• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 38 Issue 2
Apr.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Fang, WANG Zhihui. Study on ecological distribution of Arthrodontae mosses and their environmental factors in karst peak-cluster area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(2): 243-251. doi: 10.11932/karst20190209
Citation: LI Fang, WANG Zhihui. Study on ecological distribution of Arthrodontae mosses and their environmental factors in karst peak-cluster area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(2): 243-251. doi: 10.11932/karst20190209

Study on ecological distribution of Arthrodontae mosses and their environmental factors in karst peak-cluster area

doi: 10.11932/karst20190209
  • Publish Date: 2019-04-25
  • In order to explore the ecological distribution of Arthrodontae mosses in karst peak-cluster area and their environmental influencing factors, three typical karst peak-clusters with different vegetation coverage in Siya river basin of Guiyang were selected for the research, where each peak-cluster was divided into lower slope, middle slope and upper slope according to relative height difference. The mosses were collected by the S-shape sampling method, and they were classified by the peristome teeth types of mosses. The Summed Dominance Ratio(SDR), Sorenson similarity index and RDA were used to analyse the ecological distribution on Arthrodontae and the effect of environmental factors. The results show that 74 species from 26 genera in 11 families were identified in the three karst peak-clusters, including 26 species of acrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses (SDR:97.73%), 21 species of acrocarpi-diplolepideae mosses (SDR:53.35%) and 27 species of pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses (SDR:93.01%). The No.1 peak-cluster is dominated by the pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses with their SDR value of 100%, while the No.2 and No.3 peak-clusters are dominated by acrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses, and their SDR are 81.80% and 69.75%, respectively. The pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses mainly distribute at the bottom of the karst peak-cluster, with SDR of 97.06%, and the middle and top of the peak-cluster is dominated by theacrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses, with SDR of 86.23% and 90.76%, respectively. Furthermore, Sorenson similarity analysis shows that the similarity coefficient of the species of the acrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses is the highest in the middle and top of the peak-cluster, of which the Sorenson similarity is 27.91%; and that of pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses in the middle and top of the peak-cluster is the lowest, which is 11.63%. The RDA analysis shows that the distribution of the acrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses is mainly influenced by light intensity and environmental temperature. The extension of the pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses is mainly influenced by the relative humidity; while the distribution of the acrocarpi-diplolepideae mosses is mainly affected by the altitude.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    胡人亮.苔藓植物学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1987.
    [2]
    吴鹏程.苔藓植物生物学[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
    [3]
    Goebel K.Ueber die Sporenausstreuung bei den Laubmoosen[J]. Flora,1895, 80(1):459-486.
    [4]
    Vitt D H.Adaptive modes of the moss sporophyte[J].The Bryologist,1981,84(2):166-186.
    [5]
    Maier Eva,Michelle J Price.In the Footsteps of Lantzius-Beninga:Investigating the Peristome Characters of Mosses[J].The Bryologist,2005,108(1):36-46.
    [6]
    Wang QH,Jia Y.A taxonomic revision of Ulota mohr (Orthotrichaceae)in South and Central America[J].Plant Diversity,2016,38(2):82-109.
    [7]
    高谦,曹同,付星.藓类植物传孢类型及其系统演化关系[J].云南植物研究,2000,22(3):268-276.
    [8]
    李冰,张朝晖.喀斯特石漠结皮层藓类物种多样性及在石漠化治理中的作用研究[J].中国岩溶,2009,28(1):55-60.
    [9]
    刘荣相,王智慧,张朝晖.贵州贞丰喀斯特石漠峰丛苔藓植物群落生态特征[J].植物研究,2009,29(6):734-741.
    [10]
    张天汉,王智慧,张朝晖.贵州思雅河河谷地区喀斯特峰丛石漠苔藓植物群落研究[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(10):2104-2112.
    [11]
    王晓静,王智慧,张朝晖.喀斯特地区贵州铝厂周边植物对金属元素的监测能力[J].环境监测管理与技术,2017,29(1):21-24.
    [12]
    张朝晖,王智慧.黄果树喀斯特洞穴群苔藓植物岩溶的初步研究[J].中国岩溶,1996,15(3):224-232.
    [13]
    李晓娜,龙明忠,刘洋,等.贵州施秉喀斯特世界自然遗产提名地苔藓植物区系特征[J].植物分类与资源学报,2014,36(3):271-278.
    [14]
    张天汉,代玉,王智慧,等.贵州关岭县喀斯特峰丛石漠区苔藓群落生态特征[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(2):192-200.
    [15]
    殷声锋,王智慧,张朝晖.贵州喀斯特铝土矿具芽孢苔藓种类特征:以贵州省清镇市林歹铝土矿区为例[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(4):449-455.
    [16]
    庞嘉鹏,王智慧,张朝晖.喀斯特白云岩石漠化区域不同生境条件下苔藓植物群落特征及演替模式研究[J].生态科学,2018,37(3):59-66.
    [17]
    申家琛,张朝晖,王智慧,等.苔藓植物对石灰岩的溶蚀作用及环境相关性研究[J].中国岩溶,2018,37(2):175-184.
    [18]
    郭云,王智慧,张朝晖.白云岩洞穴洞口弱光带的苔藓群落特征:以绥阳水洞为例[J].中国岩溶,2018,37(3):388-399.
    [19]
    Lazarenko A S.On some cases of singular behavior of the moss peristome[J].The Bryologist,1957,60(1):14-17.
    [20]
    Steinbrinck O.Der hygroscopische Mechanismus des Laubmoosperistoms[J].Flora,1897,84:131-158.
    [21]
    Ingold C T.Peristome teeth and spore discharge in mosses[J].Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh,1959,38(1-4):76-88.
    [22]
    Crum H.The Relationship of Tetraplodon pennsylvanicus[J]. Bryologist,1966,69(2):205-207.
    [23]
    Brent D M.The phylogenetic relationships of Tortula:an SEM survey and a preliminary cladistic analysis[J].The Bryologist,1985,88(4):388-403.
    [24]
    李利博,赵建成.真藓属(Bryum Hedw.)蒴齿形态特征及其分类学意义[J].植物研究,2009,29(6):651-658.
    [25]
    王晓蕊,王立宝,李敏,等.16种丛藓科( Pottiaceae)植物蒴齿形态特征及其系统学意义[J].植物研究,2013,33(2):129-133.
    [26]
    李泽科,吴启美,张朝晖,等.岩溶城市背景下贵阳市峰丛苔藓植物多样性分布及其生态特征[J].植物研究,2018,38(3):433-443.
    [27]
    Huang W,Deng C,Day M.Differentiating tower karst (fenglin) and cockpit karst (fengcong) using DEM contour, slope, and centroid[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2014,72(2):407-416.
    [28]
    Zhang C, Pei J, Xie Y,et al.Impact of land use covers upon karst processes in a typical Fengcong depression system of Nongla, Guangxi, China[J]. Environmental Geology,2008,55(8):1621-1626.
    [29]
    L?bel S,Mair L, L?nnell N,et al.Biological traits explain bryophyte species distributions and responses to forest fragmentation and climatic variation[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2018,106(4):1700-1713.
    [30]
    Karlin E F,Bates J W,Farmer A M.Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment[J].The Bryolodist,1993,96(3):510.
    [31]
    De Oliveira S M, Ter Steege H,Zotz G.Bryophyte communities in the Amazon forest are regulated by height on the host tree and site elevation[J].Journal of Ecology,2015,103(2):441-450.
    [32]
    García E L,Rosenstiel T N,Graves C,et al.Distribution drivers and physiological responses in geothermal bryophyte communities[J]. American Journal of Botany,2016,103(4):625-634.
    [33]
    Liu Y,Pi C Y,Tian S.Relationships between characteristics of ground bryophyte communities and environmental factors in urban area of Chongqing, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,26(10):3145-3152.
    [34]
    黄雅丹,谢强.桂林喀斯特石山苔藓植物生态分布初探[J].中国岩溶,2003,22(4):299-305.
    [35]
    刘艳,皮春燕,田尚.重庆主城区地面苔藓植物群落特征及其与环境的关系[J].应用生态学报,2015, 26(10): 3145-3152.
    [36]
    李承义,吴金,张朝晖,等.天坑洞穴群苔类群落分布规律与环境因子关系:以贵州猴耳天坑为例[J],生态学杂志,2019,38(3):744-752.
    [37]
    Patterson P M. The aberrant behavior of the peristome teeth of certain mosses[J].Bryologist,1953,56(3):157-159.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1823) PDF downloads(460) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return