Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 40 Issue 5
Oct.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2021  >  40(5): 868-875
DENG Yadong,MENG Qingxin,LV Yong,et al.Evaluation of the vulnerability of geological heritage landscape based on PSR model: Taking Yongfu county as an example[J].Carsologica Sinica,2021,40(05):868-875. doi: 10.11932/karst20210512
Citation: DENG Yadong,MENG Qingxin,LV Yong,et al.Evaluation of the vulnerability of geological heritage landscape based on PSR model: Taking Yongfu county as an example[J].Carsologica Sinica,2021,40(05):868-875. doi: 10.11932/karst20210512
shu

Evaluation of the vulnerability of geological heritage landscape based on PSR model: Taking Yongfu county as an example

doi: 10.11932/karst20210512
  • 1.

    Institute of Karst Geology，CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics，MNR & GZAR，Guilin，Guangxi 541004，China

  • 2.

    Institute of Mountain Resources，Guizhou Academy of Sciences，Guiyang， Guizhou 550001，China

  • 3.

    Faculty of Land Resources Engineering，Kunming University of Science and Technology，Kunming，Yunnan 650093，China

Funds:

 DD20190022, DD20190672

 YYWF201638

 2019YFC0507504

  • Received Date: 2021-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2021-10-25
    Abstract
  • The vulnerability is an important index of geological heritage landscape system to reflect human activities and natural conditions. It is also an important index to evaluate the sustainable utilization of geological heritage landscape. Taking the typical geological relic landscape in Yongfu county as an example， and adopting the PSR model of influencing factors of vulnerability，the paper selects 17 valuation indicators from three levels of pressure， state and response to construct the indicator system of vulnerability evaluation for the geological heritage landscape in Yongfu county. The analytic hierarchy process （AHP） is adopted to determine the evaluation factor weight of vulnerability， and 5 classification criteria for vulnerability grade of geological heritage landscape are established by the Delphi Method. Finally， the comprehensive scoring method is used to evaluate the geological heritage landscape in Yongfu. The results show that vulnerability grade of Dingzi hill and Xiaoshanxia in Yongfu is respectively 16.7970 and 19.1421， being slightly vulnerable； the grade of Fulu spring and Shizhanxi waterfall is respectively 39.1628 and 39.7775， mildly vulnerable； the grade of Laxiao river， Baishou river and Banxia lake is respectively 58.5465， 52.3305 and 52.5209， moderately vulnerable；the grade of Baishou cave， Xincuntun cave and Yongfu cave is respectively 65.7430， 64.0893 and 72.9395， highly vulnerable. These values are consistent with the results of field survey， and can basically reflect the current situation of geological heritage in Yongfu county. illustrating the applicability of PSR model to the vulnerability evaluation of geological heritage landscape.

     

    • DENG Yadong,MENG Qingxin,LV Yong,et al.Evaluation of the vulnerability of geological heritage landscape based on PSR model: Taking Yongfu county as an example[J].Carsologica Sinica,2021,40(05):868-875.
    FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(25)
  • EDERW.Unescogeoparks-A new initiative for protection and sustainable development of the earth heritages［J］.N.J.B.Geol.Palaont.abh， 1999，214（1/2）：353-358.
    陈安泽.论旅游地学与地质公园的创立及发展，兼论中国地质遗迹资源——为庆祝中国地质科学院建院60周年而作［J］.地球学报，2016，37（5）：535-561.
    BirkmannJ.Measuring Vulnerability to Hazards of National Origin［M］.Tokyo：UNU Press，2006.
    ADGERW N.Vulnerability［J］.Global Environmental Cha- nge，2006，16（3）：268-281.
    方修琦，殷培红.弹性、脆弱性和适应——IHDP三个核心概念综述［J］.地理科学进展，2007，26（5）：11-22；
    李莉，王晓婷，王辉. 脆弱性内涵、评价与研究趋势综述［J］.中国渔业经济，2010，38（3）：160-169.
    邓亚东，陈伟海，罗书文，等. 旅游洞穴景观脆弱性概念与评价研究［J］.西南大学学报（自然科学版），2020，42（8）：129-137.
    赵汀，赵逊.地质遗迹分类学及其应用［J］.地球学报，2009，30（3）：309-324.
    叶飞，李江风，舒多友，等.贵州梵净山世界自然遗产地重要地质遗迹特征、成因及演化研究［J］.地球学 报，2021，42（1）：99-110.
    罗书文，杨桃，邓亚东，等.毕节鸡鸣三省·贵州地质公园地质遗迹特征及价值研究［J］. 中国岩溶， 2019， 38（6）：946-956.
    邓亚东，罗书文，史文强，等.基于乡镇区划的地质遗迹资源综合价值评价：以盐津县为例［J］.中国岩溶，2018，37（6）：932-939.
    邓亚东，史文强，罗书文，等．盐津县典型地质遗迹景观价值评价［J］.桂林理工大学学报，2019，39（3）：599-605.
    李小强，闫少波，脱世博，等. 甘肃迭部地区地质遗迹资源类型与开发利用及保护［J］. 地质论评， 2020， 66（6）：1719-1728.
    罗书文，邓亚东，覃星铭，等.地质遗迹功能属性区分及保护状况评价方法：以乐业—凤山地质公园凤山园区为例［J］.国土资源科技管理， 2014，31（5）：91-98.
    SuleriA Q. The State of Forests in Pakistan through a Pressure-State-Response Framework ［R］.Islamabad： Sustainable Development Policy Institute，2002.
    余灏哲，韩美.基于PSR模型的陕西省水资源承载力熵权法评价［J］.水电能源科学，2016，34（1）：27-31.
    赵素芳，袁仲杰，姚翔，等. 基于PSR模型的石化园区海洋环境影响后评估指标体系研究［J］.应用海洋学报， 2018，37（7）：404-412.
    刘允瑄，赵华甫，王璟珩，等.基于PSR模型的耕地可持续集约利用评价研究：以京津冀地区为例［J］. 湖北农业科学，2021，60（3）：171-178．
    张光进，赵萌，卓成刚.基于PSR模型的我国矿产资源开发与保护评价研究［J］.矿产利用与保护，2016（1）：1-10．
    陈建设，张萌萌.基于PSR-DEMATEL的世界自然遗产旅游景观健康影响因素研究［J］.湖南工业大学学报（自然科学版） ，2021，26（2）：54-61．
    李灿辉.基于PSR模型的冶金矿山企业信息化水平测度研究［J］.中国矿业，2020，29（9）：175-181．
    FerrarioF F.The evaluation of tourist resources：an applied methodology［J］.Journal of Travel Research，1979，17（4）：24-30.
    甘枝茂，马耀峰.旅游资源开发［M］.天津：南开大学出版社，2007.
    洪增林，徐通，薛旭平.基于AHP的地质遗迹旅游资源评价：以汉中天坑群为例［J］.中国岩溶，2019，38（2）：276-280.
    徐建华.现代地理学中的数学方法［M］.北京：高等教育出版社，2002.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(690.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1610) PDF downloads(50) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return