-41.
    [15]
    Hu R L, Yeung M R, Lee C F, et al. Regional Risk Assessment of Karst Collapse in Tangshan, China [J]. Environmental Geology, 2001, 40: 1377-1389.
    [16]
    Taheri K, Gutierrez F, Mohseni H, et al. Sinkhole Susceptibility Mapping Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Magnitude-frequency Relationships: A Case Study in Hamadan probince,Iran[J].Geomorphology, 2015,234: 64-79.
    [17]
    贺怀振,魏永耀,黄敬军.基于模糊综合评判模型的徐州地铁沿线岩溶塌陷稳定性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2017,28(3):66-72.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1695) PDF downloads(170) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return