Structure description and interface recognition on epikarst typical profiles using GPR technology

GAO Qiangshan; PENG Tao; FU Lei; WANG Shijie; CAO Le; CHENG Qianyun

doi:10.11932/karst20190512

Volume 38 Issue 5

Oct. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > CARSOLOGICA SINICA > 2019 > 38(5): 759-765

LIN Yun, QU Pengchong, Lü Haixin, WU Yazun. Variation characteristics of typical karst springs in the eastern margin of the Taihang Mountains[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(5): 671-679. doi: 10.11932/karst20180504

Citation:

GAO Qiangshan, PENG Tao, FU Lei, WANG Shijie, CAO Le, CHENG Qianyun. Structure description and interface recognition on epikarst typical profiles using GPR technology[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(5): 759-765. doi: 10.11932/karst20190512

Citation:

PDF( 27785 KB)

Structure description and interface recognition on epikarst typical profiles using GPR technology

doi: 10.11932/karst20190512

1.
State Key Laboratory of Environment Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang，Guizhou 550081, China/Lunar and Planetary Science Research Center, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy, Guiyang，Guizhou 550081, China/University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Environment Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang，Guizhou 550081, China/中国科学院普定喀斯特生态系统观测研究站，贵州普定 562100
3.
GuiZhou Water and soil conservation technology research center, Guiyang，Guizhou 550021, China
4.
State Key Laboratory of Environment Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang，Guizhou 550081, China/University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Publish Date: 2019-10-25

Abstract

Abstract

Epikarst is an important object in karst study. Previous research was mostly based on soil profile survey with semi-quantitative methods. We utilized ground penetrating radar (GPR) technology to conduct a quantitative study on this issue. Three typical epikarst profiles s of are chosen, which are characterized by shallow fissure soil, deep fissure soil and thick soil coverage. From the data collected through GPR technology, root mean square (RMS) amplitude and coherence attributes were extracted to mine the potential information of the GPR data for differentiation of medium structure and surface recognition. The results show that the RMS amplitude attribute permits to differentiate rock and soil of shallow and deep fissure soil types, cultivated and uncultivated layers in soil medium of thick soil cover type; while the coherence attribute can be used to recognize the epikarst and lower intact bedrock and quantify the thickness of the epikarst.
- karst,
- epikarst,
- GPR

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	蒋忠诚，袁道先. 表层岩溶带的岩溶动力学特征及其环境和资源意义［J］. 地球学报，1999，20（3）: 302-308.
[2]	Mangin A. Contribution a l’ etude hydrodynamique des aquiferes karstiques［J］. Anndles de Speleclogie, 1974, 29(1): 283-332.
[3]	Williams P. W. Subcutaneous hydrology and the development of doline and cockpit karst［J］. Z.Geomorph. N. F.. 1985, 29(4): 463-482.
[4]	彭韬，周长生，宁茂岐，等. 基于探地雷达解译的喀斯特坡地表层岩溶带空间分布特征研究［J］. 第四纪研究，2017，37（6）：1262-1270.
[5]	覃小群，蒋忠诚.表层岩溶带及其水循环的研究进展与发展方向［J］. 中国岩溶，2005，24（3）：250-254.
[6]	袁道先，戴爱德.中国南方裸露型峰丛山区岩溶水系统及其数学模型的研究［M］. 南宁：广西师范大学出版社，1996.
[7]	蒋忠诚,中国南方表层岩溶带的特征及形成机理［J］.热带地理,1998,18(4):322-326.
[8]	劳文科,蒋忠诚,时坚,等.洛塔表层岩溶带水文地质特征及其水文地质结构类型［J］.中国岩溶,2003,22(4):258-266.
[9]	刘再华. 表层岩溶带的水温特征及其与下部包气带的对比：以桂林岩溶水文地质试验场为例［J］. 中国岩溶，1991，10（4）：277-282.
[10]	袁道先，刘再华，等. 碳循环与岩溶地质环境［M］. 北京：科学出版社，2003.
[11]	袁道先，蒋勇军，沈立成，等. 现代岩溶学［M］. 北京：科学出版社，2016.
[12]	梁小平，朱志伟，梁彬，等. 湖南洛塔表层岩溶带水文地球化学特征初步分析［J］. 中国岩溶，2003，22（2）: 103-109.
[13]	严小龙，陈喜，张志才，等. 基于多元线性回归的表层岩溶泉流量预测［J］. 中国岩溶，2012，31（2）：154-159.
[14]	朱晓锋，陈洪松，付智勇，等. 喀斯特灌丛坡地土壤-表层岩溶带产流及氮素流失特征. 应用生态学报，2017，28（7）：2197-2206.
[15]	常勇，刘玲. 岩溶地区水文模型综述［J］. 工程勘察. 2015，43(3)：37-44.
[16]	赵文轲，陈国顺，田钢，等. 探地雷达属性技术进展［J］. 地球物理学进展，2012，27（3）：1262-1267.
[17]	武毅，孙银行，李凤哲. 西南岩溶地区不同含水介质地球物理勘查技术. 中国岩溶，2011，30（3）：278-284.
[18]	李华，焦彦杰，吴文贤，等. 西南岩溶地区找水的地球物理方法探讨. 水文地质工程地质，2011，38（5）：1-6.
[19]	张志才，陈喜，程勤波，等. 喀斯特山体表层岩溶带水文地质特征分析：以陈旗小流域为例［J］. 地球与环境，2011，39（1）：19-25.
[20]	Zhao Ningyu, Liu Yi. Prediction method of Karst fissure water content before tunnel face based on GPR［J］. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 20(19): 11185-11198.
[21]	Steelman C M , Kennedy C S , Parker B L. Geophysical conceptualization of a fractured sedimentary bedrock riverbed using ground-penetrating radar and induced electrical conductivity ［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 521(2): 433-446.
[22]	Al-fares W, Bakelowicz M, Guérin R., Dukhan M. Analysis of the karst aquifer structure of the Lamalou area (Hérault, France) with ground penetrating radar ［J］. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2002, 51(2): 97-106.
[23]	张可宝，张红斌，赵玉光，等. 均方根振幅与岩性［J］. 石油地球物理勘探，2007，42（增刊）：93-96.
[24]	Forte E., Pipan M., Casabianca D., Di Cuia R., Riva A. Imaging and characterization of a carbonate hydrocarbon reservoir analogue using GPR attributes ［J］. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2012, 87: 76-87.
[25]	Reìs J A,Castro D L,Jesus T E S，et al. Characterization of collapsed paleocave systems using GPR attributes ［J］. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2014, 103 (21): 43-56.
[26]	Bahorich M., Farmer S. 3-D Seismic Discontinuity for Faults and Stratigraphic Features: The Coherence Cube ［J］. The Leading Edge, 1995, 14(10): 1053-1058.
[27]	曾昭发，刘四新，冯晅. 探地雷达原理与应用［M］. 北京：电子工业出版社，2010.
[28]	Zhao Wenke, Forte E., Pipan M., Tian Gang. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) attributes analysis for archaeological prospection ［J］. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2013, 97(10):107-117.
[29]	Zhao Wenkai, Forte E, Fontana F, Pipan M, Tian G. GPR imaging and characterization of ancient Roman ruins in the Aquileia Archaeological Park, NE Italy ［J］. Measurement, 2018, 113: 161-171.

Relative Articles

[1]	WANG Ying, SONG Xiaoqing, WANG Fei, PENG Qin, CAO Zhendong, PU Xiuchao. Response characteristics of groundwater level dynamics to precipitation based on continuous wavelet-cross correlation analysis: A case study of the Guiyang karst basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(4): 843-853. doi: 10.11932/karst20240410
[2]	LUO Zhenyu, YANG Yan, LI Ji, XIAO Wenjie, SUN Tingting, YE Zhimao. Flow attenuation analysis and inorganic carbon flux estimation of surface karst spring in rocky desertification control area: A case study at Laoquan spring in the Longtan trough valley, Youyang county, Chongqing City, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(2): 337-350, 381. doi: 10.11932/karst2023y011
[3]	ZHAO Zhenhua, LUO Zhenjiang, HUANG Linxian, XING Liting, LI Hongtao, SUN Hongjie. Research on the response mechanism of groundwater level to rainfall in the western suburb of Jinan based on wavelet analysis[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 931-939. doi: 10.11932/karst20230506
[4]	QI Huan, DONG Mengyu. A study on the groundwater recharge range of Baotu Spring based on wavelet analysis[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 1037-1046. doi: 10.11932/karst20230512
[5]	WANG Dawei, QIAO Xiaojuan, GAO Bo, JIA Xiaojun. Dynamic characteristics and influence factors of discharge of the Longzici karst spring in Shanxi Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(3): 420-429.
[6]	LI Chuansheng, QI Xiaofan, WANG Yushan, AN Yonghui, XING Liting. Response characteristics of typical karst groundwater levels of central Shandong Province to precipitation and climatic index[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(5): 643-652. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y12
[7]	LIANG Risheng, ZENG Cheng, YAN Zhiwei, SHI Biao, HE Shiyi, FAN Yuhong, GUAN Jin. Recession flow analysis for Longdongwan spring at Langxi karst valley in Yinjiang county, Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(1): 10-18. doi: 10.11932/karst20190102
[8]	CHI Guangyao, XING Liting, HOU Xinyu, HUANG Linxian, YANG Yi, ZHANG Wenjing. Study of large karst springs using the wavelet analysis and Mann-Kendall methods[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(4): 515-526. doi: 10.11932/karst20180405
[9]	JIAO Youjun, PAN Xiaodong, ZENG Jie, REN Kun. Numerical modeling of the influence of karst-conduit structure on variation of spring flow[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 736-742. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y48
[10]	MAN Baiying, CHENG Xiaoyu, WANG Hongmei, YUN Yuan, ZHONG Yuhong. Isolation and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of Actinomycetes from weathered rocks in Heshang Cave, central China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(4): 572-579. doi: 10.11932/karst20170420
[11]	LU Li, WANG Zhe, PEI Jian-guo, DU Yu-chao, LIN Yong-sheng, FAN Lian-jie. R mode analysis for influencing factors of karst groundwater quality in middle and upper reaches of the Hongshuihe river[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(4): 415-419. doi: 10.11932/karst20150416
[12]	HUANG Jie, YU Shi, LIANG Quan. Analysis of characteristics and genesis of major ions in river water using multivariate statistical analysis: A case study of areas controlled by Wuzhou hydrological station[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(4): 412-418. doi: 10.11932/karst20140404
[13]	YAN Yan, HU Bao-qing, HAN Qing-yan, LI Yue-lian. Early warning for karst rocky desertification in agricultural land based on the 3S and ANN technique: A case study in Du’an County, Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(1): 52-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.01.010
[14]	WANG Mao-mei, SHU Long-cang, JI Ye-fei, TAO Yu-fei, DONG Gui-ming, LIU Li-hong. Causes of spring＇s of flux attenuation and simulation of spring＇s regime --A case in Jinan karst spring area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2008, 27(1): 19-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2008.01.004
[15]	CHEN Qi-wei, XIONG Kang-ning, LAN An-jun. Analysis on karst rocky desertification in Guizhou based on“ 3S”[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2007, 26(1): 37-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2007.01.006
[16]	KONG Lan, LIANG Hong, HUANG Fa-su. Analysis to runoff evolution features along time series in karst drainage basin— A case study in Guizhou province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2007, 26(4): 341-346.
[17]	LIANG Yong-ping, GAO Hong-bo, ZHANG Jiang-hua, HUO Jian-guang, WANG Tao-liang. PRELIMINARY QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ON THE CAUSES OF DISCHARGE ATTENUATION IN NIANGZIGUAN SPRING[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2005, 24(3): 227-231. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2005.03.011
[18]	MA Teng, WANG Yan-xin, HAO Zhen-chun. THE CAUSE ANALYSIS FOR THE DECLINING DISCHARGE OF SHENTOU SPRING AND THE FORECAST OF ITS EVOLUTION TREND[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2001, 20(4): 261-267. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2001.04.003
[19]	Li Guomin, Yang Fu. TIME SERIES ANALYSIS FOR THE DECLINING DISCHARGE OF SHENTOU SPRING[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1993, 12(2): 123-130.
[20]	Yang Zhengyi. ANALYSIS OF SUB-FLUCTUATION IN GUOZHUANG SPRING FLOW[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1987, 6(1): 1-17.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	周翠琼，柴金龙，张贵，王宇，何绕生，王劲，李继红. 云南泸西皮家寨大泉壅水水位变化特征研究. 中国岩溶. 2024(06): 1287-1294 . 本站查看
2.	李志超，姜宝良，潘登，卢金阁，王秀明. 灰色理论在新乡百泉泉水流量动态分析中的应用. 水文地质工程地质. 2023(02): 34-43 .
3.	岑鑫雨，钟金先，邓国仕，许模. 基于迟滞排泄水箱模型模拟岩溶断流泉水文过程. 中国岩溶. 2023(04): 711-721 . 本站查看
4.	袁学圣，邢立亭，赵振华，李常锁，陈奂良. 济南四大泉群流量衰减过程及其指示意义. 干旱区资源与环境. 2022(07): 126-132 .
5.	黄先贵，平建华，禹言，朱亚强，张敏. 基于氚同位素的安阳河中下游流域地下水更新能力研究. 现代地质. 2021(03): 693-702 .
6.	王大伟，乔小娟，高波，贾小军. 山西龙子祠岩溶泉流量动态特征与影响因素分析. 中国岩溶. 2021(03): 420-429 . 本站查看
7.	齐欢. 平阴-东阿水文地质单元岩溶地下水化学特征分析. 人民长江. 2020(06): 57-62 .
8.	张贵，何绕生，王波，张文鋆，周翠琼. 云南华宁县盘溪大龙潭水文地质特征. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(05): 40-45 .

Other cited types(5)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF(27785.0KB)

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (1661) PDF downloads(447)