Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 37 Issue 3
Jun.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2018  >  37(3): 462-467
DENG Xinping, YUAN Ruiqiang, PI Jiangao. Characteristics of the Doushuai karst cave in Hunan and its formation and development process[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(3): 462-467. doi: 10.11932/karst20180318
Citation: DENG Xinping, YUAN Ruiqiang, PI Jiangao. Characteristics of the Doushuai karst cave in Hunan and its formation and development process[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(3): 462-467. doi: 10.11932/karst20180318
shu

Characteristics of the Doushuai karst cave in Hunan and its formation and development process

doi: 10.11932/karst20180318
  • 1.

    402 Geological Prospecting Party

  • 2.

    College of Environmental and Resource Science, Shanxi University

  • Publish Date: 2018-06-25
    Abstract
  • The Doushuai karst cave, is located at the southern end of the Doushuai island in Dongjiang lake of Hunan Province. it is situated in warm and humid subtropical climate zone with an average annual precipitation of 1,645 mm and a mean annual temperature of 17.1 ℃. As the landform is dominated by erosive and corrosive geomorphologic types, the area is less than 500 m amsl and is well vegetated. In order to study the formation and evolution of the karst cave, the lithologies and geological structures in the vicinity of the cave were investigated in detail. The cave morphology and the characteristics of cave sediments were measured. Furthermore, 14C and U-system dating methods were used to estimate the growth rate of sediments. The results show that the Doushuai cave is an isolated karst cave with well-developed speleothems such as stalagmites. The growth rates of stalagmites are slightly faster than that of stalactites. The height and diameter of stalagmites vary from 2 to 26 m and from 0.5 to 5 m, respectively, with a growth rate ranging from 0.24 to 0.50 mm·a-1. The lengths of stalactites change from 3 to 20 m with growth rate varying between 0.20 and 0.40 mm·a-1. In the cave, the tallest stalagnate is 37 m in height; and the longest secondary sediment can reach 12 m high with a diameter of 0.6 m. The formation of the Doushuai cave is a combined result of carbonate rocks, geological structures, water flow and regional tectonic movement, in which faults and fissures provide groundwater flow paths that control the erosion and corrosion of carbonate rocks; and regional tectonic movement plays an important role in slowly uplifting the crustal block which lead to the formation of the cave. In this process, the cave have undergone three stages of development: initial formation phase of 2-0.78 million years ago, development phase of 0.78-0.14 million years ago and stable sedimentation phase from 0.14 million years ago to the present. Most of the sediments have been deposited since 0.14 million years ago and a small amount of new sediment was formed nearly 700 years ago. The secondary sediments were produced around 10 thousand years ago. At present, the cave is in the later period of the stable sedimentation stage. The non-stratification of the Doushuai cave is perhaps caused by the slow ascending of the regional crustal block and the collapse of rocks on the cave roof.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(26)
  • [1]
    Demény A, Németh P, Czuppon G, et al. Formation of amorphous calcium carbonate in caves and its implications for speleothem research ［J］. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 1-10.
    [2]
    Zhang H, Cai Y, Tan L, et al. Stable isotope composition alteration produced by the aragonite-to-calcite transformation in speleothems and implications for paleoclimate reconstructions ［J］. Sedimentary Geology, 2014, 309 (Supplement C): 1-14.
    [3]
    Fairchild J I, Baker A. Speleothem Science: From Process to Past Environments ［M］. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2012.
    [4]
    陈琼, 陈琳, 黄嘉仪, 等. 岩溶洞穴次生碳酸盐沉积铀及其同位素组成古气候环境研究进展［J］.中国岩溶,2015,34(5):479-485.
    [5]
    曹明达, 周忠发, 张强, 等. 岩溶洞穴水理化性质特征及其环境意义：以贵州织金洞为例［J］.中国岩溶, 2016, 35(3): 314-321.
    [6]
    杨振华, 李坡, 吴克华. 岩溶洞穴古河漫滩沉积物特征及其沉积环境演变：以山王洞中段为例［J］.中国岩溶, 2016, 35(4): 394-401.
    [7]
    臧红飞, 郑秀清, 赵洁, 等. 柳林泉域滞流区低温岩溶热水的年龄分析［J］.中国岩溶,2017,36(4):550-556.
    [8]
    殷超, 周忠发, 曹明达, 等. 岩溶洞穴内气候环境因子关系分析：以贵州省织金洞为例［J］. 中国岩溶,2016,35(4):414-424.
    [9]
    刘伟, 周宏, 柯怡兵, 等. 岩溶表层带水生动物微分布规律及水文环境影响：以Velika Pasica溶洞为例［J］. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(4): 563-571.
    [10]
    徐国强, 刘树根, 武恒志, 等. 海平面周期性升降变化与岩溶洞穴层次关系探讨［J］.沉积学报, 2005, 23(2): 316-322.
    [11]
    Rodriguez-Navarro C, Kudlacz K,Cizer ?zlem,et al.Formation of amorphous calcium carbonate and its transformation into mesostructured calcite［J］.CrystEngComm,2015,17(1):5872.
    [12]
    Bozeman J, Bozeman S. Speleology of gypsum caves in Oklahoma ［J］. Carbonates and Evaporites, 2002, 17(2): 107-119.
    [13]
    Bolze J, Peng B, Dingenouts N,et al.Formation and growth of amorphous colloidal CaCO3 precursor particles as detected by time resolved SAXS ［J］.Langmuir,2002,18(22):8364-8369.
    [14]
    董莹, 琚宜文, 张玉修, 等. 北京房山张坊岩溶区节理发育特征及其对岩溶作用的影响［J］. 中国科学院大学学报, 2014, 31(6): 783-790.
    [15]
    曹建文, 夏日元, 张庆玉, 等. 古今湿热气候条件下典型碳酸盐岩缝洞系统结构模式及发育特征［J］. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(2): 115-125.
    [16]
    郑聪斌, 章贵松, 王飞雁, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系热水岩溶特征［J］. 沉积学报, 2001, 19(4): 524-529.
    [17]
    漆立新, 云露. 塔河油田奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶发育特征与主控因素［J］. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(1): 1-12.
    [18]
    王增银, 万军伟, 姚长宏, 等. 清江流域溶洞发育特征［J］. 中国岩溶, 1999, 18(2): 151-158.
    [19]
    刘子金, 袁代江, 武兴亮, 等. 贵州平寨水库左岸底层灌浆廊道大型充填溶洞及其形成机制［J］. 工程地质学报, 2015, 23(3): 554-563.
    [20]
    吕金波, 卢耀如, 郑桂森, 等. 北京西山岩溶洞系的形成及其与新构造运动的关系［J］. 地质通报, 2010, 29(4): 502-509.
    [21]
    沙旭光, 程新民, 孙忠实, 等. 吉林磐石官马溶洞的洞穴特征及形成时代初探［J］. 世界地质, 2006, 25(3): 270-274.
    [22]
    夏凯生, 袁道先, 谢世友, 等. 乌江下游岩溶地貌形态特征初探:以重庆武隆及其邻近地区为例［J］. 中国岩溶, 2010, 29(2): 196-204.
    [23]
    谭明, 王颖, 何华春, 等. 南京三台溶洞地貌形成与长江古水面关系初探［J］. 第四纪研究, 2010, 30(5): 877-882.
    [24]
    平亚敏, 杨桂芳, 张绪教, 等. 张家界砂岩地貌形成时代:来自阶地与溶洞对比的证据［J］.地质论评, 2011, 57(1): 118-124.
    [25]
    唐益群, 叶为民, 黄雨, 等.全充型复活溶洞-宜兴慕蠡洞洞穴发育特征［J］. 水文地质工程地质, 2001, 28(5): 39-42.
    [26]
    Scholz D, Tolzmann J, Hoffmann L D, et al. Diagenesis of speleothems and its effect on the accuracy of 230Th/U-ages ［J］. Chemical Geology, 2014, 387(11): 74-86.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHAO Guiqing, ZHANG Jilu, ZHOU Xiaohan, LIU Xinrong, LIU Xinlin, GUO Hongqing. Study on bearing characteristics of bridge piles and deformation mechanisms of karst caves in karst area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(5): 1133-1143. doi: 10.11932/karst20240510
    [2]LIU Shijie, GUAN Qi, PAN Ming. Geochemical characteristics and paleoenvironmental implications of carbonate rocks at the Givertian and Eifelian boundary in northeast Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(3): 436-447. doi: 10.11932/karst2023y019
    [3]DENG Yulin, GUO Xulei, LUO Mingming, CHEN Xiangyong, KUANG Ye, ZHOU Hong. Study on the microstructure and variation law of carbonate rock dissolution based on scanning electron microscopy and CT imaging technology[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(5): 698-707. doi: 10.11932/karst20220503
    [4]WU Liangjun, CHEN Weihai, RONG Yuebing, ZHANG Jing, HUANG Chao, ZHU Haiyan, MENG Qingxin, WU Jiwen, LUO Qukan, BAI Bing, OU Mengmeng. Development characteristics and research value of red carbonate stone forest in the Xiangxi geopark[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(2): 251-258. doi: 10.11932/karst20200215
    [5]WANG Yueyue, CHEN Rong, SHEN Chaoyong, WU Yufeng, CHEN Xuanchi, LIN Guomin, KANG Wenhua. Research on remote sensing image characteristics of carbonate rock based on RS and GIS: An example of southern Guizhou region[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(5): 762-774. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y20
    [6]XU Songhua. Spatial distribution of karst cave resources in south-western Hubei region[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(3): 440-449. doi: 10.11932/karst20180316
    [7]DAN Yong, LU Bingxiong, LIANG Bin, ZHANG Qingyu, LI Jingrui. Effects of Paleozoic carbonate rock on shale gas accumulation and exploitation in southern China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(3): 343-350. doi: 10.11932/karst20180304
    [8]ZHANG Qingyu, LIANG Bin, QIN Fengrui, CAO Jianwen, DAN Yong, LI Jingrui. Evaluation and prediction of carbonate karst reservoirs in the Ordovician buried hills beneath the Tarim basin: An example east of the Lungu7 well block[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(1): 32-41. doi: 10.11932/karst20170104
    [9]LONG Si, CHEN Zhong-ji, ZHOU Yun-chao, ZHANG Chun-lai. Preliminary research on dissolution of carbonate rocks and major element release under the conditions of stagnant water and dripping water[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(5): 452-459. doi: 10.11932/karst20150505
    [10]CAO Jian-wen, XIA Ri-yuan, ZHANG Qing-yu. Structural model and developmental characteristics of typical carbonate crack-cave systems under warm and humid climate conditions[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(2): 115-125. doi: 10.11932/karst20150204
    [11]ZHAO Jun, LI Zong jie, YU Bing, LIU Jian hua. The logging recognition for the infill and the filling degree in karst cave[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2013, 32(2): 225-230. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2013.02.015
    [12]SHE Min, ZHU Yin, SHEN An-jiang, ZHENG Xing-ping, HE Xun-yun. Simulation experiment for the dissolution of carbonate rocks of the Yingshan formation on the northern slope of Tazhong uplift[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(3): 234-239. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.03.002
    [13]XIE Fang, FU Wa-li, WANG Xiao-yang, PU Peng, ZHANG Lei, TAN Bo, PENG Jing-tao, HEN Xiao-jun. Study on response of carbonate rock dissolution rate to the season in Zhongliang Mountain, Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 29(4): 410-413. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.04.010
    [14]WU Kong-you, WANG Yu-jie, LI Zhu-qiang. Palaeo-karst development model of the Pre-Tertiary carbonate rock in Jizhong Depression[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 29(4): 402-409. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.04.009
    [15]YANG Ming-de, ZHU An. THE LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS OF KARST CAVE IN CONE KARST AREA AND EVALUATION ON THE TOURISM RESOURCE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2004, 23(2): 101-106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2004.02.003
    [16]FENG Jin-liang, CUI Zhi-jiu, ZHU Li-ping. THE DEVELOPING FEATURES AND THE GEOMORPHIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CARBONATE ROCKS WEATHERING CRUST ON HIGH MOUNTAINS[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2002, 21(4): 239-244. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2002.04.002
    [17]CHEN Jian-geng. THE DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS AND TOURISM VALUE OF KAIKOU CAVES IN DUYUN,GUIZHOU[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2001, 20(1): 58-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2001.01.011
    [18]Nie Yueping. KARST DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS UNDER THE LITHOLOGIC CONTROL OF CARBONATE ROCKS--A CASESTUDY IN SOUTH-CENTRAL GUIZHOU[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1994, 13(1): 31-36.
    [19]Jiang Yuanjin. A STUDY ON MAMMALIA FAUNA OF LATE PLEISTO CENE IN THE KARST CAVES OF GUANGXI[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1992, 11(1): 38-42.
    [20]Zhu Fengjun. THE PRINCIPLE OF KARSTIFICATION SIMULATION IN FISSURED-CAVERN CARBONATE ROCK REGION[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1987, 6(4): 275-285.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 潘少军，张建芳，陈小友. 浙西北建德市溶洞资源价值评价. 中国地质调查. 2024(02): 72-80 .
    2. 王喆，卢丽，夏日元，曹建文，赵良杰. 揭秘湖南万华岩溶洞“石蛋生笋”之谜. 中国矿业. 2019(S1): 361-362+365 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-05051015
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 27.1 %FULLTEXT: 27.1 %META: 70.3 %META: 70.3 %PDF: 2.6 %PDF: 2.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.5 %其他: 10.5 %China: 7.2 %China: 7.2 %上海: 15.7 %上海: 15.7 %中卫: 0.3 %中卫: 0.3 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %临沂: 0.0 %临沂: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %凉山: 0.1 %凉山: 0.1 %北京: 1.2 %北京: 1.2 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %宣城: 0.0 %宣城: 0.0 %崇左: 0.7 %崇左: 0.7 %广州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %怀化: 0.0 %怀化: 0.0 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %武汉: 0.0 %武汉: 0.0 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %盐城: 0.0 %盐城: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %纽约: 1.2 %纽约: 1.2 %芒廷维尤: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 0.4 %萍乡: 0.0 %萍乡: 0.0 %西宁: 3.1 %西宁: 3.1 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %许昌: 0.0 %许昌: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.0 %运城: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %郑州: 0.1 %郑州: 0.1 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %长沙: 0.0 %长沙: 0.0 %驻马店: 57.1 %驻马店: 57.1 %其他China上海中卫临汾临沂六安凉山北京南宁南昌台州哥伦布嘉兴天津宣城崇左广州怀化扬州昆明武汉温州湖州湘潭漯河烟台珠海盐城石家庄纽约芒廷维尤萍乡西宁西安许昌贵阳运城邯郸郑州金华长沙驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(4295.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2399) PDF downloads(729) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return