• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 40 Issue 2
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LUO Wei, WU Huaying, HU Huihua, MA Deqing, ZHANG Peng, LI Zhenxing. Karst hydrogeological problems in the route selection of Yuanguping tunnel[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 253-263. doi: 10.11932/karst20210205
Citation: LUO Wei, WU Huaying, HU Huihua, MA Deqing, ZHANG Peng, LI Zhenxing. Karst hydrogeological problems in the route selection of Yuanguping tunnel[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 253-263. doi: 10.11932/karst20210205

Karst hydrogeological problems in the route selection of Yuanguping tunnel

doi: 10.11932/karst20210205
  • Publish Date: 2021-04-25
  • Avoiding high-risk areas of gushing water and mud is the basic principal for karst tunnel selection. The Yuanguping tunnel is a typical long and deep karst tunnel,which passes through the area with strong karst development. There are some important factors affecting the safty of tunnel construction,such as karst underground river, syncline water storage structure, reservoirs on both sides, and the large height difference between the groundwater level and the roof,,which are also key hydrological issues to be considered in route selection. To better compare and select the three design lines of the east, middle and west of the tunnel, a 1:10,000 special survey of karst hydrogeology was carried out in the tunnel working area.The karst development and hydrogeological characteristics of the working area were found out, and the karst groundwater system was divided, so as to compare the horizontal and vertical zoning of the three tunnel routes. The spatial relationship between tunnel and underground rivers and karst springs was analyzed, and the influence of syncline water storage structure was analyzed combined with geophysical data. The results show that: the east route tunnel passes through the surface watershed zone and is located in recharge area of the karst hydrodynamic system and the seasonal variation zone and shallow saturated zone of the vertical distribution zone. It basically does not intersect with underground river pipelines and is far away from karst springs with large flows, the rainfall replenishment area is the smallest, therefore, the overall risk of water gushing is the smallest, which is the best tunnel route. The west route runs through the middle of the groundwater system Ⅲ in the upper reaches of Chixi river passes through the runoff and drainage area,and is located in a shallow saturated zone with karst hydrodynamic vertical zoning. It intersects with multiple karst pipelines,and is close to the west side of Gaojiaxi reservior,with the greatest risk of water gushing. The northern section of the east route tunnel near Huangyuxi reservoir and the southern section passing through the Guojiajie syncline water storage structure are all high-risk areas for water gushing. Therefore,it is necessary to expand the supplementary survey of karst hydrogeology, and strengthen the research of advanced geological forecast during construction so as to avoid karst geological disasters to the most extent.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    蒙彦,雷明堂.岩溶区隧道涌水研究现状及建议[J].中国岩溶,2003,22(4):287-292.
    [2]
    洪开荣.我国隧道及地下工程发展现状与展望[J].隧道建设,2015,35(2):95-107.
    [3]
    郑克勋,裴熊伟,朱代强,等.岩溶地区地下水位变动带隧道涌水问题的思考[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(4):473-479.
    [4]
    苏贵芬. 新建云桂铁路广南段线路比选及地质控制因素研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2010.
    [5]
    李光伟.论岩溶区工程地质勘察问题与地质选线[J].铁道勘察,2016,42(2):12-15,32.
    [6]
    乐重.铁路综合选线原则思考[J].高速铁路技术,2015,6(3):54-58.
    [7]
    陈明奎,申玉生,侯瑞彬.大跨度岩溶隧道施工工法比选[J].公路工程,2014,39(2):31-36.
    [8]
    许振浩,李术才,李利平,等.基于层次分析法的岩溶隧道突水突泥风险评估[J].岩土力学,2011,32(6):1757-1766.
    [9]
    田祖涛,张俊.花梨隧道岩溶水文地质条件及危险性评估[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(4):552-558.
    [10]
    赵明阶,敖建华,刘绪华,等.岩溶尺寸对隧道围岩稳定性影响的模型试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(2):213-217.
    [11]
    李天斌,孟陆波,朱劲,等.隧道超前地质预报综合分析方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(12):2429-2436.
    [12]
    王泽峰,钟世航.陆地声纳法在探测岩溶区高铁隧道基底隐患中的应用[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(4):573-577.
    [13]
    王梦恕.对岩溶地区隧道施工水文地质超前预报的意见[J].铁道勘察,2004,30(1):7-9,18.
    [14]
    刘远鹏,邓荣斌,王子茂,等.岩溶区特大断面小净距隧道群综合探测成果分析[J].武汉工程大学学报,2020,42(5):546-551.
    [15]
    唐科行,万川,谭钢,等.广邻路华蓥山特长隧道岩溶地质问题与对策[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(4):480-487.
    [16]
    何桥,朱代强,郑克勋,等.深埋特长隧道岩溶高压涌水灌浆封堵技术研究与实践[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(4):488-495.
    [17]
    彭华中.武汉河流高阶地深隧工程岩溶地质问题及处理分析[J].西部探矿工程,2020,32(11):15-18.
    [18]
    韩行瑞. 隧道岩溶涌水预报与处治: 专家评判系统在沪蓉西高速公路的应用[M].桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2010.
    [19]
    李利平. 高风险岩溶隧道突水灾变演化机理及其应用研究[D].济南:山东大学,2009.
    [20]
    李术才,刘斌,孙怀凤,等.隧道施工超前地质预报研究现状及发展趋势[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(6):1090-1113.
    [21]
    曹化平,王科.铁路岩溶隧道工程地质选线研究[J].高速铁路技术,2011,2(1):31-36.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2282) PDF downloads(165) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return