Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 38 Issue 1
Feb.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2019  >  38(1): 28-39
WANG Zhenxing, LI Xiangquan, HOU Xinwei, ZHANG Chunchao, GUI Chunlei, ZUO Xuefeng. Karst aquifer protection evaluation to the Sangu spring basin under the condition of coal mining[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(1): 28-39. doi: 10.11932/karst20190104
Citation: WANG Zhenxing, LI Xiangquan, HOU Xinwei, ZHANG Chunchao, GUI Chunlei, ZUO Xuefeng. Karst aquifer protection evaluation to the Sangu spring basin under the condition of coal mining[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(1): 28-39. doi: 10.11932/karst20190104
shu

Karst aquifer protection evaluation to the Sangu spring basin under the condition of coal mining

doi: 10.11932/karst20190104

  • Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050061, China

  • Publish Date: 2019-02-25
    Abstract
  • The Sangu spring basin is a typical karst area in the north of China. It is located in the Jindong large coal base planned by the state. The problems between coal mining and water resources protection are prominent in this basin. Over the years,the large-scale explotiation of coal resources in the region has led to the decline of groundwater level and the deterioration of water quality. Therefore, it is of great significance to carry out evaluation of aquifer protection in northern karst coal base for water resources protection and sustainable economic development. In this work, an evaluation index system was established from three aspects: vulnerability of aquifer, function of aquifer and the influence of coal mining. The APH method was used to evaluate the aquifer protection in the Sangu spring basin. According to the characteristics of the coal base, the COP modified model with added indicators of coal goaf is adopted to evaluate the vulnerability of aquifer. The functional evaluation of aquifer was carried out from the capacity of water supply and ecologicalspring maintenance ability, and the impact assessment of coal mining was conducted from two aspects: mining activities and coal geological structure. The final evaluation results show that the aquifer primary protected area is located in the big karst spring , water source and surface water leakage region. The secondary protected areas include water-rich runoff zones and coal mining areas. This prediction is in line with the actual situation.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(28)
  • [1]
    马剑飞,李向全,侯新伟,等.高寒冻土煤炭开采区含水层保护评价研究［J］.人民黄河,2016,38(12):110-115.
    [2]
    钟佐燊．地下水防污性能评价方法探讨 ［J］. 地学前缘，2005，12 (S1)：3-11.
    [3]
    Derek C，Williams F，2007. Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology［M］. Wiley Revised Edition,2007: 551.
    [4]
    姜桂华．地下水脆弱性研究进展［J］.世界地质，2002，21（1）:33-38.
    [5]
    章程，蒋勇军，Michele L，等．岩溶地下水脆弱性评价“二元法”及其在重庆金佛山的应用［J］.中国岩溶，2007, 26(4)：334-340.
    [6]
    邹胜章，李录娟，卢海平，等．岩溶地下水系统防污性能评价方法［J］.地球学报，2014，35(2):261-268.
    [7]
    赵春红，梁永平，卢海平，等．娘子关泉域岩溶水脆弱性模糊综合评价［J］.水文，2013，33(5):52-57.
    [8]
    王松，章程，裴建国．岩溶地下水脆弱性评价研究［J］. 地下水，2008，30(6):14-18.
    [9]
    邢立亭，吕华，高赞东，等．岩溶含水层脆弱性评价的COP法及其应用［J］.有色金属，2009，61(3)，139-142.
    [10]
    孙少游，马静晨，刘全国，等．中国北方岩溶水脆弱性评价模型及改进［J］，城市地质, 2017,12(2):87-90.
    [11]
    刘海娇，范明元，张保祥，等．基于COP方法的肥城盆地岩溶水脆弱性评价［J］.南水北调与水利科技,2015,13(3):538-542.
    [12]
    孟宪萌，胡宏昌，薛显武．承压含水层脆弱性影响因素分析及评价模型的构建：以山东省济宁市为例［J］．自然资源学报，2013，28（9）：1615-1622．
    [13]
    王金哲，张光辉，申建梅，等.地下水功能评价指标选取依据与原则的讨论［J］.水文地质工程地质，2008（2）：76-81.
    [14]
    张光辉，严明疆，杨丽芝，等．地下水可持续开采量与地下水功能评价的关系［J］．地质通报，2008，27（6）：875-881．
    [15]
    张光辉，申建梅，聂振龙，等．区域地下水功能及可持续利用性评价理论与方法［J］．水文地质工程地质，2006，33（4）：62-71．
    [16]
    张光辉，聂振龙，申建梅，等．地下水功能评价体系属性层组成与意义［J］．水文地质工程地质，2009，36（5）：61-65．
    [17]
    聂振龙，张光辉，申建梅，等．西北内陆盆地地下水功能特征及地下水可持续利用［J］.干旱区资源与环境，2012，26(1)：63-66.
    [18]
    徐耀先，杨健．煤矿开采区地下水环境影响评价方法与治理研究［J］.环境科学导刊,2009，28(5):71-74.
    [19]
    孟凡生，王业耀．煤矿开采环境影响评价中地下水问题探析［J］. 地下水，2007，29(1):81-84.
    [20]
    武强，董东林，傅耀军，等．煤矿开采诱发的水环境问题研究煤矿开采诱发的水环境问题研究［J］.中国矿业大学学报,2002,31(1): 19-22.
    [21]
    王启亮，程东．山西省煤炭开采对水资源的影响［J］.人民黄河，2009，31(12):56-59.
    [22]
    李七明，翟立娟，傅耀军，等．华北型煤田煤层开采对含水层的破坏模式研究［J］.中国煤炭地质，2012，24(7): 38-43.
    [23]
    靳德武，刘其声，王琳，等．煤矿(床)水文地质学的研究现状及展望［J］. 煤田地质与勘探， 2009， 37(5): 28-31.
    [24]
    董少刚，贾志斌，刘白薇，等．干旱区井工开采煤矿山生态水文地质演化研究：以鄂尔多斯某煤矿为例［J］.工程勘察，2013，41 (2): 45-48.
    [25]
    潘军峰，梁永平．山西省岩溶泉域水资源保护［M］.中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所，2004:172-186.
    [26]
    江燕．山西晋东煤炭基地晋城矿区总体规划环境保护的实践［J］.能源环境保护，2013，27(5):63-64.
    [27]
    刘香，王洁，邵传青，等．城市地下水脆弱性评价方法及应用［J］．地下水，2007，29（5）：90-92.
    [28]
    张强，蒋勇军，林玉石，等．基于欧洲模型的岩溶地下水脆弱性风险性评价［J］.人民长江，2009,40(13)：51-54.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WU Dongqiang, XING Liting, LAN Xiaoxun, MENG Qinghan, HOU Yusong, ZHAO Zhenhua, SUN Bin, YUAN Xuesheng. Pore structure characteristics of karst water-bearing media in Jinan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(4): 680-688.
    [2]QU Qiunan, SONG Xiaoqing, TANG Yujie, YANG Zhenhua. Groundwater occurrence condition and hydrochemical characteristics：A case study of Anlong county map sheet in Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(3): 378-387. doi: 10.11932/karst20190307
    [3]LI Fengli, WANG Weiping, HUANG Qiang, LI Jinchao, QU Shisong, DU Juan. Water quantity optimal schemes of the karst aquifer recharge with multi-source water at the Yufuhe river, Ji’nan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(1): 17-26. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y31
    [4]XIE Guowen, YANG Pingheng, LU Bingqing, CHEN Feng, ZHANG Yu, CHI Yanbin, DENG Shujin. Application of high-resolution tracer technique in identifying the source of water gushing and the structure of aquifer medium in karst tunnel[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(6): 892-899.
    [5]Lyu Quanbiao, HU Xiaonong, CAO Jianhua, HUANG Fen, ZHU Hao. Aquifer structure of karst areas derived from borehole pumping and tracer tests[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 727-735. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y29
    [6]YANG Zhen-hua, SU Wei-ci, WU Ke-hua, ZHANG Feng-tai, WANG Wei. An improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of water quality in karst aquifer based on level characteristic values[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(6): 551-559. doi: 10.11932/karst20150603
    [7]KONG Xiang-sheng, MIAO Ying, LUAN Ri-jian, YANG Qi-yong, QIN Su-ni. Preliminary study on contaminant of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in vulnerable karst aquifer in a heavy industry district[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(4): 331-340. doi: 10.11932/karst20150404
    [8]HAO Chun-ming, HE Pei-yong, WANG Yi, HOU Shuang-lin, DONG Jian-fang. Study on the evolutionary process of sulfate concentration in Ordovician karst water after coal mining in Fengfeng mine[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(4): 425-431. doi: 10.11932/karst20140406
    [9]WANG Wei-ping, XU Yu, HE Mao-qiang, CAO Bin. Case of fracture karst aquifer recharge with urban roofwater at home and abroad—Reflection on the relevant issues in Jinan City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 29(3): 325-330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.03.016
    [10]Petar Milanovi?. Transboundary karst aquifers of south-eastern dinarides[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(2): 123-134.
    [11]YI Lian-xing, ZHANG Zhi-gan, LI Meng-de, LI xue-zheng. ANALYSIS ON MONOCLINIC KARST AQUIFER AND ITS SEEPAGE CONDITION— A Case in the River Bend of Jiangpinghe Hydropower Station,Loushui River, Hubei Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(1): 29-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.01.006
    [12]Chen Weihai, Zhang Zhigan. THE CHARACTERISTICS AND REGULATIVE CAPACITY OFKARST AQUIFERS IN PEAK FOREST-PLAIN AREA[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1999, 18(1): 19-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.1999.01.003
    [13]Li Dongchen. RECOGNIZING HYDROCHEMICAL FEATURES OF BASAL WATER AND WATER GUSH SOURCE IN BAIMIAO COAL MINE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1995, 14(4): 295-304.
    [14]Xiao Xiangfeng. GENERAL OPTIMUM FITTING FOR ANALYSING AQUIFER PARAMETERS ON MICROCOMPUTER[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1990, 9(2): 188-196.
    [15]Zhang Wei. Institvte of Karst Geology, Guilin , China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1990, 9(1): 15-24.
    [16]Han Xingrui, Shi Jian, Tang Jiansheng, Li Qongsong. METHOD OF STUDY ON KARST GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS IN NORTH CHINA --CASE HISTORY OF SANGU SPRING BASIN[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1990, 9(3): 197-210.
    [17]Lin Min, Chen Chongci. ANALYTIC MODELS OF GROUNDWATER FLOWS TO KARST SPRINGS[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1988, 7(3): 247-258.
    [18]Xiao Xiangfeng. APPLICATION OF MICROCOMPUTER IN ANALYSING PARAMETERS OF WATER-BEARING FORMATION --A METHOD OF COMMON STANDARD CURVE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1987, 6(2): 101-110.
    [19]Tian Kaiming. AN INITIAL APPROACH TO THE ORIGINATION MECHANISM OF "DOUBLE-LEVEL FLOW" IN A THICK AQUIFER[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1985, 4(Z1): 124-130.
    [20]Song linhua, A.H.Bath, T.C.Atkinson. A STUDY OF STABLE ISOTOPE HYDROLOGY OF CHALK AND OVERLYING DRIFT IN NORTH NORFOLK,ENGLAND[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1983, 2(1): 61-68.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 于杨，肖一鑫，陈彦美. 基于PLEIK模型的岩溶地下水防污性能评价——以贵阳市汪家大井泉域为例. 资源环境与工程. 2024(01): 55-62 .
    2. 莫美仙，刘燕华，邱文龙，王娜. 盘溪大龙潭岩溶地下河系统防污性能研究. 玉溪师范学院学报. 2024(03): 23-32 .
    3. 赵春红，申豪勇，卢海平，王志恒，梁永平，唐春雷. 晋祠泉域岩溶地下水防污性能评价与水质保护区划分. 中国岩溶. 2024(04): 822-830 . 本站查看
    4. 杨娟娟，钟凯，张海荣，王慧. 关于陕北煤炭开采中水资源保护相关问题探索. 内蒙古煤炭经济. 2022(09): 145-147 .
    5. 金艺华，尹振浩. 基于包气带动力学的长白山天然矿泉水水源地土壤吸附能力研究. 能源与环保. 2022(09): 73-78 .
    6. 张春潮，侯新伟，李向全，王振兴，桂春雷，左雪峰. 三姑泉域岩溶地下水水化学特征及形成演化机制. 水文地质工程地质. 2021(03): 62-71 .
    7. ZHANG Chun-chao，HOU Xin-wei，LI Xiang-quan，WANG Zhen-xing，GUI Chun-lei，ZUO Xue-feng，MA Jian-fei，GAO Ming. Numerical simulation and environmental impact prediction of karst groundwater in Sangu Spring Basin, China. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering. 2020(03): 210-222 .
    8. 高旭波，王万洲，侯保俊，高列波，张建友，张松涛，李成城，姜春芳. 中国北方岩溶地下水污染分析. 中国岩溶. 2020(03): 287-298 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 31.0 %FULLTEXT: 31.0 %META: 66.1 %META: 66.1 %PDF: 2.9 %PDF: 2.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 12.6 %其他: 12.6 %China: 7.6 %China: 7.6 %Seattle: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 13.0 %上海: 13.0 %中卫: 0.2 %中卫: 0.2 %北京: 0.5 %北京: 0.5 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %崇左: 0.4 %崇左: 0.4 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %朔州: 0.1 %朔州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %武威: 0.1 %武威: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %纽约: 1.3 %纽约: 1.3 %芒廷维尤: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 0.3 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 1.5 %西宁: 1.5 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %郑州: 0.1 %郑州: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %驻马店: 60.6 %驻马店: 60.6 %其他ChinaSeattle[]上海中卫北京南昌台州唐山崇左巴黎成都昆明朔州杭州武威武汉海口湖州珠海纽约芒廷维尤莫斯科衢州西宁诺沃克贵阳郑州重庆驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(7732.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1770) PDF downloads(421) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return