• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 39 Issue 1
Feb.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Yuanli, MENG Fantao, LI Minghui. Study on the genesis mechanism and prevention and control measures of shallow overburden karst collapse in central Guizhou area: An example of Baiyun primary school, Ziyun county, Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(1): 80-87. doi: 10.11932/karst20200103
Citation: YANG Yuanli, MENG Fantao, LI Minghui. Study on the genesis mechanism and prevention and control measures of shallow overburden karst collapse in central Guizhou area: An example of Baiyun primary school, Ziyun county, Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(1): 80-87. doi: 10.11932/karst20200103

Study on the genesis mechanism and prevention and control measures of shallow overburden karst collapse in central Guizhou area: An example of Baiyun primary school, Ziyun county, Guizhou Province

doi: 10.11932/karst20200103
  • Publish Date: 2020-02-25
  • Central Guizhou Province lies in the second topographic step of the plateau,with average altitudes 800-1,600 m,characterized by widely distributed soluble rocks,extremely developed karst landscapes,thin Quaternary soil layers and shallow groundwater with strong groundwater flow dynamics.Karst ground collapse is one of the major geological hazards in this area.In order to clarify the cause and mechanism of karst collapse in the Baiyun primary school,Ziyun county,Guizhou Province,this work carried out field investigations,geophysical exploration,geological drilling of hydrogeology engineering,and tests on rock and soil samples.Comprehensive research indicates that the karst collapse in the Baiyun primary school was a combined effect of special “water-soil-rock” adverse factors.According to the characteristics of geotechnical structure of the collapse area,it is suggested that the comprehensive prevention and control measures of "monitoring prevention+water control+engineering treatment" should be adopted before the site selection of future projects in karst areas of central Guizhou.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    岩溶地面塌陷调查规范[S]. 中国地质调查局,2013.
    [2]
    雷明堂,蒋小珍.岩溶塌陷研究现状、发展趋势及其支撑技术方法[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1998,9(3):1-6.
    [3]
    张殿发,邹永廖.喀斯特地质灾害的形成条件及其环境背景:以贵州省为例[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2002,21(1):39-42.
    [4]
    褚学伟,党爽,丁坚平.贵州岩溶塌陷分布及影响因素分析[J].人民长江,2015,46(12):42-44.
    [5]
    万志清,秦四清,祁生文.桂林市岩溶塌陷及防治[J].工程地质学报,2001,9(2):199-203.
    [6]
    张丽芬,曾夏生,姚运生,等.我国岩溶塌陷研究综述[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2007,18(3):126-130.
    [7]
    郭强.遵义金塘谷地岩溶塌陷形成机理初步探讨[J].贵州地质,1989,6(2):163-171.
    [8]
    徐文.贵州牛场岩溶地面塌陷的形成及其防治[J].中国岩溶,1991,10(3):214-219.
    [9]
    梁国印,何游.贵州省德江县大顶上岩溶塌陷成因及防治措施[J].贵州大学学报(自然科学版),2012,29(2):67-71.
    [10]
    吴桂武,梁国印,高建平,等.贵州省德江县大湾岩溶塌陷成因及防治措施[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2011,23(6):28-32.
    [11]
    雷国良,周济祚,邓自民,等.贵州水城工业区覆盖型岩溶塌陷研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1996,7(4):39-46.
    [12]
    肖攀,万军伟,喻 望.贵州水城盆地岩溶地面塌陷成因分析及防治对策[J].桂林理工大学学报,2015,35(2):263-268.
    [13]
    邓自民.水城岩溶地面塌陷的特征及形成机理[J].贵州地质,1991,8(2):155-162.
    [14]
    王勇.遵义市仁江岩溶塌陷机制形成模式分析[J].勘察科学技术,2011,8:22-56.
    [15]
    杨元丽,杨荣康,孟凡涛,等.黔中高原台面浅覆盖型岩溶塌陷分布及影响因素浅析[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(6):801-807.
    [16]
    苏维词.贵州主要城市的岩溶塌陷灾害及其防治[J].水文地质工程地质,1998(3):40-42.
    [17]
    丁坚平,褚学伟,等.贵州岩溶塌陷[M].北京:地质出版社,2017.
    [18]
    褚学伟,党爽,丁坚平.贵州岩溶塌陷分布及其影响因素分析[J].人民长江,2015,6(46):44.
    [19]
    冯福,蒲文斌,丁力,等.贵阳乌当区定扒岩溶塌陷评价[J].化工矿物与加工,2013(8):46-48.
    [20]
    杨荣康,杨元丽,蒋镇涛,等.基于两级模糊数学综合评判法的岩溶塌陷危险性评价[J].贵州地质,2017,34(2):109-114.
    [21]
    杨荣康,杨元丽,等.黔中地区岩溶塌陷调查综合评价报告[R].2016.
    [22]
    韩淑朋,严新泺.广西岩溶塌陷类型、影响因素、成因机制及其防治措施[J].资源调查与环境,2012,2(33):133.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2087) PDF downloads(535) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return