• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 40 Issue 2
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WU Yuanbin, YIN Renchao, LEI Mingtang, DAI Jianling, JIA Long, PAN Zongyuan, MA Xiao, ZHOU Fubiao. Triggering factors and prevention-control countermeasures of karst collapses caused by tunnel construction in the Zhongliangshan area, Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 246-252. doi: 10.11932/karst20210204
Citation: WU Yuanbin, YIN Renchao, LEI Mingtang, DAI Jianling, JIA Long, PAN Zongyuan, MA Xiao, ZHOU Fubiao. Triggering factors and prevention-control countermeasures of karst collapses caused by tunnel construction in the Zhongliangshan area, Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 246-252. doi: 10.11932/karst20210204

Triggering factors and prevention-control countermeasures of karst collapses caused by tunnel construction in the Zhongliangshan area, Chongqing

doi: 10.11932/karst20210204
  • Publish Date: 2021-04-25
  • The Zhongliangshan area is a natural barrier of the east-west traffic channel in Chongqing, that seriously hinders urban economic development. The tunnel traffic can quickly cross fold mountain areas. However, tunnel construction often induces serious karst collapse, failure of underground aquifers and surface water drainage, threatening tunnel safety construction and making impact on the ecological and geological environment. The main controlling factors of karst collapse are variable in different stages of tunnel construction with water level drainage. Therefore, the process of karst collapse can be divided into two stages: sudden drawdown and drainage. The main controlling factor of karst collapse is vacuum suction effect and the sudden change of water and gas pressure in the cracks of karst pipelines, respectively. Furthermore, the prevention and control measures of karst collapse are put forward in this paper. It provides a solid geological basis for effective management of geologic hazard by local karst collapse.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    刘丹,杨立中,王建秀. 我国铁路建设中岩溶塌陷的基本特征及成因模式[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1997(S1): 26-30.
    [2]
    张海坦,李庆华,邓书金. 歌乐山岩溶地面塌陷发育特征[J]. 中国岩溶,2015, 34(1): 58-63.
    [3]
    胡婷. 重庆地区地下工程建设诱发岩溶塌陷的机制研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2014.
    [4]
    谭开鸥,李玉生. 重庆地区的岩溶塌陷及其形成机理[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,1995(3): 23-27.
    [5]
    陈洪凯,王圣娟,粟俊江,等. 地下水降落诱发岩溶洞穴土质盖层塌陷的机制研究:以重庆歌乐山余家湾水库地面塌陷为例[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018, 35(4): 54-58.
    [6]
    靳红华,王林峰,杨培丰,等. 降雨与岩溶渗漏联合作用下岩溶塌陷稳定性分析[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(9): 105-112.
    [7]
    杨昌宇. 岩溶地区隧道设计的几点思考及建议[J]. 现代隧道技术,2011, 48(1): 90-93.
    [8]
    郭纯青,田西昭. 岩溶隧道涌水量综合预测:以朱家岩岩溶隧道为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2011, 38(3): 1-8.
    [9]
    徐卫国,赵桂荣. 试论岩溶矿区地面塌陷的真空吸蚀作用[J]. 地质论评, 1981, 27(2): 174-180, 183.
    [10]
    徐卫国,赵桂荣. 真空吸蚀作用引起的塌陷实例[J]. 水文地质工程地质,1988(3): 50-51.
    [11]
    韩宝平,何宇彬,甘志杰,等. 采矿诱发塌陷的研究[J]. 勘察科学技术,1994(3): 29-32.
    [12]
    肖载兴,郑彦飞. 重庆歇马隧道ZK7+292涌水处治施工技术[J]. 工程建设与设计,2016(18): 152-156.
    [13]
    魏兴萍,张虹,苏程烜. 重庆南山隧道工程涌水隐患研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(1): 74-80.
    [14]
    南力辉. 双碑隧道涌水量预测及运营预警措施研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2015.
    [15]
    胡明健. 突泥处治综合措施在歇马隧道施工中的应用[J]. 城市住宅,2018, 25(4): 107-109.
    [16]
    重庆市地质矿产勘查开发局南江水文地质工程地质队. 重庆“四山”规划区地质环境专项调查报告[R]. 重庆, 2016.
    [17]
    杜严飞,杨乐,廖云平,等. 重庆市地下隧道地质环境影响因素分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2016, 33(8): 105-108.
    [18]
    龚睿. 隧道工程建设对隔档式岩溶富水背斜地下水环境的影响研究:以观音峡背斜为例[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2010.
    [19]
    蒋小珍,雷明堂. 岩溶塌陷灾害的岩溶地下水气压力监测技术及应用[J]. 中国岩溶,2018, 37(5): 786-791.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2003) PDF downloads(240) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return