Study of large karst springs using the wavelet analysis and Mann-Kendall methods

CHI Guangyao; XING Liting; HOU Xinyu; HUANG Linxian; YANG Yi; ZHANG Wenjing

doi:10.11932/karst20180405

Volume 37 Issue 4

Aug. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > CARSOLOGICA SINICA > 2018 > 37(4): 515-526

CHI Guangyao, XING Liting, HOU Xinyu, HUANG Linxian, YANG Yi, ZHANG Wenjing. Study of large karst springs using the wavelet analysis and Mann-Kendall methods[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(4): 515-526. doi: 10.11932/karst20180405

Citation:

CHI Guangyao, XING Liting, HOU Xinyu, HUANG Linxian, YANG Yi, ZHANG Wenjing. Study of large karst springs using the wavelet analysis and Mann-Kendall methods[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(4): 515-526. doi: 10.11932/karst20180405

Citation:

PDF( 8170 KB)

Study of large karst springs using the wavelet analysis and Mann-Kendall methods

doi: 10.11932/karst20180405

1.
School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan
2.
School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan/Shandong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Groundwater Numerical Simulation and Contamination Control

Publish Date: 2018-08-25

Abstract

Abstract

The study of groundwater dynamics is one of the most effective ways to understand the nature of groundwater resources. According to the monitoring data of precipitation and groundwater level in the Jinan karst spring area from 1956 to 2013, this work studies the spring water level response to atmospheric precipitation during these 58 years using the wavelet analysis, Mann-Kendall trend test and mutation test. The results show that，(1) the precipitation and spring water level show a feature of multi-scale variation, and the change cycle is basically the same on a long-term scale, which are 16 years and 12 years, respectively. It means that atmospheric precipitation has a direct impact on the spring water level.(2) From 1956 to 2013, the groundwater level in the Jinan spring area had a significant downward trend of 0.65m·（10a）-1, while the precipitation had an upward trend of 12.65mm·（10a）-1, which is not significant, indicating that the weight of the influencing factors of spring dynamic has changed under the influence of human factors. (3)Furthermore, there has been a mutation of atmospheric precipitation which occurred in 1999, and the annual precipitation increased after 1999. However, the groundwater level mutation appeared in 1967, while the water level continued to decrease after 1967 and then increased rapidly after 2004. The future trend of the spring water level should be kept consistent with the precipitation and show an upward trend, indicating that atmospheric precipitation is not the sole factor affecting the dynamics of the spring. (4)The results from multivariable regressions for different periods of time suggest that the main influencing factors of groundwater level in the past 58 years are the transition from precipitation to artificial mining; at the same time, it validates the suitability and reliability of wavelet analysis and the Mann-Kendall method to study groundwater dynamics, and also provides a reference for the protection of the spring in Jinan City.
- atmospheric precipitation,
- spring water level,
- wavelet analysis,
- Mann-Kendall method,
- Jinan spring domain

FullText(HTML)

References(39)

References

[1]	祁晓凡,杨丽芝,韩晔,等.济南泉域地下水位动态及其对降水响应的交叉小波分析［J］.地球科学进展,2012,27(9):969-978.
[2]	祁晓凡,蒋忠诚,罗为群.典型表层岩溶水系统降水量与泉流量的交叉小波分析［J］.地球与环境,2012,40(4):561-567.
[3]	郭琳,宫辉力,朱锋,等.基于小波分析的地下水水位与降水的周期性特征研究［J］.地理与地理信息科学,2014,30(2):35-38，127.
[4]	Tremblay L, Larocque M, Anctil F, et al. Teleconnections and interannual variability in Canadian groundwater levels［J］.Journal of Hydrology,2011,410(3):178-188.
[5]	Nakken M. Wavelet analysis of rainfall-runoff variability isolating climatic from anthropogenic patterns［J］.Environmental Modelling & Software,1999,14(4):283-295.
[6]	张建芝,邢立亭.回归分析法在地下水动态分析中的应用［J］.地下水,2010,32(4):88-90.
[7]	迟光耀,邢立亭,主恒祥,等.大气降水与济南泉水动态变化的定量关系研究［J］.地下水,2017,39(1):8-11.
[8]	Lu W X,Zhao Y,Chu H B,et al.The analysis of groundwater levels influenced by dual factors in western Jilin Province by using time series analysis method［J］.Applied Water Science,2014,3(4):251-260.
[9]	Jan C D,Chen T H,Huang H M.Analysis of rainfall-induced quick groundwaterlevel response by using a Kernel function［J］. Paddy Water Environment, 2013(11): 135-144.
[10]	Chang F J, Chen P A,Liu C W,et al.Regional estimation of groundwater arsenic concentrations through systematical dynamic-neural modeling［J］.Journal of Hydrology,2013,499:265-274.
[11]	胡克祯,张建芝,邢立亭.基于时间序列分析的地下水动态研究［J］.水科学与工程技术,2011(5):32-34.
[12]	Mao X M,Shang S H,Liu X.Groundwater level predictions using artificial neural networks［J］. Tsinghua Science and Technology,2002,7(6):574-579.
[13]	Schulze-Makuch D,Douglas A,Carlson,D Scherkauer,etal.Scale dependency of hydraulic conductivity in hetero-geneous media［J］.GroundWater,1999,37(6):904-919.
[14]	Eric K,Webb and Mary P,Anderson.Simulation of preferential flow in three-dimensional heterogeneous conductivity fields with realistic internal architecture［J］.Water Resources Research,1996,32(3):533-545.
[15]	孙晨,束龙仓,鲁程鹏，等.裂隙-管道介质泉流量衰减过程试验研究及数值模拟［J］,水利学报,2014,45(1): 50-57，64.
[16]	Faulkner J，Hu B，Kish S，et al . Laboratory analog and numerical study of groundwater flow and solute transport in a karst aquifer with conduit and matrix domains［J］. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology，2009，110(1-2):34-44.
[17]	宫辉力,赵文吉,诸云强.裂隙-岩溶介质空间水流数值仿真与流场优化［J］.系统仿真学报,2002,14(2): 186-188.
[18]	Gallegos J J . Modeling groundwater flow in karst aquifers:an evaluation of MODFLOW-CFP at the laboratory and sub-regional scales［D］. Tallahassee:Florida State University，2011.
[19]	Shoemaker B W, Kuniansky E L , Steffen B .Documentation of a conduit flow process (CFP) for MODFLOW -2005［ M］.Virginia :U S GeologicalSur vey , 2007 :1-50.
[20]	祁晓凡,李文鹏,李传生,等.济南岩溶泉域地下水位与降水的趋势性与持续性［J］.灌溉排水学报,2015,34(11):98-104.
[21]	吴小玲,张斌,艾南山,等.基于小波变换的上海市近10年SO2污染指数的变化［J］.环境科学,2009,30(8):2193-2198.
[22]	Torrence C,Compo G.A practical guide to wavelet analysis［J］.Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,1998,79(1):61-78.
[23]	Orhan Gunduz,Celalettin Simsek.Influence of Climate Change on Shallow Groundwater Resources:The Link Between Precipitation and Groundwater Levels in Alluvial Systems［J］.Climate Change and its Effects on Water Resources,2011,3:225-233.
[24]	董婕,周淑艳,卢斌.富平县地下水位与降水量变化动态分析［J］.西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,44(6):98-101.
[25]	Noam Zach Dvory,Yakov Livshitz,Eilon Adar,et al.The effect of hydrogeological conditions on variability and dynamic of groundwater recharge in a carbonate aquifer at local scale［J］. Journal of Hydrology,2016,535:480-494.
[26]	徐建华,现代地理学中的数学方法［M］.北京:高等教育出版社,2002.
[27]	桑燕芳,王栋.水文序列小波分析中小波函数选择方法［J］.水利学报,2008,39(3):295-300，306.
[28]	姜晓艳,刘树华,马明敏,等.东北地区近百年降水时间序列变化规律的小波分析［J］.地理研究,2009,28(2):354-362.
[29]	Xu J H,Chen Y N,Lu F,et al.The nonlinear trend of runoff and its response to climate change in the Aksu River,western China［J］.International Journal of Climatology,2011,31(5):687-695.
[30]	申倩倩,束炯,王行恒.上海地区近136年气温和降水量变化的多尺度分析［J］.自然资源学报,2011,26(4):644-654.
[31]	刘宇峰,孙虎,原志华.基于小波分析的汾河河津站径流与输沙的多时间尺度特征［J］.地理科学,2012,32(6):764-770.
[32]	Van B G,Hughes J P.Nonparametric tests for trends in water quality［J］.Water Resources Research,1984,20(1):127-136.
[33]	HAMED K.Exact distribution of the mann-kendall trend test statistic for persistent data［J］.Journal of Hydrology,2009,365(1):86-94.
[34]	Zhang Q,Xu C Y,Tao H,et al.Climate changes and their impacts on water resources in the arid Regions:A case study of the tarim river basin,China［J］.Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2010,24(3):349-358.
[35]	于延胜,陈兴伟.基于Mann-Kendall法的水文序列趋势成分比重研究［J］.自然资源学报,2011,26(9):1585-1591.
[36]	刘叶玲,翟晓丽,郑爱勤.关中盆地降水量变化趋势的Mann-Kendall分析［J］.人民黄河,2012,34(2):28-30+33.
[37]	祁晓凡,王雨山,杨丽芝,等.近50年济南岩溶泉域地下水位对降水响应的时滞差异［J］.中国岩溶,2016,35(4):384-393.
[38]	王珺瑜,王家乐,靳孟贵.济南泉域岩溶水水化学特征及其成因［J］,地球科学,2017,42(5):821-831.
[39]	周娟,邢立亭,滕朝霞,等.制约济南岩溶大泉持续喷涌的主因素阈值研究［J］.华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015(3):146-156.

Relative Articles

[1]	SUN Tingting, YANG Yan, JIANG Xiuyang, LUO Zhenyu, TANG Yueer. Variation characteristics of stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in precipitation of Longtan trough valley and Maoba syncline in Youyang, Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(4): 796-809. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y013
[2]	LIU Dan, TIAN Chanjuan, CHEN Xuequn, XU Dandan, GUAN Qinghua, XIN Guangming. Spectral characteristics and indication of dissolved organic matter in the karst water system of Jinan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(3): 500-512. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y022
[3]	WANG Ying, SONG Xiaoqing, WANG Fei, PENG Qin, CAO Zhendong, PU Xiuchao. Response characteristics of groundwater level dynamics to precipitation based on continuous wavelet-cross correlation analysis: A case study of the Guiyang karst basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(4): 843-853. doi: 10.11932/karst20240410
[4]	QI Huan, DONG Mengyu. A study on the groundwater recharge range of Baotu Spring based on wavelet analysis[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 1037-1046. doi: 10.11932/karst20230512
[5]	ZHAO Zhenhua, LUO Zhenjiang, HUANG Linxian, XING Liting, LI Hongtao, SUN Hongjie. Research on the response mechanism of groundwater level to rainfall in the western suburb of Jinan based on wavelet analysis[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 931-939. doi: 10.11932/karst20230506
[6]	GUO Yi, QIN Dajun, WANG Feng, GAN Fupin, YAN Baikun. Prediction of karst spring water level based on the time series analysis method[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(4): 689-697.
[7]	GUAN Qinghua, LI Fulin, WANG Aiqin, FENG Ping, TIAN Chanjuan, CHEN Xuequn, LIU Dan. Hydrochemistry characteristics and evolution of karst spring groundwater system in Jinan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(5): 653-662. doi: 10.11932/karst20190501
[8]	LI Chuansheng, QI Xiaofan, WANG Yushan, AN Yonghui, XING Liting. Response characteristics of typical karst groundwater levels of central Shandong Province to precipitation and climatic index[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(5): 643-652. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y12
[9]	LIN Yun, QU Pengchong, Lü Haixin, WU Yazun. Variation characteristics of typical karst springs in the eastern margin of the Taihang Mountains[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(5): 671-679. doi: 10.11932/karst20180504
[10]	YU Cuicui. Numerical simulation of karst groundwater and dynamic prediction of spring water level in the Mingshui spring area , Ji’nan City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(4): 533-540. doi: 10.11932/karst20170415
[11]	ZHU Xiaoyan, ZHANG Meiliang, WU Xia, PAN Moucheng. The relationship between δ18O characteristics of the precipitation(heavy rainfall or rainstorm) and its water vapor sources in Guilin, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(2): 139-161. doi: 10.11932/karst20170201
[12]	QI Xiao-fan, WANG Yu-shan, YANG Li-zhi, LIU Zhong-ye, WANG Wei, LI Wen-peng. Time lags variance of groundwater level response to precipitation of Jinan karst spring watershed in recent 50 years[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(4): 384-393. doi: 10.11932/karst20160405
[13]	ZHANG Hong-bo, YU Shi, HE Shi-yi, LIU Qi, LI You-ling. Analysis on the chemical characteristics of the atmospheric precipitation in Guilin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(3): 289-295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.03.010
[14]	Xu Jian-guo, Zhu Heng-hua, Xu Hua, Liu Chun-hua, Zhang Zhuo. Study on organic pollution of karst underground water in Jinan spring area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(3): 249-254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.03.004
[15]	KONG Lan, LIANG Hong, HUANG Fa-su. Analysis to runoff evolution features along time series in karst drainage basin— A case study in Guizhou province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2007, 26(4): 341-346.
[16]	TU Lin-ling, WANG Hua, FENG Yu-mei. RESEARCH ON D AND 18O ISOTOPE IN THE PRECIPITATION OF GUILIN[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2004, 23(4): 304-309. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2004.04.008
[17]	LIANG Xiao-ping, ZHU Zhi-wei, LIANG Bin, GUAN Bi-zhu, ZOU Sheng-zhang. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ON HYDROGEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EPIKARST ZONE IN LUOTA, HUNAN[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2003, 22(2): 103-109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2003.02.005
[18]	LI Da-qiu, GAO Yan, WANG Zhi-guo, WANG Dong-hai. ANALYSIS ON THE VARIATIONS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY IN JINAN SPRING BASIN[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2002, 21(3): 202-205. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2002.03.009
[19]	LIU Kang-xiang, LI Jing-yang, ZHU Dong-ping, LIU Shou-quan. STABILITY ANALYSIS AND CONTROL OF PANTAOGONG LANDSLIDE OF GUIYANG CITY[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2001, 20(4): 284-289. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2001.04.007
[20]	Fang Peixian, Cao Yuqing, Tang Kewang, Li Xiangzhi, Wang Shaowen. AGE DATINGS OF THE GROUNDWATER IN THE SPRING AREA OF JINAN CITY[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1989, 8(1): 47-52.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(11)

1.	江越潇，党慧慧，易春瑶，江南，李伟，范威，孙智杰，梁川，姚佳芮. 基于Mann-Kendall法的地下水动态研究——以崔家营水电站上游为例. 资源环境与工程. 2025(01): 44-50 .
2.	刘文悦，高宗军，徐源，韩聪，罗振江，赵振华. 济南市岩溶水化学特征及基于模糊评价法的水质评价. 中国岩溶. 2023(02): 220-232+244 . 本站查看
3.	刘权，邓忠，卢丹美，夏源，杨鹏飞，覃佳肖. 广西黔江水位抬升影响下盘龙铅锌矿涌突水风险评估. 地下水. 2023(06): 13-17+96 .
4.	李常锁，高帅，殷延伟，逄伟，孙斌，柳浩然，陈奂良，刚什婷，邢立亭，耿付强. 济南四大泉群附近补给路径及补给比例研究. 中国岩溶. 2023(05): 875-886 . 本站查看
5.	赵振华，罗振江，黄林显，邢立亭，李洪涛，孙虹洁. 基于小波分析的济南西郊地下水位对降雨响应机制研究. 中国岩溶. 2023(05): 931-939 . 本站查看
6.	孙虹洁，赵振华，黄林显，邢立亭，郝杰，罗振江. 多变量LSTM神经网络模型在地下水位预测中的应用. 人民黄河. 2022(08): 69-75 .
7.	陈奂良，李常锁，高帅，孙斌，林广奇. 基于遗传算法优化BP神经网络的岩溶泉水位预测研究. 水资源与水工程学报. 2022(04): 50-57+63 .
8.	刘源，徐国宾，段宇，赵世雄. 洪泽湖入湖水沙序列的多时间尺度小波分析. 水利水电技术. 2020(02): 128-135 .
9.	于苗，邢立亭，吴吉春，侯玉松，朱恒华，彭玉明，李罡. 基于时间序列分形的济南岩溶大泉动态研究. 地质学报. 2020(08): 2509-2519 .
10.	郭永丽，章程，吴庆，全洗强. 基于文献计量学分析岩溶水文地质学研究热点. 中国岩溶. 2020(06): 817-828 . 本站查看
11.	李传生，祁晓凡，王雨山，安永会，邢立亭. 我国北方典型岩溶地下水位对降水及气象指数的响应特征——以鲁中地区为例. 中国岩溶. 2019(05): 643-652 . 本站查看

Other cited types(14)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF(8170.0KB)

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (2363) PDF downloads(649)